
Janet “JudgyBitch” Bloomfield may not have mastered the fine art of public relations in the real world, but amongst those who live in imaginary worlds of their own making she is something of a PR genius.
Bloomfield, A Voice for Men’s “Director of Social Media,” was recently booted from Twitter (again) for “targeted abuse” — evidently her harassment of feminist writer Jessica Valenti, which included making up inflammatory fake quotations and attributing them to her.
Bloomfield, who once claimed (apparently at least semi-seriously) that a previous Twitter suspension was punishment for her posting a picture of a wedding cake, has responded with a petulant note to Twitter and a similarly petulant open letter to the world, insisting that she’s an innocent woman who’s been railroaded by an evil feminist cabal.
She is, of course, full of it, but she’s picked up support from several online publications popular with the reality-challenged: Alex Jones’ loopy conspiracy megasite Infowars.com, GamerGate propaganda hub The Ralph Retort, and right-wing garbage site The Gateway Pundit. She’s got her Twitter followers in a tizzy, and they are filling up my Twitter timeline with their usual brand of nonsense.
Bloomfield claims, in a Facebook posting that’s been uncritically reposted by her supporters in the imaginary-world media, that she’s a blameless victim of a “harassment campaign” inspired by, well, me.
No, really. Here’s what she wrote, apparently with a straight face:
My most recent suspension is the result of me tweeting the actual words of Guardian journalist Jessica Valenti back to her. Prompted by @davidfutrelle, a harassment campaign to report me for spam/abuse was undertaken by users who appear to be under the impression that I made up the Valenti quotes and falsely attributed them to her. This is not true.
It takes a certain amount of chutzpah to make this claim, given that Bloomfield has not only made up numerous false and inflammatory quotes she claimed were written by Valenti, but has also gone on to publicly gloat that her falsehoods were causing Valenti distress. The fake quotes were merely one egregious episode in an months-long campaign of targeted abuse directed at Valenti.
Here’s a screenshot of four fake Valenti quotes that Bloomfield tweeted last August. (I have helpfully labeled the ones that are fake; see here for details.)
More recently, Bloomfield Tweeted yet another fake Valenti quote that has been making the rounds in Men’s Rights circles for months. (The red scrawls on the screenshot are mine.)
See here for more details.
Though none of these quotes sound even remotely like anything that Valenti would ever say, many of Bloomfield’s followers had no trouble believing they were real, and in both instances the fake quotes inspired harassment and abuse directed at Valenti.
Back in August, Bloomfield seemed proud as punch that her fake quotes were causing difficulties for Valenti. In a posting on her blog (which I’ve archived here), Bloomfield gleefully wrote:

And she added, for good measure:

It’s not clear to me how Valenti having to deal with harassment caused by Bloomfield libeling her is an example of Valenti “having to own her shit,” given that the shit in question is not actually hers.
Bloomfield also pulled a similar stunt with a screenshot of an obviously fake Tweet ostensibly from GamerGate boogeywoman Anita Sarkeesian; it, too, inspired harassment against Bloomfield’s target.

Bloomfield has helped to inspire and direct campaigns of harassment against other women as well, including one school teacher she accused, with absolutely no evidence, of trying to shut down AVFM’s conference with death threats. She has also repeatedly libeled me. In all of these cases she used Twitter essentially as an amplifier of hate.
These tactics are pretty much the definition of “targeted abuse.” And “targeted abuse” is what Twitter gave as the reason for her most recent suspension, according to a screenshot that Bloomfield has herself posted on her blog.
But Bloomfield is attempting to convince the world that she’s been suspended for quoting Valenti accurately. In her posts on her suspension, she refers to one instance in which she did indeed quote Valenti more or less accurately – as if that somehow makes up for her fake quotes.
I’m no lawyer, but I’m pretty sure that Bloomfield announcing that not everything she’s said about Valenti is a malicious lie wouldn’t be much of a defense against a libel case.
But, of course, amongst her reality-challenged fans, Bloomfield’s spin has carried the day. Indeed, the headline on the Infowars post detailing Bloomfield’s imaginary victimization declares baldly that:
It seems rather telling that the theInfowars “reporter” who wrote that post touts his Bachelor’s degree in Creative Writing from Nottingham Trent University in his Infowars bio. In this case, though, he merely repeated and amplified Bloomfield’s own fictions.
Speaking of which, Bloomfield also claims that “[m]y account has never tweeted abuse.” This is also patent bullshit.
Her peculiar wording may be a way to elide the fact that she used the official Twitter account for A Voice for Men’s conference last summer to call a bunch of people “whores.”

But the fact is she used her now-suspended @JudgyBitch1 Twitter account to post stuff much worse than this. In addition to abusive tweets directed at Valenti (like this salacious one), she also told one rape survivor [TRIGGER WARNING]
Bloomfield’s attempts to portray herself as the innocent victim of a witchhunt are especially ironic, given how carefully she’s cultivated her “mean girl” image. She attacks feminists – mostly women – with the malicious glee of a born bully, and mocks those who point out her lies and cruelty, using this picture as the profile pic for one of her Twitter accounts.
On her blog, which is often worse than her Twitter account ever was, she blamed the underage victims of Jimmy Savile’s sexual predations for exploiting him, and declared the 16-year-old victim of gang rape in Steubenville a “dumb whore.”
The woman who calls herself “Judgy Bitch” now finds herself being judged for her vindictive, bullying behavior, and doesn’t much like it.
NOTE: If anyone has screenshots of other abusive tweets from JB that I have missed, please email me with them or post them in the comments below; I may want to add more to the post or use them for a followup post.






http://www.aperfectworld.org/clipart/academic/fcircle.gif
Perfect! 10/10
http://mashable.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/07/The-Voice.gif
@andiexist – Ah, right—sorry about that! When I checked in yesterday, David’s comment (and about half of the others before yours) hadn’t displayed for me.
I know WordPress can get quirky sometimes, but that’s a new one for me. o_O
I think that she does it because it works. She, like most people who like to wind others up, creates the illusion of power and dominance over others by “getting their goat.”
That is my grandad expression, but it really seems to fit these who will go to any lengths to get their target to react to them.
Wow. Seeing all JB’s latest “greatest hits” all together like this is quite nauseating. What a horrible person she is.
thebewilderness, she’s the school bully that never grew up, really. Nasty, shitty person getting her cheap thrills from trying to distress other people.
A loser, in other words.
I think so, yes. The Internet has been a great joy for people who didn’t dare bring the schoolyard bully behaviors they were infamous for into the workplace without risk of being fired. They used to have to settle for picking on family members. Now they surf the target rich environment. Blech.
To be honest, she’s probably an excellent mother. All we know is what we see on Twitter, which is her fake identity anyway. She’s written a couple of thoughtful essays – one on how her son’s high energy was pathologised by school teachers, for example.
What she’s doing is probably more mundane than ‘evil’ – like many trolls, she’s probably getting an adrenaline rush out of seeing people react to her words, and so when she gets a reaction, she dashes off another tweet.
Trolls have been arrested in the UK after they made dramatic threats, and they all turned out to be people who got high on the attention and approval they were getting when they wrote something particularly vicious. To get more attention, they’d write something even worse. It was all about getting the likes and hits.
JudgyBitch gets plenty of positive feedback from the MRA crowd every time she commits one of these outrages. Then she gets banned from twitter and gets to feel like a martyr to free speech to boot. Why wouldn’t she do it?
When I read or listen to the words of people such as this I almost go through the 5 stages of grief. I’m like…
1. No way anyone is this crap at being a decent human being.
2. God I really want to hit a bag until my hands go numb and throbby.
3. Well ok, but this can’t be who they really are, deep down…it’s just for attention, right?
4. This is just sad. I wanna go hug my kid and tell her that she’s amazing and perfect, etc because I feel like these people maybe didn’t get that enough or something.
5. Log into WHTM and realize that there are still plenty of awesome people out there to counter the shitty ones. Maybe the shitty ones will be gifted some self awareness some day.
I might be wrong, but I’d say that anybody who gets their jollies by constantly trolling in the most viciously disgusting way possible is far more likely to be verbally and physically abusive to their children than an excellent or even passable parent. It being a fake identity still shows that the evil is in there somewhere, and in JB’s case, it bubbles to the top every single day.
How can she be an excellent parent when she takes pleasure in abusing people who’ve already been abused, when she libels people, when she’s out to cause as much pain as possible? What the hell is she teaching her alleged children? What sort of example is she setting them? So she uses a pseudonym; that’s a fake name, not a fake persona. I don’t think she’s such an actor as all that. The banality of evil doesn’t make the evil less.
I’m not a parent so maybe I shouldn’t judge, but isn’t part of being a good parent teaching empathy and kindness? Discouraging misogyny and other kinds of bigotry? How can she possibly be doing any of these things?
JB is basically the soccer mom version of the 4chan trolls who made gamergate a thing, and who also produced things like Encyclopedia Dramatica. Some people just enjoy hurting other people. It makes them feel powerful, like they’re better than their targets. When they’re 5 they pick on the one kid in their class who’s funny looking, or notably poorer than everyone else, or whatever. When they hit their teens (in the internet age) they find /b. If they were in a country with mandatory military service they’d be the bullies driving other recruits to suicide. You could say that there’s something wrong with these people, but I’m not sure that calling that a mental illness is useful when doing to stigmatizes lots of other people with mental illnesses who don’t act like assholes and get their jollies from bullying, and doesn’t really tell us anything useful about the person behaving in the shitty way that “asshole” or “bully” wouldn’t cover.
It’s been interesting reading everyone’s comments. I truly believe JB has narcissistic personality disorder. I am certain I’m dealing with a narcissistic personality in my workplace at the moment. It’s important to note that narcissistic personalities are prone to bullying, it’s one of their traits.
http://psychcentral.com/disorders/narcissistic-personality-disorder-symptoms/
http://www.psychologytoday.com/blog/stop-walking-eggshells/201201/lack-empathy-the-most-telling-narcissistic-trait
Can we also please lay off the armchair internet psychological/psychiatric diagnoses? It is entirely possible to be a bully without having some type of personality disorder.
latintruth, no matter how truly you believe it, your belief is both meaningless and irrelevant.
Shame that reading latintruth’s comment wasn’t interesting for anyone else, huh?
(BTW, for future reference, links to Psychology Today work in much the same way as links to the Daily Mail. Imagine writing “I’m an idiot and proud of it!” on your forehead with a Sharpie – that’s basically what you just did. People who have an academic background in psychology will have a particularly hard time taking you seriously.)
She might. She also might not. There’s a difference between narcissistic personality disorder and just being narcissistic, and we can’t possibly tell which one it it is without a psychiatric degree and a couch – and why does it even matter anyway?
You could add bootlicker to that list though. JB seems to be doing it to get headpats as much as for her own pleasure.
Or, again, she might just be an asshole. “Asshole” effectively sums up her approach to life and way of interacting with other people without stigmatizing mentally ill people who aren’t assholes. “Bully” is even more accurate.
Asshole (SFW, promise!):
http://i.huffpost.com/gen/2243526/thumbs/o-DONKEY-570.jpg
Yeah, honestly, if I was going to attempt internet analysis my question would be “why is a constant stream of male validation and pats on the head for not being like the other girls so important to this grown woman?” rather than “which bit of this DSM diagnostic matrix can I maybe shoehorn her into?”.
If I was going to attempt internet analysis, I would wish to be paid for it.