After hearing a misogynist make some rancid generalization about women based on the terrible behavior of one particular woman, it’s hard not to respond by saying “not all women are like that.” Misogynists hear this so often, and evidently see it as so hilarious, that they’ve invented their own little acronym for the phrase: NAWALT. You’ll find this all the time on MRA sites, along with its sister acronym NAFALT, with “feminists” in the place of “women.”
Many MRAs seem to believe that simply repeating one or another of these acronyms is an effective, and highly witty, rebuttal to their critics. Because to them it is self-evident: All women, all feminists, ARE like that.
So imagine the pleasure I felt when I finally ran across an MRA-ish fellow challenging this conventional wisdom. On his blog la prensa, the regular Spearhead commenter known as Boxer makes this controversial claim:
It is a popular misconception which men hold on to which suggests all women are the same. This is not the case.
Unfortunately, my pleasure lasted only as long as it took to read these two sentences. Because then Boxer went on to explain just what he meant by this:
For example: Some women are whores, and others are even trashier than whores. Some women live in houses where the litter boxes overflow and the pungent aroma of catshit lingers lovingly in the air. Other women are allergic to cats, and their houses carry the stench of human feces, rotting food and the cheap perfumes they douse themselves in.
Apparently Boxer has never been invited into any woman’s house, and bases most of his opinions of the fair sex on reruns of Hoarders.
Men will center themselves upon these notable differences, and mistakenly assume that the diversity of individual women points to differences in the way individual women behave. Such high-minded fools usually learn the hard way, when the woman decides to “cash out” with the help of the state and its family law courts, who are always eager to liquidate a lifetime of male planning and work, dividing it between themselves and the cunt which the fool so stupidly married.
See yesterday’s post for more on women and their apparently insatiable hunger for D-I-V-O-R-C-E.
The foolish man, confronted by a mountain of inescapable evidence that every woman, from his mother and sister down to the bitch who empties the trashcan in his office, is a trashy slut, will immediately construct an intricate conspiracy theory between his ears. ‘Yes,’ the dumbass tells himself, ‘all the women I have ever known were and are trashy skanks, but that’s just because western society has brainwashed all the women in my own vicinity with its toxic headpoison.”
I am actually pretty sure my mom is not a slut. (Though I have heard that Las Vegas is full of them.)
This mangina will be aided along in his misconception by other manginas and white knights, often falling in with a disgruntled lot on various loser’s hangouts, in real life or on the internet. Often these men get “yellow fever”, and fly off to some third world shitheap to marry (again) in an effort to find that one precious snowflake who is not a third rate whore among the billions and billions of cunts on planet earth who prove their utter worthlessness on a daily basis.
Oh dear. I think Boxer is about to add a heaping helping of racism on top of his misogyny sundae.
It is true that Asian bitches tend to be slimmer and more intelligent than those in the white and black camps, but that just means they are more cunning, and better able to exploit the chumps who delude themselves into thinking that marrying and serving an oriental master is somehow “better” than being the slave of a homegrown American cunt.
Huh. Honestly, that wasn’t quite as bad as I was expecting. Though after nearly two years of intense study of the manosphere, I have some pretty high standards for offensiveness.
For all their variety, bitches’ behavior is uniformly lousy, and in that regard, all women are indeed like that. Yes, all of them, all around the world. This is not a war, it is something more analogous to an organized deer hunt, and you are the prey. For god’s fuck’n sake, quit marrying these slits already.
And so we circle back around to “all women ARE like that.”
Still, I have to say I agree with Boxer’s final sentence. Dudes, if you believe any of this crap, please do not marry women. Or, really, have any contact with them whatsoever. Frankly, I’d suggest that you find yourself a nice uninhabited island – like, say, this one – and move there posthaste. You’ll be much happier, and so will the rest of us.
Pillowinhell: It’s awesome.
“Just because you’re issued a set of reproductive organs at birth doesn’t mean you’re issued the sexual identity to go with them.” *or an interest in using them
Otherwise I’m agreeing with you Falconer, and your Pokemon mockery is still amusing me, though I can’t speak for anyone else.
I’m interested — in a trainwreck sort of way — in how Slavey thinks the asexuality (or CFness, I’d be willing to bet) of a relative handful prevents the species as a whole from continuing. Bearing in mind those are orthogonal to each other and feminism.
The Avengers was totally awesome. XD
CFness?
Well, it would be more a more pressing issue in a situation like battle star galactica, but have between one and three percent of the human population not so interested in sex in the here and now hardly seems relevant. And that number gets even smaller when you count asexuals who do have children (like me).
So no slavely, you can’t shame me for not doing my duty for the human race.
Awww MANNN! And I have to wait another week!
I’m dyin I’m dyin!!
But feminist film studies has ruined all movies for me; now I just go “Black Widow is useless and she doesn’t even get her own movie!”
Oh see! I was totally going to be watching how Black Widow was being handled! Please tell me she’s not just eye candy?
CFness is child-free-ness I think — not that any of us have some duty to the human race to reproduce (and then are nuns sluts because they won’t have sex to make babies? does that make sense in MRA land?)
NWO you seem to have your Greek roots mixed up with your cultural meanings — asexual doesn’t mean “without sex organs” but “without a desire for sex” (loosely, the asexual umbrella covers too much for a concise definition the way you seem to just be translating the Greek)
(yes I just assumed NWO is commenting in good faith, and yes, I realize he’s probably not)
Seranvali, that’s FANTASTIC. Hugs and high fives.
NWO continues his streak of never reacting to a thing I say. Is that because I know where his memes come from? Maybe; he ignores xhinxy too.
There’s a point where someone’s insults are so far from reality that they don’t even sting anymore, and the OP here is about five miles past that point.
When someone says women always have feces in their houses, my first thought is less “oh ZING” and more “um, are you sure you understand what a ‘woman’ is?”
Also I like how Slavey’s response to me asking if women who never have sex are sluts was to call me a slut.
Yes, yes, I’m a slut, of course, but that doesn’t answer the question, now does it?
Considering that he believes that only men initiate sex and that womens’ sexuality is literally the same thing as the visible existence of their bodies, I’m not sure what he’d make of asexuality if he understood it.
Slavey, asexual means that I don’t look at people or parts of people and get aroused. I don’t date men because they’re hot. I don’t really care about sex and if it never happened for me again I couldn’t care less. I’m a demi sexual, because I do have sex, but only in terms of a pairbonded relationship where there is a considerable amount of love and trust. I personally find sex pleasant in probably the same way you’d find a foot massage pleasant. To me its just a fun game to play with someone I really care about. When I notice peoples bodies at all, its in terms of an artistic viewpoint.
I choose my partners more on their intellectual curiosity and playfullness than anytthing else. Which means geeks and nerds more often than not. And if you’re a guy with a complex about proving yourself through sexually pleasing me, its an automatic dismissal from me. Because I won’t fake what I don’t feel.
Slaveboy telling someone else to acquaint themselves with reality is irony at its finest. NWO and reality haven’t spoken in years.
Hey NWO, are these women slutty slutty sluts? They have bodies, you know.
http://www.kurskroot.com/nuns-sm.jpg
http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_k3UqzQLD6qY/THbOPD24RaI/AAAAAAAABko/IIjg2vE-mCg/s1600/Schema+Nuns.JPG
http://4.bp.blogspot.com/_qpE5hNwi618/S8xT95bW5_I/AAAAAAAAF-8/21Ibo5OyFC0/s1600/nun.jpg
And the one on the bottom is carrying wood, while we all know that women never, ever labor.
Speaking as a super, cleanliness has nothing to do with gender. I know men who are clean freaks and I know men whose skin would burst into flame if they touched soap and water simultaneously. Same for women.
And why does Slavey try to insult people with labels they have no problem with? It makes no sense…oh. Wait.
Now VOIP, you should know by now that womens privilege alllows means the laws of physics alter themselves to accomadate us. I mean clearly that wood is so light that she practically floating along.
VoIP – To be fair, those women are not dressed in standard Western clothing, which as we all know, is painfully and cruelly arousing to men. To glimpse standard Western clothing for women is to experience an agonizing boner deliberately inflicted by cruel sluts.
Therefore, I want to submit some pictures of women in conventional American clothing, and ask NWO if they’re sluts.
Are these women dirty teasing sluts?
http://www.accessrx.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2011/01/Nursing-Homes-Women-Seated-in-Line.jpg
Are these women dirty teasing sluts?
http://www.fightbacknews.org/sites/default/files/chicago-factory-occupation-women-500.jpg
Are these women dirty teasing sluts?
http://ps.b5z.net/i/u/10077433/i/womens_choir.jpg
As I said before NWO and reality’s divorce has been final for many, many years.
Cliff, those women are clearly dirty sluts. I think I saw an outline of breast on a couple of them. Clear evidence right there. Also, they are used up sluts. Look at the wrinkles on them! We all know a mans cock depletes a womans life force and beauty! I mean, they must have had thousands of cocks in them! Just look at all those wrinkles!
And the nuns are stuck up sluts because they are out in public but they aren’t smiling in a fetching way!
You guys know the answer he will give, of course, and that is that all the women are sluts, at all times, because they are women, and should have been assigned as a sex slave to a man instead of having an independent life of any kind.
“And the nuns are stuck up sluts because they are out in public but they aren’t smiling in a fetching way!”
And if they were it would just be a tease because they aren’t going to have sex with anyone either way?
Bostonian’s right about NWO and reality’s divorce then…
VoIP — that second nun picture totally made my day. All that graffiti on their robes clearly is significant to their order, but it just made my heretical self think about hippie biker grannies stomping in to save us all from some occult disaster. I may write a story about it.
(Or am I blasphemous? I always get those words mixed up.)
Standard Western clothing? That is by no means all. I don’t remember who it was, but a few months ago one poster here was told by NWO that she was responsible for her own sexual harassment on a day she was wearing a down jacket with a hood.
In the ensuing conversation, it became evident that all that was visible of this poster were her eyes and eyebrows. It was these markers of slutty slutty slutdom that made her the temptress she was. Her poor harasser just had no choice but to say horrible things to her in an elevator.
Compared to that, the fact that you can see these nuns’ faces, which is much more salient evidence of existing-while-female, makes them just radioactive with sex.