
Over on Chateau Heartiste, the Heartiste formerly known as Roissy is in full-blown white supremacist mode today.
Apparently what got dear old Mr. H in an especially racist mood was a comment from a reader called Libertardian who suggested that, while in the good old days, civilization used to rein in the alleged worst tendencies of women, “in the West we had to abolish civilization because it was hurting people’s feelings.”
This little comment was enough to send Mr. H into a full-blown keyboard-smash Whitepocalypse rage.
Every monster and manboob, every fat feminist and single mom, every quadgender and third world wretched refuse had to be appeased and their crocodile tears dried, and the cause of all their histrionically dramatized hurty — white civilization itself — razed to make room for the glorious vomit of vibrancy that is currently prolapsing the rectum of the historical West.
You get double points if you were able to make sense of that mess of a sentence on the first pass. Why is it that so many cultural elitists and would-be defenders of civilization are such terrible writers?
Just a note on usage here: When alt-right types use the terms “vibrancy” or “vibrant” it’s their oh-so-clever, oh-so-sarcastic way of referring to racial diversity and/or people who aren’t white.
God looked over all that He had made, and saw that it was good. The leftoid looked over all that his ancestors had made, and saw that it was good enough to squander. And on the eighth day, the leftoid rested his gated community security detail.
Yeah, I can count the number of “leftoids” I know that live in gated communities on the fingers of my imaginary third hand.
Anyway, it’s helpful for Heartiste to remind us from time to time how comprehensive his hate really is. And that many of his followers are even worse than he is in this regard.
Naturally, in the comments, some of these terrible people added their terrible thoughts.
everybodyhatesscott, for his part, was in the mood for murdering elected officials:
I really hope I’m still alive to see it when we brings the guillotines back. I’d say 2/3+ of our representatives are deserving of it and it’s probably closer to 4/5′s. Granted, the gallows are more american.
cryo, in a comment in which he cranked the racism up to eleven, reported from the front lines of Hartford, Connecticut:
I was in the metro part of Hartford, Connecticut the other day. Might as well have been in the Third World. After working hours, all decent working folk flee to the surrounding suburbs. What’s left over is hideous to behold: packs of feral pavement apes roaming the blighted and burnt-out neighborhoods. What once were charming and historic Victorian houses are now blasted crack dens of eldritch horror. Niglets as young as 8 running around with loaded guns and terrorizing public parks. Whores peddling their fetid vaginas in front of Jamaican bodegas and Check$ Ca$hed places.
This is pretty much the future of any eastern seaboard city that isn’t attractive to SWPLs [white liberals]. It will get worse and worse until finally the madness starts to invade the suburbs. By then, whites and other human species will have to live in a constant state of uncertainty and fear. Section 8 housing and minority pandering are the greatest weapon the ruling class has: blacks especially are a potent biological weapon that can wipe out entire civilized communities in less than a decade
Dan Fletcher, meanwhile, suggested that the only solution to all this is to go to infinity … and beyond. Literally. Convinced that people turn to “artificial. Feminism, multicult, white-guilt” ideologies only when they’ve got no new frontiers to explore, he argued that
the halt on human space exploration has been such a tragedy. Space is the next frontier. Mankind’s survival and salvation. A new frontier and a new struggle for people to throw themselves into. Something real and dangerous. A stark contrast to the petty vapidness of the social justice whack-jobs and other assorted fairies. A true adventure.
With nothing to fight against, people fight against themselves in a desperate bid to fulfill their primal need for struggle. Time to get off this rock.
Dan, I agree wholeheartedly with that last sentence. I would happily donate to a project to put you, Heartiste and the rest of his fans on a rocket to Uranus.
Good doesn’t understand that (a) women can be misogynists, and (b) gay folks can be homophobic.
I think safe money is on a sack of hammers being significantly smarter than Good.
RE: Good
Yes, sweetheart. I’m very special. I shat out a unicorn the other day, and it flew around the room and cured cancer. I’m considering starting a religion. You’ve got me all figured out.
RE: cloudiah
He probably thinks the g0ys are totally nice dudes too and that the only reason I find them homophobic as hell is that I think I’m special. Because that’s TOTALLY how it works.
Also, goddamn, I’ve been writing like mad the past week, and I’ve gotten so many writeathon prompts, I’M ONLY HALFWAY THROUGH. *flail*
@shaenon
…I missed something, somewhere, cuz I am confused.
@LBT
Does this mean you’re becoming king of gay people?
Can anyone email David and ask him to moderate my comment? It does involve bigoted language, but it’s in quotations and it’s relevant to the discussion.
@sarahliz, You can email him by clicking on his big red head up hear the upper right.
@LBT, I totally forgot about your writeathon!
cloudiah
A gay man taking up for gay men is homophobic? Then clearly, feminism must be misandrist right?
http://antimisandry.com/feminist-misandry/feminist-quotes-20106.html
I can’t even tell what Good’s saying anymore. A gay man taking up for gay men? taking up? I’m confused.
@ Good
This is NOT takig up for gay men. it is attacking lesbians, you know, a group who is affected by homophobia.
(content note this guy is an asshole) Also, I got the link from what cloudiah linked up to earlier, so thats where im copypasting from.
So Paul “some women are BEGGING to be raped” Elam, who said he would vote to acquit if he were placed on a rape jury, and hosted a terrorist manifesto for a long time in AvFM’s activism section, is the great hope who’s going to carry the men’s rights movement to mainstream acceptance?
As the kids say, El Oh El.
Taking up arms? Taking up a new hobby in the hopes of meeting a potential boyfriend? Taking up too much space on the subway?
Perhaps we should be generous and assume that English is not trolly’s first language.
RE: cloudiah
I feel so forgotten and abandoned. 🙁 You should totally come and visit! The promptcall is closed now (just as well, people were blitzing!) but see if there’re any you like!
RE: Good
Gee, gosh, golly, and willikers, Good! We’ve NEVER encountered those quotes before! We’ve certainly never taken them down, numerous times!
Sweetheart, you’ve obviously brought a stick to a gunfight. Go visit Auntie Google and do your homework.
Good doesn’t understand that (a) women can be misogynists, and (b) gay folks can be homophobic.
And men can be misandrist.
men cannot be misandrists because there is no such thing as systematic misandry.
Good: @ LBT. A guest writer criticizes Rachel Jeantel for possibly stirring Trayvon Martin up by implying that Zimmerman was a gay rapist. And that somehow makes AVM homophobic?
I thought Elam didn’t even tolerate it. (i.e. AVM does not stand for racism nor homophobia.)
So which is it, Elam; personally isn’t (citation needed) but doesn’t mind racist and homophobic fellow travellers, or he won’t allow it.
From your strong assertion at the opener you have given yourself the lie.
But we already knew you weren’t smart.
Also, assuming there was systematic misandry, who the hell are you arguing is misandrist? No one here has said men are better offf not voting, or only good for sex, or turn useless once theyre not hot
Like when men’s rights activists claim that men shouldn’t be expected to control themselves sexually around women and girls.
Screw it, I’m just going to repost the link without the explanatory language.
http://thetruepooka.wordpress.com/2013/08/05/a-voice-for-bigots/
and please read the comments by MadShangi in the following post:
http://thetruepooka.wordpress.com/2013/08/07/correcting-obvious-errors-in-a-peculiar-response/
Some of the contributors for AVfM are racist and homophobic.
I’m misandrist? For calling AVFM racist and homophobic? Well, slap my yiff and call me a yaoi. I always wondered how that worked!
Or did Good mean David? Ah well, it’s so hard to keep track.
We do not buy your premise that misandry is a thing, so, try to re-word your point in a way that makes sense to logical people who do not live in Backwards Land.
Women do not have the sort of collective institutional power required to discriminate against men in any meaningful way, so while cranky radfems on the internet can hate men, misandry is not something that keeps men down, the way racism keeps people of color down, or homophobia keeps LGBTQ people down.
Much of the examples of male suffering you cite (such as prison rape, incarceration rates, etc.) are the results of racism, not “misandry.” And many other problems men face are the result of patriarchy, and are in no way to be blamed on feminism, but that never stops you from trying.
When you compare your plight as a MAN to the troubles these REALLY disadvantaged groups face, you just look silly, and wrong.
Good, your logic is self-defeating. Here are easy to follow steps to understand why having a gay person writing for you does not magically exonerate the whole group from homophobia. Let’s use gender for you to understand:
1-AVfM claims that men are oppressed under the western gynocracy. Under this perspective, men are oppressed, women are privileged.
2-David, a member of the said oppressed group, is a feminist, and writes everyday about why MRAs are full of shit.
3-If you follow your ‘gay person in AVfM’ logic, then David, of the oppressed men demographic, cannot possibly be misandrist.
Yet, unless you think I have just debunked the existence of misandry, you know it doesn’t make sense (obviously MRA ideology is bullshit on its own merit). Doesn’t make sense regardless of the validity of the claims. The person who says the claim does not automatically make it correct based solely on their identity.
Like when certain men call other men manginas, pussies, f@ggots, betas, or white knights constantly.
Seriously, no one thinks less of men than MRAs.
pecunium
What the guest writer stated was NOT homophobic. He was accusing Jeantel of being homophobic. Whether you agree with that or not, there was nothing that Elam had to tolerate or not tolerate. But do continue being an internet warrior and fire off your ad hominem attacks.
RE: cloudiah
No shit. Why do you think I want little to do with them? They seem to have no standards for my behavior at all.