Categories
a voice for men a woman is always to blame antifeminism drama kings evil ex-wives evil sexy ladies evil single moms evil wives infighting internet tough guy marriage strike men who should not ever be with women ever MGTOW misogyny MRA oppressed men paul elam pig-biting mad red pill

Don’t trust the “womanish” liars who say MGTOWs can’t marry; they might get you KILLED, Dean Esmay warns

Man Going His Own Way, apparently.
Man Going His Own Way, apparently.

So it’s another day ending in “y” and our old MRA sparring buddy Dean Esmay has gotten himself worked up about something again. This time, he’s pig-biting mad at “paranoid … YouTube MGTOW Sectarians” who have had the audacity to tell him, a married man, that real MGTOWs can’t get married.

Given that MGTOW stands for “Men Going Their Own Way,” and that the main thing these guys want to get away from is women, you might wonder why anyone calling himself a MGTOW would get married to one of those awful lady things.

But it turns out that some self-described MGTOWs “go their own way” by marching to the chapel to get married to the women they are afraid will ruin their lives. 

And this has caused a rift in the MGTOW movement, such as it is, with a small number of “married MGTOWs” like Esmay facing off against those in the MGTOW world who think that men should totally separate from women … except if they want to date them, or live with them, but definitely not marry them!

Blimey, this “going your own way” thing is trickier than I thought!

Now Esmay has decided to throw himself into the thick of it by posting a rambling, furious 4100-word screed on A Voice for Men accusing those who think MGTOWs shouldn’t get married of spreading an “indefensible false allegation leveled at innocent men” that “just might get you imprisoned or killed.” (Emphasis in original.)

Yes, that’s right. Esmay thinks that those who disagree with him on just who can call themselves MGTOWs … ARE GOING TO GET SOMEONE KILLED.

Let’s try to unpack his, er, logic, shall we?

Esmay starts off by offering his own take on the little rift that has formed between the handful of self-described MGTOWs, like him, who have aligned themselves with A Voice for Men, and pretty much everyone else who calls themselves MGTOWs. As Esmay sees it, these other MGTOWs are indulging in

a conspiracy theory that goes like this: scheming MRAs somehow discovered that “men’s rights” was going down in popularity but “Men Going Their Own Way” was growing, so Paul Elam suddenly decided he cared about MGTOW and got busy writing about it, but in an attempt to make it more mainstream and palatable, Paul Elam tried to tell MGTOW they can be married. But thankfully, alert and vigilant True MGTOW On YouTube exposed the dastardly plot and now all know the truth: Marriage and MGTOW never! Can’t be done! Un-possible! Only that lying monster Paul Elam and his cult followers say different!

As someone who’s been watching all this on the outside for several years now, this doesn’t seem like a conspiracy theory in the slightest. If you set aside some of its hyperbole, it seems like a fairly accurate description of what has gone down. You may recall, for example, the outcry amongst MGTOWs when Elam and his pal Peter Wright self-published their own little guide on the subject this past March.

But to Esmay it’s all a pack of lies. Correction: a pack of WOMANISH lies.

To be blunt, all that is an incredibly womanish lie; it’s dense, multilayered, and carefully crafted so that every reasonable discussion of it can be torpedoed by changing the subject, shifting the goalposts, and other Rationalization Hamster moves. Those who defend this lie, this indefensible false allegation leveled at innocent men, are also guilty of marginalizing the work of other Men Going Their Own Way who are certainly not named Paul Elam, and some of whom can’t even stand Paul Elam.

Did I say “womanish?” I meant “girlish.”

I honestly suspect that most of those promulgating this conspiracy narrative are the products of single mother homes, because they’re such girlish brats so much of the time, and their narrative is such pathetic gossipy schoolgirl drama and backstabby lies.

As Esmay sees it, no furshlugginer YouTube MGTOWs are going to tell him and his pals what MGTOW is or isn’t! Instead, he’s going to tell them:

The goal of movement MGTOW was to help individual men find themselves and find what they wanted, and help that individual man craft the best way to get it—for himself, in his own way.

Really? That’s what MGTOW is all about? By this expansive definition, I’m a MGTOW, and so are my cats. (Well, they would be, if they were dudes.)

But never mind, because Esmay is working towards his crescendo. Take it away, Mr. Married MGTOW:

This idea—that a married man may not be MGTOW—is a lie. It is an abusive lie that is sometimes harmful to the men who hear and believe it.

Apparently, any time anyone expresses an opinion contrary to his own it is not only a “lie” but is actually a form of abuse.

It is also spitting straight into the face of those who first founded the Men Going Their Own Way movement on the internet, some of whom remain active to this day. It is a betrayal of MGTOW. It is a subversion and hijacking of it. It is a redefinition, and a toxic one. And it should not be allowed to stand.

Dean then turns his invective-o-meter up to 11:

Why should it not be allowed to stand? Why should we not just accept that the popular YouTube set have helped MGTOW “evolve” to its current state? First because the original MGTOW have yet to leave the stage. Second, because the YouTube Sectarians are misleading people, including themselves in some cases. And their advice is dangerous.

Yes dangerous. Not to society, but to themselves and their followers. They’re a bunch of damned fools who are going to get themselves or their friends killed. And yes, I do mean that literally.

I would repeat that last bit about people getting killed, and put it in bold. But I don’t need to, since Esmay has already done so himself:

Repeat: if you say that there is no benefit to marriage to men, you are a dangerously ill-informed fool who is likely to get yourself or others killed.

Repeat again: the man who tells you that there is no benefit or protection to the marriage license just might get you imprisoned or killed.

It’s rare to see an MRA actually acknowledge that there are certain benefits to marriage; they’re much more likely to be railing against it at the top of their lungs.

But how the hell could suggesting that “MGTOWs can’t be married” possibly lead to anyone getting “imprisoned or killed?” Esmay explains that even though

marriage is generally a bad deal for men, cohabiting with a woman without a marriage license frequently, and indisputably, reduces your rights and renders you more vulnerable than if you got the state-approved piece of paper.

Esmay tells the story of a friend of his who committed suicide after being denied access to the children he’d had with a woman he’d been living with.

It’s a sad story, to be sure, but how exactly Esmay figures that his friend’s suicide is somehow the responsibility of “YouTube MGTOW Sectarians” railing against the idea of married MGTOWs and not, for example, the result of MRAs railing against marriage in general, I could not tell you.

Esmay thinks that “if you are telling men there is never any benefit to a marriage license, you are lying to those men and may get those men killed with your lie.”

But the fact is that MRAs and others in their general vicinity make exactly this argument all the time. Consider, for example, the thrice-divorced Men’s Rights blogger who, several years ago, wrote an angry post titled “Gay Marriage? How About NO Marriage!”

Modern marriage, in case these Einsteins haven’t noticed, has all the sanctity of a ten dollar hooker. Matrimony has devolved into just another throwaway institution in a throwaway culture …  an institution that is currently the most prolific source of oppressive discrimination against them? …

What remains of marriage is not salvageable. It’s water that can’t be decontaminated; a cripple that can’t be healed. And the best thing to do is to put it out of its misery and start the whole shebang over from scratch. …

MRA’s should do the decent thing with marriage and pull the plug.

And who wrote that? A blogger by the name of Paul Elam, on a little blogspot blog that he later turned into the A Voice for Men that we know and loathe today. (And he was proud enough of this post that he reposted it on the new and allegedly improved AVFM.)

Dean, I hate to tell you this, but your former boss at AVFM seems to be one of the “abusive,” potential death-causing “MGTOW sectarians” you’ve just devoted more than 4000 words to railing against.

 

162 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
weirwoodtreehugger
10 years ago

The demonizing gendercomment image

Pandapool -- The Species that Endangers YOU (aka Banana Jackie Cake, for those who still want to call me "Banana", "Jackie" or whatever)
Pandapool -- The Species that Endangers YOU (aka Banana Jackie Cake, for those who still want to call me "Banana", "Jackie" or whatever)
10 years ago

“In my honest opinion, I do not think that you really want to rape various women. Your attempt at humor falls flat.”

The best part of feminism is the ease with which you can toy with men’s brainwashing to provide and protect while simultaneously encouraging a sense of guilt. In this way, one can simultaneously attack men’s biological drives and psychological well being with both positive and negative psychological feedback.

http://www.reactiongifs.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/06/Marty-McFly-What.gif

Fruitloopsie
Fruitloopsie
10 years ago

NoMorePc

“Women are out to destroy men!”

Later

“I love rape jokes and I want to rape women”

NomorePc is, like every other manospherian, terrified that women will treat him the same way he treats women.

reallyfriendly
10 years ago

@NoMorePc Do you even dialogue? It feels like the longer we converse the further and further you jump down your well and you still have not improved your argument in any sense. You also seem to enjoy taking your notions out and smacking them into a nearby wall till all the sense has been whacked out of them.

I never said you had no sense of humor (though I am beginning to suspect it), only that your joke was ineffective. I don’t think it would have worked on anyone to be honest – however, it is plausible that it is popular back where you came from.

I’m also not protecting anyone here because as far as I can tell, you haven’t personally called out anyone on this forum, or even women in general. I have no targets to protect. Instead I simply pointed out the flaws in your ideas and arguments. You should actually make an effort to defend your assertions if you actually want to convince any of us here of their validity.

From what you are personally stating here:

“The best part of feminism is the ease with which you can toy with men’s brainwashing to provide and protect while simultaneously encouraging a sense of guilt. In this way, one can simultaneously attack men’s biological drives and psychological well being with both positive and negative psychological feedback.”

it clearly shows your desire to not have an actual discussion. I am always open to exchanging ideas with people regardless of their background and am saddened to see how easily driven you are by your own prejudices. Dial it down and talk like a person. No need to get all aggressive to ‘win’. Your ‘psychological’ tactics are dull and boring though you may think otherwise.

When you can get off your high horse long enough to actually talk I will be waiting.

reallyfriendly
10 years ago

@katz Sure! It is very possible that I don’t know enough about the word itself and would be glad to hear your point of view on it.

This is not so much ‘whackamole’ rather than watching a ‘very spectacular train wreak happening in slow motion’.

Fruitloopsie
Fruitloopsie
10 years ago

Really friendly
“When you can get off your high horse long enough to actually talk I will be waiting.”

He’s an Mgtow, mgtows don’t want to talk logically they’ll make up whatever and even say jaw dropping garbage becuase they’re misognists and want to do whatever it takes to get womens’ attention becuase it seems like they can’t live without us not for a second and that’s why they’re always popping up in female/feminist dominated places.

NoMorePc
NoMorePc
10 years ago

“This is not so much ‘whackamole’ rather than watching a ‘very spectacular train wreak happening in slow motion’.

The only spectacular “train wreak” happening tonight, in slow motion, is you, doll. But that’s OK. I don’t care. Know why? Cause I’ll win no matter what you write. It’s really that simple. Men gain by women not marrying. Men gain from women’s double standards, hypocrisy, illusions and enchantments.

Once upon a time, a prince proposed to a princess. The princess refused. The prince lived happily ever after. The end.

For centuries, the white knights of the patriarchy have been fucking men and granting women privilege over men. This little secret is out, sweets. Your little diatribe on my misunderstanding of feminists won’t stop that train from arriving on time. With each day that passes, I and all men win more and more. Don’t believe me? Give it ten years. We’ll meet up again right here and see who was right and who was the train wreck. Agreed?

Pandapool -- The Species that Endangers YOU (aka Banana Jackie Cake, for those who still want to call me "Banana", "Jackie" or whatever)
Pandapool -- The Species that Endangers YOU (aka Banana Jackie Cake, for those who still want to call me "Banana", "Jackie" or whatever)
10 years ago

The only spectacular “train wreak” happening tonight, in slow motion, is you, doll.

http://33.media.tumblr.com/fc6386dcc1a00198d6469cc8a0c4732d/tumblr_nfdia4dPHC1qk08n1o1_500.gif

Scented Fucking Hard Chairs
Scented Fucking Hard Chairs
10 years ago

MRAs aren’t interested in defending human rights, PUAs couldn’t get consensually laid if their lives depended on it, and MGTOWs follow feminists around like lonely puppy dogs… Right-Wing Name Syndrome strikes again.

(Okay, so all three of those apply to all three “Groups,” but they’re the same damn thing anyway. =P)

Snuffy
Snuffy
10 years ago

So the University of Toronto is getting threats of a mass shooting targeting women by an anti-feminist.

http://www.msn.com/en-ca/news/canada/online-posts-about-killing-feminists-prompt-university-of-toronto-to-increase-campus-security/ar-AAeaylN?li=AA59G3#image=1

weirwoodtreehugger
10 years ago

Men gain by women not marrying

Then why are you so mad at feminism? Shouldn’t you be trolling fans of Princeton Mom and evangelical Christian blogs? They’re the ones who are all hyped up on getting. Feminists generally don’t care whether or not someone of any gender wishes to marry.

weirwoodtreehugger
10 years ago

Hyped up on women marrying I meant. Long day.

katz
katz
10 years ago

Once upon a time, a prince proposed to a princess. The princess refused. The prince lived happily ever after. The end.

I’d say the prince needs to rethink how he pursues his goals.

reallyfriendly
10 years ago

@NoMorePc Thanks for clarifying! I can add you to my growing list of ‘Anti-Feminists with no actual Argument’ which is pretty much all that I have engaged with. I was serious about sussing this out with you (as I am with anyone with an opposing idea) but it is clear that you have no desire for an honest conversation. I hope your ego was sufficiently stoked.

I now bid thee farewell, good sir!

@katz We can talk now. We have wasted enough time with this malcontent 8p

NothingClever
NothingClever
10 years ago

Can we ban the troll already? The rape jokes were enough, but they were also aggressively unfunny.

Fruitloopsie
Fruitloopsie
10 years ago

NomorePc
“Men gain from women’s double standards, hypocrisy, illusions and enchantments.”

Earlier:
*Says women are out to destroy men but wants to rape women
*says feminists lies about rape but compares being divorced to rape
*says women have all the power and we live in a gynocracy
*says women and feminists are demonizing gender but calls men “not men” and “white knights” who don’t agree with him and who are married.

Instead of admitting you’re a misognist who’s sad that women don’t obey your every command and can’t get away with abuse, rape, abandoning women on your accord, etc you have to make up garbage to blame all women and feminists even saying women and feminists should stop with lying and complaining becuase they have privilege but all you do is being dramatic becuase for not feeling powerful and not getting laid. You are just like any other manospherian coming here saying women are evil becuase apparently we’re doing things that you are doing to us but it’s ok because you’re men and it’s science or whatever and also we don’t give you whatever you want becuase you been oh so nice.

I can go on but I don’t want to hurt your little dumb brain misogyny and logic don’t go hand in hand. So bye we want you to go becuase believe or not there are good men out there and when you pull yourselves out of the gene pool and dating market you’re leaving the awesome men to us and we have the confidence and knowledge to avoid men like you so thanks sugar 🙂

Pandapool -- The Species that Endangers YOU (aka Banana Jackie Cake, for those who still want to call me "Banana", "Jackie" or whatever)
Pandapool -- The Species that Endangers YOU (aka Banana Jackie Cake, for those who still want to call me "Banana", "Jackie" or whatever)
10 years ago

@NothingClever

I emailed David after that “doll” comment.

Catalpa
Catalpa
10 years ago

Hm, this seems as good a thread as any to ask advice in regards to getting through to people who are willfully ignorant.

So I had a discussion with my brother recently regarding why it is SIGNIFICANTLY worse for white people to use the n-word than it would be for a black person to use it. He trotted out the standard “it’s just a word!” and “free speech!” and “well, the DICTIONARY definition of racism doesn’t say anything about power and priviledge and pervasive cultural oppression, therefore anyone who is biased against another person because of their race is being racist” BS, and I tried to take that down. I found it difficult to impress upon him the reality of constant, systemic discrimination, because he is a white cis (likely) het male who is privileged on all axes and therefore has that issue with fish having no word for water. There wasn’t a good analogy from his experience to use.

All the same, I’d like to at least try to steer him away from being a terrible asshole.

Does anyone have some advice about how one would go about illustrating pervasive, cultural discrimination to someone who has never experienced it in any facet of their life?

cupisnique
cupisnique
10 years ago

aaaaand he finally got to the point where he declared that we will all one day regret how horribly mean we females were to all the menz!!! Oh how sad we will be when all teh menz go their own way. . . who will bring us our bon bons and mammoth meats?

katz
katz
10 years ago

Returning to misandry: Valerie Solanas kind of proves my point, because you have to go back 40 years to find a woman who might pass as man-hating, and that’s if you take everything that gets said about her at face value. She’s an anomaly.

But it really depends on how you define “misandry.” If you really take it to mean nothing beyond “someone who hates men,” then sure, you can use it that way. And presumably you’d use analogous words for anyone who hated any particular group, however idiosyncratic; say, anti-tall-people, or anti-redhead, or anti-lefty (we are a sinister bunch).

But that’s a pretty simplistic definition; generally, words we have for types of bigotry imply that it’s part of a trend and not a complete fluke (and even more generally, all words imply that the thing exists in sufficient quantities to be worth having a word for). As far as I know, MRAs coined misandry, and they certainly think it refers to a far-reaching “gynocentric” conspiracy.

So I think it’s a rubbish word because it implies that something is going on that isn’t. But it depends how you define it.

Fruitloopsie
Fruitloopsie
10 years ago

Catalpa
“So I had a discussion with my brother recently regarding why it is SIGNIFICANTLY worse for white people to use the n-word than it would be for a black person to use it. He trotted out the standard “it’s just a word!” and “free speech!”
http://postmemes.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/08/funny-stand-up-comedian-free-country.jpg
The n-word came from white people to dehumanize black people so no it’s not the same when a black person uses the word against a white person and it’s bad for a white person to call a black person that becuase it was indeed white people who created that word in the first place. White people have privilege becuase it was their ancestors who have enslaved, taken, etc people of color so a poc can’t be racist towards white people becuase they really don’t have any power. There’s nothing wrong to be a white person but we do benefit from racism becuase again it was indeed white folks who enslaved, committed genocide, etc towards people of color we need to clean up their mess and call each other out if we do/say something racist and we need to think of privileges we have like for example: if I go into a shop no one will think I’m going to rob it even when I’m wearing a hoodie and no one will call me a terrorist even when I threaten someone.
Sorry I don’t know if I explained clearly but I’m sure others here will help you.

GrumpyOldSocialJusticeMangina

Maybe my tongue-in-cheek detector isn’t flawless, but I always thought The SCUM Manifesto was mostly snark. I mean, you start out

Life in this society being, at best, an utter bore and no aspect of society being at all relevant to women, there remains to civic-minded, responsible, thrill-seeking females only to overthrow the government, eliminate the money system, institute complete automation and destroy the male sex.,/blockquote>
And near the end she writes:

The few remaining men can exist out their puny days dropped out on drugs or strutting around in drag or passively watching the high-powered female in action … or they can go off to the nearest friendly suicide center where they will be quietly, quickly, and painlessly gassed to death.

Am I wrong in thinking there’s an ample dose of tongue-in-cheek there?

I think there is a not totally insignificant number of women who — based on particularly bad experiences with men, which are unfortunately all too common — dislike, distrust, and fear men, and male violence in particular. But I can’t remember having encountered or read about more than a very few women who hate men and would like to see them annihilated in the manner of Elliot Rodger and some other extreme manospherians. Hatred seems to be pretty much a manifestation of toxic masculinity.