Now, some WEAK ASS BETA MANGINAS think that you shouldn’t deliberately annoy waitstaff because, you know, they’re human beings like you and me simply trying to get through their work day, and why the fuck would you want to deliberately make their lives worse for no good reason, that sounds kind of pointlessly rude, I mean what the hell’s wrong with you? Heck, even I used to think that. But that was before I discovered the RED PILL subreddit.
That’s right, ALPHA DOGS, we’re returning to that wondrous place we first visited last month to learn some more TIGHT ASS GAME to use on the hot babes. Specifically, we’re going to be learning some TIGHT-ASS KNIFE GAME. No, I’m not talking about stabbing anyone, fellas, except maybe “stabbing” some hot young babe with your you-know-what later, if you know what I mean, wink wink nudge nudge nudge?
(You do know what I mean, right? By “you-know-what” I mean your penis, and I’m trying to suggest that if you master KNIFE GAME you may later have the opportunity to have consensual sexual intercourse with a young woman, which is something that someone might colloquially refer to as “stabbing” due to the regular thrusting of the penis into the vagina that is a central feature of coitus.)
Anyway, KNIFE GAME involves actual knives. DINNER KNIVES, whoooo!
I learned all about it from a cool Red Pill dude called ATowne who wrote up a totally ALPHA DOG FIELD REPORT for his RED PILL ALPHA BUDDIES about how he totally scored some points with some totally hot waitresses and like even got one of their NAMES!
Because waitresses love customers who take advantage of the leverage they have over them as customers to just fuck with them. And they especially love it when these customers are ALPHA DOG ASSHOLES trying to get into their PANTS. Because that is such a TOTALLY ORIGINAL MOVE as well as being ALPHA AS FUCK. Trust me, NO ONE HAS EVER DONE IT BEFORE. Except maybe a couple of these RED PILL ALPHA DOGS.
Unfortunately, some of ATowne’s BLUE PILL friends kept cock-blocking him and calling him a douche and apologizing to the waitresses for his behavior but it didn’t matter because it didn’t stop him from having this totally awesome INTERACTION WITH A WOMAN:
Cute waitress comes by and I decide to focus on her. She brings me a fork for my salad and I smile and say “no knife?” After a little back and forth she comes back with the knife and I get her name. A little while later I call her over, give her the knife and say “I don’t need it, I’m eating a salad.” She smiles at first, then looks frustrated and as she’s walking away “nice way to get my name…”
I’m the only one of the group who actually goes and talks to girls, so my life is the center of conversation almost always. They are talking about how I am an asshole, making the poor waitress take time out of her busy day to bring me a fucking knife. Are you serious? Anyway, cute waitress is ignoring my table and eye contact, but I can see her looking at my peripherally. I stop caring and talk to my friends and then catch her slipping while she’s walking because she was ‘looking away’ (directly where she was going) but peripherally looking at me. …
I see the cute waitress as I’m leaving and say “hey, don’t take the knife stuff personally.” She says “I know, I was kidding.” I follow up with “Okay, I’m ____, see you around.” Cringe.
Cringe, man, THAT IS totally fucking ALPHA!
Also, what kind of name is “____?” A totally fucking ALPHA name is all I know!
I found this wonderful RED PILL field report via the Blue Pill subreddit, which is sort of an awesome tribute to the RED PILL subreddit, though I am beginning to suspect that some of the people there do not fully understand the totally BADASS nature of the RED PILL PHILOSOPHY.
EDITED TO ADD: I forgot about this TOTALLY RAD scene from the movie “Made” in which ALPHA DOG Vince Vaughn demonstrates some ALPHA MOVES with a flight attendent who is obviously totally into him. Watch and learn, beta fools!
The other thing that’s getting to me is that prostitution is illegal in Texas, so the judge sided with the man who’d had the sex he thought he was entitled to “stolen” even though the “theft” was of a service that he wasn’t legally allowed to purchase anyway. So it’s not just that a woman’s life is apparently only worth $150, it’s also that men are allowed to break the law and still have a judge back them up (as long as it’s a sex worker they’re victimizing), even to the point of excusing murder.
I’m kind of hoping that the prosecution will file an appeal and get this case kicked up to a higher court, and the judge who made the call will end up facing some kind of repercussions for this, because even on a purely legalistic level this is bullshit.
I’m gonna try and shut off my soul for a bit and look at this purely from that annoying legalistic place, and… huh. It still doesn’t make sense.
The woman was not ‘stealing’ the money from him in the sense of robbery or theft (which, in Texas, would actually be grounds for shooting someone in the back, so long as it’s at night; seriously, Texas, WTF?). The story he’s making is that she was defrauding him; it’s similar to theft (in that money is being taken), but it’s not the same thing, and that should matter.
To see why, just alter the scenario a wee bit. Instead of an escort, make the victim a male drug dealer. He and the defendant enter into a verbal contract for a dime-bag of pot in exchange for $150. The victim takes the money, provides a bag of plant material, and heads for the door. The defendant opens the bag, says, “Hey, this is marijuana, give me my money back.” The victim says, “No, it’s mine now, caveat emptor!” and continues to leave. The defendant shoots the victim fatally.
Can ANYONE see a Texas jury acquitting the pothead murderer?
Cassandra–not a judge, but a jury. The judge may have made some bad rulings that allowed this travesty to occur, but I don’t know the case well enough to state that for certain. Juries are notoriously unpredictable, though, and can come up with some truly horrific decisions at times.
I’m just hit-and-running to plop this funny poster created by a user on r/againstmensrights:
http://i.imgur.com/MCWkpAt.png
Gah, I think I need to take a break from the internet. The texas shit is putting me in some seriously not happy headspace…
Regardless of who made this idiotic decision, the prosecution should try to appeal. This would not be a good precedent to let stand.
I absolutely understand that zealously advocating for your client is an attorney’s ethical doodie, but the attorney who came up with this legal strategy is a turd for even having this thought process. The jury that bought the argument makes me want to leave this planet.
An alpheta.
@cloudiah, I’ve noticed so much of their hypocrisy on their Facebook page. One photo recently posted says basically that if you don’t like AVFM, then fuck off cuz kdkcjneoifn. Then all off their recent posts are pretty much “FACEBOOKS ON TEAM FEMINAZI FOR TAKING DOWN OUR TRUFAX”.
I wish I could respond to those posts and mock, but I know I’d get doxxed or have like 30 emails and messages calling me a supernazislut.
I wanted to put a hammer through my tv when I was watching the empty heads sniggering over this case on CNN. At least Piers Antony seemed appropriately appalled, he said something like, “this is the kind of thing that makes America a dark laughingstock in the eyes of the civilized world.”
Isn’t the law already such that raping a prostitute isn’t rape, it’s theft of goods?
When the defense said the shot wasn’t meant to kill, I called bullshit. He shot her in the neck, what did he think was going to happen?
Well Texas, I’ll never be visiting you.
Being a jerk to your food server? Stuff legends are made of.Sounds like”taking the red pill” might also involve ingesting secret spit in your food by disgruntled servers/food handlers.
@yaoi huntress earth, from what I understand he fired into the car and it happened to hit her in the neck, he (at least claims) that he wasn’t aiming for her specifically.
Which is not a defense in my mind. Rule #1 is you always know what you’re firing at. Even if we pretend for a moment that he was justified in shooting her (which of course I don’t believe, but for the sake of argument)…what if they’d had a kid in the back seat of that car and he’d shot the child, or the bullet had gone through the vehicle and hit an innocent bystander on the other side? Innocent people die every damn day because someone didn’t know what the hell they were shooting at but pulled the trigger anyway, and it’s appalling that they aren’t prosecuted for it. But that’s a whole ‘nother rant.
This has been said but I think I can justifiably reiterate that WAITRESSES WEAR NAME TAGS! They wear name tags.
He should have ostentatiously ordered a chicken breast. And then started jacking off under the table.
In the US, verdicts of Not Guilty can’t be appealed. The prosecution could charge him with another, related crime, but once you’ve been acquited of a crime, the doctrine of Double Jeapordy forids a retrial.
Leum: You are correct, however, I believe that if the judge made any adverse rulings during the trial, the prosecution COULD appeal those rulings, so as to prevent them from becoming official precedent. (For instance, if there was an actual objection presented by the prosecution during the trial, which the judge overruled, they could appeal that decision so as to keep other judges from citing the ruling in the future.)
Why the fuck was CNN laughing at the case???
Someone in the Pandagon comments made the observation that if it had been a MoC shooting a white woman, he’d have been in prison so fast his feet wouldn’t have touched the ground. (I’d throw in the guess he’d have been on death row.) Was the victim a WoC? I don’t know if the commenter was reversing roles, or just mentioning that a white man can get away with a crime against any woman quite easily.
Kittehs, I have seen pictures of them both, and the woman appears to be a WoC, and the murderer is a white dude. He used an AK-47, by the way, with no regard to the safety of anyone else in the vicinity.
A what?!? Those are only legal under very specific circumstances. Off the top of my head I know you can keep one you owned before they were banned, but other than that…
Yeah, they can probably bring him up again on gun charges. (My brother has an SKS be a use you can’t legally get an AK-47 here [it’s also locked up in his room]…I’ll ask about the legality in Texas when they get back from *drum roll* the NRA dinner)
Argenti: I’m not sure about the legality of AK-47s in TX, but AR-15s are perfectly legal, so it wouldn’t surprise me if it was. This is a heavily armed state.
I’m not going to get into the gun issue in general because I know that I’m fighting a losing cultural battle there, but in terms of weapons for defending the home isn’t an AK-47 just a teensy bit excessive?
This manages to be Un Fucking Believable and No Fucking Surprise At All, both at the same time.
Cassandra: IMO, no one needs an automatic weapon of any kind. If you can’t do it in six shots, you don’t need to be doing it.