Time for another visit into the mind of Christopher in Oregon, a confirmed bachelor best known for posting long screeds on his friend MarkyMark’s blog about how ugly and smelly and disgusting women and their various orifices are. Today, his topic is old women, by which he seems to mean all women above the age of 35 or so.
I’m not even going to bother to comment on this one except to say: if you’re a heterosexual man, with an interest in sex, and you actually believe that all women over the age of 40 are icky and ugly and smelly and wear dentures, you’re not only delusional, you’re probably going to have a very sad second half of your life. (And I’m guessing the first half probably won’t be so great either.)
Here’s Chris:
Face it: Nature doesn’t want CRUSTY OLD WOMEN having children! Basic biology, folks, and I’m no expert on biology. It’s just common sense! …
Old women are supposed to be…..old women. Crabby old women. Ugly old women. Nasssssty old tobacco-chewin’ women. …
A woman should be done spewing out babies by the time she is thirty, and no later. By forty, a woman is OLD! Look around you. Look at the forty-year-old women you see every day. See any of them you want to screw? Any of them? Didn’t think so. (Blow-jobs aren’t good either- their dentures might lock up on your weinie! Imagine THAT 911 call!)
Nature makes women BUTT UGLY fairly early in life to prevent them from breeding. Kind of hard to get pregnant if you’re so gruesome no man in his right mind can get a boner over your appearance. But, women, in their arrogance, fail to realize that men are stimulated VISUALLY!
If you look like an old hag, then the penis just naturally will NOT stand to attention. You’ve got to have some sort of good looks to get our motors running, ladies, and if you look like a bag of wrinkly cellulite, then you had better face it- no one wants you! Contrary to the lie feminists have been telling you, fifty is NOT the new thirty! A fifty-year-old woman has less sex appeal than a sheep. (Ask anyone in Montana.)
I am constantly amazed at the post-forty women that have come on to me lately. Give me a break! Do they think I’m blind?
Ick! …
A woman of forty is not sexual in any sense of the word. She is useless for breeding, and her sex appeal is GONE! Why have women fallen for the lie that they remain sexual into their sixties and seventies? They are NOT! They are putrid, smelly shells of their former selves! Nothing more! By that age, a woman looks like the package her body once came in. All sagging, wrinkly and disgusting! …
If you just have to get laid, and you can close your eyes, and hold your breath (pew!), there is no easier lay than an old woman. They are so desperate. So pathetic. So easy.
So gross.
There’s more where this came from over at MarkyMark’s.
It’s not a bad thing to be an asexual- I never said it was. It’s just, it would explain his obvious disgust/bewilderment towards bodily functions/the human body.
PEMRA: add asexuality to the growing list of things you know less than nothing about. How do you go about your existence being this stupid?
FUCKING NO.
People aren’t asexual because they think the human body is icky. I think the human body is beautiful and wonderful and I like to sketch it and draw it an d paint it.
That’s a system of thought where asexuality is brokenness.
YOU ARE DIGGING YOUR HOLE DEEPER YOU PIECE OF SHIT.
@howardbann1ster- Asexuals aren’t a monolith. They’re different. Yes, some asexuals find the human body actively unappealing. Christopher might be one of those. Then again he might not…. I’m only speculating.
@PEMRA:
Your speculating is wildly offensive. Stop it.
(This was probably mentioned before… but… 40? and dentures? What 40 year-olds is Chris talking about here?)
PEMRA: Is is possible you are here to foment strife and get your jollies by being willfully, knowingly, offensive, and affectedly obtuse?
It’s understandable if you are, not everyone can have a decent social persona (even online) but it would explain some things, if it were true.
But I’m just speculating.
(And in case you’re wondering why its offensive, PEMRA, you are going out of your way to find some rationale for why being an asexual is causing Chris to be a misogynistic asshole.
Saying you’re “only speculating” doesn’t mask your intent, and if you were “only speculating” then you would listen to what people are saying and drop the whole thing.)
@kirbywarp- How is it offensive? I’m not finding a “rationale”, I’m proposing a possible cause for his obvious disgust toward the human body, because it’s very striking.
It doesn’t *excuse* his anti-woman ranting, but it explains the peculiar form his ranting takes.
PEMRA: stop speculating, you doofus.
@kirbywarp- How is it offensive? I’m not finding a “rationale”, I’m proposing a possible cause for his obvious disgust toward the human body, because it’s very striking.
Ah… reading comprehension, at it’s best. Chris hates on women’s bodies, and you read it as, “the human body”.
Way to go.
@PEMRA:
When I said “rationale,” I meant you are trying to find a justification for your belief that being an asexual could be the cause of Chris’s behavior. I know you aren’t trying to excuse anything.
Finding the human body actively unappealing is, um, a totally different thing than asexuality.
I know many people who are actively sexual who turn aside or go ‘gross’ when presented with a naked body, for one reason or another. (I suspect you can fill in plenty of blanks here)
I have known several asexuals. I am aware of the non-monolith status they have.
But to refer to a disgust at the human body as if it is a symptom of asexuality and not misogyny is grossly wrong, and pathologizing asexuals.
… I’m probably putting my foot in my mouth by saying “an asexual” rather than “being asexual”. I wouldn’t say “being a straight.” Sorry, everyone.
To state the obvious, asexuals don’t want to fuck sheep. That would be, what, an ovosexual?
@katz:
I dunno. What I do know is that someone who talks about their penis as much as Chris does is pretty clearly not asexual.
“Argenti: Fuck ancient. We had a new DOS box, and a “portable” compute (compaq, weighed about 20 lbs, needed an outlet; and a table).”
Oh fine 😛
Any ideas on the Smith Corona though (besides that it sounds like a beer, not something with a strange OS)
Yes, use it as a boat anchor (small boat).
Hey now, assuming the discs aren’t lost, it has a primitive wheel of fortune game, and something about dinosaurs!
Also, in a sense, it was my first computer, I’ve a sentimental attachment to it.
Nope, we got Christopher’s point very clearly. His claim is that it is natural for men to be physically repulsed by women over the age of 30 — to be unable to achieve an erection at all — because NATURE decrees that those women should not breed.
Nature itself contradicts his stupidity, and commonly.
@Chie and Inconvenient Truth:
Weird. I literally just found this article on women who look better as they aged. It’s… fox news magazine… so I hang my head in shame. Still, kind of a funny find.
“All you “I know hot 40-year-olds!” shriekers are missing the point. Show me one woman who was less attractive at 20 than she is at 40 (barring extreme weight loss or reconstruction, which makes another point entirely).”
I’m more attractive at 50 than I was at 20. Never had surgery in my life and certainly never lost weight (I notice you think “attractive” automatically means “thin” – surprise, not.)
See this middle finger pointing upward? Hear this scornful laughter? They’re for you, chuckles.
Also, Permascum, “not feeling desire for sex with other people” is not the same as “misogynistic shit who hates women’s bodies and everything else about us”. I’m asexual with an exception of one and I don’t go ranting on about how foul men’s bodies (or women’s for that matter) are.
Has anyone some mold remover? Pemmy seems to have stained the grouting.
The only way to remove PEMRA stains is to ignore them completely. Since they need attention to live, they will eventually go away of their own accord if deprived of it.
OK, random topic time! Anyone know if soy is OK for cats?
I’m asexual and there are lots of women of all ages that I find very beautiful. I’d stare at them for hours if that wasn’t creepy, and then I’d bake them some cookies and I’d stare at them some more (if I could). I just don’t make the leap of wanting to have sex with them.
I do feel icky about bodily functions. This means that I don’t enjoy some “South Park” episodes and that pregnancy is high up on the top 10 list of my least favourite topics of conversation. However, I’ve never been grossed out by fully dressed people, male or female (except when they have really intense BO and we’re in an enclosed space). And I certainly don’t go “ew, old people!” on the internet.
Sorry, but Christopher from Oregon reads like a frustrated, entitled, unpleasant (and possibly unwashed) straight man to me.
Pretty sure soy is not okay for cats. Basing this on… kinda half-remembering reading something once? I think we were looking up if kitties could have milk alternatives and soy was a big fat no.