Time for another visit into the mind of Christopher in Oregon, a confirmed bachelor best known for posting long screeds on his friend MarkyMark’s blog about how ugly and smelly and disgusting women and their various orifices are. Today, his topic is old women, by which he seems to mean all women above the age of 35 or so.
I’m not even going to bother to comment on this one except to say: if you’re a heterosexual man, with an interest in sex, and you actually believe that all women over the age of 40 are icky and ugly and smelly and wear dentures, you’re not only delusional, you’re probably going to have a very sad second half of your life. (And I’m guessing the first half probably won’t be so great either.)
Here’s Chris:
Face it: Nature doesn’t want CRUSTY OLD WOMEN having children! Basic biology, folks, and I’m no expert on biology. It’s just common sense! …
Old women are supposed to be…..old women. Crabby old women. Ugly old women. Nasssssty old tobacco-chewin’ women. …
A woman should be done spewing out babies by the time she is thirty, and no later. By forty, a woman is OLD! Look around you. Look at the forty-year-old women you see every day. See any of them you want to screw? Any of them? Didn’t think so. (Blow-jobs aren’t good either- their dentures might lock up on your weinie! Imagine THAT 911 call!)
Nature makes women BUTT UGLY fairly early in life to prevent them from breeding. Kind of hard to get pregnant if you’re so gruesome no man in his right mind can get a boner over your appearance. But, women, in their arrogance, fail to realize that men are stimulated VISUALLY!
If you look like an old hag, then the penis just naturally will NOT stand to attention. You’ve got to have some sort of good looks to get our motors running, ladies, and if you look like a bag of wrinkly cellulite, then you had better face it- no one wants you! Contrary to the lie feminists have been telling you, fifty is NOT the new thirty! A fifty-year-old woman has less sex appeal than a sheep. (Ask anyone in Montana.)
I am constantly amazed at the post-forty women that have come on to me lately. Give me a break! Do they think I’m blind?
Ick! …
A woman of forty is not sexual in any sense of the word. She is useless for breeding, and her sex appeal is GONE! Why have women fallen for the lie that they remain sexual into their sixties and seventies? They are NOT! They are putrid, smelly shells of their former selves! Nothing more! By that age, a woman looks like the package her body once came in. All sagging, wrinkly and disgusting! …
If you just have to get laid, and you can close your eyes, and hold your breath (pew!), there is no easier lay than an old woman. They are so desperate. So pathetic. So easy.
So gross.
There’s more where this came from over at MarkyMark’s.
As consolation, here’s a mental palate cleanser.
I have an idea. Imagine, in your minds, a baker.
My hypothesis:
Replacing “women” with “Bread” and “female” with “bun”, “Sex appeal” with “crumb appeal” and “years” with “weeks” instantly makes MRA rants much, much more amusing.
I call it:
The Fun Bun Pun Hypothesis.
That cat has a toy cat! It’s a cat with a cat! Guys!!
“I guess in the end, the fact is that we* all* decline after our salad years, looks-wise. ”
You really are willfully stupid, aren’t you? A list of examples of people saying not, that’s not the case, and you trot out your subjective opinion as if it’s some sort of law.
My beloved looked a lot better in his thirties than in his twenties, to me. He’s presenting as fifty-somethingish now and looks better still. You’re a fucking idiot, PermaMold.
My fluffy 13 year old norwegian elkhound begs to differ. 😉
Shorty looks just like our Mr Hadji, including the goggle-eyed look at the toy kitten. 😀
Here’s the other video of Kodi, who loves leads:
http://youtu.be/z5rXLZfsJT0
Pemmy… was a psych major?
Uh-huh.
Just like Pell’s in charge of an asylum.
@Kittehserf: my thoughts exactly.
Hmmm, no Perma, Chris just seems like a self-hating malcontent who is projecting his balls off. I mean, who writes that kind of shit for other people to see? Anyone with a lick of sense would put it all down in a journal then burn it. And christ, if I didn’t know any better, I’d say an older woman just broke up with him — I mean, the childish venom:
“Any of them? Didn’t think so. (Blow-jobs aren’t good either- their dentures might lock up on your weinie! Imagine THAT 911 call!).
Nature makes women BUTT UGLY fairly early in life to prevent them from breeding. Kind of hard to get pregnant if you’re so gruesome no man in his right mind can get a boner over your appearance. But, women, in their arrogance, fail to realize that men are stimulated VISUALLY!”
Oh, and women are visually stimulated VISUALLY as well! Maybe not everyone, but a lot of us…just in case any trolls were wondering. I know insecure men like to co-opt visual stimulation under the name of EVO PSYCH, but there ya go.
Shiraz – don’t you love the way they simultaneously deny that women are visually stimulated, and whine about how if a man doesn’t look like Brad Pitt, he’ll be rejected out of hand?
One more bit of cognitive dissonance (or wilful cognitive dissonance, as it were) to add to the seventy million others they display.
Psych-major is probably a popular fake identity because it allows you to announce that things are wrong with people who disagree with you.
Then again, at my school it was the don’t-know-what-I-want-to-study major, so no doubt there are a lot of slackers amongst the honest-to-god authorities on mental illness.
“Shiraz – don’t you love the way they simultaneously deny that women are visually stimulated, and whine about how if a man doesn’t look like Brad Pitt, he’ll be rejected out of hand?”
Yeah, kitteh. It’s kind of like how all women mooch off of men — but are also taking all the jobs.
No, no, guys, women aren’t visually stimulated, they just make up a physical standard and arbitrarily reject men who don’t meet it because they are bitches.
“No, no, guys, women aren’t visually stimulated, they just make up a physical standard and arbitrarily reject men who don’t meet it because they are bitches.”
Is that why I’m not leaping around every time I see a noble and worthy MRA?
“Then again, at my school it was the don’t-know-what-I-want-to-study major, so no doubt there are a lot of slackers amongst the honest-to-god authorities on mental illness.”
Oh fuck yes. Two “winners” from my undergrad days (one I’ve mentioned before)
1) oppositional defiant disorder? Kids these days just need to be spanked more! (Said by someone probably about 19-21 then, and under 30 now, this was not some back when spanking was encouraged comment)
2) and I fucking quote “what’s the difference between autism and schizophrenia?”
I hope to all the gods that neither went into either psychology nor child anything. #1 was said in child psychopathology (interesting course actually) #2 in, um, intro to clinical psych? Child development was the first one’s thing (the go to major for young women with no idea what they actual want to do)
For comparison the not-an-ex (ok maybe an ex, things got weird) was a psych major with me, ze’s finishing up pharmacy grad school, needed the research background as pre-reqs. S it does both provide a solid science background, and produce sensible people, sometimes. (Hey, I frisk troll studies!)
[quote]All you “I know hot 40-year-olds!” shriekers are missing the point. Show me one woman who was less attractive at 20 than she is at 40 (barring extreme weight loss or reconstruction, which makes another point entirely).[/quote]
If women’s looks are the only thing that matters then you might be right (but even then probably not, at 20 I didn’t know how to style my hair type or what colors I looked good in). But you know that attractiveness also includes personality. Any person who tells me that they were a more interesting person at 20 than at 40…well, that’s just very sad.
RE: PEMRA
I’m mostly asexual. Somehow, I manage to restrain being a whiny pain in the ass about it.
There’s so stopping it, so best thing to do is just not worry about it. If you want to keep your body in good shape, head to the gym, eat well, but accept that you won’t be a hot 21-year old forever. And understand that’s true for everyone else too.
Wow. I actually do hope you’re trolling, just because if you actually believe that, it’s sad. By my own husband’s admission, he was an ass back at twenty-one–not someone I likely would’ve liked. I was still growing into my body at twenty-one–I think I was only just starting to get my beard then. (Also, twenty-one was pre-surgery, and in my opinion, I look WAY better after that.)
My husband’s in his thirties, and he’s the most gorgeous man on the planet. I am positive he’s only going to get even more gorgeous over the years. Why this is so mind-boggling of an idea, I don’t know.
The world has no idea how much happier I am now versus the time I was between 18-20 years old. I am learning how to have boundaries and I now know it is okay to say the word “No.” I have a long history of people who have taken advantage of me and my kindness, from my birth mother onwards.
Also getting the mental help I have needed in my life. I am way more comfortable with myself than I ever have been. I feel okay with my place in the universe now 🙂
I was suitemates with one whose thesis project was about how we should be able to keep pets on campus because puppies are cute, bolstered with points like “and then students would be able to raise guide dogs for the blind and wouldn’t that be great!”. I hear that the background of her powerpoint presentation was bright pink.
RE: katz and Argenti
It’s a long-running joke in the online multi community about the psych students who think they know everything about multi. I think it even got put on the bingo card.
Had to resurrect this thread for an article in yesterday’s paper. It was about a recently-married couple talking about how much in love they are and the stuff they’ve done since they met. The man was saying how beautiful the woman is and how wonderful it was to meet.
He’s 73.
She’s 106.
I wish Christopher in Oregon could see that. His little head would explode.
Awww, happy old couple! Much to the OP’s jerk’s chagrin, I actually find elderly couples sweet in a way — both the “still happy after all these years” and the “just goes to show that getting old can be awesome”.
LBT — *dies* fwiw, my intro to clinical psych “prof” was a TA, willing to be questioned. She looked into how religious AA is an apologized for assuming it could work for everyone. And admitted to being completely clueless wtf “the host alter” meant and settled on “treat the one who comes to see you”. Probably not perfect, but she did admit that:
1) you treat the person in your chair
2) they might be there for non-multiple related things, and with anyone, you treat what they complain about
But she was a grad student, she’s probably still under 30. Maybe newer psychs just suck less? Anyone trained on DSM III has been, in my experience, a generally out of touch idiot. Not that that’s exclusive to older psychs, but they seem more prone to it.
Speaking of psychs, I had my last session with my bloke last week! Still one or two available to us (ie. covered by Medicare) but we agreed they weren’t necessary.
That tirade from Christopher from Oregon somehow manages to be stomach-churningly offensive & gut-bustingly hilarious at the same time. In what sort of weirdo-land does he come from? Toothless elderly 30 year old women with grey-hair, wrinkles & a thing for chewing tobacco….Dogpatch, perhaps?