antifeminism evil women hypocrisy irony alert johntheother men who should not ever be with women ever MGTOW misandry misogyny MRA neckbeard rights oppressed men racism

MRAs to women: You make us hate you! (Also, don’t call JohnTheOther a neckbeard. He’s clean-shaven!)

Racists – victim blamers extraordinaire — like to pretend that their racism isn’t their fault, that they’ve been driven to their racism by the bad behavior of some members of the group they’re bigoted against. Do a search for the phrase “I don’t hate blacks, but” and you will find thousands of examples of this “logic” at its crudest. “I don’t think blacks are ignorant just the NIGGERS,” one YouTube commenter writes, encapsulating the racist “logic” in a phrase.

Misogynists are fond of making similar “arguments” about women. As one commenter on the Scott Adams blog puts it:

I don’t hate women, but I have a pretty low opinion of women overall. I think they have poor priorities, they have poor analytical skills, they tend to be disorganized, they tend to be impulsive, and they think the world revolves around their feelings. I don’t think all women are like that, but it’s the impression I have of the gender in general, and I don’t like those traits.

Naturally, variations of this general argument (such as it is) abound in the “manosphere.” “Misogynists are not born they are made,” writes MRA/MGTOW elder and proud misogynist ZenPriest in an oft-cited rant titled “Hate Bounces.”

“Once, a long time ago when the world was young, I loved women with all my heart and soul,”ZenPriest (also known as Zed) writes. But then along came feminism, which ruined women so thoroughly that poor ZenPriest found himself more or less forced to become a woman-hater:

I began to see women as vicious creatures whose only agenda when it came to me, or any man, was to see how much they could get from the man – then when he had nothing left to give because they had taken it all, toss him out with yesterday’s garbage. In short – as nothing but users. …

I took to avoiding women, particularly groups of them, because I could never sit quietly and put up with the bashing and would always challenge it, which ended me up in a lot of fights and added greatly the count of times that I got called “misogynist.”

Gosh, why would anyone who “see[s] women as vicious creatures” get called a misogynist?

[A]fter 3 decades of listening to it, and hating it, and trying to keep the animosity which had been building in me over it … I caved in and began to really hate women. …

I will not allow most women in my house unless I have known her a long time and she is old enough to have escaped being infected with the plague of man hating or is escorted by someone I trust, nor will I enter theirs except on the same conditions. If I pass a woman stranded on the road, I will not stop to help her because it is as likely as not that she will be afraid of me.  …

I changed from a man who loved women and thought they were just about the greatest thing in the world, to a man who can’t stand them, or anything about them.

And of course it is all the fault of women and their alleged incessant man-hatery:

Man bashing and man hating harms women, because it makes men hate them back – eventually. A puppy returns love for love, but if you beat it will eventually turn mean and will one day turn on you when you raise your fist or your stick (or the club of words) to hit it. Men are no different.

As this last bit makes clear, this “she made me do it” logic is the very same logic used by abusers to justify their abuse.

Now our old friend JohnTheOther has offered a similar blame-the-ladies explanation as to why he’s developed what he calls an “indifference to female opinion.” In his telling, the straw that broke the camel’s back was some unnamed feminist who had the temerity to use the word “neckbeard” in an internet posting.

The culture of easy, casual insult by women against average men, creeps, neckbeards, mother’s-basement-dweller and so on, has a effect which might not be recognized by women. Guys generally don’t need to be told they’re held in contempt as a group, our wider culture makes this sparklingly clear. However, individual instances of circumstantial ad-hom have the very real effect of making men not care about women’s opinions.

Yeah, that’s why these guys don’t give a shit about what women say.

Naturally, Mr. TheOther feels the need to tell us that 1) he doesn’t have a neckbeard and 2) he has a (presumably human) girlfriend.

Am I a neck-beard? No, I’m clean shaven, Im not an online gamer, I have a girlfriend, a career, I dress well et-cetera. But whenever I see some casual, throw away comment like creeper, neck-beard or other minor belittling insult used to describe average men, it cements my not giving a shit about the opinions of women.

After being criticized for his blatant misogyny by a commenter in the Men’s Rights subreddit (virtually the only MRA site online where misogyny is ever called out), Mr. TheOther altered that final bit to read “it cements my not giving a shit about the opinions offered.” He evidently thinks that changing the wording of this one sentence, and complaining about “quote-mining” will convince readers that the misogynistic argument set forth in detail in the rest of the post somehow isn’t misogyny. (And, on the Men’s Rights subreddit, that ploy seems to have worked.)

Naturally, like so many misogynists, Mr. TheOther insists he’s really not a woman-hater:

I don’t hate women, I don’t believe in any “back to the kitchen” nonsense, or any other female-targeted belittlement. What I’m talking about is my personal attitude towards women’s opinions, their utterances, their writing, their thoughts, their contribution to society. If you are a woman reading this, that means your thoughts, ideas, speech, writing and so on.

Well, that clears it up. You don’t hate women; you just don’t give a shit what women think or say or do. Obviously there’s no bigotry in that!

Utterly dismissing “female opinion” because some woman called you a neckbeard: Men’s Rights activism at its finest!

213 replies on “MRAs to women: You make us hate you! (Also, don’t call JohnTheOther a neckbeard. He’s clean-shaven!)”

“Sarcasm in text form is either almost impossible to notice or you have to make it super obvious and non-subtle. ”

I made many people angry on Hotmail before realizing that…

James: it’s shiny but it probably will rain some time soon. Am I lying? 🙂

ABNOY: and everybody knows feminism should be about making women just the way straight men want us.


Buzz Cook — don’t think I’ve seen you before, have +1 internet for the excellent first comment.

Actually, it was a vapid and inane comment that looks exactly like a prelude to “I’m an equalist!1!1″

But I’m always a bit suspicious of new people in this environment.

@ABTROLL: “het sex positive”????????????///


Sex positive feminism is hardly limited to straight women you asshole.

Nor was it for the benefit of men (“I want a whore in my bed and a lady in public and only I get to cheat because DUH MENZ).

Hershele — I figure internets can be taken away as easily as given, and I understand why most people here are wary of n00bs, but it seems a bit unfair to the n00bs to me — I await further evidence to decide whether Buzz actual deserves internets, or just happened to have one good line while I was in a good mood.

And anyways, the MRM has corrupted the concept of equality by making it into a zero sum game that men must win when it really isn’t — I’ve got no issue with true equalists, the few I know are very Marxist, but think Marx missed the importance of ensuring minority rights, and include women as a minority. Idk, if we concede that “equality” means “men rule, women drool” we’re failing way more than if we assume equality means equality until proven wrong, on a case by case basis.

Ithiliana, appending the suffix “-troll” to anyone you disagree with doesn’t make you funny or intelligent, it just makes you look like a petulant baby. So I guess you fit right in here. I admit I’m very surprised you’re able to hack it as an academic.

Steele: You must be new to the internet, or amazingly innocent. Don’t worry son, one day you too will develop a troll radar.

Argenti, zie’s not just a n00b, zie’s a n00b who said something facile as though it were profound. That might be innocent, it might not be. There’s nothing wrong with equality as a goal, obviously, but they path there goes through feminism because people with more male-privilege sticks have less need of a movement than people with fewer; the frequently whimpered whine “I’m an equalist” quickly becomes “let’s treat everyone the same and spend as much money on prenatal care for cis men as we do for people with uteruses.”

Steele, perhaps technically true, but you’re new here, ABNOY isn’t. You don’t know what you’re talking about.

That was a bad example because cis men not getting pregnant is not really subject to political change. A better example is, whimpering whiner is going to be against programs to get more women into executive positions, not noticing or caring that the current situation is actually not equal.

Sigh, I think in all of these “I didn’t used to hate women but now I do” there’s some grain of truth. I think it would be interesting to hear the stories of these men in which these women have names and the specific things they did (and how they made them feel) are described.

Well that’s nice, this is a blog about mocking misogyny though so you might not find many of those stories here. But I hear the spearhead has quite a few of them, maybe you’d be happier over there?

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.