Categories
$MONEY$ antifeminism dozens of upvotes evil women grandiosity homophobia hypocrisy men who should not ever be with women ever misogyny MRA oppressed men patriarchy reactionary bullshit sluts the enigma that is ladies the spearhead vaginas we hunted the mammoth western women suck

All you need is love. Also, misogyny, and a side order of homophobia.

Love is in the air! On The Spearhead, WF Price has penned a piece with the intriguing title: “What’s Wrong with Wanting to be Loved?” To that I would answer: nothing.

Let’s see what lovely sorts of things Price has to say about the subject:

[S]till we have people whining about “misogyny.” Young feminists whose most important concern is the ability to have sex entirely free of consequences, and who shamelessly raise their voices for the right to kill their children in the womb. Lesbian gender feminists who wreck families for profit and sex. Male feminists who boast about fathering children and shuffling their responsibilities onto some duped cuckold, and who malign their fellow men for a crack at college girls.

Huh. Not sure how exactly this bit of nastiness is supposed to advance the cause of love.

(Also, I think that last bit – the line about those “who malign their fellow men for a crack at college girls” – is supposed to be a reference to … me, and the talk I gave on Monday at Northwestern, to which he has added his own little fantasies, like he did in his original, highly fictionalized, post on the subject. The man is obsessed.)

In the comments, Spearhead readers offered their own thoughts on the topic of love.

Revver started things off with this lovely thought:

Having seen and heard a great majority of women, being “unloved” becomes lighter and lighter a burden with each passing year.

 How easily they make themselves look like fools.

Opus spat forth an opus; here’s an edited version:

Women judge men by pre-selection.

If you have been dumped, then a member of Team Vagina has deemed you unworthy, so as in Snakes and Ladders you start from the bottom again. There is simply no point seeking female solace, because the woman will see that you do not seek her, and thus, offended, accuse you of unsolicited attention, or alternatively act offended that you are not interested in her. (I speak from experience). …

Women as we know are programmed to get over even the worst relationship in no more than three months, whereas for a man (even when in hindsight it was Xmas come early) we are often talking decades, for to be ditched is to take away all that it means to be a man (provider, nurturer). …  Now, why am I betting that Futrelle did not mention these things last night – and why am I also betting he has not got one single phone number from any female at Northwestern Univeristy?

(You guys are really are obsessed. Aren’t you supposed to mention my weight as well?)

Greyghost managed to work the phrase “gina tingle” into his ramblings:

Men actually have the capacity to love. Only a man can write an article like that. Women just don’t have the capacity to love. Women gina tingle. …   

The big lie was and is that a woman can love. Romance is what men do women receive it. …

The MRM with women on board on not will never ever change the nature of women. No matter how much awareness of the pain men and even children are in, women will vote and demand what is in therir childish perception of their interest. ( It will always be uninhibitted status and hypergamy)

In a later comment, he added these creepy afterthoughts:

Women do not and can not love the way you do and can. The best a man can get is some good emotional gina tingle. Never ever forget it. It can be a very emotionally pleasing and soothing time for a man but a man can never forget he is a man and right or wrong is a keeper of civilization.

The emotional trauma brought down on men when the realization of the lie hits [is] off the charts. It is where murders and suicides come from.

Georice81 offered up a rather elaborate excuse for slut-shaming:

My observation is that when women have been sexually promiscous their ability to submit and be very loyal to a single man is very diminished. …  They can’t respect that one man that may actually love them since they are contemptous of a man that could love someone like them. Men in the 1950′s understood this and would not marry someone who was not a virgin since they did not trust those that were not.

We men can love and want to love. We also have a huge capacity to forgive. Modern western woman don’t seem to comprehend this because of their own hangups.

Binxton, for his part, seemed to be posting from an internet café on Gor:

Women are by nature emotional, self-centered creatures. Absent controls on their behavior, they lack both morals and objective principles. They are too easily manipulated by their environment to allow them to be free.

Ultimately, female emotional nature requires men to control women.

Women will love when they endure hardship and respect higher authority, i.e., patriarchy.

Western women must acknowledge a male-centered world where they can enjoy the labors of man only if, and when, they show due deference to male authority. Those who fail to do so must be disciplined and punished as examples.

Joe set forth some similarly, er, traditional notions:

Women are capable of love but there’s a reason St. Paul tells wives to “fear” their husbands. Because women are just much more like children in their moral reasoning and in their emotional “resilience” (or capacity for cruelty). So for a woman to love a husband is much like a child’s love for his parents. It is a love that is requires her to be in a dependent position. This is why marriage in a feminist society of independent and irreligious (I don’t mean women without superstition, but women without fear of moral judgment) women, cannot work.

I think I’ve had enough of The Spearhead’s notions of love. Let’s try ten hours of Haddaway instead:

218 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
pillowinhell
pillowinhell
10 years ago

Hellkell, that would be one of the very few commenters I’ve seen on there with zir head screwed on straight. Sometiimes I get suckered in to some comment that starts off sounding resonable but rapidly implodes into WTF…

Shadow
Shadow
10 years ago

DAMN YOU BLOCKQUOTES

@Sharculese

Deckard: Your husband comes across a nude photo in a magazine. He likes it so much he hangs it on your bedroom wall.

Price: First of all, fuck you for suggesting I like men. Second, that’s a man’s biological imperative and the lesbian gender feminists are trying to take it away from us.

I can’t stop laughing!

no really, next time owlslave comes around try to get him started on hillary clinton

.
Do you remember when he tried to use Lysistrata as historical proof of women’s devious sexual power? Good times

Petra Lorre
Petra Lorre
10 years ago

I read all the comments. Regrettable decision. I’ll sum up: One woman no longer loves me, therefore the other 3.5 billion women on this planet? Are not capable of love. QED

xardoz
10 years ago

When you look at history it turns out women leaders are just as capable as men at waging wars, so MRAs use this as proof all women want men drafted and dead in a trench. Sigh.

Seraph
Seraph
10 years ago

Do you remember when he tried to use Lysistrata as historical proof of women’s devious sexual power? Good times

My favorite was when he used The Bacchae as an example of uncontrolled lesbians causing the downfall of a society.

Sharculese
10 years ago

Do you remember when he tried to use Lysistrata as historical proof of women’s devious sexual power? Good times

i’m pretty sure owlslave thinks star wars is based on a true story.

i wonder how he feels about all those rebel pilots princess leia sent to their deaths…

jrockford
jrockford
10 years ago

Blade Runner: You’re in the desert when you see a woman on her back. She can’t get up, not without your help, but you aren’t helping. Why is that?

Price: Because she’s a lesbian gender feminist out to profit through the destruction of the family.

lauralot89
10 years ago

Completely derailing here, but it appears B_____n has taken his brand of dumbass to Feministe, in the “I prefer small boobs” thread.

Dracula
Dracula
10 years ago

Why the fuck are these MRA dudes gassing on about “loyalty”? Why would you even want someone to stay with you out of loyalty, instead of say, love? Or desire?

I mean yeah, I get it. Breaking up sucks. I’m still working through the pain of a lost relationship myself. But you how things would be if my ex and I had stayed together out loyalty? Fucking miserable.

Loyalty isn’t love, people. I’d rather be alone than with someone who doesn’t love me anymore.

Maya Lovelace
Maya Lovelace
10 years ago

Thankfully Brandon and his cadre of morons were shot down.

Maya Lovelace
Maya Lovelace
10 years ago

Oops, there is no cadre. My bad. Would be funny if there was.

Dracula
Dracula
10 years ago

*out [of]*

Maya Lovelace
Maya Lovelace
10 years ago

Poor Brandon. One man against the world!

Sharculese
10 years ago

Completely derailing here, but it appears B_____n has taken his brand of dumbass to Feministe, in the “I prefer small boobs” thread.

lol. i can’t believe he thought that would work for even a second

pillowinhell
pillowinhell
10 years ago

Ahh..but the thing with loyalty is that they believe they’ll be still having sex and someone will still be cooking, cleaning up and minding the kids. Not to mention the probable second income.

Quackers
Quackers
10 years ago

I think they are confusing love with complete female subordination. Which is not surprising since they are heartless, miserable, narcissistic fools that wouldn’t know love if it bit them in the ass. How do they even speak of love when the sex they claim to feel attraction to is not even a full human being in their eyes?

ostara321
ostara321
10 years ago

I’m amused by the specificity of the “all women everywhere get over every break-up within precisely three months” thing – $5 says that guy is still bitter over one ex-girlfriend who started dating someone else three months after they broke up, and he’s too damn stupid and obsessed to come to a normal conclusion like, “I guess this particular woman’s experience of our particular breakup wasn’t completely devastating, and also she met someone nice about three months later.”

I’d bet $20. The comment reeks of projection. I feel like his thought process went something like “it’s taken me ten damn years to get over her, she went off and found that other dude three months later! That’s not supposed to happen! I’m supposed to be happy and SHE’S supposed to be miserable! I’m the guy! I’m supposed to be manly and not have all these gushy lady feelings! Wait a minute, if I’m having all these feelings, they must be manly! Ergo, women are heartless subhumans and all men process breakups the same way I do! SCIENCE!” I almost feel bad for him. Not exactly because he’s miserable, but mostly because it’s obvious his shit logic is making him even more miserable.

kirbywarp
kirbywarp
10 years ago

@Sharculese:

B-nubs gets much more leeway here than elsewhere, apparently. Gosh, I never realized how nice we all are. 😛

hellkell
hellkell
10 years ago

I liked it when NWO thought “Chicago” was a.) real, and b.) recent.

magnesiumcookie
magnesiumcookie
10 years ago

Totally unrelated, but apparently the pretend spermburgler from April Fool’s is getting doxxed by the illustrious MRA’s of Reddit: http://theageofeschatology.blogspot.com.au/2012/04/mras-embarrass-themselves-againand-they.html
He named a school he didn’t attend, though, in anticipation of this, so now they’re trying to get random students get kicked out of school who have nothing to do with it.

ostara321
ostara321
10 years ago

Also, ladies, why did none of you tell me that ladies were supposed to get over break-ups in three months? I wouldn’t have spent those extra ten months crying over my ex or those extra five years mourning a relationship I didn’t even have. Really, the emotional turmoil I could have saved myself if someone would have informed me that I am incapable of love and that that was just “gina tingle”. What a silly ladybrain I’ve got. I’m too emotional to realize my emotions aren’t even real! /sarcasm

Quackers
Quackers
10 years ago

@Kirby

we really are too nice to trolls I think…that’s probably why we get both extremely revolting ones (like Meller & NWO) and really stupid ones…

and yeah…3 months huh? I thought the general complaint was that women were to clingy and overly-emotional during relationships and breakups. I guess its different when it’s the guy getting dumped or hurt from the breakup. Suddenly their heartbreak is valid, but lol at the pump and dump victim or cheated on girlfriend right?

Holly Pervocracy
10 years ago

Why the fuck are these MRA dudes gassing on about “loyalty”? Why would you even want someone to stay with you out of loyalty, instead of say, love? Or desire?

I think most of these guys have a fundamental misunderstanding of what a relationship is. They aren’t thinking much about “this is a person that I’ll be spending lots of mostly nonsexual time with and trusting with my thoughts and emotions.” They’re just thinking of keeping sex on tap.

Which is probably why they consistently describe the nonsexual quality time and the fuzzy stuff as a cost they have to pay for sex, rather than a benefit they get in addition to sex.

Holly Pervocracy
10 years ago

“Sex on tap” becomes “sex, housework, and childcare on tap” if you get married, of course.

Ruby Hypatia
Ruby Hypatia
10 years ago

Wars and genocides throughout human history have been mainly perpetrated by men. Why did people like Alexander the Great and Julius Caesar conquer other lands leaving countless dead bodies in their wake? It was greed for power, pure and simple. Why did Hitler try to kill as many Jews as possible? Pure hatred. Yet it’s women who are so emotional that men must control them? There is no way to logically put the blame for men’s bad behavior on women. Both genders are emotional. It’s just that men’s emotions are more likely to result in violence.

%d bloggers like this: