Warren Farrell, as a sort of “elder statesman” of the Men’s Rights movement, may have gained a sort of weird respectability simply by being around as long as he has, and because he’s published books with major publishers. But the myth of Farrell’s intellectual respectability shatters pretty quickly once one takes a good, honest, and unbiased look at what he has actually written, in The Myth of Male Power and elsewhere.
We’ve already taken a look at some of the strange and troubling things he wrote about rape in that book. Farrell is also fond of rape as a metaphor, and regularly compares things that men endure to rape, as a way of bolstering his overall thesis that it is men, not women, who are the “disposable sex,” and who truly suffer.
Here are some of the things that Farrell argues are equivalent to rape:
Draft registration. In Farrell’s view, the fact that young men are required to sign what is in essence a meaningless piece of paper is a kind of mass rape of men.
How, exactly? Well, you see, young men who refuse to register for the draft when they turn 18 can be barred from government jobs and can – in theory at least – face a stiff fine and prison time. Never mind that most young men sign without fear, because the draft is about as likely to return to fashion as raccoon coats. Farrell imagines what might hypothetically happen if they don’t:
Once in prison, your son’s nubile, young body combined with his reputation for not fighting makes him a perfect candidate for homosexual rape and, therefore, AIDS. In brief, he is subject to being killed. …
Do male-only draft registration and combat requirements amount, then, to the legalized rape of men? Yes. (p. 135, Myth of Male Power, 1993 hardcover edition)
Farrell offers no evidence that any of this ever actually happened to anyone who refused to register for the draft since it was reinstated in 1980, but in his mind, evidently, the hypothetical rape of men is as terrible an injustice as the real rape of women.
Unemployment: In Farrell’s view, unemployment – at least for men – is essentially the same as rape.
Many women report that rape leaves them feeling humiliated, violated helpless, angry, guilty, self blaming, depressive, lower in self-esteem, and suicidal. Their vulnerability leaves them feeling powerless, as if the whole world were an elephant and they are an ant. Similarly, men who are fired or experience any of “the three unemployment’s – underemployment, unemployment, and the fear of unemployment” – often feel humiliated, violated, helpless, angry, guilty, self blaming, depressive, lower in self-esteem, and suicidal.their vulnerability leaves them feeling powerless, as if the whole world were an elephant and they are an ant. (p. 173)
Oh, it gets worse:
Unemployment deprives men of that which has given many men the respect and love of women; rape violates the body that has given many women the appreciation and love of men. Few men feel they chose unemployment, just as few women feel they chose to be raped. (p. 173)
Huh. Don’t women get fired, too? And aren’t some men raped? Well, sure, but women who lose their jobs don’t really count.
Of course, unemployment affects women and rape also affects men. But the unemployed man is the subject of ridicule. … Despite the similarity between the unemployment of men and the rape of women, no one would dare joke about the worthlessness of a raped woman.” (p. 173)
Well, I guess he hadn’t met Paul Elam. Or Ferdinand Bardamu Matt Forney. Or this dude. Or about fifty million other examples I could dig up if I felt it was worth it.
Indeed, it’s so extremely unlikely that Farrell has never run across someone joking about rape victims that I can only assume that either he has some sort of short-term memory problem akin to Leonard in Memento or he’s lying.
While comparing draft registration and unemployment with rape in order to suggest how much men suffer, Farrell also compares rape with trivial or harmless things in a way that minimizes the suffering of female rape victims:
For example, Farrell compares rape with successful salesmanship:
We are still requiring men to be the sexual salespersons but now defining them as rapists when they do it well. (p. 316)
He also compares rape laws with traffic signs.
Laws with broad definitions of rape are like laws making fifty-five-miles-per-hour speed limits for men and no speed limits for women. (p. 318)
More on Farrell to come.
NOTE: A draft version of this went up accidentally earlier; I fixed a few things in it, none of them substantive.
If I actually want to have sex with someone no convincing is required. If I don’t want to have sex with someone their trying to convince me to do so is going to either annoy or scare me, depending on how prone to violence they seem.
Notice that there is no “I am now happily convinced!” in this scenario.
Cassandra – exactly, exactly! You put it a lot better than I did.
About the idea of rape jokes as bete noire… I seem to recall that this was far more accurate when Farrell published his book. I think our culture has been somewhat vulgarized through the Internet and other factors.
You know what would be fun? Let’s replace some words from the p-zombie wikipedia article and see if accurately describes Warrell’s views about women.
Hey, it works!
As a functionalist, I don’t believe these “women” are logically possible.
I guess strike out tags don’t work like I thought they did. Use your imagination!
“it does not feel any pain though it behaves exactly as if it does feel pain (it may say “ouch” and recoil from the stimulus, or tell us that it is in intense pain)”
That’s exactly what that shitstain Descartes claimed about non-human animals.
Descartes a shitstain? Blasphemy! 😉
You thought that was even worth making a joke about?
This guy’s trolling. He has to be.
Here’s what I mean by that. He’s pissed off that women (a group he disdains and fears) get to say “when we’re raped, it’s worse than anything you know.” But he has FEELINGS and he FEELS and knows other men who FEEL, and it’s literally the most invalidating thing any of them can imagine that THEIR distress is not THE MOST distress. So, he’s just trying to reclaim all The Pain for himself.
That’s another confusing thing about this whole ideology. It’s couched in aggression and masculinity, but it so blatantly emerges from fear, sadness, sensitivity, and self-pity. “Sometimes men are mocked!” “Sometimes men get rejected!!” “Sometimes men are made to feel unmasculine!” The whole thing’s bizarre.
They take legitimate things, like the narrow limits of “acceptable” masculinity in our culture, but instead of seeing it for what it is – the effects of a kyriarchy, which are oppressive to men but much more so to women – they blame women for it. Do they actually want to be free of patriarchal constrictions, or just to stamp women down so they don’t have to think about it at all while they grab all the benefits they think they’ve lost?
wordsp1nner: I grabbed it. I have my first skein of yarn for sale (120 yards of 2×3 cable: a red/orange/purple colorway; Alpaca, a but less than 5 oz).
I’m setting it aside. I need to price it, but I want to have more than one skein to put up for sale. I also might just sell it at a local fiber meetup (there are several in NYC).
RE: Kittehserf
Do they actually want to be free of patriarchal constrictions, or just to stamp women down so they don’t have to think about it at all while they grab all the benefits they think they’ve lost?
Seeing the response MRAs have had to me being gay and trans, I suspect it’s the latter.
@LBT
I wish you good luck. I know disability takes forever to get.
I had to start the whole process over because I didn’t read one of the rejection letters correctly. It just got so hard to look at them. So I missed an appeal window.
Sometimes state (in the U.S.) can take up the slack while you are waiting. But it’s more paperwork, more documents.
I got copies of all of my medical records (as suggested by a lawyer). And it seemed to help on the second time around, with the assistance of another lawyer.
They were not willing to accept any old records (that pre-date the onset of my oldest record I had allready given them) for the second try, just new ones (that date after the last of my submitted records). But I believe the lawyer got the older ones submitted.
The first time, I only included records relating to the latest issue, my hands. Instead of the problems with my legs (since at least 3 years old) and all the other stuff.
David has my email if you wanna talk disability stuff.
There’s definitely an Atlas Shrugged/Ayn Rand element to a lot of mrm thinking. Men as the noble, hardworking producers of the world, and government as the looters who steal what these poor, hardworking men produce and give it to lazy, mooching, undeserving women.
Of course sometimes they try (and fail, badly) to appropriate progressive language as well. “Did you know that 20 percent of alpha men have sex with 80 percent of women, while us poor betas get nothing? It’s just like income inequality, when you think about it! If you care about income inequality, prove it by helping me get laid!”
LBT, I have no doubt that’s what it is.
Fibi has nailed it, here. None of Farrell’s arguments make the least bit of sense if you think of women as people. It just looks silly. But as long as you only think of women as property and only men as people, then the internal logic holds up perfectly.
Once you realize that, then the whole MRM starts to make perfect sense. Also, it’s terrifying.
It’s the crux of all MRM “thought.” None of it makes sense if you think women are people.
For me it falls into the “shocking but not surprising” category – I’ve never believed this level of misogynist sees women as human, even before I’d ever heard of the MRM or seen their rantings. “Breathing fuckdolls” in Slavey’s memorable phrase, with “domestic slaves” thrown in, and that’s about it.
serrana: thank for the gifs, they sum up my reaction to Farrell perfectly!
@LBT:
That sucks. Good luck with all of it. ‘
@Thread:
Breathing fuckdolls?
Nope nope nope
Sheesh. I thought I knew what an asshole was…I was wrong.
Well… I can think of times in my life when I wasn’t initially attracted to someone who started flirting with me, but they did it in a charming and funny way that made me change my mind, and I ended up happily having sex with the person.
Obviously the above is very different from what a salesperson does, since the salesperson would more likely try to convince me to by something by bringing up arguments like “this product would totally be really useful to you” or “if you don’t take this order it might be a long time until you find as profitable a deal again”. If someone tried to come up with analogous ARGUMENTS as to why I ought to sleep with him, he would just be some kind of really creepy Nice Guy(TM) or something. But still, stretching Farrell’s weird sales-person analogy a bit, you might say that these people managed to “sell” themselves to me.
Only this has NOTHING to do with rape, and I seriously doubt any woman has every run to the police because she was pondering the events of the night before and realized that “wait a minute… I wasn’t attracted to him at the beginning of the evening… and later in that evening I wanted to have sex with him…”. Like how would that be a reason for accusing someone of rape?
Can’t decide whether those rape equivocations were the most intellectually lazy arguments I’ve ever read or the most brilliant mental gymnastics this side of Antonin Scalia. Woof.
So, wait a second – this shows another problem!!!
(hey, he wants to come up with inaccurate comparisons, I get to do it, too)
There are benefits that the unemployed get – such as unemployment insurance. And, due to the recession, there are some other places that are helping out people who haven’t been able to find a job in a long time.
BUT (world reversal begins now) – since a man being unemployed is exactly like a girl/woman being raped – WHAT ABOUT ALL THE FALSE UNEMPLOYMENT CLAIMS!!!!!
We all know that men lie all the time about being unemployed, just so they can run to their daddy government and get these benefits, and they weren’t ever unemployed at all – they’re all actually CEOs of companies, raking in millions of dollars, but they’re lazy, shiftless and want to mooch off of hard-working women. Almost all of these men claiming unemployment aren’t actually unemployed (cite a bogus study here), they’re just faking it, and as soon as one of them goes in to file a claim, all he has to do is say the words “I’m unemployed” and immediately the evil government takes a hard-working woman and forces her to give up all her free time, and spend 24/7 at her job in order to support him while he goes off to eat bon bons all day.
The horror! The horror! We must concentrate on stopping this scourge of false male unemployment claims!!
(end of sarcasm)
@Rahu *lol’