It’s a sad day for Chads: An incel “theoretician” has revealed one more feminine secret — that women don’t really like Chads much more than they like (or don’t like) ordinary schmoes.
According to Swedeguy93, posting on Incels.is,
Given the fact that women exist for the sole purpose of birthing more people, it is literally impossible for them to be as attracted to men as we are to them.
Huh. That’s certainly … a take.
Men can spread their genes via polygamy so men in general are all trash to women, even chads somewhat, as they know instinctively that there´s always a better chad.
Harsh truth, I guess.
In a feminist society in which women are allowed to survive without men, i dont think they even like chads that much. As long as a woman is at least younger and not overweight (deformed ogres dont count, theyre so few), a man will basically always find her attractive. Mens attraction to younger and thin women is 1000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000% higher than females attraction to men.
I suspect he might have to remove several dozen zeroes there to get a more accurate picture.
Women are only a little bit horny when they ovulate, and even then they arent as horny as men are all the time.
I’m not sure this guy has ever spoken to a woman.
The only reason females have many kids like 3+ is if she isnt given a choice, its either have as many as their husband wants or get kicked out and either starve/whore themselves out in a traditional society.
But wait , aren’t women all secretly fucking Chads on the side? That’s the traditional manosphere belief, in any case. Wouldn’t these women want to bring Chad’s babies into the world?
This is why the average birth rate is like 1,7 in the west & the east. Females have basically 0 attraction to men or lust to breed so they wont if given a choice not to.
If they exist only to make babies, why don’t they want to make babies? At least with Chads as the fathers. Seems like evolution slipped up big time here.
If they did like chad as much as men liked women, the birth rates would show it. The chads, the top 5% of society, would have (huge) harems and the birthrates would be high, like 4-5-6 / woman. Feminism beats chads as well.
Ok, now I’m a bit lost. I’m beginning to think this guy is not the expert on human sexuality he thinks he is.
But don’t worry! He explains more in several additional comments:
They like the idea of chad, or their genes instinctively TEMPORARILY scream for chad, until they find a better chad and the previous chad becomes trash to them, no different from the ugliest incel.
Due to polygamy, women dont think of men as a grade system 1-10. Its always 0 or 10->0 new 10->0 new 10 etc. So all 10s are eventually guaranteed 0s to them.
I wonder if it’s too late to say .
Thats why men are all trash to women in the end. Due to always in their mind/for real, switching men, they always live in the NOWNOWNOWNOWNOW. There is no future or planning for women. Thats why they arent individuals, only the birthing tool for the species. They are things.
Boy I can’t imagine why this guy has trouble getting dates.
Oh, but there’s more:
Think of ovulation.. the fact that they need a fixed point every month to push themselves to be somewhat attracted to men means they arent in general. Only then are they attracted to chads, and less so than men are attracted to women 24/7
Yeah, that’s not how ovulation works. I mean, as a cis dude I only have a vague notion of how ovulation actually works, but I know it doesn’t work like this.
One commenter takes issue — somewhat — with Swedeguy83’s thesis.
“True but cope,” writes coping_manlet.
Chad still fucks consistently, but you’re right.
If a taller, more muscular and handsome guy comes along the women are always going to flock to him. Women are just pre programmed birds flocking to breed with the next best opportunity
ye[s] they are preprogrammed to flock to chad always, but since they dont rly have attraction to even chads the way men have to women, they need incentive to breed a lot. They feel like theyve bred just after 1-2 max 3 [children].
Isn’t having fewer kids adaptive? I mean, this world is overpopulated already.
But nature doesnt work like that. Men just wanna breedbredebreedbreedbreed….breed..breed.
I feel silly having to spell out to everyone who thinks like this that a desire to fuck is not the same as a desire to “breed.”
While it’s true that men are somewhat more interested than women in having kids, that doesn’t mean they want an infinite number of them. That’s why so many people devote so much energy to preventing pregnancy.
All women feel like they´re done at 2. They dont feel the intense atraction for even chads to adore him enough to give him a legion of children.
Dude, “sexual attraction” and “wanting to bear a legion of children” are not the same thing.
Thats why i think men will always find women more attractove than women even find chads. All women are stacies to men if they are at least younger and thin & not deformed/handicapped.
I got nothing. He’s finally broken my brain with all this. But Swedeguy93 isn’t done yet. In another comment he clarified his “young and thin” point.
The only ugly women are the old, like 35+, the young fat (and ofc old fat but young/old alrdy mentioned) & the deformed.
Like most incels, this dude should never be allowed to have sex, at least not until he un-brainwashes himself from all this nonsense.
Follow me on Twitter.
Send tips to dfutrelle at gmail dot com.
We Hunted the Mammoth relies on support from you, its readers, to survive. Please donate here if you can, or at David-Futrelle-1 on Venmo.