By David Futrelle
It’s not just the incels who are utterly obsessed with the semen of other men. Nope. So are the (allegedly) voluntarily celibate guys who call themselves Men Going Their Own Way.
Despite their constant claims to no longer care for or about women, MGTOWs spend an inordinate amount of their time obsessing about all the sex they imagine these allegedly unimportant women are having with men, especially if it involves certain rather ordinary sexual activities that MGTOWs seem to have collectively decided are both super fun and deeply degenerate — like anal sex, or, perhaps even worse, blowjobs that involve the ingestion of a couple of milliliters of semen.
MGTOWs — like a lot of other misogynistic men who are deeply jealous of every man having more sex than them — have redefined the word “cuckold” to include pretty much any man who has sex with a woman who has ever had sex before. And this cuckery goes double, apparently, if the woman has ever had butt sex or swallowed.
It’s even worse if a guy actually goes and marries one of these degenerate anal and/or oral sex havers.
Take it away, irate guy in the MGTOW subreddit:
These guys — like many others in the manosphere — have thoroughly convinced themselves that any woman who has ever been with more than one man will be forever incapable of true love. Those slutty, slutty grapes are apparently very sour!
Dude, I’m pretty sure these women are more than capable of love. They’re just unable to love you. Because, seriously, who on earth could?
We Hunted the Mammoth relies entirely on readers like you for its survival. If you appreciate our work, please send a few bucks our way! Thanks!
Still waiting for these guys to start talking about their hobbies or exciting upcoming travel plans. I suppose I shouldn’t hold my breath.
It always astonishes me when the manosphere goes on about their man(ufactured)facts of how women are biological insatiable of handling multiple sex partners but it’s ok, beneficial or even necessary for men to have multiple sex partners.
Like, uh, ok. Who are you going to have sex with? The world has nearly the same number of men and women.
It’s like they believe that in the proper situation a vortex appears inside a woman’s vagina, whereby a man can magically have sex with a woman without that woman having had sex with that man.
It is medically possible to be allergic to semen. Even in that case, you should not be this concerned with who your partner has slept with before they met you. These people need a hobby. Board games. There’s a fun hobby.
I wonder if these self-cucked migtoes have any idea how many of those women had oral and/or anal sex before marriage due to precisely the same purity-obsessed far-right culture that’s making these guys so impossibly particular when it comes to those women they’re allegedly Going Their Own Way from. The phenomenon is so common, in fact, that it’s known as “God’s Loophole”.
The weirdest thing about StyleandSpeed is that he appears to be OK with women giving blowjobs as long as they don’t swallow.
And of course no mention of women receiving oral sex, as always. You’d think if any former lover could ruin a woman’s ability to “bond” with future “beta bux” partners, it would be a cunnilingus rockstar, someone who could give her what a Manospherean would never think to.
But nope, as usual, they’re obsessed with the cock in the equation.
obsessing over blowjobs to own the females
@C.S.Strowbridge:
Oh God, now I want to see MGTOW: The Board Game. “You discover that a woman you’ve met has had sex before (not with you). Pick an action card.” “You see a woman dressed in a way you disapprove of. Pick an action card.” Then the action cards: “It occurs to you that it’s none of your business. Go forward one square.” “Go onto the Internet and rant. Roll dice to discover how poorly spelled your rant is, and go back that number of squares.” The goal is to make it to the central Safe Space of Manly Solitude, but you can only advance one square at a time, while acting the way MGTOWs generally do forces you to go backwards, usually several squares at a time. And woe betide you if you land on one of the Cootie Squares.
@Bina: Obligatory “God’s Loophole” link (NSFW):
And were these guys saving their first time for marriage? Somehow I doubt it. They’re certainly not cynical, bitter and unable to form normal emotional bonds, no siree.
Manosphereans vastly overestimating, as usual, how many partners the average woman under 25 has had.
MGTOWers always like to claim that women A.) sleep around like mad, then B.) marry after she is far past the MGTOWers’ opinion of the correct age to marry, C.) cheat on hubby, then divorce him frivolously, taking his property, and then D.) somehow *RE-marry*, despite being the things that drive men away (i.e., old, used up, bitter, divorced, and so on).
I don’t get it. Men remarry at a higher rate than women do. And men are always telling women online that once they’re “dumped” no one will want them (yet they also complain that it’s always the wives doing the dumping). So they just complain out of both sides off their mouth. “No man will ever have you after you’ve slept around/gotten divorced!!!” … “All women go through husbands just taking more and more in each subsequent divorce!!!!!!!!” This is what they call “hypergamy”, despite the meaning of hyper-gamy being to dump your ‘older’ wife for a younger, newer one, and not marrying a succession of men who just get better and wealthier despite your supposedly getting older and older.
**{Please pardon the poor sentence structure, etc., above. I just had a series of small calamities in life and haven’t slept in about 36 hours. I feel like I’m wired on coffee, despite not having laid (lain???) down for a day and a half nor having had any coffee.}
@ Jane Done
It’s a part of these folks’ world view that not everyone can have it good. Some people can have everything they need at the cost of others, and the rest are here to serve them and suffer. In their ideal world order every man of the peer group they identify with (STEMlords, conservatives, white guys, and/or middle class guys) will have a virginal high status wife and sleep with low status women on the side. This leaves everyone except their own group unsatisfied (according to their own beliefs, except maybe their wives if they’re sincere in their belief that women are happy when forced into a subservient, limited, domestic role) but that’s ok since their group are the natural winners.
I love how these guys are always so Very Smart™ that they are compelled to use words they don’t understand. “Verbiage” doesn’t mean what you think it means, UAV_Pilot! Moreover, from the context of your reply, you appear to think that it’s a compliment. It is not; at least, it is not among non-MGTOWs. Judging from the occasional MGTOW troll that turns up around here, I’m not sure how it works among that lot . Shakespeare might have said that brevity was the soul of wit but he’s probably just another cuck to them (and they probably don’t understand any of his actual cuck jokes either ?)
The choice of 5 as a benchmark for a possible number of sexual partners a woman might have had in both these MGTOW guys is an odd one because I honestly don’t know if that’s supposed to mean lots or not very many. What happened to the weird manosphere hyperbole of “riding the cock carousel” of hundreds of guys?
In the real (non-MGTOW) world, fewer than five sexual partners across a whole lifetime or more than five across the space of a few months can both be well within the confines of what most people would consider an entirely normal, unremarkable, healthy sex life. (Like, I guess if you were with five different guys in a week or something then that would be kind of unusual, but not particularly otherwise). So I’m genuinely struggling with whether in weird MGTOW logic five sexual partners means “less of a whore than most of those THOTs, right?” or “typical slut who’s been with multiple guys”?
@ C.S. Strowbridge/Rabid Rabbit
Great board game idea. Think it could take off in time for Hogswatch next year ? Bit late for 2018 unfortunately.
An MRA version too ?
But I’d steer clear of (shudders) incels.
That’s solid life advice for everyone, including incels.
…this is basically Dante’s temper tantrum about his girlfriend in Clerks, isn’t it?
… all the action cards in the incel version say “You didn’t get your end wet, go back 10 spaces”
And speaking of issues the MRAs don’t get around to acting on, here’s a CNN piece on divorced dads!!
By her own cheerful admission, my wife has bonded with a lot more than five men in her time, and we’ve been married for the better part of two decades.
And there was I thinking that the valuable experience that she gained in her twenties made her much more certain about what kind of long-term partner she was looking for, but I now realise that she’s nothing but a whore. And I’m a textbook cuck.
I’ll break the news gently when she gets home from work.
(I imagine they disapprove of that last bit as well.)
I’ve missed out in life, no Cock Carousel for me☹️. Though it’s never too late to start, I guess. Whenever I read that phrase, I picture a merry-go-round with giant wooden roosters in place of horses. I think the roosters could be way cooler looking than horses.
@ dormousing-it
Here you go…
@ Dormousing; Alan:
cuck carousel
http://www.quigleycartoon.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/02/round.jpg
@Alan
That’s one gorgeous … rooster.
@Kevin
Oh, I don’t know, an incels board game might have some laugh value. But I was thinking an old-school text-only adventure game might be even better. “Incel Quest”! Guide plucky adventurer Tantal Kilt through interminable verb/noun textual action in search of the mystical Unbecomer artifact whose invocation will mean your tortured existence never was to begin with! Paradoxical fun for the whole family!
@Alan Robertshaw: it’s a very imperious-looking cock, to be sure. It’s like it’s giving me a look rust says, “you must be this awesome to ride the cock carousel”! ?