
The We Hunted the Mammoth Pledge Drive is on! If you haven’t already, please consider donating through the PayPal button below. Thanks!
Another weird scene inside the poop mine. By which I mean the Red Pill subreddit:
![MakeEmSayAyy 3 points 2 days ago The fucked up part is that it's women who vote for policies and immigration to let savages come in and destroy the country, the same women who get to become warbrides and survive happily. So they give the country away and someone else suffers for their stupidity. It's fucked. permalinkembedsaveparentreportgive gold [–]Lucifer_The_Unclean 0 points 2 days ago Yeah, they literally have nothing to lose if all white men die. We'll just be replaced by colored men.](https://i0.wp.com/www.wehuntedthemammoth.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/03/savages2.png?resize=488%2C326&ssl=1)
I can only assume that both of these lovely people are Trump supporters.
H/T — r/BestOfOutrageCulture



Because it’s every little girl’s fondest dream to become a “warbride.” Hence, the popularity of “Warbride Barbie” ™ and “Warbride Skipper” ™.
Because I am a new to commenting here, I’ll just make sure I denote this as /s.
http://i.imgur.com/2kHk4Ou.jpg
– What do you want to be when you grow up? And don’t say “warbride”!
– WARBR… oh.
Wow. Seems they bought JBs (#) WhyWomenShouldNotVote – shtick, hook, line and sinker.
I find it interesting tho, that they actually claim no difference between “white men” (i.e. themselves) and the “savages” they fear so much OTHER than the color of the skin.
Could it be actual REALIZATION that, to women at least, mra/redpill men and radical islamists are pretty much the same? That if you’re being subjugated by misogynist fascists, it doesn’t really matter what color of skin they have?
I’ve seen similar sentiments posted to BoOC, here’s a particularly notorious video. On the youtubes, don’t watch more than a few minutes at the risk of dangerous stupidity exposure (may cause reddening of the skin).
There’s this entire throughline about how women are a volatile element of society that will gladly accept domination by other men so long as they are the strongest. It’s a sort of combination of the fascistic inferiority complex/xenophobia with an extreme patriarchical view of women. The conclusion is that women destroy civilization, of course, and so it is up to righteous white men to keep them in line or else face utter destruction. Ugh.
Aww, poor troglodytes. And I know this is cliche but, it’s #NotAllWhiteMen. Just the ideologically backward racists.
Is there an implication here that men would suffer without white women? Intriguingly awful possibility.
Edit: I mean it’s yet another horrifying thing to unpack.
They not only don’t see women as individuals with intrinsic value. They can’t even see themselves that way. No wonder they cling to delusions of superiority so tightly. They don’t think there is anything worthwhile about themselves and they are probably right.
– Dark Statistic
Well. In a way. From what I’ve seen, these racist types fear that without white women, there will be no more white men.
I don’t know if it’s racial purity paranoia, or has something to do with women supposedly carrying more genetic material than men (i’m not good at genetics, but if this is true, it means the bulk of “superior white genes” are actually locked inside white women, not white men).
It’s probably a mix of the two.
in general, most of us white women have families of origin that contains at least one white man. they really do think we’re heartless, don’t they?
White people go all over the world dropping bombs and setting up puppet governments to exploit the local populace.
But these dudes are sure some refugees are going to be a danger to them.
Just…wut? Project much?
I’m sorry but when I hear warbride. I think of a warrior bride who seeks vengeance upon those who hurt those closet to her. Resplendent in the tattered remains of her wedding dress. Covered over by various scraps of armour. Holding a broadsword, in a mad max type setting….. Please someone make a movie of this!!!
What’s a warbride? I’m scared to google.
@ EJ
A woman who marries foreign military personnel stationed in the woman’s country.
ETA: During a war if that wasn’t implicit.
They’re so amazingly hostile to people who want nothing more than to not be bombed and murdered by people who are supposed to be their government. They act like that’s somehow a weird request. As if if they were syrian they wouldn’t look at Germany and go, ‘you know I think I’d rather be in Berlin right now’ as another shell flyies over their head. They’re not invading. Invaders don’t bring their children or grandmothers with them. Invaders aren’t 17 year old kids. Warbride should just mean the wives coming with their war husbands to try and eacape the war. Surviving war doesn’t mean you bring it with you.
“I couldn’t think of another word.”
Exactly, mechazawa. I’d sure miss my white-man husband if he was replaced by a stranger of any color.
ETA: Though I suppose the average RedPiller thinks (if that’s the word) I wouldn’t mind so much as long as my standard of living remains the same. As if finances are the only thing that matter in a marriage. Hint: They aren’t. And when I said, “For richer or for poorer,” I meant it.
If all white men were like these, then yeah, we’d have nothing to lose but our morons.
Fortunately, #NotAllWhiteMen
It’s interesting to compare MRA/red pill rhetoric now to what it was 5 years ago. Back then, they were insisting they weren’t racist. Now being a racist is pretty much a manosphere requirement. Have they changed and become more racist and fascist over the years? Or were they just hiding it back then because they were trying to appeal to moderate men and when they failed, decided to just be honest since it was only their echo chamber that agrees western women are universally awful?
I’ve been looking at the posts from when this blog first started and it’s radically different in a lot of ways, the same in many others. It’s interesting.
@ Bina
Ain’t that the truth. The RedPillers have been telling themselves over and over again that “women can’t love,” because it’s more palatable than admitting, “The women I want as sex partners don’t love me.”
@Alan:
I mean, what is it a racist euphemism for in this context?
@ WwTH
Maybe they’ve changed to become more racist because their earlier set of excuses kept getting thwapped by reality? Of course, if we can’t tell if they’re pretending to be racists or actually being racists, then at the end of the day, they’re being racist.
I also get a distinct smell in my nostrils every time I hear one of them whining to that effect. It’s a smell remarkably like that of a dusty old film projector.
They see women as objects and breeding stock, and they just assume we see them the same way. Because they literally can’t conceive of any other way of looking at, well, PEOPLE.
@WWTH, maybe both? I mean, the tide has shifted, certainly, and it’s becoming more acceptable to be a racist again (ugh). So maybe they’re just letting out the things they’ve always bottled up. But at the same time, hate infects things, and bigotry on one axis is a good indicator for bigotry on others. I bet both things are true.
@ EJ
Gawd knows.
ETA:
My guess would be that they either meant war widow (ie, when all the white men are killed fighting off the ‘invaders’) or that women will marry said invaders (like some women in occupied countries did in WW2)