Categories
disgusting women drama kings evil women grandiosity hate heartiste men who should not ever be with women ever misogyny playing the victim PUA whores

Pompous Misogyny on Parade, Part Eleventy Million Billion

But of course! She's a she.
But of course! She’s a she.

Most misogynists, it would seem, are loath to admit that they’re misogynists. “How can you say I hate women?” they’ll ask. “After all, I love my sister. She’s not like the rest of those whores.” Or, “I just hate Western Women.” Or whatever fine distinction they like to make to pretend that their hatred of pretty much every woman they ever come across, or imagine in their overheated little brains, is something other than misogyny.

Then there are those who not only admit their misogyny but who are downright proud of it, thinking it’s a sign of their own personal superiority. Today, a pretty good example of Proud Misogyny, taken from the reactionary Christian blog Samson’s Jawbone.

Our intrepid woman-hater starts off by contrasting his brand of misogyny to the peculiar kind of woman-appreciation advocated by the PUA gasbag now known as Heartiste (but still known as Roissy when this post was written):

Roissy is fond of saying that he’s not a “misogynist”; no, learning the unvarnished truth about female psychology has given him a *higher* appreciation for women. Not so for me. Sociosexual philosophy has disillusioned me beyond all reckoning. Peering deep into the psyche of woman has rendered me grievously scornful in feeling and mercilessly unscrupulous in behaviour towards these unholy, ungodly beings. I venture to say that… I hate them. Yes, I hate them! And how could I not?

Did I mention that he has literary pretensions as well? Like a lot of reactionaries, Mr. Jawbone has adopted a melodramatic, vaguely archaic prose style that he evidently feels is the height of literary sophistication, but which sounds a lot more like the monologuing of some cartoon villain.

Oh, the vile criteria by which women judge menfolk! O, abominable, loathsome beings!

Is anyone else reminded of Newman from Seinfeld?

But Mr. Jawbone is just getting started:

A creature so damnably constituted as to admire a man for his “social dominance” – by which is meant his ability to waltz through an absurd series of meaningless, contrived riddles – rather than his work ethic, his self-sacrifice, his affability, his charity, his honesty, his justice – in short, his righteousness and integrity; such a creature deserves to be used and abused like a cheap street harlot – or better yet, a vermin-ridden ass – and discarded appropriately. Nothing more; she merits nothing better.

Here’s an actual vermin-ridden ass, having a nice scratch in the dirt:

donkey-lying-down-1-655x373

Oh, but Mr. Jawbone isn’t done yet:

Words like “honour”, “duty”, “kindness”… those things that define goodness and rightness… all meaningless, meaningless to this wretched, wicked half of the human race. And do women who profess belief in something “higher”; women who should know better, afford any solace? No. Instead they show themselves as fraudulent, fickle hellcats who think good men are “weak”. So alas, I can no longer view the distaff horde with anything besides revulsion and contempt. They perjure themselves by their own words; they are beasts, deserving nothing but callous treatment and damnation; and I can wish nothing upon them but furious hatred, ignominy and a miserable passing.

What a cheery fellow!

I take no joy in penning the above – but I feel clean and spotless as the lamb. What else is to be said for a lot that believes black to be white, up to be down, and good men to be worthless? Poor Ashley Wilkes, and all good men.

Hate to break it to you, dude, but you’re not actually a good man. You’re a pompous dickbag. Oh, sorry, you’re a base, proud, shallow, beggarly, three-suited, hundred-pound, filthy, worsted-stocking knave!

(Thanks to Shakespeare for that last insult, and to Quackers for pointing me to Mr. Jawbone’s post.)

754 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
CassandraSays
CassandraSays
13 years ago

Wouldn’t a conversation between Socky and Tom Martin be hilarious?

Perfectus Raymond
Perfectus Raymond
13 years ago

Fade:

But by your logic, it would be the most virtuous. No sex outside marriage!

I regard marriage as worthless.

Please tell me by which standards these are sinful. I would like to know the source of your bullshit.

It’s sinful because it’s bad to have contact with material things or engage in behaviour that is connected with the telos of the material world.

CassandraSays:

As usual his source is http://www.google.com.

This is a hostile place, where you have absolutely no respect for for other peoples faith.

Marie
Marie
13 years ago

So, um, Pompous Raymond, what do you have against sex so much? I mean, can you explain it, or is it just a DO NOT WANT thing? Cuz you can hate it while other people like it. Different opinions are allowed to exist, you know.

hellkell
hellkell
13 years ago

Pompous RayRay: we’re here to mock misogyny, not have yet another discussion about religion. We don’t care about your faith, we care about your shitty views towards women.

hellkell
hellkell
13 years ago

Is this that Samuel freak?

cloudiah
13 years ago

Um, did you see the tag line? [points up] This is a place of mockery.

Do not be surprised when we mock you.

Fade
13 years ago

I regard marriage as worthless.

… So… sex is evil according to you?

It’s sinful because it’s bad to have contact with material things or engage in behaviour that is connected with the telos of the material world.

You know, I’m fine with you following whatever moral code you want. But don’t try to enforce that on everyone else.

And no, taxes are not enforcing it on you. If you only paid taxes for things you wanted, I’m betting a lot of people in the US would opt out (ie, people who don’t want to pay taxes to finance the military if their anti-war, not wanting any to finance police if they don’t like the police…) You can’t just pick and choose.

cloudiah
13 years ago

How does a person live their daily life, NOT having contact with material things? Is he naked, hovering 6 inches above the ground, surrounded by a force field to keep other objects away? Is he an air plant?!!??!

hellkell
hellkell
13 years ago

I’m starting to wonder what his thoughts on carpooling are.

Perfectus Raymond
Perfectus Raymond
13 years ago

Marie:

So, um, Pompous Raymond, what do you have against sex so much? I mean, can you explain it, or is it just a DO NOT WANT thing? Cuz you can hate it while other people like it. Different opinions are allowed to exist, you know.

It is difficult to explain in a few sentences, there are profound reasons, the main point has something to do with the material world.

hellkell:

Pompous RayRay: we’re here to mock misogyny, not have yet another discussion about religion. We don’t care about your faith, we care about your shitty views towards women.

I am n o t a misogynist. I have no shitty views towards women. Also, why do you think misogyny exists? Doesn’t have religion something to do with that? The Roman Catholic Church discriminates women to the present day o p e n l y and without shame.

clairedammit
clairedammit
13 years ago

I have some chicken enchiladas on my counter that I will come in material contact with in about two hours. SINNER SINNER CHICKEN DINNER!

(Morning star farms chick’n, pepper jack cheese, cannellini beans and an adaptation of this recipe.)

hellkell
hellkell
13 years ago

Misogyny is older than religion, dipshit.

hellkell
hellkell
13 years ago

claire, I’ll be right down!

Marie
Marie
13 years ago

Also, why do you think misogyny exists?

Track record. (I know I’m not hellkell…sorry hellkell, I just couldn’t resist)

Also, didn’t we just have a religion and misogyny discussion on another thread? Go to that one, ray ray, it doesn’t need to dominate all our threads.

Also, Raymond, why do you hate the material world then?

Also, also, if you don’t want to seem like a misogynist, you wouldn’t have started with ‘sinful womenz needing birth control for their evil sinful ways!!!!!!eleven’

Just pointing that out.

Marie
Marie
13 years ago

I have some chicken enchiladas on my counter that I will come in material contact with in about two hours. SINNER SINNER CHICKEN DINNER!

OM NOM NOM SO JELLY!!~!!!!! *drools*

Briznecko
Briznecko
13 years ago

Hi Marie! I’m a long-time daily lurker who is usually a few days behind on threads, and I (unluckily?) caught Perfectus Sir Uptightmond.

Perfectus Sir Uptightmond: You can have your faith over there in the corner, it’s already got judgy stains anyways.

clairedammit
clairedammit
13 years ago

It makes a ton, hellkell, you’re welcome to some. We can make frozen margaritas, too.

Fade
13 years ago

It is difficult to explain in a few sentences, there are profound reasons, the main point has something to do with the material world.

So why are you commenting on this blog? You must be using a computer or cellphone, and those have to do with the material world.

Briznecko
Briznecko
13 years ago

Except masterbation! It’s part of the material world, but that’s ok…for some reason.

Marie
Marie
13 years ago

@Briznecko

Almost makes one* wonder if he’s been making this up as he goes along… 😉

*me, at least XD

CassandraSays
CassandraSays
13 years ago

Why are people mocking me on this mockery blog? It’s all so unfair.

(Time to meltdown – less than an hour, I’m guessing.)

katz
13 years ago

Luckily cars and roads have no contact with the material world.

Briznecko
Briznecko
13 years ago

Random nerdy comment! But the picture is from the 1956 film The Violent Years which features a teenage gang of women who rob gas stations, rape men on the roadside, and trash as school.

Briznecko
Briznecko
13 years ago

HUZZAH! It worked!

Fade
13 years ago

What if they’re hover cars?

1 15 16 17 18 19 31