
Most misogynists, it would seem, are loath to admit that they’re misogynists. “How can you say I hate women?” they’ll ask. “After all, I love my sister. She’s not like the rest of those whores.” Or, “I just hate Western Women.” Or whatever fine distinction they like to make to pretend that their hatred of pretty much every woman they ever come across, or imagine in their overheated little brains, is something other than misogyny.
Then there are those who not only admit their misogyny but who are downright proud of it, thinking it’s a sign of their own personal superiority. Today, a pretty good example of Proud Misogyny, taken from the reactionary Christian blog Samson’s Jawbone.
Our intrepid woman-hater starts off by contrasting his brand of misogyny to the peculiar kind of woman-appreciation advocated by the PUA gasbag now known as Heartiste (but still known as Roissy when this post was written):
Roissy is fond of saying that he’s not a “misogynist”; no, learning the unvarnished truth about female psychology has given him a *higher* appreciation for women. Not so for me. Sociosexual philosophy has disillusioned me beyond all reckoning. Peering deep into the psyche of woman has rendered me grievously scornful in feeling and mercilessly unscrupulous in behaviour towards these unholy, ungodly beings. I venture to say that… I hate them. Yes, I hate them! And how could I not?
Did I mention that he has literary pretensions as well? Like a lot of reactionaries, Mr. Jawbone has adopted a melodramatic, vaguely archaic prose style that he evidently feels is the height of literary sophistication, but which sounds a lot more like the monologuing of some cartoon villain.
Oh, the vile criteria by which women judge menfolk! O, abominable, loathsome beings!
Is anyone else reminded of Newman from Seinfeld?
But Mr. Jawbone is just getting started:
A creature so damnably constituted as to admire a man for his “social dominance” – by which is meant his ability to waltz through an absurd series of meaningless, contrived riddles – rather than his work ethic, his self-sacrifice, his affability, his charity, his honesty, his justice – in short, his righteousness and integrity; such a creature deserves to be used and abused like a cheap street harlot – or better yet, a vermin-ridden ass – and discarded appropriately. Nothing more; she merits nothing better.
Here’s an actual vermin-ridden ass, having a nice scratch in the dirt:
Oh, but Mr. Jawbone isn’t done yet:
Words like “honour”, “duty”, “kindness”… those things that define goodness and rightness… all meaningless, meaningless to this wretched, wicked half of the human race. And do women who profess belief in something “higher”; women who should know better, afford any solace? No. Instead they show themselves as fraudulent, fickle hellcats who think good men are “weak”. So alas, I can no longer view the distaff horde with anything besides revulsion and contempt. They perjure themselves by their own words; they are beasts, deserving nothing but callous treatment and damnation; and I can wish nothing upon them but furious hatred, ignominy and a miserable passing.
What a cheery fellow!
I take no joy in penning the above – but I feel clean and spotless as the lamb. What else is to be said for a lot that believes black to be white, up to be down, and good men to be worthless? Poor Ashley Wilkes, and all good men.
Hate to break it to you, dude, but you’re not actually a good man. You’re a pompous dickbag. Oh, sorry, you’re a base, proud, shallow, beggarly, three-suited, hundred-pound, filthy, worsted-stocking knave!
(Thanks to Shakespeare for that last insult, and to Quackers for pointing me to Mr. Jawbone’s post.)



Mickey: There’s rampant dishonesty in the feminist movement, as well. For example, feminists trumpet their online abuse for all to see. However Paul Elam receives just as m,uch, but doesn’t exploit it.
Do the lurkers support you in email too?
Even if you believe what trolly is saying that’s not dishonesty, unless he’s assuming that all feminists have access to Elam’s inbox and thus can monitor what kind of email he receives.
Historophilia:
yes, you are indeed lucky but you suffer also from entitlement mentality that you think it’s normal to have other people (the UK taxpayer) subsidizing your lifestyle choices.
Aww! A Bootstraps drive-by. How cute.
/delurking long-time lurker. Hi all!
Because you’re either a woman who has sex or you’re a taxpayer. You can’t be both. It’s physics!
Hi Briznecko.
Hi Briznecko. Argenti, are you around with the welcome packages?
So are you just exempt from paying taxes if you have the pill? Or
Briznecko, kindly accept this hard chair, this scented candle, these colored towels, this bottle of flavored water, and this kitten.
Hiya Briznecko :). I’m a newbie myself.
There’s a redistribution of wealth by the NHS system. If you earn more than a certain amount, it would be cheaper for you to just buy the pill yourself instead of paying higher taxes and getting the pill paid by the NHS. Of course you may just not need the pill but you will still pay with your taxes for other peoples choice to have sex.
I’m actually in favor of wealth redistribution, but then I’m a socialist. Leaving that aside, I’m also in favor of (relatively cheaply) making it possible for people to prevent (quite expensive, unwanted) pregnancies.
Yeah, total fail troll.
If we accept health care as a right, and consequently have a National Health Service…
Then the contraception is cheaper than paying for childbirth.
So…. whose lifestyle is being subsidized, again?
I am totally happy for my taxes to fund other people’s birth control. In fact, I can think of many reasons why that might be a good investment for a society to make.
If you want a society that punishes people for having sex, sorry, Britain may not be the place for you.
To be clear, that’s math fail.
Then there’s the ‘lifestyle’ he’s talking about subsidizing, which is sleeping around. Who’s the majority of people on birth-control/procurers of abortions?
That would be people who already have children, actually. (family planning: also for people who have plenty of family already, thank you)
So he fails on the ‘lifestyle’ bit, because this is NOT all about the slutty sluts who slut, this is about practically everybody. Even folks who aren’t having sex occasionally have medical needs that contraceptives come in handy for.
Double troll fail!
To be sexually active is a choice. It may be true that the increase in unwanted pregnancies will be more expensive for the NHS than paying for contraception (I doubt it), but as a matter of principle I hate it if people hold me hostage like “if you don’t subsidize my behavior, I will recklessly continue anyway and then it will become even more expensive”.
Damn all those old married couples and their evil, evil choices! Damn all those mothers and fathers with one and a half kids! Damn them and their reckless continuing!!!
Do you listen to yourself?
There’s a redistribution of wealth by the
NHStax system.Your problem is with taxes. This site is not about taxes. Take it somewhere where they care.
PS: driving costs more money to the system than people having sex.
Damn you, driver’s of cars, and your holding everybody hostage with “if you don’t subsidize my behavior, I will recklessly continue anyway and then it will become even more expensive!”
….
OMG, people are having the sex! We must figure out a way to make this stop!
Aw, but Claire! He worked so hard to try to come up with a valid reason to scream about slutty sluts who slut. You see, it’s not misogyny, just a theory of government! Just because it looks exactly the same as hating women, cloaked in a paper-thin tissue of bad rationalizing, why would you call him a vile woman-hater?
(PS: there may be amounts of sarcasm in this post)
I’d love to see what would happen if MRAs succeeded in getting the pill removed from what’s covered by the NHS and a bunch of women decided that sex had become a luxury that they could no longer afford. Their husbands and boyfriends would be so happy with the great activist triumph achieved on their behalf. Thanks again for fighting to make men’s lives better, MRAs!
Gotta go. Having fun batting the troll around.
Thanks everyone! I’ve always wanted SCENTED FUCKING CANDLES! Also, katz, that kitty is SQUEE-tastic!
Perfectus Sir Uptightmond: That’s nice. Please don’t get your judgyness all over the carpet.
Howard, in your opinion, should we ban automobiles altogether or simply deny treatment to anyone who gets in an auto accident? I myself favor the former, since it would save on road maintenance as well as medical costs.
Why can’t they just stop having sex if they can’t afford it? Or if they just can’t help it engage in the multitude of sexual practices where there’s no risk of conception? I find it outrageous that I have to pay for such sinful behaviour.
Yes, contraception has uses for certain medical conditions, but that’s something completely different.
Roads are a part of the infrastructure, that’s not comparable also they’re partially paid by the fuel tax, so those who use it more pay more.
Maybe ban women from driving automobiles? After all, those slutty ladies shouldn’t be able to travel from one cock to another with ease. But barring men from automobiles and basic healthcare? MISANDRY!