
Norwegian Men’s Rights Activist blogger Eivind Berge, known for his violent rhetoric and rape apologia, has been arrested for death threats against police.
Not too surprising, given that he once announced on his blog that “[k]illing at least one cop is on my bucket list.”
Here are some Google-translated details from a news account here:
The right-wing extremist and anti-feminist blogger Eivind Berge has been arrested for having encouraged and glorified the killing of policemen. The police have found both ammunition and textbooks in use of explosives at Berge.
The police regard the threats as an invitation to others to kill police officers, but also feared that he would commit the acts themselves shortly.
He was evidently arrested on Wednesday. According to this story — at least as far as I can tell from the obviously crude Google translation — he made a specific threat to kill a police officer this Saturday:
Berge also writes about how he was planning to attack a policeman with a knife on a Saturday evening:
“Then I used the trial to come forward as a good example for men, and I considered it to be worth 21 years in prison for premeditated murder.”
According to this account, Berge is being held for two weeks. He claims innocence.
Berge, as readers of this blog may well already know, is a fan of right-wing terrorist and mass murderer Anders Brevik. On his blog, he’s also argued (among other things) that “Rape is Equality.”
He’s glorified the murder of police on his blog numerous times.
Some examples, taken from the second news account:
“… attack on the police is something 100% in harmony with everything I stand for.”
“I maintain that police murder is both ethically and tactically correct.”
Some other examples, direct from his blog (each paragraph is from a separate post; click on the quote for the source):
I viscerally despise cops and wish them the worst. Killing at least one cop is on my bucket list.
If ever a victim of psychiatry, here is what I would do. I would first attempt to kill the cops or whoever tried to apprehend me. Failing that, I would feign docility in order to get out as soon as possible and then kill a representative of the industry as revenge. … killing cops is also very much a men’s issue. Every pig killed is also a blow against feminism, so men should be doubly elated whenever an officer goes down in the line of encroaching on our cognitive liberty.
This was his reaction to a news story about a police officer being killed:
Good news for men is rare in this hateful feminist utopia that is Norway, but today is a joyous day! Today I feel schadenfreude in my heart along with all the hate that feminism and resultant mate deprivation have instilled in me. One blue thug less on the streets.
From another post on the same subject:
The swine Olav Kildal died while trying to enforce our lack of cognitive liberty. This was a defensive, much deserved killing that cheered me up.
Here he threatens a female prosecutor:
To feminist prosecutor Anne Cathrine Aga I have the following message: The Men’s Movement is watching you, bitch, and we are seething with hatred against you personally and the police state you represent. Actions have consequences. Trials are still (mostly) public and they sink into our collective minds, where they form the basis of future activism. Hate breeds hate — that is a fact of life too smugly ignored by feminists. …
2011 is the year Norwegian men as a group emerged out of the blogosphere and into the battlefield. This in turn has led to a breakthrough for MRAs such as my good self in the public discourse, probably for the simple reason that the powers that be now realize ignoring us has deadly consequences. Men are angry now, and we have proven that we are deathly serious about resisting feminism. So the feminist prosecutors referred to above ought to wipe that smug look off their faces before it is too late. Clearly seventy-seven body bags wasn’t enough, but I am fairly confident that you will be sorry one day.
Aside from the explicit threats of violence, the violent and threatening rhetoric here is not unlike much of the rhetoric we see regularly on A Voice for Men and other MRA sites. AVFM founder Paul Elam, for example, told one feminist that:
I find you so pernicious and repugnant that the idea of fucking your shit up gives me an erection. … We are coming for you.
The blogger Emma the Emo, Berge’s girlfriend, has posted comments here in the past defending him. The news account quotes someone identified as Nataliya Kochergova, described as his girlfriend; I assume this is “Emma,” because what she told the media is similar to what she posted here. She of course denies that he planned any real violence. According to the article, she said:
There are not really threats. He has never had plans to kill someone, he has said several times in his blog. When for example, he says that “the police killings are an effective way to prevent stupid laws,” it’s a factual description and not a threat. Even those who love the police agree with it.
Berge, for his part, has stated publicly that if he had not met Emma, he probably would have killed by now:
At the time I wrote my last blog post, I believed I would probably become Norway’s first modern violent activist in peacetime. Celibacy enforced by a feminist regime had driven me to the point where I saw no other option. I would target the pigs who enforce feminist law, knowing I could realistically at least kill one of them before I would be captured or killed myself. Thus revenge would be assured and if I lived, my reputation as a violent criminal would make me attractive to some women. But then in the nick of time this blog attracted a lovely girl commenting as “Emma.”
This is why I take violent rhetoric from MRAs very seriously.
Meanwhile, on this side of the Atlantic, MRAs glorify MRA “martyr” Thomas Ball, who killed himself on the steps of a New Hampshire courthouse last year in hopes that his death would inspire MRAs to literally burn down courthouses and police stations.
Ball’s manifesto is still up on A Voice for Men in its “activism” section, including these passages:
So boys, we need to start burning down police stations and courthouses. … This is too important to be using that touchy- feeling coaching that is so popular with business these days. You need to flatten them, like Wile E. Coyote. They need to be taught never to replace the rule of law. BURN-THEM-OUT!
Most of the police stations built in New England over the last 20 years are stone or brick. Fortunately, the roofs are still wood. The advantage of fire on the roof is that it is above the sprinklers
AVFM tastefully omitted Ball’s specific instructions on how to make Molotov cocktails, but left this in:
There will be some casualties in this war. Some killed, some wounded, some captured. Some of them will be theirs. Some of the casualties will be ours.
For many more examples of violent threatening rhetoric from MRAs, I urge you to go through some of my posts here and here.


@Tom
“…a lot of housewhores and princess wannabes could do with a little economic activity-inducing work ethic therapy themselves.”
Tell us what you think about stay at home wives and mothers, again, Tom.
@katz Which wall? Because I want to do some wall punching myself, but don’t want to damage the structural foundation of any specific buildings.
Meanwhile, here is a little brain bleach:
Oh, and Steele? Tom Martin is your ally. No mainstream MRM web site denounces him. Consider your company.
Just to recap,
A complaint about the hard chairs was not actually part of my lawsuit against the LSE, as it had already been satisfactorily rectified before I joined the university.
The reason I mentioned it in court, was to demonstrate that prior to joining the university, whilst visiting its library and filing this complaint, I had reason then, to view the university’s equality regulations, in relation to filing a complaint about the chairs, and that this episode (with written correspondence) acts as proof that I did have reason to view the equality guidelines before entering the contract, and that these regulations had induced me into entering the contract on the understanding that sex-discriminatory learning materials and environment and teaching practice would not be allowed.
It was misrepresented by the Times, who conflated the chair complaint with the lawsuit in a grammatically vague way in order to make it look like I was being incoherent or spurious, and subsequently the West End Extra followed suit, and then manboobz ran with it as his main opportunity to pour scorn on the rock solid facts of my case, that gender studies is sexist.
I did explain this in an email to Cuntrelle, but he chose to edit that portion of my email out when telling you people about the email.
Do not blame yourselves for this misunderstanding. Your leader is a douche.
And scumbags like Tom Martin are in no way rare, or unique. i come across these asshats ALL THE FUCKING TIME. Just scroll through the comments section of The Spearhead and the assholery is strong. The MRM is a violent, misogynistic, hate group. PERIOD. They regularly ponder stripping women of their vote, forcing them back into “subordinate” roles, legalizing rape, and segregating men and women. If Chippy Chapan want to rationalize Berge and others as “random, fringe elements,” they are lying, possibly even to themselves.
You, Tom Martin, blame children when they are raped by adults. You are the face of the Men’s Rights Movement.
Well , here is the MRM in all its horrifying glory:
“And incidentally, men who pay money to have sex with child prostitutes should not be criminalized – but taken out of circulation and treated compassionately for their condition. I’ve heard that most criminal activity peaks with testosterone levels, in the late teens, but paedophillia is the only crime that increases in frequency as these men get older, indicating a growing pathology for them rather than just a typical immature criminal act.
A lot of crime may be down to low serotonin levels and problems with unresponsive prefrontal cortexes etc, so I suppose there’s a medical excuse for most things. Deciding to be a hooker may be one of those choices down to mental medical conditions too. If licensed hookers pay for a massive license fee and heavy taxes, then some of that money can be ring-fenced to research how best to get women (and girls) to renounce prostitution in all its forms, because let’s face it, a lot of housewhores and princess wannabes could do with a little economic activity-inducing work ethic therapy themselves.”
Yes, he fits right in with NWO, Meller, AVFM, the Spearhead and all the other assorted MRAs.
“I did explain this in an email to Cuntrelle, but he chose to edit that portion of my email out when telling you people about the email.”
Fuck you, Tom. You’re the douche. And you’re on his site. He is generously allowing you to spill your venom here, and you insult him? Fuck you fuck you piece of shit.
And we really don’t give a fuck about your chair lawsuit. That is the LEAST DISGUSTING AND ABHORRENT thing about you.
Yeah, must have been a hard day at work for those journalists.
Tom Martin is a hemorrhoid on the asshole of humanity.
It doesn’t matter if the chairs were part of your lawsuit or not, your complaint about them being “misandry” still reveals you to be a whiny fucking idiot.
And considering that you’ve just now proven yourself unworthy of licking dog shit off my boots, I’m far less inclined to care about your poor tender ass than I already was.
Don’t insult hemorrhoids like that 😀
Dammit, he was funny when he was just talking about chairs.
Fembot,
You said: [MRAs] regularly ponder stripping women of their vote, forcing them back into “subordinate” roles, legalizing rape, and segregating men and women
I’m dead against all of these things. You’re willfully mixing up sex and rape (because you’re a victim-feminist wanker).
It’s this kind of blatant lack of sincere discourse though, among the whore-placating feminist drones, which makes this latest story about a gender studies course downsizing somewhat inevitable:
http://www.utdmercury.com/news/campus_news/article_9e18ec90-cb9f-11e1-95d0-0019bb30f31a.html
You’d rather take the whole of gender studies programme down with you, than give up the ‘sex is rape’ excuse for whoring.
Tom, you ignorant asshole. The kids are to be criminalised, the men coddled.
The thing I can’t figure out is if you believe it, or are just saying it to get off on the abuse you know it will generate.
Steele This guy spent money filing a lawsuit, and is spending another £37,000; because of the judgement, in the pursuit of making Misandry a legal thing in Britain.
He’s one of the most Activist people the MRM has.
He’s on your side.
“I’m dead against all of these things. You’re willfully mixing up sex and rape (because you’re a victim-feminist wanker).”
No I’m not you wanker. I’m talking about forced sex, not consensual. Shut the fuck up about that “sex is rape” crap. You know that came from a novel, right? And feminists don’t think that all sex is rape.
Whoring? You’re the pedophile sympathizer. So go fuck yourself, asshat.
Holy fuck, I went to The Spearhead tonight (I know, big mistake) and now I have this fuckwad Tom and his whoring obsession. Seriously, I’m going to go cuddle with my husband.
You know, Steele is possibly the only MRA I’ve encountered who doesn’t even obliquely approve of pedophiles.
Tom Martin is consuming nutrients that would be better spent breeding plague rats.
Anyone want to take photos of Tom Martin’s bile, so that it will come up the next time he’s mentioned as a rational voice of the MRM…or for anyone, for that matter?
Because goddamn, I need a shower.
@Red Locker
I’m tempted to copy and paste his comments to The Spearhead, and let WTF Price see who is representing the MRM.
I’m confused, Tom. You keep talking like you’re a real grownup person. You keep pretending that you possess dignity, intelligence, and a conscience. Do you actually believe you have these things? Do you somehow imagine anyone has any reason to take you seriously?
And I’m sorry for all the cussing, people.
hey guys, a conversation where there’s a dude telling a chick that the sexual harassment she experienced was “just a mistake” and “both you and he made mistakes” and “if you didn’t want it, you should have yelled: No!” is taking place outside my apartment window. What should I do?
You’ve got nothing to apologize for, Fembot.
@Fembot
Nah, they’ll most likely handwave it in the most bullshit way imaginable. A “movement” with members earnestly stating that Berge is a conspiracy by Futrelle…yeeeeeeah, good luck with them.