Categories
antifeminism creepy I'm totally being sarcastic misandry misogyny MRA sexy robot ladies

Children of Dudes

Dude! I'm making a baby!

Ladies, your days are numbered! The sexy lady sexbots are only a few years off, which will free men of the onerous task of having sex with your cootie-ridden human bodies, and pretty soon you won’t be needed for anything at all, not even making babies. At least according to this comment by “JR” on Roissy’s blog, which was recently highlighted on the Pro-Male/Anti-Feminist Technology blog:

I think the obvious gender-wide frustration of women today can partly be explained by this lowered value of children/reproduction altogether. Women understand that their primary purpose will always be tied up with reproduction and not civilization-altering achievement; now that this purpose has been largely removed, what do they have left? … [M]en are as useful as ever, whereas women’s role as child-bearer is rapidly becoming unnecessary and in many cases even harmful.

Babies? We don’t need no stinkin babies!

And if after a few years of childless Children of Men-style dystopia we male humans decide that maybe it would be good if we, collectively, had a few kids, well, by then some clever dude will have invented an artificial womb. And then, ladies, you’re toast! (Which we dudes will be eating a lot of in the future, by the way, as actual cooking, not to mention sammich-making, is for bitches.) As Mr. Pro-Male/Anti-Feminist Technology explains:

Before … our current level of technology, women were in complete and total control of reproduction.  Women could get knocked up by one guy and claim another guy is the dad and there was no way of knowing what the truth was.  First came increased scientific knowledge about reproduction.  Before that the process of reproduction would have been considered to be almost magical given women room to exercise total control.  This lessened women’s control over reproduction.  In the 20th century came paternity testing so men could know without a doubt who a child’s father is.  Now women have no room to hide except that the law allows for paternity fraud.  Eventually we will have artificial wombs which will allow men to have children without women if they so choose.  The artificial womb represents control of reproduction being wrestled away from women.  This is a pretty direct progression of how women become less and less necessary in reproduction.

Of course, there’s that whole issue of actually raising the little buggers. But don’t worry, dudes are totally better at this, too!

[W]omen’s role as child bearer in many cases is becoming harmful.  …  All the pathologies caused by single mothers do not need to be repeated here.  Beyond single motherhood take a look at younger women in their 20s.  How many of them would you really trust to be mothers even if divorce wasn’t an issue?  Take a look at the current crop of teenage girls, and it’s clear they will be even worse for motherhood than women currently in their 20s.  Don’t forget all the misandry that these women carry which will have a negative impact on any sons you might have with them.  …  All things being equal the two parent family is probably better for raising children, but all things are not equal.  Because of divorce the two parent family can become single motherhood at the drop of a hat.  Single fatherhood from the beginning is better than that.  Even without divorce women are increasingly unqualified to be mothers.  … We are getting to a point where single fatherhood may be the superior system of raising children, especially when it comes to raising sons.

In your face, ladies! Moms suck!  DudeMoms rule!!!!

Of course, not all dudes want to be single fathers. As savethemales notes in the comments on Pro-Male/Anti-Feminist Technology,

Robogirls can take the place of mothers and assist in raising children for the biological dads who employed artificial wombs in the labs to incubate their babies. Personally, I never want kids and frankly, what reason is there? Children and women are a big liability. Actuarial escape velocity and transhumanism will be the answer and logical choice over procreation for many men.

I have no idea what he just said there, but I am totally 100% behind it. Except maybe for the part about Robogirls. I mean, how do we know for sure that Robogirls aren’t going to teach robomisandry to our dude-children?

Personally, I wouldn’t trust my artificial-womb-born dude-children to anyone but a RoboDudeMom.

246 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Pecunium
10 years ago

Ami: I didn’t (this go round) take down what he said.

I took him down.

kirbywarp
kirbywarp
10 years ago

Grah, she can’t take any more, cap’n!

Hypergamy: “What’s more to life than money and power?”

@DKM:

Obviously, (though you still hate to actually reference me by name), I’m an individual giant pink marshmellow! Also, we all referenced Nazis? Wait… crap, you’re right. XD

“You can lead thirsty asses to water–but you can’t make them drink!”

Yeah.. Even the thirstiest of asses won’t drink raw sewage…

kirbywarp
kirbywarp
10 years ago

@Pecunium:

The way I’ve seen it used in other areas, while you’re technically correct, Godwinning is usually considered an argument lost. Its true though, sometimes Nazis are appropriate. (A quote I hope never ever gets taken out of context)

Ami Angelwings
10 years ago

@Kirby Its true though, sometimes Nazis are appropriate.

That’s exactly what the Nazis said.

And no that’s not a Godwin because

Its true though, sometimes Nazis are appropriate.

Pecunium
10 years ago

Kirby: Having been around on the net when Godwinning first started to becoming a “big deal” I sort of value the distinction, in no small part because sometimes Nazis are an appropriate reference, and I hate to see a thread derailed when someone makes an apropos use of history.

So yes, it’s not a big deal, just a personal peeve.

I also think the Godwinning was the least of his crimes against reason and sanity.

kirbywarp
kirbywarp
10 years ago

@Pecunium:

Yeah, no problem. I myself have seen the subject of nazi’s come up, and people start shouting “Godwin! Godwin!” without actually paying attention to the argument… -_- Ah well.

darksidecat
10 years ago

“individuall WHAT, I have NO idea” We are secretly the lizard people (the small ones, that learned to type with their tiny claws). MRAL is a werewolf, hence his obsession with the question of who are the alphas at every moment. NWO is a troll duke. Eoghan is the troll king. Troll King is actually a troll peasant. (Troll royalty systems can get complicated).

Ami Angelwings
10 years ago

Eoghan is Henry V, disguising himself as a common MRA to walk amongst his people. xD

kristinmh
kristinmh
10 years ago

I’m telling you, it’s a Dr. Bronner’s soap label

Speedlines hits it on the nose!

Whatever it is I find myself skimming it rapidly while scrolling.

PEACE AND FREEDOM!

Kristin M. H.

Holly Pervocracy
10 years ago

Holy crap, Ami, THAT’S my card?!?

…wow…

…I’m your biggest fan.

Laura Bladen
10 years ago

Man, these ‘feminists’ sound fucking scary, amirite?…

PosterformerlyknownasElizabeth

DKM-If we were to accept your premise that men are more intelligent and creative then women, it does not follow that simply because someone is less creative that we automatically deny them an opportunity to express that creativity. Or less opportunity to hone their intelligence.

I think your problem is that you assume women are less then men and get mad when proven wrong because women are not less then men.

Ami Angelwings
10 years ago

@Laura Bladen Ami is always rite! 😀

Albert
Albert
10 years ago

Feminism has deluded many women into believing they are superior God-like beings. When they’re proven wrong, they get defensive, like this blog clearly illustrates.

Bee
Bee
10 years ago

Exactly, Albert. And whenever you have something really, really important to say, like that, just make sure to find an old, dead comment thread so you can whisper it under your breath and then run off to wherever it is you normally stay feeling like a big cool guy for Taking A Stand!!!!

Clearly you understand feminism very well. No need to act all embarrassed about it, Albert.

Johnny Pez
10 years ago

I personally want to thank Albert for having the courage to come onto a feminist blog that specializes in mocking anti-feminists and speaking his mind. I guess this proves that anti-feminists aren’t a bunch of whiny-ass titty babies after all.

Linn
Linn
10 years ago

I know I’m way late to this, but I’m overwhelmed by the compulsion to remark how much that entire ‘dudes-making-dude-babies-without-the-envolvement-of-any-filthy-honorless-wimmins’ idea reminds me of oglaf’s hilarious hypermasculine-vikings storyline, especially “Son of Kronar”
http://oglaf.com/son-of-kronar/ (Not QUITE safe for work).
That right there would be the ideal, I wager.

Linn
Linn
10 years ago

… aaand that would be ‘INvolvement’, although, come to think of it..

Pecunium
10 years ago

Albert: I missed this: Feminism has deluded many women into believing they are superior God-like beings. When they’re proven wrong, they get defensive, like this blog clearly illustrates.

Which is why you came in two weeks after the conversation was quiet to make your bold statement. A statement which could have been made about any post here; as it lacks any content other than, “feminists are whiners, and wrong.”

So… way to go. Manly men ought to emulate you, and slink into feminist enclaves where they can whisper in the corner and count coup for the bravery of walking into the mouth of hell and coming out with their balls unsinged, and their peckers still attached.

You are an exemplar in the MRA movement.

hatestupidpeople
hatestupidpeople
10 years ago

trying to make you king over ‘YOUR” “children” making them submit to you?????

MKlein
MKlein
9 years ago

But i don’t understand: how would an artificial womb make women obsolete? You’d still need a woman’s eggs and DNA, or at least an X chromosome, to cause the fertilized egg cell to become an embryo. At least one X chromosome is necessary for human life, in both men and women.

1 8 9 10
%d bloggers like this: