• Home
  • Comments Policy
  • About
    • Mammoth FAQ
    • David Futrelle FAQ
  • T-Shirts, etc.
  • WTF is a MGTOW? A Glossary
← Women are overpriced vagina buses that won’t let you ride them, Man Going His Own Way explains
Announcing the We Hunted the Mammoth Legal Fund to Spite the Honey Badger Brigade →

It came from the comments: Women want co-ed schools, workplaces so they can falsely accuse men

 April 29, 2015
  · 117 Comments
Woman contemplating a false accusation

Woman at work, possibly contemplating a false accusation

I screen out a lot of truly terrible comments from drive-by commenters. Though I don’t want these people roaming freely in the comments here, some of what they post is really too good not to share with the world.

And by “too good” I mean “holy crap what the hell is wrong with this person?”

One such commenter, calling himself AvoidDeception, recently offered his thoughts on co-ed facilities, and why women, despite their deep hatred of men, actually prefer them to women’s-only alternatives. Enjoy!

He starts off with a little sarcasm:

What’s wrong with women only schools, women only workplaces, women only hospitals and women only retirement homes? LETS HAVE MORE WOMEN ONLY, SAFE, NON-TRIGGERING SPACES, RIGHT?

Wouldn’t that be great for women? No longer would women have to deal with men.

KNOW WHY THIS WILL NEVER HAPPEN? YOU’RE GOING TO LOVE THIS!

And here comes a plot twist worthy of M. Night Shyamalan.

Women need co-ed everything to falsely accuse men of rape, sexual assault and harassment. Without this power over men and without their dead husbands, fathers and divorce raped X husbands, women would have no wealth. It is therefore imperative for women to have co-ed schools, workplaces, hospitals and retirement homes. Without these things, women can’t continue the blackmail and intimidation of men via fear, false rape, harassment and sexual assault charges.

Clever girls.

Ask any modern college hobag what I’m talking about. They’ll deny every single word. What more solid, positive proof can you get than that?

I’m not sure I agree with you 100 percent on your police work there, Lou. 

Feminism’s ultimate goal is the destruction of the patriarchy, right? What does that mean, dear mother? It means your son will come to hate you deeply (and rightfully so) upon the recognition that you blew smoke up his anal cavity while simultaneously sexing up most of your neighbors – ho. He will divorce you both physically and mentally, dear mother, and cut all women from his life after learning the hard way that women are the most evil creatures ever mistakenly spawned. Where will he get this information. FROM ME!

Someone woke up on the wrong side of bed this life.

Know how I know women will cum crawling back to men on their knees? Think long and hard.

Er, penis? Really? I’m not sure that’s going to be enough of an incentive for any woman considering crawling back to you.

What’s wrong with the world today? Christians, conservatives, feminists, liberals, white knights, captain-save-a-hos, and most certainly every single member of WeHunted(then ate)TheMammouth.

What’s a “mammouth?” Some sort of mixed drink? A Manhattan, with a mammoth tusk instead of a maraschino cherry?

He ends this lovely miniature manifesto with an equally lovely death wish:

Bye, cowards. Hope you have a painful death!

Have a lovely life stewing in your own rage.

Share this:

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Reddit
  • Tumblr
  • Email
  • More
  • Google
  • Pinterest
  • LinkedIn
  • Pocket
  • Print

Like this:

Like Loading...

Related

Posted in: a woman is always to blame, antifeminism, boner rage, citation needed, crackpottery, creepy, empathy deficit, entitled babies, evil moms, evil working women, false accusations, men who should not ever be with women ever, MGTOW, misogyny, oppressed men, paranoia, patriarchy, penises, post contains sarcasm
← Women are overpriced vagina buses that won’t let you ride them, Man Going His Own Way explains
Announcing the We Hunted the Mammoth Legal Fund to Spite the Honey Badger Brigade →

Comments

Please read the comments policy before leaving a comment - thanks!

  1. Pages:
  2. «
  3. 1
  4. 2
  5. 3
  1. Banana Jackie Cake, the Best Jackie and Cake! Yum! (^v^) says:
    April 30, 2015 at 4:10 pm

    If we ask AvoidDeception if he a man, who has an Oedpius complex, is a register sex offender, has never interacted with another human being, and microwaves melons to have sex with them with his mother’s picture attached to the rind, and he denies it, that means it’s true, according to his logic.

    I tried looking this up in logic diagram, and this might be a false dilemma, but I’m not sure myself.

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/False_dilemma

    “A false dilemma (also called black-and-white thinking, bifurcation, denying a conjunct, the either–or fallacy, false dichotomy, fallacy of exhaustive hypotheses, the fallacy of false choice, the fallacy of the false alternative, or the fallacy of the excluded middle) is a type of informal fallacy that involves a situation in which only limited alternatives are considered, when in fact there is at least one additional option.”

    So, maybe?

    Reply
  2. Robert says:
    April 30, 2015 at 5:11 pm

    One mark of the conspiracy theorist – a conviction that the absence of evidence of the conspiracy is proof of the conspiracy’s existence.

    I found a piece online recently, regarding the Protocols of the Elders of Zion. Almost all participants in consensus reality now agree that it was a plagiarizing of Maurice Joly’s anti-Bonapartist work, “A Dialogue in Hell Between Machiavelli and Montesquieu”. The author of this piece contended that Joly found a copy of the ‘real’ Protocols and plagiarized _it_. It was brilliant, in much the same way as a broken mirror is.

    Reply
  3. epitome of incomprehensibility says:
    April 30, 2015 at 5:15 pm

    @Banana Jackie Cake – I’m not sure. I think that’d apply to “you’re either with us or against us” statements (when a third option exists), but this might be more of a disguised ad hominem, since it’s saying the other person’s always wrong.

    More precisely, it’s saying women always say the opposite of what’s true. So… ad feminem maybe? 🙂

    Reply
  4. epitome of incomprehensibility says:
    April 30, 2015 at 5:16 pm

    Ad feminem oppositatus! (Hey, it SOUNDS Latin.)

    Reply
  5. Banana Jackie Cake, the Best Jackie and Cake! Yum! (^v^) says:
    April 30, 2015 at 5:46 pm

    I found possible two logical fallacy that might categorize this guy’s logic.

    Affirming the consequent

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Affirming_the_consequent

    Evidence of absence

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Evidence_of_absence

    However, they aren’t perfect. In fact, no fallacy of any kind, whether formal, informal, or conditional/questionable perfectly matches whatever the hell this guy said.

    His statement is so fucking stupid, in the thousands of years humans have been debating, such a fallacy has never existed. THAT is how outlandish and cartoonish this guy’s thinking process is.

    So, let’s call this the “Avoid Deception Fallacy”, where the denial of something makes it true. Could also be called the “Paranoid Deception Fallacy” or the “Tin Hat Fallacy”.

    I like Tin Hat the best, actually.

    Reply
  6. Buttercup Q. Skullpants says:
    April 30, 2015 at 5:48 pm

    It’s like he thinks the world is one of those logic puzzles where one group always lies and the other always tells the truth. And he has one question to figure out which door leads to the center of the castle and which door leads to certain doom. And the guard is a woman.

    (ANSWER: Both doors lead to women refusing to have sex with him. Mwah ha haaa!!!)

    Reply
  7. GrumpyOldMangina says:
    April 30, 2015 at 5:58 pm

    Buttercup: I thought of that one too, but in my version it’s which fork in a road you should take.
    The underlying assumption is that women ALWAYS lie,. even when it is against their interests.

    Reply
  8. chaltab says:
    April 30, 2015 at 6:30 pm

    Thinking about it now, think it’s a bit more specific than that based on his wording. He seems to think that his assertion is so self-evidently true that denying “every word” could only be a bald-faced lie and that the only credible denial would be mealy-mouthed double talk or admission of at least partial guilt.

    Which sounds like what he’s actually expecting is that everybody conducts discourse exactly like MRAs do.

    Reply
  9. sparky says:
    April 30, 2015 at 6:48 pm

    What a sad, hateful, ignorant bigot.

    Who really should switch to decaf.

    But seriously, it’s baffling they think that women get showered with money when they’re raped, or sexually assaulted, or battered, or divorced. It just so completely and totally defies logic and all available evidence. But then, a guy who takes denial of something as concrete proof that that thing is happening really isn’t the sort to be concerned with logic and evidence.

    Reply
  10. Buttercup Q. Skullpants says:
    April 30, 2015 at 9:20 pm

    @chaltab Yeah, it sounds like he arrived at his conclusion by affirming the consequent. “All guilty people automatically deny their wrongdoing when confronted. Woman A has denied wrongdoing when confronted. Therefore, Woman A is guilty.” (Not a fallacy because penislogic)

    What’s wrong with the world today? Christians, conservatives, feminists, liberals, white knights, captain-save-a-hos, and most certainly every single member of WeHunted(then ate)TheMammouth.

    Well, Ignatius J. Reilly managed to cover just about everybody there. “What’s wrong with the world today? All of it except me!”

    Also, “WeHunted (then ate)TheMammouth”? Wouldn’t manly paleo cave alphas normally eat something they had hunted?

    I think that was supposed to be an insult, but it turned into an own goal.

    Reply
  11. theboost says:
    April 30, 2015 at 9:21 pm

    Perhaps he meant Gregory of MONMOUTH, British Historian.

    Reply
  12. Robert says:
    April 30, 2015 at 9:47 pm

    We hunted the vermouth for you, then drank it all.

    We hunted the Man-Moth for you, but he flew away.

    We hunted the Weymouth for you, but we didn’t have passports.

    Reply
  13. Alan Robertshaw says:
    May 1, 2015 at 3:35 am

    Rather worryingly, in cases of suspected Munchhausen’s by proxy, denial is seen as evidence!

    And yes, we lawyers have pointed out the absurdity of this.

    http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/7960420

    Reply
  14. skybison says:
    May 1, 2015 at 10:01 pm

    Oh goodie, an MRA comment thread, these are always classic. [i]grabs popcorn[/i]

    Ask any modern college hobag what I’m talking about. They’ll deny every single word. What more solid, positive proof can you get than that?

    Avoid Deception feels sexual arousal at the sight of giraffes. Ask him and he’ll deny every single word. What more solid, positive proof can you get than that?

    Reply
  15. jaygee says:
    May 2, 2015 at 3:25 am

    Ask any modern college hobag what I’m talking about. They’ll deny every single word. What more solid, positive proof can you get than that?

    How ironic; by this logic, whenever a man denies raping someone, that is proof he did it. What more evidence do you need than a denial?!?! There’s never any other motive for denying things!!

    This is classic conspiracy theorist thinking (and this is likely only one of many conspiracies he subscribes to). I wonder how he can ever come to the conclusion that anything is false/wrong. Everything is true, even when contradictory. Basic communication must be so hard for AvoidDeception.

    Reply
  16. Hannah says:
    May 4, 2015 at 11:43 pm

    Hmmm… I thought I chose a co-ed school environment in order to maximize the perspectives I am exposed to in my academic life. Here I was thinking that I valued male experiences along with my own female experinces. Silly me.

    Reply
  17. KL says:
    June 2, 2015 at 9:36 pm

    cuz its not as if rape happens in gender segregated socieites – oh wait, it does.

    Reply
  1. Pages:
  2. «
  3. 1
  4. 2
  5. 3

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Please read the comments policy before leaving a comment - thanks!

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Donate to the Mammoth!

We Hunted the Mammoth is an ad-free, reader-supported publication written and published by longtime journalist David Futrelle, who has been tracking, dissecting, and mocking the growing misogynistic backlash since 2010, exposing the hateful ideologies of Men’s Rights Activists, incels, alt-rightists and many others.

We depend on support from people like you. Please consider a donation or a monthly pledge by clicking below! there's no need for a PayPal account.

1
Send comments, questions, and tips for stories to me at dfutrelle@gmail.com, or by clicking here

Follow Me

  • View david.futrelle’s profile on Facebook
  • View DavidFutrelle’s profile on Twitter
  • View David Futrelle’s profile on YouTube
  • View David Futrelle’s profile on Google+

Subscribe via Email

Recent Posts

  • Nazis, Yes; Tiddies, No: Gab launches “cultural revolution” against porn and lust
  • MRAs: What do feminists do for men? ALSO MRAs: Why should men care about women?
  • Jordan Peterson fans mansplain makeup: “You try to cheat men’s brains by presenting a more sexually attractive face than you really have”
  • Open thread to discuss the legacy and honor the victims of the École Polytechnique massacre
  • Banning abortion “is about making women scared to have more than one sexual partner,” Red Pill Redditor declares
  • I read this incel “field report” and now you have to, too
  • The Daily Stormer launches an attack on the female orgasm
  • Black athletes are turning white men into a cucked “third sex” by being better at sports, weirdo racist football fan argues
  • Where I’ve been
  • In the battle betwen John Wayne and Mr. Rogers it’s the gentler soul who’s winning

Top Posts

  • MRAs: What do feminists do for men? ALSO MRAs: Why should men care about women?
  • Nazis, Yes; Tiddies, No: Gab launches "cultural revolution" against porn and lust
  • Jordan Peterson fans mansplain makeup: "You try to cheat men's brains by presenting a more sexually attractive face than you really have"
  • The Daily Stormer launches an attack on the female orgasm

Archives

My Twitter

Tweets by DavidFutrelle

Recent Comments

  • Kat, ambassador of the feminist government in exile December 10, 2019 at 3:13 am on Nazis, Yes; Tiddies, No: Gab launches “cultural revolution” against porn and lust
  • danielrigal December 10, 2019 at 2:33 am on Nazis, Yes; Tiddies, No: Gab launches “cultural revolution” against porn and lust
  • Moggie December 10, 2019 at 2:25 am on Nazis, Yes; Tiddies, No: Gab launches “cultural revolution” against porn and lust
  • TB Tabby December 10, 2019 at 1:58 am on Nazis, Yes; Tiddies, No: Gab launches “cultural revolution” against porn and lust
  • Battering Lamb December 10, 2019 at 1:47 am on Nazis, Yes; Tiddies, No: Gab launches “cultural revolution” against porn and lust
  • Catalpa December 10, 2019 at 1:31 am on Nazis, Yes; Tiddies, No: Gab launches “cultural revolution” against porn and lust
  • GAZZA December 10, 2019 at 1:11 am on Nazis, Yes; Tiddies, No: Gab launches “cultural revolution” against porn and lust
  • Catalpa December 10, 2019 at 12:57 am on MRAs: What do feminists do for men? ALSO MRAs: Why should men care about women?

Random WHTM Posts!

  • Matt Forney: #BlackLivesMatter faked Philando Castile’s death-by-cop “to slander whites”Matt Forney: #BlackLivesMatter faked Philando Castile’s death-by-cop “to slander whites”July 7, 2016
  • Why is A Voice for Men giving a platform to one of Canada’s leading opponents of gay and lesbian rights? [UPDATED with AVFM response]Why is A Voice for Men giving a platform to one of Canada’s leading opponents of gay and lesbian rights? [UPDATED with AVFM response]June 19, 2014
  • The top 10 shocking “truths” about feminism I’ve learned from #HowToSpotAFeministThe top 10 shocking “truths” about feminism I’ve learned from #HowToSpotAFeministMay 6, 2015
  • Donald Trump: Could he become America’s first troll president?Donald Trump: Could he become America’s first troll president?March 30, 2016
  • Mission Accomplished! Paul Elam declares victory, quits the Men’s Rights movementMission Accomplished! Paul Elam declares victory, quits the Men’s Rights movementMarch 31, 2016

If You’re Being Harassed

  • Speak Up & Stay Safe(r)
  • Crash Override
  • DIY Feminist Cybersecurity
  • Without My Consent
  • 9 Ways to Dodge Trolls

Creep Watchers

  • Hail to the Gynocracy!
  • Right Wing Watch
  • Hate Watch (SPLC)
  • Media Matters
  • Fundies Say the Darndest Things
  • My Right Wing Dad
  • r/ShitRedditSays
  • r/GamerGhazi
  • r/TheBluePill
  • r/AgainstMensRights
  • r/CreepyPMs

Mammothy Fun

  • Official WHTM Welcome Package!
  • Artistry For Feminism. And Kittens.
  • A Voice for Pierre

Feed the Mammoth!

Keep this blog going by clicking on the link below! You don't even need a PayPal account.

Privacy & Cookies: This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this website, you agree to their use.
To find out more, including how to control cookies, see here: Cookie Policy
We Hunted The Mammoth | Copyright © 2019 All Rights Reserved
loading Cancel
Post was not sent - check your email addresses!
Email check failed, please try again
Sorry, your blog cannot share posts by email.
%d bloggers like this: