On the Incels.is forums an angry and somewhat grammatically challenged commenter tries to explain why misogyny is a-ok and women don’t need rights.
“Misogyny is absolutely normal and healthy,” Persecuted begins.
Often misrepresented or reduced to irrational hatred. Misogyny is only rational answer that man can have to degenerate and idiotic behviour of cumdumpsters.
Well that’s quite a start.
It’s realisation that only metric of foids value is how usefull they are to men and since holes are worst at almost everything than men, thier rights should be taken away and thier roles reduced to mothers and housewifes.
I’m pretty sure society already tried this. Let’s just say it didn’t work.
In fact, most of the positive qualities associated with femininity are result of strict patriarchal supervision. It’s men who created an image of a woman that prelevant in culture.
Foids by nature are devoid of those positves qualities and as such strict control of female behaviour is a key to stable society, since foids themselves don’t posses any ability to control themselves.
Those self-uncontrollable bitches!
Moreover, since foids already leech most of society resource and contribute to society less than men, that means that thier role isn’t crucial in society, so getting rid of thier rights would only benefit society.
Time for the world’s largest [CITATION NEEDED]. Make it retroactive for all the other bullshit he’s peddling here.
By making foids a property of a father and then husband, we shift burden from of financially providing for a whore from society to a father and then husband.
You know, dude, that most women pay their own bills, right? It’s not like they get a monthly whore allowance deposited in their bank account.
If you disagree, you’re a cuck and waste of space.
Ah, yes, calling someone a “cuck,” the most powerful logical argument of all.
In a followup comment, Persecuted suggests that women needed to be forced into motherhood at a young age.
If given a choice, foids themselves have no want of being mothers, especially with below-to-averege males. Mothership is obviously patriarchal concept, as even feminist note. The liberated foid only became mother and wife after a years of taking Chads’ sperm and settles in her 30s, way after her ovaries past prime. In past, foids were forced by society to give birth at young, prime age, most suited for child birth.
Also this system is created to profit of[f] degeneracy, in which foids take lead, and financial dependency of average citizen
A lot of terrible ideas knocking around inside this guy’s mostly empty head.
Naturally, Persecuted’s miniature manifesto has received an overwhelmingly positive response among his Incels.is colleagues — except for one dude with only a handful of comments to his name who suggests that the manifesto-writer move to Afghanistan, rousing the ire of others in the discussion.
Most are enthusiastic about Persecuted’s blatherings.
“Yes,” writes RetardedChinlet.
I think even a happy, well-adjusted sexhaver man ought to have a healthy dose of misogyny. It’s what women deserve and even want deep down. This fantasy of gender equality is sheer fucking insanity.
“Foids are less than men,” adds uo89997, a little more concisely.
I’m pretty sure that no one who uses the term “foid” is contributing much positive to civilization. But we all deserve the same rights nonetheless.
Follow me on Twitter.
Send tips to dfutrelle at gmail dot com.
We Hunted the Mammoth relies entirely on readers like you for its survival. If you appreciate our work, please send a few bucks our way! Thanks!