alt-right anti-antifa AntiFa disinformation lying liars

Andy Ngo and the Big Lie of the “antifa-involved mass shooting” in Portland

Just say Ngo

The Pledge Drive is winding down! If you’ve given, thank you! If not, give the donate button below a little click.

donate button

In the wake of the mass shooting in Portland last Saturday night, when reliable information was still scarce, some of those on the right took advantage of the confusion to spread a little more confusion of their own.

Right-wing trolls posted disinformation about the identity of the shooter and the woman he allegedly killed. Others on the right, drawing loosely on misleading and in some cases factually incorrect statements by police, made up their own story of the events, transforming the shooter’s attack on the demonstration into an act of self-defense against am antifa mob attacking his house. (See my last post on the subject for more on this.)

Still others, who stopped just short of blatant lies, attempted to muddy the responsibility of the shooter for the death and injuries among the demonstrators and their supporters by describing the events of the night as what far-right “journalist” Andy Ngo called an an “antifa-involved mass shooting” — a turn of phrase that makes it sound like it was Antifa responsible for the death and the injuries of their own allies. Indeed, some on Twitter took it to mean just that:

Given Ngo’s longtime animosity towards antifa (the feeling is mutual), it seems likely to me that Ngo is deliberately encouraging his uncritical followers to jump to this conclusion.

Ngo used the phrase or a similar one in multiple tweets to his nearly one million Twitter followers.

Ngo has also referred to “the mass shooting involving #antifa” and “the deadly mass shooting last night involving #antifa”; in more recent posts he has talked of the “the antifa vs homeowner shooting” and “the furry neighbor vs antifa deadly shooting.” (He has made much of the fact that the alleged shooter was a furry, evidently as a way of eliding discussion of his oft-stated far-right beliefs.)

Several right-wing publications have also leaned heavily on the word “involved.” The Post Millennial, the web publication for which Ngo is an Editor at Large, referred in one headline to the “Antifa-Involved Mass Shooting.” The Epoch Times declared, also in a headline, that “Portland Shooting Leaves 1 Dead, 5 Wounded Amid Reports Antifa Is Involved.” National Conservative offered its own take, reporting that the “First ‘victim’ of Antifa related mass shooting [had been] identified.” The Lid, citing Ngo as a source, “reported” that “[a]n armed Antifa confrontation with an armed Portland Homeowner near Normandale Park left one woman dead and 5 other people wounded… .”

None of this jibes with what seems to have really happened Saturday night, as made clear not only by the eyewitness accounts but also in the charging document of the solitary suspect. The accused and now arrested shooter — apparently a fervid far-rightist (and Andy Ngo fan) who regularly talked about his desire to shoot “commies” and antifa — reportedly confronted, then opened fire on, a group of women who were trying to diffuse tensions, shooting a disabled 60-year-old woman in the head, killing her instantly, according to accounts of the evening. 43-year-old Benjamin Smith was taken down with a bullet fired by one of the demonstrators before he had a chance to injure or kill anyone else. If the witness accounts and the charging affidavit are accurate, Smith was a cold blooded killer; the man who shot him is a hero, a rare example of a “good guy with a gun” stopping a mass shooting in its tracks.

Antifa was “involved” only in that most of the wounded and injured (except Smith himself) were at least informally associated with the movement. Calling this an “Antifa-involved” shooting makes about as much sense as calling the assassination of Abraham Lincoln a “president-involved shooting.”

While dismissing a survivor’s account of the shooting posted anonymously to Twitter, Ngo eagerly jumped on rumors that the alleged shooter had only been defending himself — a rumor he thought discredited the antifa “narrative.”

Ngo in one tweet tried yet another way to blame the shooting on Antifa, declaring that:

It’s not clear if anyone other than the demonstrator who allegedly shot Smith was armed in the antifa camp. Saying the shooting “happened” because protesters insisted on protesting would be roughly equivalent to blaming the Lincoln assassination on the President’s trip to the Ford theater.

Ngo has also spent a good deal of time tweeting derogatory information about one of the survivors, including her photo, knowing full well that this puts her at significant risk of harassment and worse from his numerous followers. He has also posted tweets about antifa in which he simply makes up “facts” about the group members and their motivations.

The only way to know if the disruptors were “fearful” about the potential release of information would be to literally read their minds. Many in, or in sympathy with, antifa have repeatedly called on the police to release MORE information.

Ngo and his allies on the right are taking a tragedy and trying to turn it into a farce.


Notify of

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
11 months ago

@ Surplus to Requirements

Safely is relative. Obviously the dentist did not do it outside in a pile of snow, but I am as vaccinated as I can be, complete with booster. The office required masks at all times when not removed for actual procedures. Best we can do for a root canal. (At this point in time, basically everyone I am in contact with whose name I know, coworkers, family, etc, is vaccinated, so I accepted the risk. Mileage may vary.)

@ Alan Robertshaw

I might try that if it continues to show up. It really hasn’t bothered me much, only noticing it a couple of times yesterday and it turns out nada all of today. That, and since the dentist found no signs of infection, makes me think it is probably more a nerve thing or something. The tooth in question has been dead for about twenty years to start, and I do have a mild cold sensitivity overall anyway. I have a follow up appointment next month for a more permanent filling, so I’ll see how it goes.

Still, I have salt and I have water, so I will keep it in mind if things get worse. Perhaps it would be useful for whatever Surplus has going on.

GSS ex-noob
GSS ex-noob
11 months ago

@.45: I’m having a similar problem with a root-canaled and then capped molar. It’s gotten sensitive again and wiggly. I had it fixed in early November and now this.

@Alan: That was my mother’s recommendation, and it’s also my dentist’s. You want it hot enough and salty enough to really get your attention, but not so hot that it burns the gums/tongue and thus causes more pain. Just cool enough you can swish vigorously for a while. Not only does it help with the ouch, but the salt solution kills any germs that might be lurking around to cause problems, which is why my dentist is so enthusiastic about it. He advises it in addition to or instead of antibiotics, and says twice a day, or thrice if you can. It’s also good if your gums are bleeding just a little, say from overactive flossing or something.

So I don’t know if it’s an ADA-approved thing, but the guy I’ve been going to for years recommends it to everyone.

There are fascist furries, but the majority of furries are peace-loving folk who shun the right-wingers.

I really commend the protester who was the vanishingly-rare “good guy with a gun”. They saved more lives from this dysfunctional man-baby triggered snowflake. Who, if we had a decent society, would have gotten the psychiatric help he needed and would have so many guns.

Queen of the Harpies
Queen of the Harpies
11 months ago

So more of the same ol’ spinning, deflecting, projecting, and NO U-ing, gotcha.


I am shocked, shocked, I tell you!

Hope the shooter gets the book thrown at him.

Would love your thoughts, please comment.x
%d bloggers like this: