Some thoughts on divorce from a delightful, and recently divorced, Red Pill Redditor by the name of vengefully_yours. (Divorced? Yes, that’s right, ladies: he’s available!)
![vengefully_yours 36 points 1 day ago (57|21) I have been divorced a month now, and I timed buying some land for about a month after it would be final so I could close on it today and her name is nowhere on it. Its mine. No trollop nor cheating whore will be able to wrest it from me by taking off to fuck some other guy. I will never again marry, and most likely never tell a woman I am not blood related to that I love her. This is my life, and I am living it how I see fit. I do what I want, when I want to do it, and no female has any say in how I go about it. Its not as if my ex wives had any say what I did anyway, but now I dont have to listen to them bitch that I am spending more money on cars than I am on them. Fuck yes I am free, and you're damn right I dont need some self warming fleshlight sapping up my hard earned resources. That might sound like I hate women, I dont. I love and adore them, but damn you just cant trust them. permalink source give gold save hide child comments [–]Cyralea 24 points 1 day ago (38|14) This is RP shining true. Don't hate women. They are what they are. Trusting them makes you the idiot, not them.](https://i0.wp.com/www.wehuntedthemammoth.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/10/selfwarmingfleshlight.png?resize=529%2C441&ssl=1)
I’m glad he clarified that he doesn’t hate women, because some people (you know, manginas and feminazis) might have jumped to conclusions based on, you know, reading his comment and understanding his words.
Thanks to maniacalnewworld in the Blue Pill subreddit for finding this golden nugget in the shitheap.
@Falconer: Another Shorpy’s addict? This is my favorite. View full size for greatest effect.
The feeeeeeeeeeeeemales pictured come from here: http://www.loc.gov/pictures/collection/nclc/
Well, well, one of them owns up at last to how he sees women – as self-warming fleshlights. May his dick never enter anything but an actual fleshlight ever again.
He needs to take a remedial English course, if only to find out what “love” and “adore” actually mean.
cloudiah – I looked at the Dreamland pic and wondered who was the lucky beggar who had to change those lightbulbs when they blew …
@kittehs, I know, but it’s gorgeous. Anyway, it’s unlikely they’d all go out at the same time, so just think of the ongoing maintenance as job security. XD
Yeah, kittehs, that was my first thought, too. My second was that it must be pretty hot in there with that many incandescents.
Hey, I didn’t even notice that the Dreamland pic has got people in it.
Probably there was a very large crowd on the skate floor and the camera didn’t catch it.
*dance floor.
The Recent Posts widget shall soon be mine! Muahahahahahahaaa!
I’m overjoyed I don’t have to raise two babies in this.
He doesn’t hate women? He adores them but can’t trust them? He thinks they’re just self-heating fleshlights?
Dude, that’s not adoration, that’s basically the definition of objectification. Love and adoration without trust is a nonsensical idea anyway, but comparing a person to a sex toy is just… blugh.
And, of course, it’s entirely the women who are in the wrong. I know it sucks to recognise the times when you’ve acted badly, but come on! Isn’t that page one of “how to be an adult”? Paragraph one: don’t abuse people. Paragraph two: don’t allow others to abuse people. Paragraph three: don’t take abuse. Paragraph four: help people who’re being abused get away from it. Paragraph five: admit when you’ve been wrong.
…It’s a small print book.
Today I felt more sympathy for the mother of libertarianism than I have for any MRA I’ve ever met. Is this a damning indictment of MRAs or of me? Is this how “It” begins?
I don’t want to interrupt your posting streak, Falconer, but your link is borked.
Here’s one of the NCLC photos at Shorpy.
It works for me… Let’s try this.
That comic didn’t make me feel sympathetic to Rand, except maybe for the bit where her husband has dementia and she tries to fix it with rationality. I felt much more sorry for all the people around her who were harmed by her influence.
Off-topic: Just got my ass handed to me by the IKEA furniture or black metal band quiz.
Women are human, and as such have flaws, so yes, some of them are faithless and have poor character. I’m sure there’s been many a guy who was wrongfully screwed over by a faithless wife and sure, that’s going to hurt and make him bitter for a while.
I’m not “blaming the victim” here, if a guy was cheated on and he wasn’t actually abusive or something, then he doesn’t “deserve” to be cheated on, but if it happens more than once, he should be asking himself if his selection method isn’t flawed in some way. Like maybe he’s too eager to hook up with a woman for superficial reasons, without finding out about her character. Perhaps he even considers her character not that important or worth investigating. I’ve heard guys bitch about their wives or GFs, bitch about things that they really *should* have known before they got involved . . . but I guess since she had a smokin’ hot bod and was great in bed, they didn’t look past that. And now later on, they’re shocked, SHOCKED I tell you, to find out that there’s more to her and not all of it is to their liking? Well, guess what? They got what they asked for and wanted. A smokin’ hot woman with undetermined character.
There are plenty of high character women who are also smokin’ hot, if these guys took the time to look. But a high character woman would look for a high character man, which means that these guys would have to *work* harder on improving their character, and who has time for that? LOL.
There are also the women who may not have *as* smokin’ hot of a body, or maybe won’t perform hot sex on the first date, therefore they are disregarded immediately by these guys, even though these women would be faithful, solid companions and have exceptionally high character. But who wants them, because they aren’t smokin’ hot! They might as well crawl into a hole and die, right? LOL.
So due to the fact that these guys won’t look past the superficial, won’t seek out women of higher character (which takes time and requires *them* to have high character too, to be worthy of such women), they end up with women who may have serious character flaws. And then these guys come to the *obvious* (snort) conclusion that ALL women are cheating whores! Because clearly there’s nothing wrong with them (the men)! No, it’s all the women’s fault! LOL!
He calls them trollops and whores, but the most specific he gets is to describe them as “taking off to fuck another guy.” To me, that sounds like they ended their marriage and then started new relationships, which is basically what tends to happen when any relationship ends — people start new ones, both men and women. I for one am shocked that a series of wives weren’t happy being viewed not as human beings but as “self-warming fleshlights” by this charmer of a man.
@katz: I don’t think it was supposed to. By all accounts, she was a perfectly horrible person.
I feel sorry for her poor husband. So. Lonely.
You mean TWO women actually divorced this gem? I can’t believe it!!!
Hey, I didn’t say I felt much sympathy for her, only more than I have for MRAs. I haven’t fallen that far to the dark side!
Quacker, within that Reddit thread there’s another one linked to by YetAnotherCommenter:
http://www.reddit.com/r/masculism/comments/1j9vy4/objectification_and_the_male_power_fantasy/cbcjn27
My 9-year-old sister can provide a better analysis of objectification than that.
According to him, he didn’t happen upon two horrible people who happened to be women. He happened upon two women who were horrible like all women, and their femaleness is the reason his marriages failed.
At first I was inclined to cut him a little slack, because I think it’s totally normal to hate your ex a month after you break up. But there’s “my heart is broken and I’m done with [gender(s) I date]”, and then there’s this red pill bullshit.
Hooooly monkeys.
I’ve been given this spiel before. Slightly different, it was about how monogamy is not the natural state of humanity, and so I should be happy to “share” my girlfriend (who had spent a measurable portion of our relationship up to that point screaming at me because she was convinced I was sleeping with someone else) with the guy giving me the speech.
Do people actually agree to that kind of thing?
One thing I always like about the “no you!” of this is that they’re mock-horrified that male cartoon heroes are exaggerated into the male ideal of masculinity, which is totally the same as when female cartoon heroes are exaggerated into the male ideal of femininity.
And this Loki/Thor comparison he brings up is interesting… not so much because it makes an important point about how bad guys are shown to be similar to the nerds among us, because Tom Hiddleston doesn’t really fit into that role – yes, he’s smaller and paler than Thor, but that’s because he’s a different archetype. He’s not the ideal of the body, he’s the ideal of the mind. Thor is a warrior, and has the physique of a warrior. Loki is a mage/rogue combo and has the physique that fits his character. That’s not demonising nerds, it’s demonising arcane tricksters, which is fine because that’s a good class for Tieflings.
Ally: I was a little disappointed that that article was just “Waaaah, I’m skinny and sociopathic like Loki instead of hunky and lovable like Thor, Hollywood hates me!” I was hoping for “Thor has a moment of self-sacrifice! MALE DISPOSABILITY!”
(Thor always has stubble, but his hair looks clean. Loki is always clean-shaven, but apparently never washes his hair. Conservation of hygiene?)
Even then, Loki’s not exactly sickly, stick-thin, or short. He is the übernerd.
It’s happened at least once.
They never do seem to be able to understand the fact that “love” doesn’t mean “want to fuck”, do they?