Seriously, if you’re feeling depressed, don’t read these.
1) Hunter Moore’s ‘Scary as Shit’ Revenge Porn Site Will Map Submitted Photos to People’s Addresses
Remember the guy behind the revenge porn site Is Anyone Up, which enabled assholes to post nude pictures of their exes for a worldwide audience to see? That site’s down, but he’s got a new one about to go up, with a new feature:
Scorned lovers who submit photos of their exes for revenge can now also enable others to physically stalk them by including their addresses along with the photos. HunterMoore.TV will then display the photos on a map. …
“We’re gonna introduce the mapping stuff so you can stalk people,” Mr. Moore gleefully told Betabeat, adding, “I know–it’s scary as shit.”
More here.
2) Creepy ‘Love Surgery’ Performed on New Moms’ Unwitting Vaginas
This isn’t a new story, but Jezebel’s Erin Gloria Ryan has written a horrifying overview of the case of Dr. James C. Burt, a gynecologist who maimed countless women by performing weird, unnecessary, and often quite damaging “vagina tightening” surgery on them without their knowledge or consent over the course of several decades.
Burt’s “Love Surgery” was based on the doctor’s cockamamie idea that women are “structurally inadequate for intercourse” and that the only way to fix their “pathological condition” was through surgery that made the vagina and vulva more penis friendly. He also believed that Love Surgery would turn women into “horny little mice.” In his 1975 book, entitled “Surgery of Love,” Burt … says that “hundreds and hundreds” of women were treated this way, but other sources estimate that the number is actually in the thousands. …
In his tireless efforts to make women more fuckable, he actually ended up causing his patients serious, irreversible damage.
Perhaps most astonishing:
[O]ther doctors and medical professionals knew what Dr. Burt was up to, but did nothing. St. Elizabeth Hospital in Dayton, Ohio, where Dr. Burt practiced, didn’t require medical consent forms for the procedure for the first 12 years it was being performed.
3) When “Men’s Rights” Narratives Kill
Amanda Marcotte writes about a sad story related to Slate’s Dear Prudence in which a man stalked and killed his ex and one of her children – after being alerted to her location by a sympathetic friend, who is now “haunted” by this terrible mistake and its horrifying consequences. As Marcotte notes,
The so-called “men’s rights” movement is very intent on convincing the public that domestic violence is overblown by feminists, and that many to most victims are lying to the police and the courts, who take them at their word because the justice system is supposedly in the thrall of the all-powerful feminist regime. This narrative tends to have a lot of power, because it feeds off long-standing stereotypes of women as deceitful, manipulative gold diggers. Unfortunately, the widespread credulity for anti-feminist ravings about lying women in cahoots with the police does lead to tragedy … .
If you are not already depressed enough by this story, take a look at Domestic Violence Crime Watch, a site that chronicles cases in which domestic violence leads to murder and other violent crimes. While women account for some of the violence, the overwhelming majority of the cases on the site involve male perps and female victims; sometimes children and other family members are harmed or killed as well. Data from the Bureau of Justice Statistics shows clearly that women are far more likely to be murdered by intimates (and exes) than men. (The one bit of good news in all this: the number of such murders has been declining for some time.)
If this is all a bit much, here’s a live stream of kittens in action. (Or, at the moment at least, napping.)
This is just getting embarrassing.
I am LOLing.
Gametime: I guess if he wants to show himself as the immature, insecure naif that he is, that’s his deal. For someone so smart, he has said some demonstrably stupid things.
@The Kitteh
Didn’t you see above where I acknowledged failings in methodology? Or where I suggested a way to gather data accurately?
Or did it not process?
No, no, he didn’t learn the concept of x at age 10, that’s when he learned the letter x.
I’m cringing in secondhand embarrassment here.
Given that the Mensa test costs $40 to take, I cannot fathom any reason why someone would choose to take it while “nearly blackout drunk” other than “so that afterward, if I do pass, I can brag to people on the internet about how I passed the Mensa test while nearly blackout drunk.” Which is, quite frankly, pretty much the stupidest use of $40 I can imagine.
I am, however, somewhat impressed that Diogenes can manage to be “nearly blackout drunk” for two hours at a stretch without consuming any additional booze or, y’know, blacking out.
I mean, I know you are critiquing the actual arguments I am making here, but I just told you a bunch of stuff that proves I am smart. WHY DON’T YOU BELIEVE I AM SMARTER THAN THE AVERAGE BEAR?!!?!???!!?
Apparently wine coolers make you do stupid shit like taking the Mensa test.
I invented Impressionism when I was eight. I wanted to paint an oak tree in the back yard, and the leaves were so many shapes and shades of green, I didn’t know where to start. Then I stepped back and noticed that they were just dots. So I painted a bunch of green dots.
Diogenes, dance with me. I want to be your partner. Can’t you see the music is just starting?
¿what?
He can bench press a car, he’s an ex-football star
With degrees from both Harvard and Yale,
Girls just can’t keep up, he’s a real love machine,
He’s had far better sex while in jail,
He designed the Sears Tower, he makes two grand an hour,
He cooks the world’s best duck flambe,
He’ll take the pick of the litter, girls jockey for him,
He don’t need these lines to get laid!
SO KISS MEEEEEEEE I’M SHITFAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAACED…
I have a suspicion someone, who shall go nameless, is going to regret this in the morning.
Bravo! katz.
(In case anyone was wondering)
Cynic, I’m fourty and they were teaching how to solve for x when I was nine.
Two, being able to do so only demonstrates that you have some talent for math OR more likely that you could see the pattern. It does not make you a genius.
I think that even the people who came up with pi or how to solve for x weren’t considerd geniuses, but are renowned for the breakthroughs those discoveries were. Math is more often than not a plodding, methodical, progressional pattern.
So you speak a few languages. I used to as well and I have tenants here who never got past grade six who read, write and speak half a dozen languages fluently. This is not genius, but rather entirely within the grasp of pretty much any human who wishes to apply themselves in that direction.
I do believe that the word genius has become rathr watered down in the past hundred years.
Upon further reflection and reading other threads, I have come to the realization that I was not put on moderation. My apologies; nonetheless, I will be retiring for the next few days; I have worked myself up to a point that is not good for my health, I believe.
Considering your demonstrated temperment here and the fact that you’ve suffered a recent break up, I think you’ve made a wise decision Steele. Best wishes for your improved health.
Steele, take care of yourself.
Steele, that seems to be a good decision. Take care.
…You guys are all incredibly generous.
Take it easy, Steele.
Katz, seriously. Maybe it’s just the shitty day, but I’m hoping that the door hits Steele on the ass on the way out.
And Diogenes. Wow. Mensa. That’s. Wow. I’m so impressed. Sincerely. (Granted, I’m impressed by something other than you passing the test, but impressed nonetheless.)
Hey, where’d the trolls go? I gotta kid with flu who’s going to keep me up tonight and I need an amusing toy to bat around while the demonseed is sleeping.
Appreciated. It’s possible I may have been a little bit hyperbolic recently. Not much, but a little – perhaps.