Categories
alpha asshole cock carousel alpha males antifeminism bad boys beta males evil women men who should not ever be with women ever misogyny MRA oppressed men oppressed white men PUA thug-lovers

Anglobitch: “Misandrist women cannot distinguish between Nobel Prize winners and tattooed psychopaths – all are men and thus worthless brutes in their entitled eyes.”

Ladies love psychos — and Psychlos!

We hear again and again from the angry dudes of the Manosphere that women are status-seeking sluts, spending their twenties riding what has come to be known as the Alpha Asshole Cock Carousel and shutting out the hapless beta males who beg for their attention. Indeed, some Manosphere dudes are so convinced by this narrative that they devote their whole life to learning how to be (or at least how to pretend to be)  the the Alphas males that the ladies allegedly prize so much.

Rookh Kshatriya on Anglobitch thinks these fellows – PUAs and “nice guys” alike  — are all wrong about “Anglosphere” women. Far from preferring Alphas, he suggests, these women would rather hook up with smelly, butt-scratching losers. Literally. Here’s his, er, argument:

Because of the puritanical fictions  that prevail in Anglo-American society, Anglo women have become impossible to please by rational means. … the bar has been set impossibly high. The outcome is either misandrist spinsterhood or, more often, what we see around us: a female obsession with the dregs of the male sex.  …

Since no male is good enough for her, all men are flattened into an undifferentiated, priapic horde in the Anglo female’s mind. A king is a jack is a joker… a classical scholar at Yale is suddenly no better than a murderous baboon like Charles Manson. An illiterate tramp with a ring through his nose instantly acquires the same standing as an architect, physicist or surgeon.

Naturally, Kshatriya provides no actual evidence for these odd assertions, but in the wide world of misogyny that’s never a deterrent for a guy with a new dumb theory about the evils of women.

[T]his is what makes Game – so appealing to the logical male mind – so ineffective in the Anglosphere. Misandrist women cannot distinguish between Nobel Prize winners and tattooed psychopaths – all are men and thus worthless brutes in their entitled eyes.  And so all the Gamers’ striving for ‘Alpha’ status is pointless – they might as well stick rings through their noses, grow some dreadlocks and slouch the streets scratching their butts.  Indeed, as many North American commentators claim, their mating chances would probably improve if they did this. ‘Omega males’ doubtless confirm the Anglo female’s contempt for men in general. If she has to have a man, only the worst knave will do.

I’m pretty sure that I’ve seen “Anglo females” out strolling with men who are neither wearing dreadlocks nor sporting nose rings nor scratching their asses, but those sightings must be anomalies.

Kshatriya is convinced that social conservatives are equally wrong about the ladies:

Writers like Daniel Amneus consider female hypergamy to be the ‘glue’ that binds male consent to the social order. …. In the Anglosphere, however, rational female hypergamy has short-circuited due to our cultural bloc’s uniquely puritanical socio-moral conditions. While alphas and high betas trudge home to empty beds or divorce threats, tramps and mass-murderers wade through tons of female flesh without breaking sweat. And so the Anglosphere falls apart around our ears. Yet still David Futrelle exhorts us all to ‘respect women’ and be ‘nice’.

Woah, that was a bit of a surprise ending there.

But obviously I must be doing something  terribly wrong to merit such a mention. I guess I’d better start growing out some white-boy dreads and thinking awful things about women.

247 replies on “Anglobitch: “Misandrist women cannot distinguish between Nobel Prize winners and tattooed psychopaths – all are men and thus worthless brutes in their entitled eyes.””

While alphas and high betas trudge home to empty beds or divorce threats, tramps and mass-murderers wade through tons of female flesh without breaking sweat.

I thought that it was the very definition of “alpha” to “wade through tons of female flesh without breaking sweat”. What other criteria is this guy thinking of?

“I guess I’d better start growing out some white-boy dreads and thinking awful things about women.”

Why not? You might even finally lose your virginity!

tramps and mass-murderers wade through tons of female flesh without breaking sweat.

I’m impressed by anyone who can wade through tons of flesh without sweating. The smell alone would be pretty nasty…

Boobz, you’re a woman aren’t you? All emotion, no facts (except occasionally a couple taken out of context and twisted.)

Hey assbag, why the tat hate?

Anyway, David, their hatecrush on you grows ever more adorbs.

Since there are only three women for every hundred men*, I can see the problem here!

*If by women, you mean conventionally very attractive women between the ages of 18-25. The rest of the women around don’t exist. The problem is that those women don’t happen to have much in common with him and are dating someone who is different from him.

Also, I thought hypergamy was supposed to be a bad thing? But I guess if an MRA sees a women dating someone he considers inferior to himself, suddenly women are fucked up for not being hypergamous, as we’re denying our true nature. Also, we’re not sleeping with him. (Well, not me, I’m nearly 50, so I don’t exist.)

Because people who look loserly obviously are. No one who looks “loserly” is ever a good person.

I’m a computer scientist (sometimes…I wear a lot of hats). A lot of the guys around me are not handsome in the classical way. My mom, who has some more conventional ideas about appearance than I, once commented to me that a guy I worked with who I had a crush on “looked like a loser” and that it was shocking to her that he was so smart. He has a PhD and an awesome job appointment. He’s productive, hardworking, multilingual, all cool stuff. This need to break men into good dudes and losers just shows that the MRM isn’t just anti-woman, anti-child and pro-abuse. They’re seriously, severely anti-man, as well.

Oh… dear. Uhm. The thing is… BoyFantastic has a nose ring and was talking about dreading his hair earlier today. I’m also sure I’ve seen him scratch his bum at one time or another, since we live together and mystery be damned.

Butbutbut he is also nice, kind, not a murderer, has a degree and a job (that he’s really good at), does other super-awesome things AND even treats me like a human being.

And when I met him he didn’t have a nose ring and I had no idea of his opinions on dreadlocks or bum-scratching, so I don’t think this theory really stands up.

Driversuz, trolls aren’t allowed to play bingo. You can’t just spout out the cliches trying to fill your own card.

Boobz, you’re a woman aren’t you? All emotion, no facts (except occasionally a couple taken out of context and twisted.)

Okay, I don’t usually do this, but all’s fair when trolls lie.

Driversuz, a week or two ago, people were speculating about whether you were a new troll, or a sock puppet for an old one, and I googled your username. I found your Discus user profile (http://disqus.com/driversuz/), which I know is you because it has the same profile picture. In an article about online attacks against Mary Kellet, here http://bangordailynews.com/2012/08/28/news/hancock/online-attacks-against-hancock-county-assistant-district-attorney-unusual-other-prosecutors-say/#comment-633754152 you write

Wow, that was pathetic. btw, I AM female, but I have no “gender” loyalty to the likes of Kellett. Female criminals are criminals. Period.

What’s up with that, troll? You just like to stir shit up, don’t you?

An illiterate tramp with a ring through his nose instantly acquires the same standing as an architect, physicist or surgeon.

I just have to break radio silence to have a good laugh at Roosh, who seems to live in a world where no architect, physicist or surgeon wears tattoos or nose rings. I had two friends (one M and one F) in my university’s Physics department who went with me to underground punk rock shows. At the time I had a pinkish red mohawk and I wasn’t even the most outlandish of our trio. I was doing a Masters degree at the time.

I also know of two social workers and one nurse (working in the surgery bloc) who have, at the very least, full sleeves.

and was talking about dreading his hair earlier today.

It took me a moment to realise that was dreading as in putting his hair into dreadlocks – I had an image of BoyFantastic developing a phobia about his hair. Which is a thing, it’s called chaetophobia. (Yeah, everyone probably already knew that!)

As to the OP … oy, every time I think MRAs have reached the bottom of the “how fucking stupid can they be” barrel, they go a little deeper.

Since no male is good enough for her, all men are flattened into an undifferentiated, priapic horde in the Anglo female’s mind. A king is a jack is a joker… a classical scholar at Yale is suddenly no better than a murderous baboon like Charles Manson. An illiterate tramp with a ring through his nose instantly acquires the same standing as an architect, physicist or surgeon.

It’s odd. The first thing I thought of when I read this was the ship wars of fandoms yesteryear– specifically the anti-slash cry of “why do you you have to slash every guy with every other guy?” There was a presumption that every fan liked the same stuff, so if three different slash fans liked three different slash pairings, all slash fans must like all three pairings, and therefore “slashed everyone”.

I mean, I guess it’s kind of common if you’re smushing everyone in a community into an undifferentiated monolith to get confused by their differing preferences.

I don’t know. It made sense in my head. I think I need to take a nap.

Since no male is good enough for her, all men are flattened into an undifferentiated, priapic horde in the Anglo female’s mind. A king is a jack is a joker… a classical scholar at Yale is suddenly no better than a murderous baboon like Charles Manson. An illiterate tramp with a ring through his nose instantly acquires the same standing as an architect, physicist or surgeon.

It’s odd. The first thing I thought of when I read this was the ship wars of fandoms yesteryear– specifically the anti-slash cry of “why do you you have to slash every guy with every other guy?” There was a presumption that every fan liked the same stuff, so if three different slash fans liked three different slash pairings, all slash fans must like all three pairings, and therefore “slashed everyone”.

I mean, I guess it’s kind of common if you’re smushing everyone in a community into an undifferentiated monolith to get confused by their differing preferences.

I don’t know. It made sense in my head. I think I need to take a nap.

NOW WITH LESS BLOCKQUOTE FAIL! 😀

I hope you’re listening, women. Don’t go out with high status men or low status men, because either way you’re bound to be doing something wrong. Probably better to stay away from mid status men as well, just to be sure.

What is the actual argument here? The most coherent thing I’m getting is “Feminists/white Western women hate men, so they only date the men that confirm their prejudice.” But that may be giving Kshatriya too much credit.

driversuz, could you point out where in Kshatriya’s obviously emotional rant I might find some actual facts?

Also, could you point out where I took anything he wrote out of context or twisted it? I actually quoted a good chunk of his post; much of what I removed was simply redundant.

Again, I am so confused about how to classify my boyfriend. He’s a tattooed DJ *and* a chemistry major! Am I dating an illiterate tramp or not?

I know, right? I married a guy with tattoos and longer hair than I have (by, like, a lot), who played right tackle in college but who also has a Master’s degree in music conducting and theory. What am I supposed to think, really? (I mean, other than “wow, I am glad I married this guy and not Kshatriya or any of his ilk!”)

Women only sleep with alpha males. The definition of alpha male is anyone women sleep with ergo the statement is proved.

Many white male physicists my age (27) are married or in long term relationships, there are some exceptions though. For people from cultures where it is less traditional to get married early, or dating isn’t the norm, or marriage is a bit more structured and occurs only after schooling there are a lot more single people. However if you talk about being in relationships I’d say being a physicist (at least for men) indicates a higher success rate than many other professions. Oddly most mathematicians I know are single so clearly physicists take all the women.

These guys are way too caught up in everyone else’s business–what you should look like, act like, who you should sleep with. I guess it’s comforting to know that MRAs hate men more than any radfem.

I’m not sure how to classify myself and my husband, two tattooed/pierced, educated people with good jobs according to the criteria above.

Some day the MRM really needs to have a summit or something to sort things out between the “women only fuck alphas and that’s terrible,” “women only fuck alphas and that’s awesome,” “women are sluts who fuck everyone,” “women are sluts who never fuck anyone,” and “women only fuck thugs [racist version] and/or guys with dreadlocks [slightly less racist but still definitely racist version]” factions.

My boyfriend was very surprised to find out he has dreadlocks, piercings and tattoos that he wasn’t previously aware of. And that his job is imaginary.

Some day the MRM really needs to have a summit or something

By something, I hope you mean cage match.

While alphas and high betas trudge home to empty beds … mass-murderers wade through tons of female flesh without breaking sweat … Yet still David Futrelle exhorts us all to ‘respect women’ and be ‘nice’.

Because the only good reason to be ‘nice’ to someone is to get in their pants.

Falconer – good point. Now if he said “women are screwing clones of John Travolta in that makeup” he might have something to complain about.

And I didn’t even see the film.

I’d like to stick up for illiterate tramps. Both my fellas were illiterate, and both have been homeless at times. Both are also much better people than the bloke quoted in the post.
even No 2, the root rat 🙂

Soooo Anglob—- is a site, note a person. See? I told you I hadn’t read it.

A king is a jack is a joker… a classical scholar at Yale is suddenly no better than a murderous baboon like Charles Manson. An illiterate tramp with a ring through his nose instantly acquires the same standing as an architect, physicist or surgeon.

Helllooooooooo classism!

And when I scratch my butt in public, every woman whose company I’m keeping at the time tells me to stop.

Yet still David Futrelle exhorts us all to ‘respect women’ and be ‘nice’.

David Futrelle: The Snowball of the modern men’s rights movement.

Joanna not met enough to pass comment 🙂 I just notice that at conferences most people make attempts to contact or mention partners

OK, that tattooed = evil thing is flooring me. I thought body art was pretty commonplace these days. I don’t even do a double take on tattoos unless someone’s got something like an amazing sleeve and they’re wearing a t-shirt. I must be surrounded by the dregs of society 24/7 and have never known until now.

I find it very interesting that the worth of a guy isn’t related to, you know, how kind he is, how good of a person he is, how much he helps others, or even things like how hot he is or how passionate he is about his job or how intelligent he is. Noooope, it’s all about CLASS. Nice middle-class white women are fucking the DIRTY POORS, some of whom even have SKIN THAT IS DARKER THAN OFF-WHITE. Someone fetch me my smelling salts.

My mum had a tattoo done when she was seventy-something … does that make her evil and illiterate, too?

Ozy –

I find it very interesting that the worth of a guy isn’t related to, you know, how kind he is, how good of a person he is, how much he helps others, or even things like how hot he is or how passionate he is about his job or how intelligent he is.

Yes, because all those things exclude MRAs.

By something, I hope you mean cage match.

… well, I didn’t, but now that you’ve suggested it I am 100% on board. First match: JohntheOther against two or three bored people thirty people with boxcutters!

Gametime: It’s almost as if women have lots of different tastes and fuck lots of different people!

Keep up that kind of talk and we might have to abandon the idea of obsessing over sex with women as a faceless, anonymous amalgamation altogether!

I thought body art was pretty commonplace these days.

My money is on the guy being a very ‘upright’ guy who hates that this is true more than he hates the body art in the first place. That he wants things to be like they were in the 50s and doesn’t understand that the later generations are able to take on aesthetics of different cultures/sub cultures without buying in to all the behavioral rules as well. He wants everyone to be in neat little boxes because then his ‘logical’ plan for success will get him to the top. He doesn’t realise that it’s not women being fickle, it’s that the entire world has moved on without him.

Who should we pair up against Otis?

What about a FMRA who could rip him to shreds?

Nobel prize winners, physicists, architects okay (because not a one has a tattoo). Guess they’re not too big on war vets, though, what with so many of the, having tattoos.

@Kim – Yeah, I was going to venture that Mr. Kshatriya was showing his age here. I know it’s too much to ask for logic in an emotional rant, but it seems dumb to point out tattoos as a sign of moral degeneration when you know a good chunk of your audience will have them.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.