
Norwegian Men’s Rights Activist blogger Eivind Berge, known for his violent rhetoric and rape apologia, has been arrested for death threats against police.
Not too surprising, given that he once announced on his blog that “[k]illing at least one cop is on my bucket list.”
Here are some Google-translated details from a news account here:
The right-wing extremist and anti-feminist blogger Eivind Berge has been arrested for having encouraged and glorified the killing of policemen. The police have found both ammunition and textbooks in use of explosives at Berge.
The police regard the threats as an invitation to others to kill police officers, but also feared that he would commit the acts themselves shortly.
He was evidently arrested on Wednesday. According to this story — at least as far as I can tell from the obviously crude Google translation — he made a specific threat to kill a police officer this Saturday:
Berge also writes about how he was planning to attack a policeman with a knife on a Saturday evening:
“Then I used the trial to come forward as a good example for men, and I considered it to be worth 21 years in prison for premeditated murder.”
According to this account, Berge is being held for two weeks. He claims innocence.
Berge, as readers of this blog may well already know, is a fan of right-wing terrorist and mass murderer Anders Brevik. On his blog, he’s also argued (among other things) that “Rape is Equality.”
He’s glorified the murder of police on his blog numerous times.
Some examples, taken from the second news account:
“… attack on the police is something 100% in harmony with everything I stand for.”
“I maintain that police murder is both ethically and tactically correct.”
Some other examples, direct from his blog (each paragraph is from a separate post; click on the quote for the source):
I viscerally despise cops and wish them the worst. Killing at least one cop is on my bucket list.
If ever a victim of psychiatry, here is what I would do. I would first attempt to kill the cops or whoever tried to apprehend me. Failing that, I would feign docility in order to get out as soon as possible and then kill a representative of the industry as revenge. … killing cops is also very much a men’s issue. Every pig killed is also a blow against feminism, so men should be doubly elated whenever an officer goes down in the line of encroaching on our cognitive liberty.
This was his reaction to a news story about a police officer being killed:
Good news for men is rare in this hateful feminist utopia that is Norway, but today is a joyous day! Today I feel schadenfreude in my heart along with all the hate that feminism and resultant mate deprivation have instilled in me. One blue thug less on the streets.
From another post on the same subject:
The swine Olav Kildal died while trying to enforce our lack of cognitive liberty. This was a defensive, much deserved killing that cheered me up.
Here he threatens a female prosecutor:
To feminist prosecutor Anne Cathrine Aga I have the following message: The Men’s Movement is watching you, bitch, and we are seething with hatred against you personally and the police state you represent. Actions have consequences. Trials are still (mostly) public and they sink into our collective minds, where they form the basis of future activism. Hate breeds hate — that is a fact of life too smugly ignored by feminists. …
2011 is the year Norwegian men as a group emerged out of the blogosphere and into the battlefield. This in turn has led to a breakthrough for MRAs such as my good self in the public discourse, probably for the simple reason that the powers that be now realize ignoring us has deadly consequences. Men are angry now, and we have proven that we are deathly serious about resisting feminism. So the feminist prosecutors referred to above ought to wipe that smug look off their faces before it is too late. Clearly seventy-seven body bags wasn’t enough, but I am fairly confident that you will be sorry one day.
Aside from the explicit threats of violence, the violent and threatening rhetoric here is not unlike much of the rhetoric we see regularly on A Voice for Men and other MRA sites. AVFM founder Paul Elam, for example, told one feminist that:
I find you so pernicious and repugnant that the idea of fucking your shit up gives me an erection. … We are coming for you.
The blogger Emma the Emo, Berge’s girlfriend, has posted comments here in the past defending him. The news account quotes someone identified as Nataliya Kochergova, described as his girlfriend; I assume this is “Emma,” because what she told the media is similar to what she posted here. She of course denies that he planned any real violence. According to the article, she said:
There are not really threats. He has never had plans to kill someone, he has said several times in his blog. When for example, he says that “the police killings are an effective way to prevent stupid laws,” it’s a factual description and not a threat. Even those who love the police agree with it.
Berge, for his part, has stated publicly that if he had not met Emma, he probably would have killed by now:
At the time I wrote my last blog post, I believed I would probably become Norway’s first modern violent activist in peacetime. Celibacy enforced by a feminist regime had driven me to the point where I saw no other option. I would target the pigs who enforce feminist law, knowing I could realistically at least kill one of them before I would be captured or killed myself. Thus revenge would be assured and if I lived, my reputation as a violent criminal would make me attractive to some women. But then in the nick of time this blog attracted a lovely girl commenting as “Emma.”
This is why I take violent rhetoric from MRAs very seriously.
Meanwhile, on this side of the Atlantic, MRAs glorify MRA “martyr” Thomas Ball, who killed himself on the steps of a New Hampshire courthouse last year in hopes that his death would inspire MRAs to literally burn down courthouses and police stations.
Ball’s manifesto is still up on A Voice for Men in its “activism” section, including these passages:
So boys, we need to start burning down police stations and courthouses. … This is too important to be using that touchy- feeling coaching that is so popular with business these days. You need to flatten them, like Wile E. Coyote. They need to be taught never to replace the rule of law. BURN-THEM-OUT!
Most of the police stations built in New England over the last 20 years are stone or brick. Fortunately, the roofs are still wood. The advantage of fire on the roof is that it is above the sprinklers
AVFM tastefully omitted Ball’s specific instructions on how to make Molotov cocktails, but left this in:
There will be some casualties in this war. Some killed, some wounded, some captured. Some of them will be theirs. Some of the casualties will be ours.
For many more examples of violent threatening rhetoric from MRAs, I urge you to go through some of my posts here and here.


Steele, I’d also like to ask you about something. You claim that the MRM is necessary, but could you point me to anything they’ve actually done? I mean I know it’s super-tiring spending all day on the internet calling women bitches and gender-policing, not to mention the homophobia, racism, transphobia and general wank-baggery, but in areas that disproportionately problematically affect men (i.e. higher rates of suicide), what has actually been done? Even if you haven’t done anything (you haven’t), what would you propose be done?
Because what I’d say is if there weren’t people aggressively enforcing gender roles and arbitrary rules (i.e. “boys don’t cry”) then maybe men who are likely to commit suicide would be able to ask for help before the situation got critical? That would honestly help. So how is the MRM going about this? Calling people ‘manginas’ for expressing emotion seems to… well, I’m not going to lie Steele, you’re kind of doing the opposite of helping men in real danger.
Huh.
Well, hellkell, Berge’s rape advocacy/apologetics didn’t specifically reference 10 year olds. Naturally, Eurosabra is aghast.
Fuck heads.
Yes, but my alma mater is against child rape, is generally pro-decrim, and has comfy chairs. As I am and I do.
@Nobinayamu:
Gets pissy at blogs for not using his specific definition of a word for 1000+ comments, but adamantly refuses to justify his assertion that the word refers to a real thing because his opponents are “too dogmatic?”
Yeah, I can see how that would be really “necessary.”
Thanks, Kirby.
You’re going to be surprised, if not exactly comforted, that I was led to Berge via the Hit the Bitch and Stockholm the Game controversies when I was tasked with doing an anti-rape PSA’s subtitles. I personally am all sorts of ick, but my work is progressive. Consider it, well, penance.
Piss off, Eurosabra. You’re not even the most offensive person in this thread anymore, which makes you doubly pointless.
And I probably should have inveighed.against him, rather than considr him ” but for the Grace of G-d go I”.
Let me stop you right here – You’re both an admitted and demonstrable liar so I don’t believe a fucking word that comes off of your fingers.
We good? Good.
Don’t have to believe, it’s true.
You never responded to this, Steele, so I’m gonna ask again:
I can think of one movement that tells me I don’t have to a misogynist asshole to be a man, that I can be who I want to be and stereotypes be damned, and it ain’t the fucking MRM.
You’re here. You have an audience. So sell it. What’s the MRM got to offer me?
BTW, unlike Berge I’m not in Schutzhaft and I don’t owe £37,000. So am obvs doing stg right.
” Not a felon” obvs not world’s strongest selling pt, tho.
@Eurosabra
Please shut the fuck up. Do you really think you can fool us after all you’ve condoned and done?
@Dracula:
Steele isn’t here to argue that right now. What he really wants to argue about is how the MRM is necessary to help ease the suffering that all men face today by fighting our society’s pervasive misandry.
Besides, you’re a feminist. You won’t believe him out of principle. So *Phbbbbbbt*
@TheNatFantastic
“Steele, I’d also like to ask you about something. You claim that the MRM is necessary, but could you point me to anything they’ve actually done? I mean I know it’s super-tiring spending all day on the internet calling women bitches and gender-policing, not to mention the homophobia, racism, transphobia and general wank-baggery, but in areas that disproportionately problematically affect men (i.e. higher rates of suicide), what has actually been done? Even if you haven’t done anything (you haven’t), what would you propose be done?”
Calling everyone’s attention to the world’s most vile hate movement and the destruction it’s caused is a noble goal. If women are being bitches telling them their flaws is a very good thing.
Only one gender is policed, women are never held accountable for their stupid behavior.
There’s no such thing as homosexual or transsexual. All sexuality is due to reproduction.
Telling someone their actions are repulsive is also good so they won’t continue doing it.
Everywhere that’s adopted the hate movement of feminism has seen a huge rise in men committing suicide. All data shows that pre feminism men and women committed suicide in roughly equal numbers, the amount of rise in suicides among men is directly proportional to the amount of feminism forced on any given society.
The proposal is simple, the destruction of the hate movement known as feminism.
Apparently the key to having a clear conscience is maintaining incredibly low moral standards.
Look, fuckwit, I’m not a 23 year old full of appletinis, and teetering on a pair of knock-off Louboutins, in some L.A. club at 3 in the morning. You can stop now.
I’m as uninterested in your new lies as I am in your old ones.
Eurosabra, the SS CreepyasFuck has sailed, and you’re on it. Let it go. Stop typing.
Is Eurosabra really seriously thinking that he will somehow, someway, be on our good site NOW? Or even EVER?
I just can’t…it’s like he honestly thinks that’s possible, when most of us have his “mild gaslighting” and “I’m a facist so fuck Hannah Arendt” bullshit implanted in our memories, clear as crystal, like in Total Recall.
@Steele:
I agree, for example, that male circumcision is wrong and would like to see it stopped. What has the MRM proposed to do about it? I am curious because I don’t see much positive male activism coming out of the MRM. Instead, I see a whole lot of angst and anger misdirected at women in an environment that not only welcomes it but reinforces wallowing in it. I am totally for men working on issues that they feel negatively impacts their gender unfairly. I just don’t see how the MRM is actually doing much of anything to really help anyone.
Funny thing is the MRM is doing the opposite of helping. The anti-male sentiment Steele keeps talking about? A lot of it comes from the MRM itself, they’re just too stupid to see it.
@Steele
Here is a list of things that feminist activists have done for men:
Advocated for and acheived legislation against prison rape.
Set up thousands of shelters and sexaul assault centers. There is a feminist-run crisis center open to all genders in virtually every major city in the world.
Advocated for greater acceptance of non-normative sex acts. There’s still about 10 states where fellatio is illegal, and they’re not the ones who listen to feminists.
Advocated for greater acceptance of non-normative sexuality and gender expression.
Over the last thirty years, have promoted the idea that men can be child care providers and that relationships can be equitable. The rate of men receiving custody after divorce has massively increased as a result.
Here is a list of things that MRAs have done for men:
Fuck all.
Do you have anything to add to that second list there? I’m all ears.
Shorter Eurosabra – “Well, I’m better than that guy who advocates child rape, as well as the other, rapier PUAs. Cookie now, please?”
Aim high, creeper.
@Steele
Also, I’d imagine my list of things feminism has done for men is far from complete.
It’s true that feminism is focused on women, I don’t think that’s inherently a bad thing. However, what does it say about the MRM that feminism has accomplished so much for men despite not focusing on them, while the MRM’s only accomplishments are tedious internet defenses of pedophile apologists and a couple of terrorist manifestos?
Also, if you want to read male-focused activism that isn’t actually just painfully stupid screeds about Jesus’ sex life or hateful shit, check out the feminist/masculinist blog at What About the Menz!