Categories
disgusting women evil women man boobz fun time videos men who should not ever be with women ever misogyny oppressed men racism reactionary bullshit vaginas

Man Boobz Video 6: Are North American white women a bunch of whiney-vagineys?

Well, Man Boobz Super Fun Time Video Party is back, and you may notice a few changes. First, the bad news: Tiny Bunny and Small Dog are on hiatus. The Good News: I’ve moved on from Xtranormal to a real animation program, Muvizu, and am now using actual human beings for the voices.

This episode takes us to scenic Los Angeles to meet a fellow calling himself John, who offers some reflections on North American white women. He’s not fond of them. Apparently he’s much more fond of African and Latin American women. It’s not clear if any women of any race are fond of him and, if so, why on earth that would be. I found John’s little monologue on the blog Boycott American Women.

Playing the of John from Los Angeles, or at least his voice, is Jack Rose. Big, big thanks to Jack for an excellent job, and on very short notice.

 

 

Here’s the somewhat edited version of John’s monologue I used in the video:

Many of the stupidest women i have ever met were white females from North America. Truth is, white north american females are really like the old Ford clunkers our grand-parents used to buy: they are unreliable, expensive, rather grotesque, and dangerously unpredictable.

White women are truly pigs. Can we expedite the caliphate so that they get the come-uppance they richly deserve? …

Ask any man who was stupid enough to marry one of these pigs and you’ll see exactly where I’m coming from. they have emotional problems, are deviants, amoral and just flat-out nasty; plus, they really are overweight, smelly and ill-mannered.

Only losers marry white females.  The tragedy for american women is that they’ve bitched their way right out of the marketplace. Men want something better and the rest of the world offers that. bye, bye, whiney-vagineys; the jig is up and men are looking elsewhere.

More Man Boobz videos are on the way.

213 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Rutee Katreya
10 years ago

“women CHOOSE to work in fields that pay less
women CHOOSE to work fewer hours per week”
Actually, that’s not the wage gap. The wage gap strictly relates to compensation for full time, salaried workers within the same field, and it still exists when you control for that.

“women CHOOSE to work in fields with lower risk, etc.”
This is the biggest piece of bullshit MRAs’ve ever been sold. on this topic

It’s not that it’s not, itself, true, but it’s not remotely connected to any income gaps. The only risky jobs that pay more are governmental positions, and even then it’s only relatively. If you actually weren’t going to control for hours and field in determining the wage gap, a far bigger confound can be found than military, police, fire fighting, and construction; it’s the super wealthy, and the positions that create new ones. They receive the majority of the income within the US, and they are overwhelming male. But we control for those things, and the fact that sexism steers women out of risky work isn’t relevant when determining whether the women who DO still end up in those fields get paid equally.

“Men like you CHOOSE dirty and unpleasant jobs because you are too lazy to find a better one”
WHoa, tone down the classism there.

“Men like you CHOOSE to work in fields with high risk because those fields offer inflated pay and numerous perks.”
No, no they don’t; benefits for high risk government employees (The only ones who actually *GET* good benefits) are not as awesome as the benefits for bureacrats, engineers, etc, who work for the government. Sorry, this just isn’t true.

cynickal
cynickal
10 years ago

Anyone who says women “want” to be on the front lines so they can die is a liar.

You never get tired of being wrong, do you?

“Catherine Ross wants to see women afforded full combat roles”
http://www.theatlanticwire.com/politics/2010/02/pros-and-cons-of-allowing-women-in-combat-roles/25482/

“Women are barred from joining combat branches”
http://www.nytimes.com/2009/08/16/us/16women.html?pagewanted=all

“Yet, over and over, in Iraq and Afghanistan, Army commanders have resorted to bureaucratic trickery when they needed more soldiers for crucial jobs, like bomb disposal and intelligence. On paper, for instance, women have been “attached” to a combat unit rather than “assigned.””

Holly Pervocracy
10 years ago

Actually, let’s cut this to the core.

HEY NWO: Do you believe women are innately evil from birth?

If so, why?

If not, why do women become evil?

shesaidwut
shesaidwut
10 years ago

NWOslave

Just because men force women in the army into “coddled” positions doesn’t mean that’s where they want to be.

Anyone who says women want to be on the front lines is not a liar. They might, however, be a historian. Why not research with women of the Russian steppe tribes, who fought as warriors until they reached a healthy age to bear children–which we know because graves of these women, killed in battle, have been found. (See Warrior Women by Jeannine Davis-Kimball)

How about Queen Manduhai, who restored the kingdom of the Mongols? For that matter, Mongol women in general were no slouches. (See Genghis Khan and the Making of the Modern World and The Secret History of the Mongol Queens by Jack Weatherford)

There’s always, of course, Jeanne d’Arc, who lifted the months-long siege on Orleans in under a week and charged into battle with her troops, taking more than one arrow in the process and, among other things, getting a stone to the helmet while scaling a wall. (See Joan of Arc: By Herself and Her Witnesses and Joan of Arc: Her Story by Regine Pernoud)

Or maybe you could try looking into the women who disguised themselves as men to fight in the civil war. I haven’t gotten to in depth study on them, but I’m looking forward to it.

The problem with you MRAs is, you’re not only not in touch with the present reality, you’re also not in touch with the past, either. You can make all the statements you want, but it doesn’t change the facts. The facts are written in history and history is set in stone. Women are not afraid of dying on the front lines. No more than men are.

So um, when is your bullet on the front lines scheduled for, by the way?

Sharculese
10 years ago

Why not research with women of the Russian steppe tribes, who fought as warriors until they reached a healthy age to bear children–which we know because graves of these women, killed in battle, have been found. (See Warrior Women by Jeannine Davis-Kimball)

no wonder russia invented modern feminist communism, then

Sharculese
10 years ago

owlslave still waiting for you to tell me what you think a corporation is

Holly Pervocracy
10 years ago

NWO has the magical ability to interpret ANY information as confirming what he already knows.

If a woman says she doesn’t want a combat role, he believes she’s telling the truth (albeit for the worst possible reasons–she wants men to die).

If a woman says she wants a combat role, he believes she’s lying.

NWO may not be totally sure why she’s lying, but he knows she is. She must be. And if she keeps saying it, he gets angry with what a constant liar she is. And if a lot of women say it, he gets furious that so many women are liars.

NWO is thus literally immune to evidence.

cynickal
cynickal
10 years ago

That’s CORPORATION.

KathleenB
KathleenB
10 years ago

NWO: Or Boadicea, who led the united armies of Celts into battle against the Romans (and burned Londinium to the ground in the process). Hells, look at woman fighters in the modern SCA! It’s not exactly deadly, but they sure as fuck don’t get coddled on the field!

Rutee Katreya
10 years ago

Surprisingly, the Vikings were also fairly gender equal. The women died in battle same as the men. This was erased in modern media portrayals of the vikings, and it started changing with the Christianization of Scandinavia, if I remember my lectures correctly.

Oh, I see why we’re discussing warrior women, Owlslave is saying they don’t exist.

shesaidwut
shesaidwut
10 years ago

Rutee: Not only were they (like many other women warriors) erased, but we’re now unearthing archaeological proof, and there’s likely a lot more to be found. Until recently, it was common practice in archaeology to decide a burial was male simply because there were weapons in it. Now archaeology teams are starting to work with anthropologists, which is turning up, shall we say, slightly different results.

So how long before NWO comes in here to insist that women were somehow responsible for that practice, I wonder?

feminist Goebbels
10 years ago

You can tell the same lie a million times Goebbels, yet it’s still a lie.

until i get bored with it, im feminist goebbels

KathleenB
KathleenB
10 years ago

NWO: So, when are you scheduled for basic training? How many bullets are you willing to take for your country? The record among people I know is 15 – all in one leg, taken while pulling wounded out of a burning building and covering them until they could be evacuated. The guy who did this got one of the highest possible medals and a standing offer of any help he needs from Cheney. He also killed an al Quaeda leader – someone on the card deck, don’t know who, and is currently on a hit list circulated through extremist groups. And no, I won’t give any more info that that – for his safety and for my nephew’s. He has permanent nerve damage, bad enough that the pain meds he takes could knock out a charging rhino, and his doctors are still debating whether the damage is bad enough that they should amputate – the only thing holding them back is that even if they take the leg, the pain might not stop. This man sacrificed his mobility and peace of mind for people he doesn’t know. You?

Sharculese
10 years ago

i have to do the moderation thing again just cause i changed my name? screw that, im sticking with sharculese

KathleenB
KathleenB
10 years ago

Effing html tags…

Rutee Katreya
10 years ago

“Rutee: Not only were they (like many other women warriors) erased, but we’re now unearthing archaeological proof, and there’s likely a lot more to be found. Until recently, it was common practice in archaeology to decide a burial was male simply because there were weapons in it. Now archaeology teams are starting to work with anthropologists, which is turning up, shall we say, slightly different results.”
Define ‘now’. AFAIK the scandinavians who care have known this for some time. It’s just now getting press elsewhere, is the understanding I have.

KathleenB
KathleenB
10 years ago

Vikings

A small side note: Viking was a verb, it meant to go out raiding, hunting, etc. Norse is the proper term for the people who went a’viking.

shesaidwut
shesaidwut
10 years ago

Scandinavians have suspected it for a long time, but as far as I know the actual evidence, as in physical evidence, is a lot more recent.

(My husband is Danish. I’m living in Sweden. You kinda end up hearing a lot about this sort of thing. 🙂 )

KathleenB
KathleenB
10 years ago

This is the only article on Norse women warriors I can find in a quick check:

http://tinyurl.com/3qmlft5

It’s USA Today, admittedly not the greatest scientific resource in the world…

Plus, the article on jezebel, not worth much, but the header picture is pretty badass:

http://jezebel.com/5822867/viking-women-could-invade-with-the-best-of-them

Pecunium
10 years ago

NWO: I don’t pull this card out very often.

How long did you spend in the Army? When? In what MOS? What combat theaters?

Because I just finished a career. I spent time in a combat zone. I spent time in a Medical Hold Unit (3/3 Medical Hold Co/5122 GSB/I Corp, at Ft. Lewis Wash). Half my troops were female. They ranged from one who had a grenade take out part of her knee (nothing major), to one who was cut out her vehicle (she was driving) when she had to choose between sheer drops, or slamming into the vehicle in front of her. Her A Driver (also female) didn’t make it. The cab decapitated her.

The only soldiers I had who were suffering from mental disorders were male. One PTSD case, (discharged), and a narcoleptic (he was also discharged, the jury was still out on the question of whether he was suffering from a defensive psychiatric condition). I had three females who worked like hell to get back to theater. I had two males who did everything they could to avoid it.

The rest were content to let the wheels of the medical system grind their slow way. About half were sent back to theater.

The percentage of females who went back was about 50/50. For males it was about 65-35.

The only person in my unit to get a purple heart was female. She took a grenade fragment in the eye. She never left the theater. One of the female troops I was evacced to Germany with refused to moved back to the states. She figured she’d get better the same in either location, and from the states it would be harder to get back to the combat zone.

So… that’s my experience.

Your experience is what?

Kave
Kave
10 years ago
Kave
Kave
10 years ago

Slave

Have you ever defended your legal documents are in uppercase rant? I thought not.
You know you’re a liar right?

hellkell
hellkell
10 years ago

“As I explained above, the “more feminism” you offer was offered in the former Soviet Union, the birthplace of modern feminism.”

LOL, wut?

Have you considered contacting DeBeers and having your ass certified as a diamond mine? Because you have pulling some GEMS out of there lately, my man.

hellkell
hellkell
10 years ago

^have been

%d bloggers like this: