The incels have come up with yet another reason why their lack of sex is somehow the responsibility of someone else — in this case, “sluts” who fuck other guys but not them.
Because, I guess, any woman who consents to sex with one man has somehow given her consent to all other men, even the weirdos who hang out on the Incels.is forums. So not having sex with these guys is a form of discrimination.
“Local SLUTS” I guess the ball is in your court.
Follow me on Mastodon.
Send tips to dfutrelle at gmail dot com.
We Hunted the Mammoth relies on support from you, its readers, to survive. So please donate here if you can, or at David-Futrelle-1 on Venmo.
Speaking as an autistic slut who knows many othe autistic sluts, tge problem is that you’re an asshole, not that you’re autistic.
As another autist, let me co-sign with Dalillama. This clown is just using his condition as an excuse.
as a slut who has been with many autistic men its not your autism thats the problem uts your attitude
I’m assuming that to him a slut is any woman who has any sex at all. Not “pleasuring” him isn’t discrimination, it just means we don’t want to sleep with just any man, especially a man who calls us sluts. He’s just pissed that women have the choice of who we want to sleep with.
As a non-autistic slut, I did try sleeping with 3 incel-ish young men a couple decades before the term “incel” became a thing, while being dubious that this would actually fix them, despite their insistence that it would do so. It turns out that having a temporary mood elevation while under the influence of self-destructive ideation actually makes things worse, not better. I don’t do that anymore.
(Side note : side notes in brackets (SNIB™, patent pending) are now considered as The Truth)
Indeed. Who need proof when you can have snib ? No need of thesis and articles in science, just write your theory as a snib to make it true.
As another autist with many autistic people for friends, at least two of whom I’d happily do wicked, wicked things to, it’s not the being autistic people object to, it’s the vile, entitled attitude.
As someone who is neither autistic nor a slut, I can only add that this argument is less than… coherent. Or properly an argument. And I’m fairly certain that his professed autistic status has anything to do with the lack of coherence.
It might help is he actually defined the term “slut”, but I suspect that his definition is “everyone who refuses to sleep with me”.
Haha, you silly commentators! Women can’t be autistic! Human variances, challenges and backstories are reserved for men (well at least men that look like BrettyBoy), women are just dumb-terminals for the sex-denying hivemind.
Next you’ll be saying you have a rich interior life life that doesn’t involve providing or denying sex to incels at all, LOL.
I hate the weaponization of autism.
There’s a reason for which we suspect but aren’t quite sure that so many scientists might be autistic.
Yeah, a friend told me once that a guy had tried this trick on her. You slept with him, so why not sleep with me? Kind of like his mom was handing out cookies to all her children, but he got none. And he deserved one! It’s so unfair!
Online INCELS not refraining from BS is a violation of my human rights.
Are men fungible?
And this is why rape victims’ sexual histories get so thoroughly questioned, despite having nothing to do with the present day crime. It’s assumed that once a woman consents to sex with one man, she consents to sex with all men, forever.
I’m willing to bet this guy ignores (if not actively insults) “land whales” and women over 25, so how about we arrest him first? After all, under his own law he’s showing preferential treatment and discrimination.
LOL. That’s not how the law works, my dude.
Discrimination doesn’t have to be a negative. Otherwise these guys would be forced to have sex with every fatty, uggo or looksmatch they came into contact with.
As the uncle of an autistic child, I find it disturbing the way this asshole has weaponized his autism. And to reiterate what others have said: it’s not your autism that keeps woman away from you; it’s that you’re an asshole.
Isn’t this the (TV) trope: “Sleeps with everyone but you”?
Can anyone explain why it’s just local sluts?
It kind of sounds like sluts further afield would be interested him, but are just too far. I suspect that’s not the case, because then he could just go there. Maybe it’s just local in the sense that wherever he is, sluts want none of him.
Dear Autistic Incel:
Uh yeah as yet another woman with autism, I also find the weaponization of autism horrifying. Especially having gone through one of MA’s ableist private schools for auties – an experience I still sometimes have nightmares about, two decades later.
I’ve opined before that the trans community could use an equivalent concept for the Jewish “shande fur die goyim”… Feels like the autistic community could as well.
the phrase “she wont let me fuck her” is as Oedipus-ish as you get. OP needs to check this ASAP
Re: slut. This is kinda OT, but…
I’ve never particularly liked that word for myself. And I respect efforts to reclaim it, but I really don’t like how often in queer spaces I’ve had it applied to me without consent. Or similar reclaimed misogynistic language, e.g. “hot mess”.
You get to reclaim it for yourself. You don’t get to reclaim it for me. Don’t call me that if I don’t say you can, even implicitly.
TIL that semantic satiation is nowhere near as pleasant as it sounds.
@Cyborgette
I detest the word. Yeah, reclaiming is noble and all, but I keep expecting Nan to whack me in the ear every time I read it. 😀
I have reclaimed the word “floozy”. I find it much more attractive than “slut”
Separately: with respect to people nonconsensually applying the word slut to you, I obviously agree that is completely not OK.