block that metaphor men created civilization men who should not ever be with women ever MGTOW misogyny reddit women are... would not bang

Women are lambs who become mutton after a single penis eats their virginity peanut, MGTOW explains

Trust me, you don’t want to see the other pictures I found by searching for “sheep nuts”

By David Futrelle

Here’s a little lesson in vaginanonmics from a Man Going His Own Way who might, I suspect, be a little bit hungry.

Men are appreciating assets. Women are depreciating assets. Women must acknowledge this fact. (self.MGTOW) submitted 1 year ago by FuckTOW So there's this old story about a girl posting on a forum to find a rich guy and she gets a reply from a banker explaining anyone with 500k annual income would not marry her because she is a depreciating asset. This line is key. The sooner women realise that they are less valuable than men the better. Men are the builders of society. We will continue to make money for a long time to come. We don't just pop out kids and then expect to be catered for till we die. Women lose their looks quickly (their ONLY bargaining chip) and the ability to reproduce. Women are like monkey nuts. Once you extract the peanut from the shell, who the hell wants the shell? You discard it and it disintegrates into nothingness. Biodegradable. Just like women. Once one man eats the nut inside. there's nothing left for anyone else. Men withstand the test of time. Our looks may (eventually) fade but we're still able to procreate till a ripe old age, and the money keeps on flowing in. So many women are just husks - mutton dressed as lamb. As far as I'm concerned, after that first cock - a women is nothing but a husk. And what do you do with the husk? Chuck it

Other MGTOWs agree: Once some guy eats a woman’s virginity peanut with his penis, she is no longer a tasty snack for any other man.

[deleted] 16 points 1 year ago* Very true. As far as I'm concerned, any woman who's already experienced one cock is just as used as a full-blown slut. A lot of guys will hamster "Well, she's only had sex with 2 or 3 guys, which is a lot less than most girls these days!" When girls bring nothing to the table but their sexuality and their sexuality has already been enjoyed by another man, what do they have left to offer? permalinkembedsave [–]FuckTOW[S] 0 points 1 year ago Yeah those guys that hamster are nothing but CUCKS. CUCKS who are happy being cuckolded. Happy in their position as lesser men. One cocks all it takes. We live in the age of science, and even science agrees the strongest bond is with the first cock. If that cock was a one night stand / initiation into adulthood due to peer pressure / any excuse to take a cock before the right time means you've fucked yourself for life. Then the next cock is just another cock, is another cock, is another cock. It has no value therefore, for me, that pussy isn't worth jack shit

In addition to being peanuts who are also somehow sheep, women are of course parasites. Parasitic peanut sheep.

FuckTOW[S] 13 points 1 year ago Women are worth a negative value as they literally are parasites. Emotionally mentally physically and financially they will take everything they can from a man.

Stay safe out there, fellas! It’s a dangerous world, metaphorically speaking.

108 replies on “Women are lambs who become mutton after a single penis eats their virginity peanut, MGTOW explains”

I’ve been thinking about trying to write a piece at some point about male homosociality (NB: not a typo) and how it reinforces these kind of toxic dynamics, as well as encouraging the dehumanisation of women, but I just haven’t had the energy to write for so long that I doubt I’ll be productive any time soon.

I’d really like to read this.

@mcbender, seconding EJ (The Other One),

a piece at some point about male homosociality

sounds really interesting. I don’t know Kimmel’s Guyland, I really just came across the Grauniad article “cold”, as it were, and was quite positively surprised to see something like this even seeing the light of day at all in a ‘regular’ mainstream newspaper (it’s not that the Graun doesn’t cover some feminist issues, but this came across as a different perspective I don’t think I’d seen before) – and tbh I was surprised to see that the comments btl weren’t the usual vomitorious outpouring of FragileManlyMan bile that tends to flood any feminist articles.
(disappearing to knead pizza dough, ‘scuse me)

Kimmel’s “Guyland” makes a lot of good points about Toxic masculinity, as noted, without using the term, but imo there was way too much of what seemed to me like ’70s social psychology… just my opinion.

Another Kimmel book, “Angry White Men” has a good critique of… them

@Weird Eddie

I’m glad it isn’t just me, heh. Still, I don’t want to point people away from Kimmel’s work necessarily.

@EJ, @opposablethumbs

First off, don’t elevate your expectations too high, I’m not an expert on this or anything! But I’ll see what I can do, I’ll bump it up a bit on the priority list and if I do manage to get it done I’ll certainly link it here.


I’ve had several lovers, and quite frankly, I prefer the ones who know their way around a cock. What a weird concept, preferring women who haven’t a clue what to do in bed. Their sex lives must be dreadfully dull.

I think their sex lives are actually entirely imaginary.

@epitome of incomprehensibility

You mean a CÉGEP? 🙂 Good luck! (or should I say ‘Bonne chance’!)

This idea that someone is better or worse for having or not having sex is daft. Women dont get used up after sex, sometimes they can get a bit emotional, and they need support, not fucking ridicule

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.