Most of us have moved on from that whole “Mike Pence refuses to go to dinner alone with women other than his wife because he’s apparently afraid they might end up doing it on the table right there next to the Crispy Shrimp Lettuce Wraps.”
But the internet Nazis over on AltRight.com are still plenty mad — not at Pence or his little rule, but at those in the “Lügenpresse” who made fun of it (or pointed out that such a rule systematically disadvantages women in business). As AltRight.com’s
This example of solidarity between Whites called for a coordinated psychological assault on our sexual ethics. A powerful White man with a stable marriage is an indigestible quantity. Any union between Whites, including the private one between a man and a woman, is a possible threat to the neoliberal order.
I mean, who else but an evil hater of all things white could possibly Tweet something like this?
https://twitter.com/Vectorpark/status/847454910983454720
Or this?
https://twitter.com/Home_Halfway/status/847827749444231172
(He calls his wife “mother,” you see.)
Or this?
as a bisexual i am unable to go out for meals with anyone. socialising is a nightmare. please help i'm hungry https://t.co/PcwbK4TnC5
— daisy (@daiseaaa) March 30, 2017
Or even this?
This is the best internet video I've ever seen pic.twitter.com/RooSpAMGhH
— Dorsey Shaw (@dorseyshaw) March 30, 2017
Ok, that last one has nothing to do with Pence. It’s just a really funny video.
Anyway, Ms. Bernard is sick of your anti-white tomfoolery:
Beneath the apparent absurdity of the media reactions is a deadly serious hostility to the foundation of our resistance to our dispossession and historical erasure — the love of one’s own. Our decency frightens our enemies because of its metapolitical implications.
Yeah, I don’t think the issue here is “decency.” It’s that Pence and his fans seem to think that heterosexual men and women can’t get together to talk about the state of the Penguin Boiling Vat industry (or whatever it is they do for a living) without being overcome by carnal lust.
Is Pence truly too sexy for the dinner table? Millions of men and women regularly eat in public with representatives of the gender or genders they find sexually attractive and aren’t overcome by their uncontrollable passions. Because passions aren’t actually uncontrollable, for one thing.
But I have to give Ms. Benard some credit for her, er, lively prose. At one point, she attacks Stephen Colbert for making a joke about Pence, first describing him as “characteristically over-animated but dead-eyed behind his Communist glasses,” before declaring that his eyes were “wide with Botox and aggression.”
So were his eyes “dead” or were they “wide” and aggressive? Or can he switch back and forth at will? And what does Botox have to do with it?
Ms. Bernard offers no answers to these questions, but she is pretty sure WHY Colbert unleashed his dastardly jokes:
Transient commissars like Colbert attack the love stories of our people because marriage is the foundational White institution upon which all other White institutions are built.
Bernard proudly declares that proud whities like her are “beyond [the] reach” of people like Colbert trying “to corrupt,” then dials her purple prose up to 11 for an energetic if not always coherent finale:
The oaths we make to one another insures our impudence to survive and our mirth in the face of the abyss that the left insists is our destiny. We will continue to realize the promise of generativity hinted in the first simpers of courtship, and we will continue to envision a dawn of our own making. There is nothing more blithe for our morale, nor grave for our enemies, than the love between our people. Out of love for our people, we will strive and sacrifice. We will not rest until we have secured a future for white children. Love is indeed, reactionary.
The real question I am left with is why the hell do so many reactionaries write like this? I mean, Jeez, put away that thesaurus before you hurt someone.
@CleverForAGirl
Mind if I snatch this quote for Fingie’s upcoming DVD cover?
@IP: Fingie is a handsome boy! I just want to pet him on his bib all day — I bet it’s soooooo soft.
And I’ll scratch Demi on the ears.
I just found something, err, interesting. All the usual warnings apply to the link because it’s the Daily Stormer.
Also the article isn’t that interesting in itself, save for this much-belated epiphany :
Emphasis mine. Also, that’s how they call Nikki Haley, the US embassador to the UN. *sigh*
Anybody got that Anita Sarkeesian popcorn gif on hand ?
@IP, lol all yours
@John:
http://i1.kym-cdn.com/photos/images/original/000/992/526/601.gif
20 hypothetical US$ says this guy thinks neoliberalism is the left-wing version of neoconservatism.
Because they’re overdramatic and think it makes them look smart.
@IP
Congrats on your test! Your kitties are so cute, you’re so lucky.
@Rhuu
That was very interesting and imformative, thank you.
Congratulations, IP!
First, your fixation on that one slip-up with my attribution of Bravely Default’s ownership, in a post with many multiple examples, while you continue to pretend to ignore my actual argument, shows that you are the petty one, nitpicking on trivial technicalities while bypassing the serious substance.
Second, if I am using Gamergate’s points , it is precisely because I am a heterosexual male hobbyist gamer , and enough of us share the same complaints (since we all play the same games after all which got censored because of your own movement) for us to form a common movement of our own.
Fake?! Feh, if someone like me is still fake considering all I’ve managed to spend in both time and cash over the years in this hobby, then I would dearly love to see a “true” fan, who must be one of those full-blown “chuunibyo” who marry game characters and post it online.
Then again, I can’t blame them at all. Human females, being the embodiment of fickleness, chaos made flesh, can be distractingly trying even at the best of times and maddeningly vexing. This is why human males have always had male-only no-females-allowed retreats like the boys clubhouse, gentlemens club, the dads den, etc.
People are fixating on your slip up because if you’re going to try to gatekeep gaming and declare it to be a hobby that only straight men have and claim that only straight male opinions count, you better fucking back it up by knowing more about than everyone who isn’t a white male.
No surprise, Humbug goes for the “Bitches be crazy!” trope. If I didn’t know better I’d guess he’s never actually met any men, since he thinks they’re more rational than women.
Yes, by Jove! The fairer sex are nought but a passel of flibberdigibbets and twitterpates who think of nothing but rouge and rolling their stockings! Now excuse me while I tie an onion to my belt and yell at a cloud.
I meant, straight not white at the end of my last post but I guess either works.
The only coherent comment I have to contribute at the moment is “humbug plz.”
I second.
humbug plz.
Also, do you seriously have to wank over every other thread ?
@Paradoxy
Thanks ! I need to keep that somewhere.
Also, rational dood :
Precisely ! So are men. And, y’know, life in general.
There. Fixed your essentialist point.
http://www.reactiongifs.com/r/clk.gif
You know, if you go away and go jerk off to your shitty volleyball games, no one would fixate on the multitude of wrongness you’ve left here. Just putting that out there.
Actually, I addressed the rest of your *ahem* “serious substance” in that thread as well, but you just straight up ignored it.
However, if you come into a thread pretending to be a damn expert while assuming that everyone else is beneath you in terms of knowledge, and you make a huge mistake in something VERY simple (such as who published a game that you’re currently whinging about), especially in a thread format where you have ample time to Google such information before posting your drivel, then you’re damn right I’m going to mock you for it.
You acted like an arrogant ass, and you got mocked when you “slipped up”.
But, of course, you neglected to address me or anything else I posted for you and instead repeated your talking points ad nauseum. But I’m the one fixating, right?
Oh, but I thought that GG was for “all” gamers? Wasn’t that the point of #NotYourShield? To prove that GG wasn’t all cishet white dudes?
So, which is it? Is GG a bastion of Cishet White Dude gaming, or is it a movement that is devoted to all gamers?
Of course, you have no way of proving that, so we’ll just have to take your word for it.
Naturally, you missed the fact it was a joke.
“Feeemales are so confusing! They keep saying they want to be treated like people! They keep saying they don’t want to be objectified and they want to be represented in a culture that they’ve been in since day one! They say that men can’t claim a whole culture as theirs! So confused! I need to retreat to my Manly Man Cave of Manliness (No Girls Allowed!)™ to hide from them instead of listening to other people’s experiences and trying to make this world better, because I’m scared of introspection and analyzing my own thoughts and experiences in relation to how I treat other people because it might make me feel like I haven’t always been The Good Guy I like to think I am!”
Chaos made flesh.
Chaos made flesh.
I AM CHAOS MADE FLESH!
BRB, changing my username.
Humbug sez:
Chuunibyou isn’t a term for stereotypical, pathetic fanboys who want to marry game characters. It means puberty-age kids who fancy that they’re “not like the other kids” and go out of their way to prove it. They’re anything from poseurs who adopt a subculture they’re not really into to make themselves seem interesting all the way to escapist confabulists who play at being some sort of “chosen one.” (The term also refers to a character type of the latter extreme that has recently been showing up in anime and novels.)
Things that are actually considered typical of chuunibyou types: playing Monster Hunter because “Pokemon is for kids!”, carrying a lighter even though they don’t smoke, being inordinately proud of having porno videos, drinking bad coffee, sulking, spouting poorly-informed political opinions, and so on. So the typical obnoxious, grandiose, up-one’s-own-ass behavior of teens figuring out who they are.
So like, aside from the whole being an actual teenager thing? You are a total chuunibyou.
Paradoxical Intention, your troll pwnage skillz are legendary!
@A. Noyd
And he’s not even the endearing Chuuni
http://31.media.tumblr.com/1b11a2b3dbf70e4b77c45b4f8ee1e4e5/tumblr_mu6gl1umdK1r60ay5o1_500.gif
FEEEEEEEMAAAAAALES ARE CHAAAAAOOOOS!!!!!!!
Well, naturally, the endearing ones are always female
‘carrying a lighter even though they don’t smoke’ 🙂 I do that. Lit a bonfire on my allotment last night.