Over on the MGTOW subreddit, the regulars are daydreaming about sexbots. And they can’t seem to decide what excites them more: the prospect of endless on-demand sex with robot super-hotties — or ruining the lives of non-robotic women who won’t be able to compete with the aforementioned robot super-hotties.
It’s really kind of adorable.
Let’s let the MGTOW Nostradamus who calls himself EnterPseudonym explain how it’s all going to go down when the sexbot revolution arrives at last.
Men will be ecstatic to finally have something they can put their penis into that doesn’t talk:
[I]magine that sexbots are a reality. They’re not too expensive maybe $5000. With a decent job and no girl friend you could save up that money within a year. Now you only have to pay electricity to keep her running and maintenance every so often.
Just don’t get her wet! Those things are known to short out.
You don’t have to pay to take her out. You don’t have listen to her nag or bore you with dull conversations. You don’t have to deal with her emotional swings. There are no pregnancy scares.
You should probably clean her once in a while, though.
How can an average woman, who requires tens of thousands of dollars and thousands of hours in time spent to maintain the relationship, compete against a downloadable Kate Upton who requires a quarter of the maintenance time and money?
But, wait, won’t women be able to buy themselves sexbots as well?
Well, yeah, but women aren’t going to want them, because sexbots can’t provide what women really want: money.
Sexbots aren’t appealing to women because a sexbot is only good for sex and won’t actually be able to provide for a woman.
After the sexbot revolution, the world will be filled with desperate women.
Sexbots will essentially collapse the already ruined market for sex. Women will lose much of their social power, and a social switch might happen where males who haven’t chosen to use sexbots are extremely rare.
And so women will start throwing themselves at any man who will have them.
When 90% of males have dropped out of the market, the 80% of women will be competing for whatever man they can find.
Men who’d been cruelly rejected by real-life women in pre-sexbot days will suddenly find themselves in very high demand.
A former sexbot user, could get tired of his sexbot and want to settle down. He enters a market which is deprived of sperm, and now a man that was ugly, overweight, and typically undesirable before the social collapse, is now part of the top 10% of males. He has his choice with almost any woman. Any woman would choose this “undesirable” man because in fact he is desirable.
They never get tired of this fantasy, do they?
Somehow, though, I suspect that even if 90% of straight men were to take themselves off the market EnterPseudonym would still have trouble convincing women that he was much of a catch.
@Alan
I did and I’m like, “yes good”. I found Monroe’s website and it seems there’s some good recipes on there. I found a rhubarb and rice pudding recipe! I love rhubarb! We have a rhubarb plant and everything.
(Monroe is also now filed with Angel Haze in my mental file of “people to be exactly like because they’re amazing” so thank you.)
I have issue with EVERY fucking social justice issue being glommed into feminism.
Feminism is for cishet women. There. I said it.
Problematic = all social justice issues becoming feminism.
Fuck you. The 2nd wave says, “Fuck you and your pronouns.”
You are trivializing the struggles of women. We are leaving your definition of feminism.
Yah, PoM, I am and always will be a cock guzzling, 2nd wave feminist.
I am such a fan of Scildfreja Unnýðnes’ Fluttershy gifs. Always perfect to the post being answered.
No.
And this is why I know you are running nothing more than an extended game for your own amusement.
Fuck off.
Anti-feminist here.
This is my shocked face:
http://i.imgur.com/0t5WOdk.jpg
Really. So very, very shocked.
No, you are trivializing the struggle of anyone who isn’t a cishet white woman. We’re trying to address the root of the problems that women face in a way that won’t shove everyone other than white cishet women under the bus. Why are you afraid of a feminism that also happens to help people who don’t happen to be cishet white women? How does it hurt you?
I so have to learn how to imbed on mobile.
@ handsome jack
They managed to live with a particular friend of mine for over a year, so yes they are 🙂
(but that’s another story)
How is feminism being for cishet women a 2nd wave position? Okay, plenty of feminists of that era didn’t do great on that front. But 2nd wave feminism does include subgroups such as lesbian separatists and there are and were plenty of lesbians who aren’t separatists in 2nd feminism.
Edit: History lesson for our old school feminist friend here
http://outhistory.org/exhibits/show/lesbians-20th-century/lesbian-feminism
Yup. As I said, you SWJs have managed to turn 2nd wave feminists against feminism, atheists both left and right against the left, agnostics against the left, etc.
The leftists who used to be on your side have now turned against you.
Good job.
You are vile, repugnant people who do not respect or understand Freeze Peach.
The only thing this clod knows about any of the waves is “2nd wave good, 3rd wave baaad.”
@Mrs. Chad Skyboomrooster
Hyperbole is not an argument, but I acknowledge that you dislike parts of feminism relavent to others being included within feminism.
What do cishet women feminists lose by including others with issues in common with them?
More hyperbole. Not all social justice issues. Issues in common and issues that benefit feminism.
But why? What good are they losing, or bad are they gaining?
Recognizing and interacting with issues common between feminism and other issues strengthens the importance of those issues in the public discourse. How does that trivialize?
I do hope you are enjoying it. I only wish I were so free.
I understand freeze peach. Feeling that criticism is silencing or violence is freeze peach. But if you are indirectly referring to free speech you will need explain.
Wait.
It’s fucking Gert again, isn’t it.
Go on, then.
It’s abundantly clear that you got want you wanted out of feminism. It’s the excuse you need to go out and manipulate people. I’m quite willing to bet that your twisted “game” runs on more than PUA’s, but on any guy you happen to set your sights on.
You don’t need anything else out of it, so why bother expanding the definition? LGBT women, women of colour, women who are trans – they aren’t you, who cares that feminism doesn’t work for them? You got what you wanted, and that’s what’s important, right?
Keep living your dream, Mrs Chad. We’re going to keep cutting a path forward to a brighter future, going to keep working to make life better for everyone, instead of just being concerned with getting a big enough slice of the pie for ourselves.
And we’re winning. You can bluster all you want about how the world is against you, but it doesn’t change the facts. Your ideas are the racist, sexist, selfish relics of the past, but they’re melting away.
Go on, then. We don’t need you here.
@Mrs. Chad
No, but it would really help your case if you demonstrated that you had the slightest clue about linguistics.
Also, I entirely rescind my previous welcome, you transphobic piece of shit.
It’s hilarious you think this means something.
Consistency? What’s that?
@Axe
What Viscaria said.
Or not 🙂
@ IP
Preach, sibling. I’m coming up on 36, and it’s been less than a year I’ve been presenting and mostly identifying as female (femme-leaning androgyne, if one wants to get technical, but woman works adequately for most social purposes).
@Alan
oh wow, I laughed so hard I gave myself a rib cramp.
@littleknown
I’ve certainly not been. Rather the opposite, in fact.
@ WWTH:
I consider a lesbian woman cishet because she owns up to being a straight up pussy muncher. She is a woman who likes pussy.
I also validate bi-sexual people by saying they are bi-sexual.
A growing number of full-on, non-bi lesbians and gay men are getting pissed about the gender rainbow, and from what I am hearing, the actual full-on “I like to fuck people who have the same genitals I have” people are getting straight up pissed off about TransTrenders.
It is trivializing homosexuality and heterosexuality.
SJWs are turning their allies against them by trying to rule the language we use.
Keep doing it, assholes. You will experience a backlash from every group in the world.
LGBT hates you. Atheists hate you. Agnostics hate you. Constitutionalists hate you. Libertarians hate you. Republicans hate you. Democrats hate you (but Democrats are needing to go “right” to differentiate ourselves from you), black people hate you, Black Lives Matter hates you.
EVERYONE HATES YOU!!
You have 0 supporters but yourselves and your echo chamber.
I came here as a person seeing your point of view but disagreeing with the entire agenda you have.
I found wit and snark. I love me some wit and snark. Underneath that wit, I found ZERO.
I don’t like you. (And again, that’s my fucking opinion. I am entitled to it, and you are absolutely entitled to think I am the worst piece of shit, a gnat, or a troll.)
Add cishet to the list of words Mrs. linguist doesn’t know the meaning of.
@Ludicrous troll
I wasn’t going to bother responding to you anymore, but seriously? You’re claiming to not realize that cishet is a contraction of cisgender heterosexual, and that lesbians are, literally by definition, not heterosexual? Much linguist, wow.
Mrs. Chadly reminds me of an old troll with her “vile” nonsense…Varpole? Steele? Some asshole.
Fuck off, Mrs. Chadly.
You’re an asshole, too. Shoo.
I like how Goat’s just assuming that nobody here is LGBT+… Despite melting down concurrently with a side conversation between several of us who aren’t. That’s heteronormativity in action, folks!
*facepalm* No, dude. No. I’m cis, but I’m not het. Christ, you’d think a linguist would be aware of the arcane concept known as a “Compound word.”
@PeeVee
Yeah, Mr Al/Steele/Varpole/Gert/fifty other socks.
http://derpicdn.net/img/2013/12/21/502630/full.gif
If you have an MA in Linguistics, what the hell are you doing crying about “SJWs” “ruling” the language we use? Language isn’t prescriptive, it changes over time based on the desires of the people using it. I’m not even a linguist and I know that one. The only ones who whine about dictionary-definitions being changed are tedious dictionary atheists and MRA sophists. We use the words as we want to, the dictionary can go to heck. Language changes.