In an apparent attempt to prove that they’re not misogynists, the folks at A Voice for Men have decided to take a temporary break from their practice of vilifying individual female activists to vilify a male activist – University of Toronto Student Union VP for University Affairs Munib Sajjad.
As far as I can tell, the folks at A Voice for Men decided to target Sajjad, perversely, because he told Toronto’s CityNews that he was afraid he was “going to be targeted” after announcing publicly that he thought a campus Men’s Rights group should be banned. The A Voice for Men post about Sajjad is a typically long-winded, and largely content-free, rant from the excitable John Hembling (“John The Other”).
But what’s more disturbing than Hembling’s empty bloviating on Sajjad is the way A Voice for Men has framed the attack. “Munib Sajjad, it’s your turn in the barrel,” the headline declares, and Hembling repeats the phrase “your turn in the barrel” in the post itself.
I wasn’t familiar with this phrase, so I looked it up, and found that it derives from a rape joke. Here’s the definition of the term, from Urban Dictionary:
To say someone is “in the barrel” or “taking a turn in the barrel” means it’s their turn to do an unpleasant task or to suffer an unpleasant experience.
Click on the “definition” link above to see the gang rape joke it’s derived from.
Rape jokes aimed at men — even men you don’t like — are certainly a, well, counterintuitive way of showing “compassion for boys and men,” as the A Voice for Men slogan has it.
EDITED TO ADD: Looking again at Hembling’s piece, I realize I hadn’t noticed his, er, argument that the term “mansplaining” — which I find useful from time to time — is somehow equivalent to the incredibly offensive term “[racial slur redacted]splaining,” which Hembling has just made up. (The slur in question starts with an “n.” You can figure it out.) This is ridiculous on its face, not to mention that it’s frankly racist not only to compare the alleged oppressions of men — who are not systematically oppressed — with those of black people — who are — but also to use a racial slur in doing so. Of course this isn’t the first time that A Voice for Men has used the n-word in an attempt to suggest that men, collectively, have it as bad as a historically disadvantaged and still systematically oppressed group.
Rape jokes and racial slurs: A Voice for Men has it all!
@Prester
Why the King James Bible? Why not an earlier one? It can only get changed more over time. (nontroll religious people, feel free to correct me if I’m missing something.)
Doesn anyone else have a say on this (one what the bible says, obviously not on whether this should happen). Because my most recent memories of church/ bible stuff was that the ‘wives, submit to your husbands’ guy was Paul or something, not God.
Again, more knowledgeable people correct me, but I thought God was referred to in neutral pronouns in Hebrew.
Where does it say in the bible that abortion is a sin?
Wow God’s kinda a dick then. Luckily I don’t think God wants people to get raped, or that zie thinks we should ‘make the best of a bad situation’ and accept marrying a rapist/ carrying babies of our rapist. Because I would have a really hard time worshipping a god who thought rape was okay, and even if I knew for sure that such a god existed, I still would not be able to worship them.
@fade
You’re totally wrong, Artemis is the best Greek goddess! (is it weird I have opinions about this?)
@prester
Okay, if you are going to say religious are true, you need a citation.
And no, the bible is not a citation.
@Cthulhu’s Intern
XD
A long, long time ago:
SirRandomGuy: My arm is bleeding and I need some medical help to fix it! God, can’t you give us medicince.
God: What the fuck do you guys expect, I already gave you bananas that fit right in your hands.
SirRandomGuy: Oh, I know, what if you gave us–
God: Fucking ungrateful jerks, don’t like my bananas.
wow that made no sense. /rambling.
katz: Around here the pointless argument is usually steel-cut vs rolled oats.
Is that home-here, or manboobz-here? Because I thought the manboobz-here one was the plural of octopus. 🙂
wordsp1nner: I just finished a 2×3 cable of alpace/tussah. Didn’t overspin the plies enough, so it’s a bit twisty. I may uncable it when it’s dry, and retwist it.
Sweet, ninja’d, and I was kinda right then! Just had to hear it from someone else since I’m all out of touch with Christian-y stuff, and never sought out the info on my own, just heard what was said at church + assorted internet sites, now at least 😉
I haven’t yet caught up w/ this thread, but I got a couple of emails on Prester John, and I’ve banned him. He was an obvious troll, which does not necessarily mean banning; there was no evidence he was a sockpuppet of anyone (though he may well have been); but that comment about rape being part of God’s plan was over the line.
More than that, he’s not making an argument at all. Just as he did with Catharism, he’s just saying “do X because my religion says so” and when people say “I don’t want to do X,” his only response is “join my religion and then you’ll want to.” No reason why we should want to, not even a hand-wavey “you’ll be happier that way.”
Almost as if his actual goal was just to piss us off.
oooh party. I will bring dark chocolate covered almonds and the world’s cutest misandrist beagle. (Careful of those puppy dog eyes- she will beg for whatever your eating).
http://i.imgur.com/Cc1evFW.jpg
Oh dear god, we’re going to start a pointless argument about which pointless argument we have the most.
Pester-er John had me at feminist pagan witches. Where do I sign up? What cool spells do we get? Do we get a super duper cool feminist grimoire, too? I’m excited!
I didn’t see Pathetic-er John’s comment about rape being part of God’s plan. A dumptruck loadfull of legos onto him!
…I don’t really have anything I can bring to a party. <.< Poverty, ho. Maybe I can bring, like, some of the extra thingies of tea a friend gave us? I have random bits of blueberry rooibos.
I have many, MANY, ex christian women followers, at least 70% of which are staunch feminists. Christianity is a patriarchal, misogynist belief system which is evident by the words in its own holy book!
@becausescience
I want awesome spells! 😀 Sign me up too!
My chosen spell is Blood Barrage* It is feminist because it relates to blood and that means PERIODS obviously
I don’t know why periods are feminist, but I’m ninety nine percent sure mras think they do. After all, why else would they refuse to use them?**
*has anyone else played runescape? (except Marie, lol I know you did :P)
**I do not know if this joke even succeeded
LBT, you can bring your awesome company 🙂 and rooibos is my favorite tea.
^seconding katz. parties are only fun because of the company!
marie: Why the King James Bible? Why not an earlier one? It can only get changed more over time. (nontroll religious people, feel free to correct me if I’m missing something.)
Given the ability of scholars to build on previous scholarship and the ability of more modern scholars to have more texts to use as reference a more modern text can be better than an earlier one.
The real problems arise because of how culture has changed; and that is something we seem to be doing better at interpreting when looking at ancient texts.
Where does it say in the bible that abortion is a sin?
It doesn’t. In the Pentatuech (the books of Moses) and the rest of the OT abortion is not only condoned, but required (the life of the mother is more important than the life of the child). For an Orthodox Jew abortion can be religiously required.
@Fade It took me a second but I loled after I got it. 🙂
sweet!
@Pecunium
Ah, that explains it. I was just questioning the trolls choice, mostly for the ‘obvious trolling’ part.
And thanks for the answers 😀
RE: Katz and Fade
Ooh, ooh, we can do entertainment! We’ll be the PC Storyteller for the evening and improv stories from suggestions!
See, LBT? Wouldn’t be a party without you.
Marie: Some of the questions you asked are worth answering, even with the banning of Pester Johnny. For disclosure’s state, I’m an Atheist these days, but spent the first 35+ years of my life as a very devout/practicing Episcopalian.
In general, fundies and others of their ilk prefer to cite the KJV because it supports most of their positions the best. Also, since it was the first major translation into English, it’s regarded as the ‘purest’. Remember, these folks believe that the world is on a long, slow slog to Armageddon; anything that can be considered ‘progress’ is therefore anethema to them. At the same time, learning other languages is hard, so they’d rather just stick with the first English copy and be done with it.
Most Christians, even the moderates, are technically “Pauline Christians”–they regard Paul’s writings to be as divinely inspired as the Gospels, pretty much. Most Christians who are into debate will assume that Paul’s writings supercede anything in the Old Testament whenever there’s conflict. Thus, for instance, jibes about shellfish roll right off their backs, since Paul says kosher rules are gone. Instead, you should challenge them to insist that all women who go to church either wear a hat or shave their heads (1 Corinthians 11). On the flipside, you can point out that Paul was totes okay with Christians owning slaves, unless the slave was a Christian who was interested in being an evangelist.
Neutral, and even plural at points.
It doesn’t, at least not directly. In fact, it actually orders abortion in the case of suspected adultery.
If I weren’t an Atheist–if I actually believed that the God of the Bible was real, I’d have to spend my entire life opposing the motherfucker. As it is, the character of “God” is the sickest asshole in fiction, ever.
Not at all; of course, I regard the Greeks as a rather lame group of deities (and full of patriarchal misogyny, to boot). Give me Freya, Frigg and Hel, or alternately Isis and Bastet, over those Greek posers.
Let’s see if all those offerings to the blockquote monster worked….
@freemage
Thanks for all the info 🙂
:/ Didn’t know that. Kinda peeved though (at them, not you). Just luckily haven’t met any who’ve made it obvious in real life.
O_o Why? I mean, I like the New Testament better than the Old one, mostly cuz I’ve heard more from it in recent memory, and mostly cuz Jesus sounds a lot nicer than God in the Old Testament.
So, what’s the shellfish stuff? (if you don’t mind answering). The only food-related knowledge* I’ve gotten is from my dad on why he eats seafood during lent but no other meats or dairy products.
*age 18, finally able to spell knowledge without having spell check fix it for me! ::parties:: /milestone.
@ Marie —
the KV version of the bible is quite beautiful compared to other translations, but it is also a very poor translation. i think the revised standard is what is considered by experts in the field to be the most “accurate,” if my undergrad memory serves. and as another poster rightly stated, it is often most easily manipulated to serve certain political agendas.