
Norwegian Men’s Rights Activist blogger Eivind Berge, known for his violent rhetoric and rape apologia, has been arrested for death threats against police.
Not too surprising, given that he once announced on his blog that “[k]illing at least one cop is on my bucket list.”
Here are some Google-translated details from a news account here:
The right-wing extremist and anti-feminist blogger Eivind Berge has been arrested for having encouraged and glorified the killing of policemen. The police have found both ammunition and textbooks in use of explosives at Berge.
The police regard the threats as an invitation to others to kill police officers, but also feared that he would commit the acts themselves shortly.
He was evidently arrested on Wednesday. According to this story — at least as far as I can tell from the obviously crude Google translation — he made a specific threat to kill a police officer this Saturday:
Berge also writes about how he was planning to attack a policeman with a knife on a Saturday evening:
“Then I used the trial to come forward as a good example for men, and I considered it to be worth 21 years in prison for premeditated murder.”
According to this account, Berge is being held for two weeks. He claims innocence.
Berge, as readers of this blog may well already know, is a fan of right-wing terrorist and mass murderer Anders Brevik. On his blog, he’s also argued (among other things) that “Rape is Equality.”
He’s glorified the murder of police on his blog numerous times.
Some examples, taken from the second news account:
“… attack on the police is something 100% in harmony with everything I stand for.”
“I maintain that police murder is both ethically and tactically correct.”
Some other examples, direct from his blog (each paragraph is from a separate post; click on the quote for the source):
I viscerally despise cops and wish them the worst. Killing at least one cop is on my bucket list.
If ever a victim of psychiatry, here is what I would do. I would first attempt to kill the cops or whoever tried to apprehend me. Failing that, I would feign docility in order to get out as soon as possible and then kill a representative of the industry as revenge. … killing cops is also very much a men’s issue. Every pig killed is also a blow against feminism, so men should be doubly elated whenever an officer goes down in the line of encroaching on our cognitive liberty.
This was his reaction to a news story about a police officer being killed:
Good news for men is rare in this hateful feminist utopia that is Norway, but today is a joyous day! Today I feel schadenfreude in my heart along with all the hate that feminism and resultant mate deprivation have instilled in me. One blue thug less on the streets.
From another post on the same subject:
The swine Olav Kildal died while trying to enforce our lack of cognitive liberty. This was a defensive, much deserved killing that cheered me up.
Here he threatens a female prosecutor:
To feminist prosecutor Anne Cathrine Aga I have the following message: The Men’s Movement is watching you, bitch, and we are seething with hatred against you personally and the police state you represent. Actions have consequences. Trials are still (mostly) public and they sink into our collective minds, where they form the basis of future activism. Hate breeds hate — that is a fact of life too smugly ignored by feminists. …
2011 is the year Norwegian men as a group emerged out of the blogosphere and into the battlefield. This in turn has led to a breakthrough for MRAs such as my good self in the public discourse, probably for the simple reason that the powers that be now realize ignoring us has deadly consequences. Men are angry now, and we have proven that we are deathly serious about resisting feminism. So the feminist prosecutors referred to above ought to wipe that smug look off their faces before it is too late. Clearly seventy-seven body bags wasn’t enough, but I am fairly confident that you will be sorry one day.
Aside from the explicit threats of violence, the violent and threatening rhetoric here is not unlike much of the rhetoric we see regularly on A Voice for Men and other MRA sites. AVFM founder Paul Elam, for example, told one feminist that:
I find you so pernicious and repugnant that the idea of fucking your shit up gives me an erection. … We are coming for you.
The blogger Emma the Emo, Berge’s girlfriend, has posted comments here in the past defending him. The news account quotes someone identified as Nataliya Kochergova, described as his girlfriend; I assume this is “Emma,” because what she told the media is similar to what she posted here. She of course denies that he planned any real violence. According to the article, she said:
There are not really threats. He has never had plans to kill someone, he has said several times in his blog. When for example, he says that “the police killings are an effective way to prevent stupid laws,” it’s a factual description and not a threat. Even those who love the police agree with it.
Berge, for his part, has stated publicly that if he had not met Emma, he probably would have killed by now:
At the time I wrote my last blog post, I believed I would probably become Norway’s first modern violent activist in peacetime. Celibacy enforced by a feminist regime had driven me to the point where I saw no other option. I would target the pigs who enforce feminist law, knowing I could realistically at least kill one of them before I would be captured or killed myself. Thus revenge would be assured and if I lived, my reputation as a violent criminal would make me attractive to some women. But then in the nick of time this blog attracted a lovely girl commenting as “Emma.”
This is why I take violent rhetoric from MRAs very seriously.
Meanwhile, on this side of the Atlantic, MRAs glorify MRA “martyr” Thomas Ball, who killed himself on the steps of a New Hampshire courthouse last year in hopes that his death would inspire MRAs to literally burn down courthouses and police stations.
Ball’s manifesto is still up on A Voice for Men in its “activism” section, including these passages:
So boys, we need to start burning down police stations and courthouses. … This is too important to be using that touchy- feeling coaching that is so popular with business these days. You need to flatten them, like Wile E. Coyote. They need to be taught never to replace the rule of law. BURN-THEM-OUT!
Most of the police stations built in New England over the last 20 years are stone or brick. Fortunately, the roofs are still wood. The advantage of fire on the roof is that it is above the sprinklers
AVFM tastefully omitted Ball’s specific instructions on how to make Molotov cocktails, but left this in:
There will be some casualties in this war. Some killed, some wounded, some captured. Some of them will be theirs. Some of the casualties will be ours.
For many more examples of violent threatening rhetoric from MRAs, I urge you to go through some of my posts here and here.


Can you please mean it this time and just leave, already? This is like the twentieth time you’ve made a big deal out of how it’s a waste of your time to post here, yet you keep doing it.
“And I’m done talking to you; it’s a waste of time.
That’s what, the 4th or 5th time you’ve said that?
What do I do? Well, I was the proprietor of a now-defunct blog. I work with homeless people, among whom there are a significantly higher proprotion of men, but many women as well.
Oh and look, Steele is a racist (by the way of reinforcing racist structures, before you come at me, you twit). I remain utterly unshocked.
NO FOR SRS IF YOU PEOPLE DON’T QUIT USING IMAGINARY SLURS WE’LL USE REAL SLURS FOR ALL THE TIME THIS IS WHAT’S FORWARDING MEN’S ISSUES IN OUR SOCIETY. OH WHAT, HOMELESS MEN? FUCK ‘EM! WE GET TO CALL SOME WOMEN CUNTS!
Did I say this? I’m utterly shocked. I was making no such threat; I do not and will not use racist or any other slurs, no matter how much of a petulant baby Rutee is. I merely am stating my belief that, in my opinion, activists for a particular cause should not hurl abuse as members of the privileged group. Or if they do, they really shouldn’t be surprised when they’re ignored . Do as you demand others do.
I’m a racist because I personally think that activists should probably not refer to white people as “honkies”? That’s… interesting. Guess Arthur Goldwag is a racist:
https://arthurgoldwag.wordpress.com/2012/05/18/more-on-mens-rights-extremism/
If you want to be taken seriously as a civil rights activist, don’t call white people “crackers” or “honkies.” Only racists take the New Black Panthers seriously, for example (they have earned their place on the SPLC listing of hate groups).
Your frequent usage of the gendered slur “creep” has been noted.
Uh oh. Looks like Steele is going to report us to the MRA police. Noooooo!
So you consider the SPLC a good measure of which groups are hate groups?
I’m aware that you can not substantiate your point. That is why I ask you to do so.
Your opinion is wrong. It’s really easy to do those things.
Actually, you kind of did. It’s why you’re a lackwit.
“Don’t further oppression, and don’t be racist”. Only an ignorant chump is going to confuse the two. You know, like you. You’re trying to muddy waters that aren’t.
Sorry, were you confusing your place here? ’cause you’re one of the lackwits. Catch up now.
Is that so?
I donate time and money to various causes.
You would be wrong, MRAL.
Wow. It only took asking you half a dozen times for you to respond with these vague and unimpressive answers.
Forget the blog. What kind of work do you do with homeless people, “…among whom there are a significantly higher proportion of men…”? How does your work count as MRM activism?
The SPLC has the New Black Panther Party on its list of hate groups.
You know who else is on their list of hate groups…?
“I work with homeless people, among whom there are a significantly higher proprotion of men, but many women as well.”
Ooohhh. Hi, Brandon.
From the SPLC page on the New Black Panther Party:
I don’t think they’re on there for saying “honky.”
So you consider the SPLC a good measure of which groups are hate groups?
Of course. A very reputable organization. If you don’t, I suppose that’s fine.
Oh shit, you think? That went on a while. Can’t say I’m surprised.
http://www.splcenter.org/get-informed/intelligence-report/browse-all-issues/2012/spring/myths-of-the-manosphere-lying-about-women
http://www.splcenter.org/get-informed/intelligence-report/browse-all-issues/2012/spring/a-war-on-women
It would make sense.
@ Cliff
Those two both live in Boston, right? Maybe they got together for drinks and discussed bratty trolling tactics.
Well, they’re not big fans of the MRM:
http://www.splcenter.org/get-informed/intelligence-report/browse-all-issues/2012/spring/a-war-on-women
http://www.splcenter.org/get-informed/intelligence-report/browse-all-issues/2012/spring/misogyny-the-sites
They haven’t exactly come out and declared the MRM a “hate group” officimally, but they’ve got some pretty harsh words about all the misogyny.
I’m aware that you can not substantiate your claims. That is why I ask you to do so every single time.
Your opinion is wrong. It’s really easy to do those things.
Actually, you kind of did. That’s why you’re a lackwit, not just a tone troll.
“Don’t further oppression,” so yes, I did. Only an ignorant chump is going to confuse the two. You know, like you. You’re trying to muddy waters that aren’t.
Sorry, were you confusing your place here? ’cause you’re one of the lackwits. Catch up now.
I donate time and money to various causes. Now that I’m settled back in, the next order of business for me is likely to be campaigning for the socialist party.
You know, Brown University Student of Fail, when I told you I had some middle class privilege, my choice of words was particular for a reason. It’s because I don’t have all of it. And yes, I know that it’s you, you can fuck back off to whatever corner you spend the majority of your time in.
Not really. It’s honky. I’m pretty sure you’re cackling about your chance to use stupid arguments about it, not that you’re actually offended.
No you’re not. You never are.
Oh, bother, is it Brandon? It’s definitely a returning troll. I redid that because I was in moderation for naming my guess.
I think the other one is he who shall not be named.
You know who else is on their list of hate groups…?
Not the MRM. The Movement was issued a rebuke, but not placed on their list. In other words, we were implicitly given the thumbs-up by the SPLC.
Steele is tedious and stupid, but the writing’s not quite solipsistic enough for Brandon. Plus, no “ya” for yeah or girlfriend who giggles when he spanks her, and he couldn’t sock for shit before. I don’t think he could keep it up this long.
If it’s either of those jackasses then I’m slightly impressed.
Totally fucking baffled by their continued need to come back to a site that banned them… but impressed.
Slightly.
Actually the tendency to capitalize words that he faps over could point to our other old friend. Think he’s bored enough to maintain two socks at once?