
Norwegian Men’s Rights Activist blogger Eivind Berge, known for his violent rhetoric and rape apologia, has been arrested for death threats against police.
Not too surprising, given that he once announced on his blog that “[k]illing at least one cop is on my bucket list.”
Here are some Google-translated details from a news account here:
The right-wing extremist and anti-feminist blogger Eivind Berge has been arrested for having encouraged and glorified the killing of policemen. The police have found both ammunition and textbooks in use of explosives at Berge.
The police regard the threats as an invitation to others to kill police officers, but also feared that he would commit the acts themselves shortly.
He was evidently arrested on Wednesday. According to this story — at least as far as I can tell from the obviously crude Google translation — he made a specific threat to kill a police officer this Saturday:
Berge also writes about how he was planning to attack a policeman with a knife on a Saturday evening:
“Then I used the trial to come forward as a good example for men, and I considered it to be worth 21 years in prison for premeditated murder.”
According to this account, Berge is being held for two weeks. He claims innocence.
Berge, as readers of this blog may well already know, is a fan of right-wing terrorist and mass murderer Anders Brevik. On his blog, he’s also argued (among other things) that “Rape is Equality.”
He’s glorified the murder of police on his blog numerous times.
Some examples, taken from the second news account:
“… attack on the police is something 100% in harmony with everything I stand for.”
“I maintain that police murder is both ethically and tactically correct.”
Some other examples, direct from his blog (each paragraph is from a separate post; click on the quote for the source):
I viscerally despise cops and wish them the worst. Killing at least one cop is on my bucket list.
If ever a victim of psychiatry, here is what I would do. I would first attempt to kill the cops or whoever tried to apprehend me. Failing that, I would feign docility in order to get out as soon as possible and then kill a representative of the industry as revenge. … killing cops is also very much a men’s issue. Every pig killed is also a blow against feminism, so men should be doubly elated whenever an officer goes down in the line of encroaching on our cognitive liberty.
This was his reaction to a news story about a police officer being killed:
Good news for men is rare in this hateful feminist utopia that is Norway, but today is a joyous day! Today I feel schadenfreude in my heart along with all the hate that feminism and resultant mate deprivation have instilled in me. One blue thug less on the streets.
From another post on the same subject:
The swine Olav Kildal died while trying to enforce our lack of cognitive liberty. This was a defensive, much deserved killing that cheered me up.
Here he threatens a female prosecutor:
To feminist prosecutor Anne Cathrine Aga I have the following message: The Men’s Movement is watching you, bitch, and we are seething with hatred against you personally and the police state you represent. Actions have consequences. Trials are still (mostly) public and they sink into our collective minds, where they form the basis of future activism. Hate breeds hate — that is a fact of life too smugly ignored by feminists. …
2011 is the year Norwegian men as a group emerged out of the blogosphere and into the battlefield. This in turn has led to a breakthrough for MRAs such as my good self in the public discourse, probably for the simple reason that the powers that be now realize ignoring us has deadly consequences. Men are angry now, and we have proven that we are deathly serious about resisting feminism. So the feminist prosecutors referred to above ought to wipe that smug look off their faces before it is too late. Clearly seventy-seven body bags wasn’t enough, but I am fairly confident that you will be sorry one day.
Aside from the explicit threats of violence, the violent and threatening rhetoric here is not unlike much of the rhetoric we see regularly on A Voice for Men and other MRA sites. AVFM founder Paul Elam, for example, told one feminist that:
I find you so pernicious and repugnant that the idea of fucking your shit up gives me an erection. … We are coming for you.
The blogger Emma the Emo, Berge’s girlfriend, has posted comments here in the past defending him. The news account quotes someone identified as Nataliya Kochergova, described as his girlfriend; I assume this is “Emma,” because what she told the media is similar to what she posted here. She of course denies that he planned any real violence. According to the article, she said:
There are not really threats. He has never had plans to kill someone, he has said several times in his blog. When for example, he says that “the police killings are an effective way to prevent stupid laws,” it’s a factual description and not a threat. Even those who love the police agree with it.
Berge, for his part, has stated publicly that if he had not met Emma, he probably would have killed by now:
At the time I wrote my last blog post, I believed I would probably become Norway’s first modern violent activist in peacetime. Celibacy enforced by a feminist regime had driven me to the point where I saw no other option. I would target the pigs who enforce feminist law, knowing I could realistically at least kill one of them before I would be captured or killed myself. Thus revenge would be assured and if I lived, my reputation as a violent criminal would make me attractive to some women. But then in the nick of time this blog attracted a lovely girl commenting as “Emma.”
This is why I take violent rhetoric from MRAs very seriously.
Meanwhile, on this side of the Atlantic, MRAs glorify MRA “martyr” Thomas Ball, who killed himself on the steps of a New Hampshire courthouse last year in hopes that his death would inspire MRAs to literally burn down courthouses and police stations.
Ball’s manifesto is still up on A Voice for Men in its “activism” section, including these passages:
So boys, we need to start burning down police stations and courthouses. … This is too important to be using that touchy- feeling coaching that is so popular with business these days. You need to flatten them, like Wile E. Coyote. They need to be taught never to replace the rule of law. BURN-THEM-OUT!
Most of the police stations built in New England over the last 20 years are stone or brick. Fortunately, the roofs are still wood. The advantage of fire on the roof is that it is above the sprinklers
AVFM tastefully omitted Ball’s specific instructions on how to make Molotov cocktails, but left this in:
There will be some casualties in this war. Some killed, some wounded, some captured. Some of them will be theirs. Some of the casualties will be ours.
For many more examples of violent threatening rhetoric from MRAs, I urge you to go through some of my posts here and here.


The hope, however slim, that this fucking idiot will go away.
Oh, you noticed that too huh?
Well obviously trying to persuade feminists (in their own space, no less) that we should use words as defined by Captain Dictionary is more important than actual men’s issues.
Though at least he’s trying to persuade us that we should use definitions that would allow misogynists and MRAs to say “hah, we have it just as bad, see!” rather than going normal MRA route of claiming men have it worse in society than women.
So, Steele can use his favorite m-word, and we can’t stop him.
We can refuse to use his favorite m-word, and he can’t make us.
So, how is it he won again? *scratches head confusedly*
Ithiliana – Shhh! He might come back!
OOPS!
sorry!
From the perspective of a child who has actually been raped by an adult, how must it seem, to hear the victim-feminist establishment conflate child rape with child prostitution? The raped child remembers having no choice about participating in the sexual activity, of being forced, and then is asked to consider his or her fate or level of agency as similar or the same as that of a child who marketed them self for sex to an adult, took payment, then performed the act.
I don’t think the average 10 year old genuine rape victim would buy the manboobz style analysis that all child prostitution is rape, or that anyone who dare try and make a distinction is x, y, or z.
Questions of genuine agency are complicated, but not complicated enough to pass a 10 year old genuine rape victim’s bullshitometer I posit.
“Rape!”
Eat shit, Tom Martin.
Should we call this one He Who Shall Not Be Named 2?
So Tom, been out spreading the word? How did it go?
Child prostitutes are being raped you sack of shit. They have been raped and they continue to be raped by any adult who pays a pimp for the opportunity to rape them. Or are you under the delusion that 8 year olds run away from home in order to be prostitutes?
Please go be horrible somewhere else. When I read through your posts on the thread this morning I actually felt physically ill.
You could make one of your videos! Go door to door with a camera, and tell people to their faces you’d like to punish their children for being raped. You believe in your cause, don’t you?
from the perspective of a dude who tried to sue someone for making his tushy a lil bit sore, how does it feel to have wasted all that money making a fool of himself
10-year-olds can’t even consent to work regular jobs.
You’d be goddamn horrified if you saw a 10-year-old working at McDonalds (well, fuck, maybe you wouldn’t be), but you think they’re making an adult choice to do sex work?
Jesus fucking Christ, you should go to all the newspapers that were like “maybe he has a point” about your lawsuit and share this revelation with them.
this is just sour grapes from the dude who tried to become a professional victim and failed miserably at it
We got rid of one asshole, let’s see if we can’t get rid of Tom’s vile filthy self.
can we not use the word vile for a while? steele kinda ruined it
@Tom Martin:
“I don’t think the average 10 year old genuine rape victim would buy the manboobz style analysis that all child prostitution is rape, or that anyone who dare try and make a distinction is x, y, or z.”
I don’t think the average 10 year old knows enough about psychology or prostitution to make accurate assessments about the subject matter in the first place. Nor do I think a raped child would give a shit, quite honestly, about making such determinations about prostitutes or their detractors. At ten they really wouldn’t be interested in politics or your ideological bullshit. Geez, for a troll you are getting pretty tedious.
Cliff: So can we get over the cloak-and-dagger shit already? I know who you are, and I don’t give a shit, and given that, all your teasing little hints about being an International Man of Mystery are even more hilarious.
From his comments in the last three threads I’ve seen him in… completely findable. You don’t need to out him, he’s outing himself.
As you say, I have no interest in making it public but… he’s not so clever.
Sorry, sharculese, but the shoe fits Martin too well.
@hellkell:
“Sorry, sharculese, but the shoe fits Martin too well.” Personally, I find the word ‘repugnant’ just rolls right off the tongue when speaking of such a classy gent.
OK. Repugnant, disgusting, like something nasty under a rock, gross, foul, craven, and let’s not forget ick.
I vote that from now on we use the word Creeper to refer to Eurosabra, thus hopefully not summoning him any more often than necessary.
How about “The Creeper,” because dude is a horrorshow?
What level spell is “Summon Eurosabra”?