
Norwegian Men’s Rights Activist blogger Eivind Berge, known for his violent rhetoric and rape apologia, has been arrested for death threats against police.
Not too surprising, given that he once announced on his blog that “[k]illing at least one cop is on my bucket list.”
Here are some Google-translated details from a news account here:
The right-wing extremist and anti-feminist blogger Eivind Berge has been arrested for having encouraged and glorified the killing of policemen. The police have found both ammunition and textbooks in use of explosives at Berge.
The police regard the threats as an invitation to others to kill police officers, but also feared that he would commit the acts themselves shortly.
He was evidently arrested on Wednesday. According to this story — at least as far as I can tell from the obviously crude Google translation — he made a specific threat to kill a police officer this Saturday:
Berge also writes about how he was planning to attack a policeman with a knife on a Saturday evening:
“Then I used the trial to come forward as a good example for men, and I considered it to be worth 21 years in prison for premeditated murder.”
According to this account, Berge is being held for two weeks. He claims innocence.
Berge, as readers of this blog may well already know, is a fan of right-wing terrorist and mass murderer Anders Brevik. On his blog, he’s also argued (among other things) that “Rape is Equality.”
He’s glorified the murder of police on his blog numerous times.
Some examples, taken from the second news account:
“… attack on the police is something 100% in harmony with everything I stand for.”
“I maintain that police murder is both ethically and tactically correct.”
Some other examples, direct from his blog (each paragraph is from a separate post; click on the quote for the source):
I viscerally despise cops and wish them the worst. Killing at least one cop is on my bucket list.
If ever a victim of psychiatry, here is what I would do. I would first attempt to kill the cops or whoever tried to apprehend me. Failing that, I would feign docility in order to get out as soon as possible and then kill a representative of the industry as revenge. … killing cops is also very much a men’s issue. Every pig killed is also a blow against feminism, so men should be doubly elated whenever an officer goes down in the line of encroaching on our cognitive liberty.
This was his reaction to a news story about a police officer being killed:
Good news for men is rare in this hateful feminist utopia that is Norway, but today is a joyous day! Today I feel schadenfreude in my heart along with all the hate that feminism and resultant mate deprivation have instilled in me. One blue thug less on the streets.
From another post on the same subject:
The swine Olav Kildal died while trying to enforce our lack of cognitive liberty. This was a defensive, much deserved killing that cheered me up.
Here he threatens a female prosecutor:
To feminist prosecutor Anne Cathrine Aga I have the following message: The Men’s Movement is watching you, bitch, and we are seething with hatred against you personally and the police state you represent. Actions have consequences. Trials are still (mostly) public and they sink into our collective minds, where they form the basis of future activism. Hate breeds hate — that is a fact of life too smugly ignored by feminists. …
2011 is the year Norwegian men as a group emerged out of the blogosphere and into the battlefield. This in turn has led to a breakthrough for MRAs such as my good self in the public discourse, probably for the simple reason that the powers that be now realize ignoring us has deadly consequences. Men are angry now, and we have proven that we are deathly serious about resisting feminism. So the feminist prosecutors referred to above ought to wipe that smug look off their faces before it is too late. Clearly seventy-seven body bags wasn’t enough, but I am fairly confident that you will be sorry one day.
Aside from the explicit threats of violence, the violent and threatening rhetoric here is not unlike much of the rhetoric we see regularly on A Voice for Men and other MRA sites. AVFM founder Paul Elam, for example, told one feminist that:
I find you so pernicious and repugnant that the idea of fucking your shit up gives me an erection. … We are coming for you.
The blogger Emma the Emo, Berge’s girlfriend, has posted comments here in the past defending him. The news account quotes someone identified as Nataliya Kochergova, described as his girlfriend; I assume this is “Emma,” because what she told the media is similar to what she posted here. She of course denies that he planned any real violence. According to the article, she said:
There are not really threats. He has never had plans to kill someone, he has said several times in his blog. When for example, he says that “the police killings are an effective way to prevent stupid laws,” it’s a factual description and not a threat. Even those who love the police agree with it.
Berge, for his part, has stated publicly that if he had not met Emma, he probably would have killed by now:
At the time I wrote my last blog post, I believed I would probably become Norway’s first modern violent activist in peacetime. Celibacy enforced by a feminist regime had driven me to the point where I saw no other option. I would target the pigs who enforce feminist law, knowing I could realistically at least kill one of them before I would be captured or killed myself. Thus revenge would be assured and if I lived, my reputation as a violent criminal would make me attractive to some women. But then in the nick of time this blog attracted a lovely girl commenting as “Emma.”
This is why I take violent rhetoric from MRAs very seriously.
Meanwhile, on this side of the Atlantic, MRAs glorify MRA “martyr” Thomas Ball, who killed himself on the steps of a New Hampshire courthouse last year in hopes that his death would inspire MRAs to literally burn down courthouses and police stations.
Ball’s manifesto is still up on A Voice for Men in its “activism” section, including these passages:
So boys, we need to start burning down police stations and courthouses. … This is too important to be using that touchy- feeling coaching that is so popular with business these days. You need to flatten them, like Wile E. Coyote. They need to be taught never to replace the rule of law. BURN-THEM-OUT!
Most of the police stations built in New England over the last 20 years are stone or brick. Fortunately, the roofs are still wood. The advantage of fire on the roof is that it is above the sprinklers
AVFM tastefully omitted Ball’s specific instructions on how to make Molotov cocktails, but left this in:
There will be some casualties in this war. Some killed, some wounded, some captured. Some of them will be theirs. Some of the casualties will be ours.
For many more examples of violent threatening rhetoric from MRAs, I urge you to go through some of my posts here and here.


Ineffective counsel = check
Unqualified psych = check
Asshole Judge = check
These three factors being in any way limited to custody cases? Nope.
And fathersandfamilies is unsurprisingly ignoring that the whole thing could be overturned on appeal. Please try for a study or survey next time, I’m sure I could find dozens of cases where the father got exactly what he wanted (actually, I don’t even have to look, one of my cousins is one such man).
Yep, abstract, in the same way that it would never occur to a shark to feel compassion towards the things that it eats or wonder if maybe the seal was scared or in pain. That’s our Eurosabra.
Did Eurosabra ever explain why he has a minder?
“publishing the home address of the judge in a clearly threatening context”
Yeah, I retract my previous statement’s bit about asshole judges, that’s over the free speech line.
Eurosabra —
“It is stupid for a democratic citizen to make terroristic threats. It is equally stupid for a depressive to make himself seem dangerous.”
So remind me, what’s your point again?
“The pro-rape discourse seemed so abstract as to be a thought experiment, one that no real rapist would launch, for obvious reasons.”
Perhaps it should’ve been clearly labelled as such then?
“So, given Breivik, I don’t think Eivind is a threat, and now he’s neutralized.”
First, wtf does “given Breivik, he’s not a threat” mean? Second, most people do not refer to being arrested as being “neutralized” (I’m assuming English is not your first language and maybe that was just a slip?) Third, first names or last names, be consistent.
Because he was considered to be the dorm creep, apparently. Which was totally unjustified and he can’t understand why they’d think that, of course.
It’s kind of sad that Tom has basically ruined any argument to do with the crappyness of hard chairs. It reminds me of when I was at school and the uncomfortable hard plastic chairs we used. At least for me anyway, stupid coccyx!
Of course, i’m not going to blame “misandry” for crappy chairs like he does, because that’s just stupid.
@Shade
Whe I was a freshman in High School I took a yearlong Keyboarding class. The plastic chairs were so hard and uncomfortable it caused long lasting damage to my tailbone. It actually continued to hurt for almost five years.
I saw Tom posted that story, and I thought “Give it 30 minutes and I bet someone here will have debunked it.” In fact it only took about 12 minutes for 4 people to tear it to shreds!
Tom, there’s this thing called Google that some people use to check out stories. You might give it a try. It’s free!
Tom — now will you face the fact we’re not mocking the claim that hard chairs suck but rather mocking the claim that hard chairs suck because of misandry?
Cassandra — did he even say that much? I thought he’d basically concluded with “I’m not explaining it to you guys”?
Nah, he clearly stated the dorm creep part and when asked why said he had no idea.
To quote me from earlier: “However, I was working with the prior exhibited evidence that Mr. Martin is both horribly disingenuous and shockingly dim. I thought it safe to presume that he was that much of an epic ninny”.
Anyway Tom, one incident of one father going to jail after conducting himself terribly and threateningly during and after the case… yeah, I’d say that was a freak happening.
Which EU country is David again?
I am not a buffoon like NWO, but I hold some antedeluvian views. I worked in health care in Israel, ffs, with women, with Palestinians, as co-workers and patients, and no one ever heard about or suffered from my darker musings, I delivered excellent care because I am a decent human being, though probably quite mentally ill. When I could no longer do so, I left the field.
I don’t think PUA involves more coercion than BDSM, but perhaps some women really can be bullied into submission. I have never done that or seen it, and I get around in.PUA circles.
Yeah, we know. You may have mentioned it once or twice.
Creep.
“I delivered excellent care because I am a decent human being”
There has been absolutely zero evidence of this, and lots of evidence pointing in the opposite direction.
Futrellia. It was going to be included as one of the chapters in Norman Davies’ book <a href="http://www.penguin.co.uk/nf/Book/BookDisplay/0,,9781846143380,00.html"Vanished Kingdoms, but it was accidentally omitted due to a printing error.
The thing is, European native of a non-European Country, BSDM is a consensual activity. It involves no coercion. It may appear to be coercion to the inattentive layman, but it is consensual.
One of my friends began stalking his dormitory ex, and I was tarred by association.
It is true that I am right, and the minders were wrong, at least about me. No formal action was ever taken, as it would have revealed waste of university resources.
Basically Eurosabra is a creep who hangs out with creeps. Surprise, surprise.
Fembot: I’ve probably ended up with lasting effects from it, thinking about it. Not physically (although I did have go to the doctor once because I bruised my coccyx, I don’t have enough padding to avoid injuries from hard landings.. and that wasn’t fun), so it’s not really a massive problem.
But ever since school, I pretty much default to a non-“proper” sitting position even if the chair is comfortable, because I had to compensate for hard chairs for so long. Just depends if you consider a “never sits in a chair properly” habit to be an issue. 😀
Nothing is proof I’m not a dog, either.
I’m a crank who gripes on the net, and you allege a horrible person as a result.
Right, because if there’s one thing a university can’t have, it’s somebody revealing a waste of resources. Especially if those resources were wasted in an attempt to keep the students safe from predators, because NO university wants to be known as an institution that prioritizes student safety.
What makes him creepier than NWO is that to some extent NWO is aware that he’s an awful person, and that people think he’s an awful person. Eurosabra consistently says (and does) appalling things and then insists that he’s a good person. Online he’s simply creepy and vaguely irritating, but in person he’d be frightening, because people who can do bad things and honestly think they’re doing nothing wrong are dangerous.
Eurosabra, all I have to do is read what you’ve written.
@Shade
Well I have a very round backside, so I don’t know why the padding couldn’t protect me. 🙂
“Mild gaslighting”
Just wanted to put that out there for people who may be new to this particular creeper.