Categories
a voice for men antifeminism misogyny MRA rape rapey reactionary bullshit terrorism threats

Norwegian Men’s Rights Activist blogger Eivind Berge arrested for death threats against police [UPDATE 3]

Eivind Berge and police

Norwegian Men’s Rights Activist blogger Eivind Berge, known for his violent rhetoric and rape apologia, has been arrested for death threats against police.

Not too surprising, given that he once announced on his blog that “[k]illing at least one cop is on my bucket list.”

Here are some Google-translated details from a news account here:

The right-wing extremist and anti-feminist blogger Eivind Berge has been arrested for having encouraged and glorified the killing of policemen. The police have found both ammunition and textbooks in use of explosives at Berge.

The police regard the threats as an invitation to others to kill police officers, but also feared that he would commit the acts themselves shortly.

He was evidently arrested on Wednesday. According to this story — at least as far as I can tell from the obviously crude Google translation — he made a specific threat to kill a police officer this Saturday:

Berge also writes about how he was planning to attack a policeman with a knife on a Saturday evening:

“Then I used the trial to come forward as a good example for men, and I considered it to be worth 21 years in prison for premeditated murder.”

According to this account, Berge is being held for two weeks. He claims innocence.

Berge, as readers of this blog may well already know, is a fan of right-wing terrorist and mass murderer Anders Brevik. On his blog, he’s also argued (among other things) that “Rape is Equality.”

He’s glorified the murder of police on his blog numerous times.

Some examples, taken from the second news account:

“… attack on the police is something 100% in harmony with everything I stand for.”

“I maintain that police murder is both ethically and tactically correct.”

Some other examples, direct from his blog (each paragraph is from a separate post; click on the quote for the source):

I viscerally despise cops and wish them the worst. Killing at least one cop is on my bucket list.

If ever a victim of psychiatry, here is what I would do. I would first attempt to kill the cops or whoever tried to apprehend me. Failing that, I would feign docility in order to get out as soon as possible and then kill a representative of the industry as revenge. … killing cops is also very much a men’s issue. Every pig killed is also a blow against feminism, so men should be doubly elated whenever an officer goes down in the line of encroaching on our cognitive liberty.

[I]f you are a victim of psychiatry, it is probably in your best interest (as well as a publicly beneficial act of activism) to kill a guard or cop in order to get a fair public trial and possibly escape treatment before it ruins your health completely.

Rather than cowering in fear of the police, I assumed a warrior mentality and started hating law enforcement. I really, really wanted to hurt those responsible for enacting and enforcing feminist sex law.

This was his reaction to a news story about a police officer being killed:

Good news for men is rare in this hateful feminist utopia that is Norway, but today is a joyous day! Today I feel schadenfreude in my heart along with all the hate that feminism and resultant mate deprivation have instilled in me. One blue thug less on the streets.

From another post on the same subject:

The swine Olav Kildal died while trying to enforce our lack of cognitive liberty. This was a defensive, much deserved killing that cheered me up.

Here he threatens a female prosecutor:

To feminist prosecutor Anne Cathrine Aga I have the following message: The Men’s Movement is watching you, bitch, and we are seething with hatred against you personally and the police state you represent. Actions have consequences. Trials are still (mostly) public and they sink into our collective minds, where they form the basis of future activism. Hate breeds hate — that is a fact of life too smugly ignored by feminists. …

2011 is the year Norwegian men as a group emerged out of the blogosphere and into the battlefield. This in turn has led to a breakthrough for MRAs such as my good self in the public discourse, probably for the simple reason that the powers that be now realize ignoring us has deadly consequences. Men are angry now, and we have proven that we are deathly serious about resisting feminism. So the feminist prosecutors referred to above ought to wipe that smug look off their faces before it is too late. Clearly seventy-seven body bags wasn’t enough, but I am fairly confident that you will be sorry one day.

Aside from the explicit threats of violence, the violent and threatening rhetoric here is not unlike much of the rhetoric we see regularly on A Voice for Men and other MRA sites. AVFM founder Paul Elam, for example, told one feminist that:

I find you so pernicious and repugnant that the idea of fucking your shit up gives me an erection. … We are coming for you.

The blogger Emma the Emo, Berge’s girlfriend, has posted comments here in the past defending him. The news account quotes someone identified as Nataliya Kochergova, described as his girlfriend; I assume this is “Emma,” because what she told the media is similar to what she posted here. She of course denies that he planned any real violence. According to the article, she said:

There are not really threats. He has never had plans to kill someone, he has said several times in his blog. When for example, he says that “the police killings are an effective way to prevent stupid laws,” it’s a factual description and not a threat. Even those who love the police agree with it.

Berge, for his part, has stated publicly that if he had not met Emma, he probably would have killed by now:

At the time I wrote my last blog post, I believed I would probably become Norway’s first modern violent activist in peacetime. Celibacy enforced by a feminist regime had driven me to the point where I saw no other option. I would target the pigs who enforce feminist law, knowing I could realistically at least kill one of them before I would be captured or killed myself. Thus revenge would be assured and if I lived, my reputation as a violent criminal would make me attractive to some women. But then in the nick of time this blog attracted a lovely girl commenting as “Emma.”

This is why I take violent rhetoric from MRAs very seriously.

Meanwhile, on this side of the Atlantic, MRAs glorify MRA “martyr” Thomas Ball, who killed himself on the steps of a New Hampshire courthouse last year in hopes that his death would inspire MRAs to literally burn down courthouses and police stations.

Ball’s manifesto is still up on A Voice for Men in its “activism” section, including these passages:

So boys, we need to start burning down police stations and courthouses. … This is too important to be using that touchy- feeling coaching that is so popular with business these days. You need to flatten them, like Wile E. Coyote. They need to be taught never to replace the rule of law. BURN-THEM-OUT!

Most of the police stations built in New England over the last 20 years are stone or brick. Fortunately, the roofs are still wood. The advantage of fire on the roof is that it is above the sprinklers

AVFM tastefully omitted Ball’s specific instructions on how to make Molotov cocktails, but left this in:

There will be some casualties in this war. Some killed, some wounded, some captured. Some of them will be theirs. Some of the casualties will be ours.

For many more examples of violent threatening rhetoric from MRAs, I urge you to go through some of my posts here and  here.

 

1.6K Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Tom Martin
13 years ago

I can’t find any accounts of Suffragettes killing anyone with their arson campaigns, which is something. Did Thomas James Ball advocate killing anyone when he recommended burning down corrupt anti-male court houses?

Suffragettes did not just burn down law buildings though:

http://www.spartacus.schoolnet.co.uk/Warson.htm

I made a flippant comment in a documentary interview recently, where I was asked what should be done about the corrupt courts who refused to uphold the law on my gender studies sex discrimination lawsuit, and I replied “Burn the courts down.”

I would like to say now, I wasn’t being literal. Do not burn any court houses down.

But anyway, on the scale of things, what is a bigger legal injustice, women not being allowed to vote, or men not being allowed to see their kids? It’s a close one. To put it another way, compare women not being allowed to vote, with women not being able to see their kids. Yep.

Emily Davison was and is seen as a huge selfless martyr, despite the fact that she was prepared to endanger the horse’s and jockey’s life as well as hers, and so was clearly no saint. Thomas James Ball did not endanger anyone else’s life, and yet, manboobz himself, pours scare quotes on the notion that Thomas James Ball may be, by the standards of previous gender equality struggles, legitimately beatified by the men’s equality movement.

… MRAs glorify MRA “martyr” Thomas Ball, who killed himself on the steps of a
New Hampshire courthouse last year in hopes that his death would inspire MRAs
to literally burn down courthouses and police stations.

If feminists know their history, they know that by feminist activist standards, it would be a massive double standard to dismiss the actions of Thomas James Ball.

Thanks for your video, Cloudiah. Don’t give up the day job (unless it’s in the brothel).

hellkell
hellkell
13 years ago

Hey Tom, ya big WHORE, how’s your ass? Still sore?

Mac Truck (@cdnfreedomlover)

Nice hit piece. God forbid responding to actual arguments eh?

Tom Martin
13 years ago

If you go to this website, you’ll find an edition of Dragon’s Den from 2007, where inventors show a prototype for a school bag which can go on the back of a hard chair, with padded panels which fold down to make the chair more comfortable. The dragons get into a bidding war, because they all realize it’s a good idea:

http://www.concentrate.org.uk/index.php?page=89

I think some of you manboobzers’ grey matter may have hardened.

Ithiliana
13 years ago

*puts on the “Beer Barrel Polka” and begins stomping around the room on top of DA TROLL*

Ithiliana
13 years ago

*stomp splash twirl* AND REPEAT!

pecunium
13 years ago

I do have to give Tommy credit for one thing… he has yet (to the best of my knowledge) to set fire to chairs.

But anyway, on the scale of things, what is a bigger legal injustice, women not being allowed to vote, or men not being allowed to see their kids? It’s a close one. To put it another way, compare women not being allowed to vote, with women not being able to see their kids. Yep.

Not being allowed to vote. In all but the rarest of cases parents who are denied all access to their children have shown themselves to be some sort of menace; with the caveat that this is in relation to court orders, not one parent spiriting the others away. The latter is a different issue, and isn’t related to the law; in the way that voting is, so it’s not a comparable circumstance.

pecunium
13 years ago

Mintigan:Mens rights has nothing to do with violence but of course an MRA like this is a psycho but people will tag whim with the rest of the mens rights movement.

Yep, praise for Tom Ball, George Sodoni, Marc Lépine, the guy who killed his wife; and the bystanders in the hair salon, nope not a single MRA praised them.

Not a single MRA said that Anders Brievik had some decent points.

No MRA has ever said that if the world doesn’t become what they want there will be blood in the streets.

Nope. And if they did, all the MRAs like you would be roundly condemning them.

Right?

Nope. You’d rather “no true scotsman” his ass, because he got caught.

Sir Bodsworth Rugglesby III
Sir Bodsworth Rugglesby III
13 years ago

Hey, it’s Tom Martin! Tom, I just replaced my desk chair, and the new one has a much softer seat cushion than the old one. But now I find that my right leg keeps falling asleep! Since you’re such an expert, I’d welcome any advice you might have,

Tom Martin
13 years ago
Reply to  pecunium

Yes Pecunium, I should have asked whether it’s worse not having the right to vote, compared to not having the right to live with your kids.

Right now, 7 or 8% of divorced fathers end up living with their kids in the UK, and a lot of manboobzers seem dead against the principle of shared custody after divorce.

The National Organization for Women changed their policy, from supporting the principle of shared parenting after divorce, to one of favouring sole custody for the primary care giver, in about 1982.

The UK government recently rejected the Norgrove Report, which recommended preserving the sole custody model, in favour of a move towards shared parenting.

You can tell how out of touch feminists are when even a conservative-led government of the day is more egalitarian than them.

Ithiliana
13 years ago

Roll out the barrel! We’ll have a barrel of fun

STOMP STOMP SQUISH!

And fun fact: you can sit on a barrel as well!

katz
13 years ago

Go sit on a hard chair, Tom.

hellkell
hellkell
13 years ago

Sued anyone and won lately, Tom?

Ithiliana
13 years ago

*Grabs Hellkell and swings them into a rousing STOMP THE TROLL POLKA*

Unimaginative
Unimaginative
13 years ago

a lot of manboobzers seem dead against the principle of shared custody after divorce

Citation needed. Which manboobzers are those, Tom? The ones in your head?

In fact, citation needed for everything you posted. Where are you getting these “facts” (besides your ass)?

Sir Bodsworth Rugglesby III
Sir Bodsworth Rugglesby III
13 years ago

That’s funny, I could have sworn the consensus on this site regarding child custody could be summed up as “courts/parents should do whatever is best for the children”.

That sound about right?

cloudiah
13 years ago

@ Sir Rugglesby III, Sounds pretty close.

VoIP
VoIP
13 years ago

@Pecunium: Thanks. (Also, it just BLOWS MY MIND how well-documented 20th century history is. Holy crap.)

You think pick-up artists are bad with the whole aestheticization of power thing, but you third-wavers are kink-positive, so there.

I am not aware of any kink which eroticizes state violence the way Fascism does.

cloudiah
13 years ago

Thanks for your video, Cloudiah. Don’t give up the day job (unless it’s in the brothel).

The funniest about this insult from Tom (“Female penguins are whores!”) Martin is that all the words in the video are direct quotes from him on this blog.

hellkell
hellkell
13 years ago

Ithiliana: WHEE!!!

Unimaginative
Unimaginative
13 years ago

“To dance is human. To Polka is divine!” –k.d. lang, on an autographed picture of her and the Reclines from the 1980’s, in the office of our local theatre.

Tom Martin
13 years ago

“Best interests of the child” is just code for “give the children to the economically inactive whore of the house, and throw the house into the deal too”.

As for Futrelle’s position on Thomas James Ball, as not being a legitimate martyr, how many horses did Thomas James Ball maim? How many jockeys did he endanger? How many national sporting events did he disrupt? How many windows did he smash? How many letterboxes did he acid attack? How many buildings did he set on fire?

All those Suffragettes breaking the law went down in history as on balance, a force for equality.

Conservative traditionalist anti-equality nutjob men like Lepine, The Norwegian white knight idiot, and this latest one, have little in common with Thomas James Ball, who primarily wanted equality for men in family law.

There are some very confused people who call themselves MRAs, who aren’t really anything to do with the men’s equality movement, just as there are feminists who focus on difference because they are massive whores, and nothing to do with equality either.

The difference is, mainstream feminists within government advocate for difference, like in the
UK, with it’s Women and Equality commission’s slogan: Women: Equal, Different

Imagine a government’s official men’s issues department started coming out with difference shit on why men should be privileged – you fucking whores!

All Futrelle can do is scrape around the lunatic fringe of the MRM, then conflate those views with the broad aims of the movement.

But with feminism, I can go straight to the vice president and quote you plenty ‘women are special victims’ crap.

Or I can go to the largest women’s group in America, or the chairwoman of the Labour Party in the UK, or to the fucking UN with their bullshit “1 in 5 women are raped”.

I may just have been presented with a bill for £37,000, but at least I’m not David Futrelle.

Dracula
Dracula
13 years ago

…Thomas James Ball, who primarily wanted [to beat his daughter with impunity].

Fixed that for you.

All Futrelle can do is scrape around the lunatic fringe of the MRM, then conflate those views with the broad aims of the movement.

Like acquiring comfy chairs and calling women whores?

Sir Bodsworth Rugglesby III
Sir Bodsworth Rugglesby III
13 years ago

“I may just have been presented with a bill for £37,000, but at least I’m not David Futrelle.”

I laughed so hard at this that my neighbor started banging on the wall.

1 14 15 16 17 18 65