The Summer 2017 WHTM pledge drive is! Please consider donating money to enable continuing coverage of Nazi sexbot debates! Thanks!
By David Futrelle
The Greater Internet Lady-hating community has generally been pretty enthusiastic about the allegedly impending arrival of vaguely realistic sexbots, hoping that the ready availability of faux ladies for sex will render real ladies more or less obsolete. Or at the very least make the real ladies feed bad about themselves, thus achieving a major goal of misogynists worldwide.
But sexbots have gotten a much chillier reception from the subset of internet misogynists who also happen to be Nazis. Last year, for example, a writer for the Daily Stormer denounced sexbots as a plot by Jewish degenerates to lower white fertility and, you know, white genocide the superior race.
A recent poll on the Daily Stormer suggests that most internet Nazis are still wary of sexy robot ladies, with 54% (as of this writing) thinking they’re a bad idea. But a significant minority — 35% — is kind of into the whole thing. A lively debate on the subject has broken out of the site’s BBS. Naturally, these being Nazis, the reasons behind these differing opinions are uniformly terrible.
According to hacker Andrew “weev” Auernheimer, commenting on the Daily Stormer, BBS, sexbots might be good for
nonwhites …(maybe not blacks because they are incapable of caring for any object of high value and it would cost society a lot of money)
for whites no– we implement WHITE SHARIA, and then freely beat and rape women after …
being a faggot with a five figure masturbation machine is probably gonna make you a lot less likely to implement WHITE SHARIA
As someone called Hercules1 sees it,
Having it with a robot is a weird and completely desperate degeneracy.
It’s almost the same as guys who can’t get any, having it with an animal or something out of desperation. …
Have a little self control. We’re not animals, and as National Socialists, we shouldn’t strive for degeneracy.
Fanda is similarly wary
Sounds like either a Semitic scam to further atomise society, a gooky reaction to a horribly atomised society, or a combination of the above.
VorginiaSavior worries about robot-assisted White Genocide:
Sex robots would be not only degenerate but it would go against the propagation of the Aryan race.
But SnakeDoctor has much more immediate concerns:
I’m not sticking my dick in anything that has the potential to clamp my dick off. That’s like taking a gamble getting a blow job from a bitch who has seizures.
But for every commenter denouncing sexbots as “degeneracy” or worse, there are perhaps two others parroting the standard misogynistic argument for sexbots. While running behind the naysayers in the Daily Stormer poll, on the BBS itself the pro-sexbot Nazis are offering much more detailed and passionate arguments as to why sexbots are great news for white dudes.
“Im for it,” declares Exiled_Idiot.
Robots with artificial wombs would pose a giant threat to the female population (cuz noone wants to deal with thots if you can avoid or need to fuck them) and force them to better themself and become more viable. It would essentially force them to evole or die out.
TheOutlander14 sees sexbots as a boon for men in a world teeming with”unmarriageable women.” Echoing pretty much every MGTOW and Men’s Rights Activist who’s ever offered an opinion on the subject, he argues that
Sex robots decrease the marketplace value of sex, essentially taking away nature’s one advantage that women have and exploit to the downfall of civilization in the post-modern era. …
Men have already been FORCED to live lives without women. You have to do everything in the house. Cook, Clean, Work, Maintenance and the only thing your post-modern woman will offer you is a second income, maybe sex, and debt to maintain her consumerist lifestyle. Robots cannot provide money to women or meaningful attention, which works against them.
We’re entering a eugenic bottleneck everyone, and if women won’t shape up and compete against robot pussy, then they will end up without a child or husband. There are more great men out there than there are decent women, and I think they deserve to at least be fucking happy without being called a degenerate because they don’t want to date a 2 ton whale of a woman covered in tattoos who wants to spend their money. Not everyone will be able to mate, and it’s better they do it with a sex robot than a chink. …
If you know a decent chick who isn’t some fat slut with uranium up her vag, don’t fuck a robot. Otherwise, fuck one in the meantime.
The aptly named Terrible thinks that sexbots will force women to stop saying “no” to sex.
‘Female’ sex robots designed for men are a good idea because they will take a lot of leverage away from women, dealing a deadly blow to the thot institution of ‘consent’. If a guy can just bang his robot and it feels better than banging you, then I guess you’d better learn to cook and clean and be a mother, right? Got some serious competition if all you’ve got to offer is a wet slit.
What must never be allowed to happen, though, are sex robots designed for women, for obvious reasons
Red_In_T_and_C offers an extended take on the threat sexbots pose to the power of pussy.
Our problems may be Jewishly inspired, but the lever that moves us is pussy.
Sex is both the carrot and the stick used to control men. We do the most ridiculous and destructive shit to get our nut. Which is harmful. We are then punished afterwards via things like “harassment” claims, child support etc…
Sex robots will allow men to develop the tools needed to resist being manipulated by women.
For those still unconvinced, Red offers an argument that even the dullest Nazi should be able to understand. Because it involves vaping.
Being against sex robots is exactly like being against vaping. Pussy and tobacco are addictions that are expensive, that are undignified, and which have serious and life ruining real world consequences.
Consider a man of potential being sperm jacked at 20. He may never see his child, but would still be a slave to the child support machine until around 40. His career, ruined. His ability to raise a family, ruined.
And all because a bunch of feminists who hate men wish to deny us our liberation. And because a bunch of insecure men fear shaming language.
The only argument against sex bots is some sort of nonsense about no babies getting made.
Where are the arguments against condoms, the pill, sex ed, and abstinence?
And, hey, if you’re worried about the fertility rate falling amongst whites, Red adds, just “imagine the endless benefits if we gave sex bots to muds.”
Sorry, I’m still imagining the benefits of sexbots designed to clamp Nazi dicks off.
Who ARE these people? Are there pictures? I’m old and not easily shaken, but these guys are horrifying.
They’re not animals but, Ogdru Jahad willing, Nazi rule’s gonna be defined by self control. That poorly planned and poorly executed move to the ost lebensraum notwithstanding.
On the other hand, the numerous predictions of an inevitable Fembot Singularity are becoming as sad and predictable as the limitless predictions of the standard Kurzweil Singularity. I’d bet one of their silly Kübelwagens that they’ll still be discussing the imminent Fembot replacement of women a century from now (Hellboy forbid there are still Nazis in the future); it’ll be followed by equally nonsensical conversations relating to the replacement of jetliners with supersonic rocket planes and efforts of the Jewish capitalists and socialists to suppress them.
So am I…so am I.
Maybe we could sell them some Fashlights? You know, like Fleshlights, but for fascists?
“Marketplace value of sex.”
Somewhere John Adams is saying, “Oh, Abigail! Abigail–I have such a desire to knock heads together!”
Man, they’re not even hiding behind a veil of decency any more, are they? Just whippin’ out the ol’ rape fantasies for all to see, these days.
Because they’d be more interesting and compassionate companions than you?
Oh, no! Someone fetch my fainting couch! No husband or child! Whatever will I do?!?
Oh, wait. I’ll just continue living my life and being happy with it, like I have for the past 32 years.
Bina FTW.
Somebody posited to be that DS was a satirical site, to which I laughed and laughed, but honestly, it’s getting harder and harder to believe these fucknuggets exist. And I’m reading their shit!
Should have read “what is it wet with?” , not set. Sorry.
Do… do you think we should tell them?
What a horrible fate, having to cook and clean.
Women already have sex with machines and have been doing so for a hundred years. Little slow on the draw there, slick.
At some point they’re going to have to make up their minds whether we’re terrifying omnipotent oppressors who rule society with an iron fist, or helpless children unable to accomplish anything. We literally can’t be both.
I would Kickstart this so very, very much….
@Ktoryx
Umberto Eco, go!
“The followers must feel humiliated by the ostentatious wealth and force of their enemies…. However, the followers must be convinced that they can overwhelm the enemies. Thus, by a continuous shifting of rhetorical focus, the enemies are at the same time too strong and too weak. Fascist governments are condemned to lose wars because they are constitutionally incapable of objectively evaluating the force of the enemy.”
Umm……everywhere? Except for abstinence. I suppose there are not many right wing arguments against abstinence only education.
“Either be my sex slave and house maid, or else I won’t fuck you, and you’ll never have my kids!”
BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAH
Once again, misogynistic shitbags highly overestimate the value of their peens. To paraphrase Wonder Woman: “Men are not necessary for pleasure.”
This is…also true about women? Like, I cook, clean, work and do maintenance here and there. Ya ain’t special, broflake. It isn’t hard, and the idea that you’re FORCED to do it, and you’re such a poor widdle victim of society because you can’t force women to do it for you is fucking laughable.
There’s plenty of arguments (by cis men) against condoms, such as “It’s too small”, “it doesn’t feel right”, “I don’t get pleasure when I wear one.”, etc. And if you, a person who sleeps with men, hears this bullshit? You fucking run into the sunset, and keep going. That man isn’t safe.
There’s plenty of arguments against the pill (by mostly old, cishet white men who have no idea how a female body fucking works), and a lot of these also have to do with religion. Specifically, theirs. The other ones stem from their ignorance about how the pill actually works and what its uses are beyond preventing pregnancy.
That same group is also one that argues against proper sex ed, citing the idea that they think kids are too fucking stupid to understand it, and that it’s “immoral” and all that other shit. Of course, if we had better sex ed in the first place, there wouldn’t be an issue of people not understanding how shit works in the ol’ nether regions.
However, the arguments against abstinence are ones I happen to agree with. Forcing people to be abstinent and not giving them other options only leads to more teen pregnancies, and other sexual behaviors from kids who aren’t doing it safely because they don’t know how.
I’d rather if kids were going to be sexually active with one another, then they’d at least be safe doing it.
I will say though, there’s nothing wrong with being abstinent. If you choose to be that way, or you’re going through a dry spell, there’s nothing wrong with you. It’s okay to not have sex. You’re a complete person without sex, and it’s not a necessity to live.
If SnakeDoctor tries to stick his dick in me, it would get clamped off. I can’t imagine I’m the only woman who feels that way. It’s not only sexbots that don’t want his dick anywhere near them.
I do agree that I can’t compete with robot pussy though. Who could ever compete with this?
Would someone please indulge me and let me know where the hell “thot” comes from and what it means? I can’t get closer then “a woman we don’t like” and I ain’t googling it. Please and thank you.
@WWTH, That is the best robot pussy I’ve seen yet.
OK, Mr. MGTOW. I, a woman, see you. Your desire for sex robots is based, not on wanting sex, but on wanting to hurt women. You believe (or are trying to convince yourself) that you refusing to have sex with women would hurt them.
You claim that women* are bluffing when we say we don’t want sex with you. You claim that you having sex with robots would call our bluff and force us to come begging to you. You claim that sexbots would rob women of our power and deliver us, helpless, into your hands.
There’s one problem, chickadee; women are not bluffing, and deep down, you know it.
I don’t want to have sex with a misogynist tool who hates me and wants to oppress and hurt me. I have been celibate for over a decade, and I will cheerfully go to my grave never touching another dick if you are the only dick on offer. I don’t wish you ill; I just want you to keep the fuck away from me and anyone I care about. If your use of a sex toy achieves that, I urge you to buy that sex toy.
You pretend to believe that if you fuck your sexbot for a while, women will be lining up at your door and begging to make you sammiches. But you know it’s not true. That’s why you keep pretending that sexbots are a futuristic fantasy, instead of an actual existing thing that you could order over the internet right now. If you bought one, you could no longer pretend your fantasies are valid.
I see you, fucker. And you disgust me.
* I considered adding the disclaimer, “For “women”, please read “women sexually attracted to men”. Then I realised the clarification was unnecessary. Lesbians don’t want these fuckers either. No one of any gender identity or sexual bent wants these fuckers.
@Falconer: That Ho Over There.
Yes, even their abbreviations are offensive.
Then again, deciding that it’s just their poor spelling of thought sometimes works for mockery.
“No one wants to deal with thoughts” seems to be about right in that guy’s case.
For other “new slang”, google “urban dictionary stupidwordhere”
@ Falconer
“Thot” originally stood for “That Ho (whore) Over There”. It’s basically a synonym for “slut”.
I think it may have more racial overtones than “slut”. Source; it gets thrown at a lot of women of colour on Maury Povich paternity episodes. White women are more likely to be called “slut” or “whore”.
So, I was talking to my mom about a theoretical possibility: essentially, robot-powered socialism (without mentioning that last word because…it’s my mom). In the future, robots make all the things and do all the things, and humans are left to create as they will.
But would that imply sexbots provided for these folks? Would they even bother with them? Would they complain that it’s not a real woman, no matter how advanced they are? Or would they continue to claim that the entire system that benefits all is still a Jewish conspiracy, and attempt to destroy it?
Seriously, Larry Laffer is less pathetic than these guys. (Is reference got? Should I even try to reference this?)
@Falconer
“thot” = “that hoe over there” = “I’m a raging misogynist and I denigrate women”
I am unaware of the history or origins, but it’s definitely approximately synonymous to “slut”.
On women and having sex with machines:
At work, I had to stock about a hundred bullet-type vibrators. Sexbots already exist for women, and are plentiful. That battle is over.
If they’re really that interested in sex, we’ll just have to put them into some nice padded capsules automated with massaging tubes, rubbery things, and plugs, so they never have to worry about not having an orgasm again. Perhaps including feeding tubes and breathing apparatus, to make sure they eat and get enough oxygen. The temporary side effect of quieting the moaning is probably a feature.