Categories
antifeminism crackpottery drama kings grandiosity mansplaining men who should not ever be with women ever misogyny MRA oppressed men post contains jokes reddit

Reddit MRA: If we let feminism “win,” they’ll throw all men in prison and use them for breeding. Then Muslims will take over.

Wait a minute! All this already happened ... in 1992!
Wait a minute! All this already happened … in 1992!

I learn a lot from reading the Men’s Rights subreddit. For example, I learned today that feminism can’t win, because it’s impossible, but that if it does win, feminists will throw all of us men into prison and use us for breeding. Though they won’t actually be able to throw us in prison. Then Muslims will take over, unless they don’t.

Let’s let the fella who calls himself 192873982 explain, because reading back over that last paragraph, I have to say it doesn’t seem to make much sense:

92873982 1 point 7 hours ago Because you are making false assumptions. If we let feminism "win", they'll try to control men by throwing all men in prisons and using them only for breeding. Then some other culture will start a war against the country, most likely the muslim people because they are the most patriarchical and power-hungry around, and they'll win, because woman don't have enough ability to defend themselves, and they don't even understand the importance of an army (they'd abandon the army most likely). Then this other culture would subdue the feminists and we would be at a patriarchy. If no other culture attacked, they would most likely be able to keep themselves alife (it's not hard with todays tools), and having enough babies would be easy to achieve too. But anyway, they'd not be able to force all men into prisons, because men would win in a fight. The pendulum would swing back, and women would be subdued. I don't want to be killed or imprisoned. Because most men feel the same, feminism can't win. Even most women disagree with the goals of feminsim. There is just no way feminism can win, that's why we can't let them win, because it's impossible. Feminism can only be successfull, if they have mens support, which they do right now. But since they can't reach their goals with mens support, they can't win.

Is this what they call STEM logic? Because it sounds like something the stem of a cherry might have come up with after soaking in a martini for a couple of hours.

H/T — r/BestOfOutrageCulture

 

133 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
kylagb
kylagb
9 years ago

Hope “illegitimate” doesn’t offend. Sorry. 🙁

bananananana dakry
bananananana dakry
9 years ago

@Buttercup Q. Skullpants

Nope, for currency. It’s liquid fucking gold after all. Think about the amount of spooges required to finance a car, for instance.

bananananana dakry
bananananana dakry
9 years ago

@happy cat

Now I feel nauseous reading that vileness. I know it makes me a bad person, but I’m glad that little shit is dead. I’m just sad he took several people with him and for the impact it had on his family.

latsot (@latsot)
9 years ago

This guy has *form*: https://www.reddit.com/user/192873982

I need to get around to writing a bot to generate an insight-of-the-day from this sage.

A little bit of concern trolling: I think number-person is French so doing a remarkable job of communicating absolutely fucking blithering ideas in a foreign language.

happy cat
happy cat
9 years ago

@bananananana dakry I feel the same way. Also, sorry, I should have put a trigger warning.

sff9
sff9
9 years ago

What strikes me in this post, and also in Roosh’s plan to restore the patriarchy, is the extent to which they deny, apparently in good faith, that they’re already living in a patriarchy. They’re so oblivious! Red pill, yeah right.

Vanir (@Vanir85)
9 years ago

they deny, apparently in good faith, that they’re already living in a patriarchy

– sff9

To them, it’s not patriarchy until women are practically (or perhaps even literally) slaves with no rights and no choice but to submit themselves to men in every way. They only see it as patriarchy if the patriarchy is absolute – if there is any way in which women have freedoms and rights that inconvenience men like them, then it’s not patriarchy – it’s a ball crushing matriarchy.

– Trigger warning –

Honestly, their idea of patriarchy, their masculine utopia, really boils down to this; “Unless she is claimed by another man, I should be able to do whatever I wish with her, and if I rape her, I should be congratulated on my manly virility, while she should be branded a dirty, used, slut.”

sff9
sff9
9 years ago

@Vanir, it seems so, yes. In a way, the “Dear Muslima” argument is a watered-down, more socially acceptable version of this idea.

sff9
sff9
9 years ago

N.B., I was referring to the first part of Vanir’s post—as for the second part, I agree that this description of over-the-top patriarchy is probably correct, but despite everything I read on this blog, I trust the standard level of decency of most MRAs and other anti-feminists is not so low as to consider this a utopia.

Vanir (@Vanir85)
9 years ago

I trust the standard level of decency of most MRAs and other anti-feminists is not so low as to consider this a utopia.

-sff9

I was generally referring to the more extreme types of anti-feminists, like Roosh V – I should have made this more clear.

sff9
sff9
9 years ago

@Vanir, yup, I wouldn’t hold Roosh to any level of decency either! I’m not that naïve.

Subtract Hominem, the Renegade Misandroid
Subtract Hominem, the Renegade Misandroid
9 years ago

OP Redditor:

woman [sic] don’t have enough ability to defend themselves, and they don’t understand the importance of an army

Oh, look what I found! It’s a list of women in combat, from ancient history through WWII. I wonder how such a thing could possibly exist. Hmmmmm.

painteyelash
painteyelash
9 years ago

Haha, the last two sentences were amazing. It takes a certain amount of skill to contradict yourself so much.

weirwoodtreehugger
9 years ago

Kylagb,
I was just thinking how much he sounds like Manson. In that Manson thought there was going to be a race war, black people would win, but are too inferior to rule so Manson would get to emerge from his desert hideaway and become the ruler with his superiority and whiteness. Just change it from a race war to a gender war and that’s exactly the way this MRA thinks. It’s a little disturbing.

takshak
takshak
9 years ago

@ weirwoodtreehugger – “a little”?

@ bananananana dakry – I am absolutely against the death penalty myself, but I’m not gonna apologize for agreeing with you, I’m glad that piece of shit is dead.

Scented Fucking Hard Chairs
Scented Fucking Hard Chairs
9 years ago

I think Happy Cat’s figured it out – this garbled mess of conspiracy theory that even LIZARD JFK CAN’T MELT STEEL CHEMTRAILS would be embarrassed to be seen with is just projection (because “Projection” might as well be the entire bowel movement’s middle name).

Cthulhu's Intern
9 years ago

Is no one going to comment on David’s picture? Of those alpha guys taking cover behind a freakin’ saw horse? Basically just a board? Damn, if that’s our resistance, we need to step up our game. We can take over the world MUCH faster than we have.
No wonder TRP hasn’t taken over New Zealand yet.

TheLulzWatch
TheLulzWatch
9 years ago

The point we are at av icecow i MensRights
[–]192873982 3 points 23 hours ago

“Don’t immitate feminists behaviour of blaming your own problems on other people.”

Dude, the whole point of the Red P… Neomasculinity is so you don´t to blame yourself for your problems ever again!
If you aren´t going to be a hypocritical a***hole, why even bother?!?

TheLulzWatch
TheLulzWatch
9 years ago

Subtract Hominem, the Renegade Misandroid, thanx!

patti roberts
patti roberts
9 years ago

Don’t worry guys, we will keep ya all ‘alife’ and somewhat happy. LOL.

latsot (@latsot)
9 years ago

@patti

As I said, number is probably French so it’s churlish to point out errors in English. However, he misspells “successful” about nine fucking times while explaining how important success is, so I think irony wins.

A.A. Wils
9 years ago

Is that book some anti-feminist version of the Turner Diaries?

That that I’ve read the Turner Diaries myself. I most likely couldn’t stomach it. I’ve only gotten the plot filtered through wikipedia–which has told me enough about it that I’m good.

The Redditor, on the other hand, sounds like he must be a big fan of TD himself. Which would not at all be shocking in any way, knowing the mentality of those idiots.

A.A. Wils
9 years ago

Ugh. I don’t know know where my “Not” in front of the “That I’ve read the Turner Diaries myself” went. Maybe my cats ate it.

In any event, I have not personally read that detestable book.

Vanir (@Vanir85)
9 years ago

Is that book some anti-feminist version of the Turner Diaries?

– A.A. Wils

The Turner Diaries is plenty anti-feminist on its own – same as most white supremacists are anti-feminist (and anti liberal, anti progressive, etc.) as well as horribly racist. What little I’ve read of the TD far from embraces white men and women as equals.

Not really surprising, seeing as both white supremacism and male supremacism seems to hold that only the right kind of men with the right way of thinking should be allowed to have any power and say in the world – and anyone else is to be subjugated to their will – or removed. The only real thing separating these racists and sexists is the starting point of their hatred (the main problem is non-whites vs. the main problem is uppity women).

A cheerful little bunch, all in all 🙁

Nequam
Nequam
9 years ago

I’m surprise the ultimate fear didn’t come up in this guy’s screed (probably because of his delusion that his genetic material is in any way desirable): usually when male domesticated animals are not intended to be used for stud purposes, they’re GELDED so as to reduce sexual aggression.

Say hello to Monsieur Ecrasure, boys…