• Home
  • Comments Policy
  • About
    • Mammoth FAQ
    • David Futrelle FAQ
  • T-Shirts, etc.
  • WTF is a MGTOW? A Glossary
← Beer-soaked Roosh V files charges against alleged drink-tosser, retreats to fainting couch
Celebrate Roosh V’s “Historic Victory” in Montreal with these lovely memes →

MRA Paul Elam: If a feminist pours a drink on me, I’d be justified in killing her

 August 10, 2015
  · 169 Comments
Paul Elam: Might kill you for pouring a drink on him

Paul Elam: Might kill you for pouring a drink on him

Apparently jealous of all the media attention being paid to the Montreal misadventures of PUA shitweasel Roosh Valizadeh, the recipient of an unwanted beer bath at the hands of an angry feminist this past Saturday night, MRA shitweasel Paul Elam has announced to the world that if any lady feminists try that with him, he’ll punch their lights out.

Hell, he adds, he might even kill them. And he thinks he would be completely justified in doing so. 

Elam, the founder and, ahem, CEO of A Voice for Men, describes himself as “nonviolent” and his site as “doggedly antiviolence.” But he wants to warn all drink-holding feminists who might now or in the future be in his vicinity not to “mistake my nonviolence for pacifism.”

“Being an advocate for nonviolent change does not mandate anyone to be a punching bag,” Elam writes.

And while self-defense needs to be proportional to the threat, he argues, it’s safe for MRAs and PUAs and “anyone [else] who dissents honestly from feminism” to assume that if a feminist tosses a drink at you, they are literally trying to kill you.

After Roosh got beer tossed on him this past weekend, you see, one feminist on Twitter noted that alcohol is flammable, and suggested in a jokey hashtag that people encountering him “throw smokes” at him.

This is, of course, a deeply shitty thing to say. Roosh may or may not have deserved the beer-soaking; if some of the things he’s described doing to women in his various books are true, he probably deserves to be in jail.

But, no, he doesn’t deserve to be lit on fire. And you would be hard-pressed to find any feminists (including, I’m pretty sure, that Tweeter) who actually think he deserves a fiery death at the hand of a vigilante mob.

As far as Elam has decided, though, that one shitty tweet suggests that any feminist with a drink in her or his hand is a potential murderer. If a feminist tosses a drink at you, he argues, you can reasonably assume this is an act of attempted murder. 

Given the current climate it becomes rationally questionable whether a feminist throwing a flammable liquid on me intends to ignite it. My personal option at this point would be to assume they would. Thus I would make my response proportional to someone trying to incinerate me. That means they would have to go down and at the very least be completely incapacitated, by any means necessary.

Personally, I think it would be a really bad idea to wait till you see them strike a match. It is now reasonable [to] assume that this is what they are going to do.

Emphasis mine, in this and in the quotes that follow.

Elam has apparently confused “reasonable” with “completely and utterly unreasonable what the fuck are you talking about you piece of shit?”

And it gets worse:

The question for me is whether I will risk being immolated in order to not be arrested. I won’t. And while each person has to make their own decision I don’t suggest anyone roll the dice on these insane ideologues. … 

In the end I am betting this time of crisis will not be long lived. The feminist narrative is increasingly being recognized for the joke that it is. The time will soon come when very few people will even admit to being a feminist, much less take the risk of assaulting people in its name.

Till that happens, though, I think feminists of all kinds should be aware that belonging to a nonviolent movement does not mean you are a pacifist.

Trust me, Paul. No feminist will ever mistake you for a pacifist.

As an MHRA I am willing to die for my beliefs. I only think it prudent to caution that I am equally willing to kill to protect myself.

What the fuck is wrong with you, you fucking piece of shit?

Share this:

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Reddit
  • Tumblr
  • Email
  • More
  • Google
  • Pinterest
  • LinkedIn
  • Pocket
  • Print

Like this:

Like Loading...

Related

Posted in: a voice for men, advocacy of violence, attention seeking, empathy deficit, entitled babies, men who should not ever be with women ever, misogyny, MRA, paranoia, paul elam, threats
← Beer-soaked Roosh V files charges against alleged drink-tosser, retreats to fainting couch
Celebrate Roosh V’s “Historic Victory” in Montreal with these lovely memes →

Comments

Please read the comments policy before leaving a comment - thanks!

  1. Pages:
  2. «
  3. 1
  4. 2
  5. 3
  6. 4
  1. freemage says:
    August 11, 2015 at 4:45 pm

    Oh, I’m all about the pure sugar versions, generally. One of the few ‘food trends’ I’ve really jumped on board with.

    Reply
  2. Paradoxical Intention says:
    August 11, 2015 at 4:52 pm

    weirwoodtreehugger | August 11, 2015 at 4:33 pm
    Pepsi? What kind of monsters are you people? Pepsi is too sweet. Coke for the win! Especially kosher /Mexican Coke with real sugar instead of high fructose corn syrup.

    The reason Pepsi is sweeter is that it was invented after refrigeration became accessible to everyone, so it has more sugar in it.

    Coke was invented pre-refrigerators, so it was meant to taste good when warm, so less sugar.

    Reply
  3. Alan Robertshaw says:
    August 11, 2015 at 5:03 pm

    @ SunnyS

    Since Aspartame K has been linked (loosely) to malignant tumours

    Ooh, be careful saying that, you’ll get sued. Or possible not, the case was a bit confusing. I like that one of the judges said the case proved defamation law was “beyond redemption”. 🙂

    http://www.5rb.com/case/ajinomoto-sweeteners-europe-sas-v-asda-stores-ltd-no-2-ca/

    Reply
  4. sunnysombrera says:
    August 11, 2015 at 5:39 pm

    @Alan
    He he, yeah I know it’s dodgy science that made that link. Hence why I used the word loosely as a moderator.

    On another note, CollegeHumor have made perhaps one of their best videos yet:
    https://youtu.be/f7WQMZWguBQ

    Reply
  5. Yutolia says:
    August 11, 2015 at 5:44 pm

    It’s so weird – whenever we call out one, the rest respond too!! Even if it has nothing to do with them. Talk about hive-mind!!

    Reply
  6. Mary says:
    August 11, 2015 at 6:10 pm

    I’ve been meaning to tell you David, thank you for the work that you do. Thanks to your blog I can laugh at these ridiculous twats without having to click on their own websites/videos and increasing their popularity.

    You are awesome.

    Reply
  7. Tracy says:
    August 11, 2015 at 7:48 pm

    @Prios

    Even if he was set on fire, would it really be life threatening? One time a doctor told me that if it’s a legitimate fire, the male body has ways to try to shut that whole thing down.

    You win the thread 🙂

    So according to Paulie, setting a courthouse on fire = totes ok; absolutely no chance of being set on fire after being doused with a non-flammable liquid = start punching.

    If I showed Paulie that I had a lego in my hand, and then I hid my hand behind my back, would he understand where the lego went? I’m not sure he would.

    Reply
  8. repentantphonebooth says:
    August 11, 2015 at 7:51 pm

    Bahahahahhaha, @Prios, I splurfed my water!!!

    Reply
  9. Alan Robertshaw says:
    August 11, 2015 at 7:55 pm

    @ Tracy

    If I showed Paulie that I had a lego in my hand, and then I hid my hand behind my back, would he understand where the lego went?

    He’d cite the fact that Lego is the weapon of choice around here and use that as justification for shooting you.

    Reply
  10. Kreator says:
    August 11, 2015 at 9:01 pm

    For the record: Regular Pepsi > Diet Coke > Regular Coke > > > > > > > > Diet Pepsi a.k.a. “Devil’s bile.”

    Reply
  11. Bina says:
    August 11, 2015 at 11:46 pm

    Paul NEEDS to fee victimized.

    He NEEDS to pretend that he’s powerless.

    And yet, he’s also the guy who says “The pen is in your hand”.

    Well, Paulie? Which IS it?

    Reply
  12. Rabid Rabbit says:
    August 12, 2015 at 12:24 am

    @Tracy

    Well, I don’t know. Maybe Paulie doesn’t have double standards. I mean, he’s never weighed in on whether the courthouse would be justified in punching the arsonist, has he?

    Reply
  13. Kay says:
    August 12, 2015 at 2:23 am

    Once again so-called “feminists” miss the point, entirely ignoring the most important issue at hand, which is that Paul Elam thinks beer is flammable.

    Reply
  14. EJ (The Other One) says:
    August 12, 2015 at 6:53 am

    @pecunium:

    The proof system originates in the Royal Navy. Suspicious of the quality of the booze they were issues, sailors would soak ordinarily-flammable things in rum and set fire to them to see if the rum was suitably strong. If it was too weak, the substance wouldn’t catch fire. This substance was usually cord or canvas, although Wikipedia claims that gunpowder (!) was also used.

    As the test substance was suffused in rum before a light was set to it, the fumes wouldn’t play a part in this test – it’s to do with the ability of the water content to retard the fire as opposed to the alcohol content’s flammability.

    I’m aware that countries other than Britain have proof systems which vary from the standard; I have no idea how those systems are defined.

    Reply
  15. potterchik says:
    August 12, 2015 at 1:58 pm

    Pretty sure beer doesn’t qualify as a flammable liquid. Just sayin.

    Reply
  16. Elliot Rodger Was A Terrorist says:
    August 12, 2015 at 3:25 pm

    Reminds me of all the diehard Trumpers who are now reportedly sending death threats to Megyn Kelly.

    http://www.msn.com/en-us/news/other/megyn-kelly-reportedly-received-death-threats-from-donald-trump-supporters/ar-BBlEKtS?ocid=mailsignout

    Speaking of Trumpers, have you seen the new “Shaun the Sheep” movie? The villain’s name is “Trumper”. It’s almost certainly just a coincidence, but because the film came out right when the media was all abuzz over Donald Trump, I thought it was interesting.

    Reply
  17. shartheheretic says:
    August 12, 2015 at 8:07 pm

    As a always-reader and very-scarce-commenter, I just want to say that I am happy to see you back here, Pecunium. I missed your comments. I’m always amazed at how much you know about…well, so much. 🙂

    Reply
  18. jgpercussion says:
    August 13, 2015 at 12:12 am

    What a dope, beer doesn’t have nearly enough alcohol in it to catch fire. He’s just rationalizing his desire to abuse women.

    Reply
  19. pecunium says:
    August 13, 2015 at 9:33 am

    EJ: I am well aware of the idea of “proofing” spirits (which predates the RN as a going concern)*: It’s problematic, at best

    Modern proofing is based on the specific gravity of alcohol, as a ratio, with the UK using the formula 100 proof = 12/13th the SG of water**

    Wines and distilled spirits have specific gravities of less than one. The best known measure of hard liquor is proof. This term relates any sample to a standard that is regarded as 100, the resulting measure being expressed as either percentage proof or degree proof in absolute terms, or as under or over proof, relative to 100. In the UK the historic standard is a mixture with 57.1% alcohol by volume; in the USA it is 50%. Proof figures equal the change in overall volume that would produce a mixture of proof 100, a useful factor for proportional taxation.

    (Oxford Dictonary of Weights and Measures, Ofxord University Press, 2002: footnote omitted)

    And taxation, more than “fair measure” was the big issue in setting legal proof(though one of the interesting things was the idea that more dilution = less effect, so that the Royal Navy would punish sailors by adding extra water to their grog).

    As to the flammability of various concentrations: flash point of 40 percent (US 80 proof UK 70 Proof, Guy Lussac [the European Standard] 40 proof) has a flash point of 79F/26C.

    The odds of it igniting if tossed on someone aren’t great, but it could be done. If one had intent, heating it (by say cradling it in the hands for several minutes) would increase the odds greatly.

    It isn’t until the concentration gets to 70 percent, or so, that room temperature is, generally, adequate for easy ignition (see above my comments re the use of warmed spirits in flambe cookery).

    *the version of the story which says sailors were doing this test are, at best, hard to credit as factual. 1: Powder was very closely kept. 2: Fire was the single greatest hazard to ships. 3 Rum was more closely kept than powder (because of sailors fondness for stealing it). 4: any fire not contained on the galley decking was punished harshly; flogging at the very least. At the most, court martial leading to death, esp. if it was seen as mutinous, which is how most captains would see the implicit accusation they were cheating the men of their due.

    ** A hydrometer introduced in 1725, Clarke’s hydrometer, became the standard way tax collectors determined proof. By 1762 this hydrometer was even mentioned in the law defining the standard gallon of spirits, six parts spirits and one part water by weight, and weighing 7 pounds, 13 ounces at 50° Fahrenheit.

    A hydrometer, however, can only determine the composition of a water-alcohol mixture if it contains only water and alcohol–and there are other complicating factors, especially temperature. By adding sweeteners, such as molasses, importers could evade the tax on higher proof spirits. After decades of controversy, on 6 January 1817 a different hydrometer, Sike’s, was made the legal method for determining proof.

    By Sike’s hydrometer, proven spirits were at least 57.1% alcohol by volume (49.28% by weight). The British proof system is built on this number. “Proof” spirits, or 100-proof spirits, are 57.1% alcohol by volume. Proofs above and below 100-proof are sometimes referred to as so many degrees under proof or over proof. American 100-proof whiskey, for example, might be called either “87.5-proof” or “12.5 under proof.” For a quick conversion of British proof to American, multiply the British proof by 8, then divide by 7.

    “Between the Trader and the Public,” British alcohol standards and the proof of good governance. Technology and Culture, volume 42, no. 1 (January 2001)

    Reply
  1. Pages:
  2. «
  3. 1
  4. 2
  5. 3
  6. 4

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Please read the comments policy before leaving a comment - thanks!

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Donate to the Mammoth!

We Hunted the Mammoth is an ad-free, reader-supported publication written and published by longtime journalist David Futrelle, who has been tracking, dissecting, and mocking the growing misogynistic backlash since 2010, exposing the hateful ideologies of Men’s Rights Activists, incels, alt-rightists and many others.

We depend on support from people like you. Please consider a donation or a monthly pledge by clicking below! there's no need for a PayPal account.

1
Send comments, questions, and tips for stories to me at dfutrelle@gmail.com, or by clicking here

Follow Me

  • View david.futrelle’s profile on Facebook
  • View DavidFutrelle’s profile on Twitter
  • View David Futrelle’s profile on YouTube
  • View David Futrelle’s profile on Google+

Subscribe via Email

Recent Posts

  • Jordan Peterson fans mansplain makeup: “You try to cheat men’s brains by presenting a more sexually attractive face than you really have”
  • Open thread to discuss the legacy and honor the victims of the École Polytechnique massacre
  • Banning abortion “is about making women scared to have more than one sexual partner,” Red Pill Redditor declares
  • I read this incel “field report” and now you have to, too
  • The Daily Stormer launches an attack on the female orgasm
  • Black athletes are turning white men into a cucked “third sex” by being better at sports, weirdo racist football fan argues
  • Where I’ve been
  • In the battle betwen John Wayne and Mr. Rogers it’s the gentler soul who’s winning
  • Amazon is promoting “racial hate crimes” with a new show featuring Nazi hunters as the heroes, professional mad guy One Angry Gamer declares
  • HE SAID THE THING! YouTube ranter Warcorpse666 thinks men deserve privilege because they hunted the you-know-what

Top Posts

  • The Daily Stormer launches an attack on the female orgasm
  • Jordan Peterson fans mansplain makeup: "You try to cheat men's brains by presenting a more sexually attractive face than you really have"
  • Banning abortion "is about making women scared to have more than one sexual partner," Red Pill Redditor declares
  • Open thread to discuss the legacy and honor the victims of the École Polytechnique massacre

Archives

My Twitter

Tweets by DavidFutrelle

Recent Comments

  • Dormousing_it December 8, 2019 at 8:12 am on Jordan Peterson fans mansplain makeup: “You try to cheat men’s brains by presenting a more sexually attractive face than you really have”
  • Naglfar December 8, 2019 at 7:26 am on Jordan Peterson fans mansplain makeup: “You try to cheat men’s brains by presenting a more sexually attractive face than you really have”
  • Buttercup Q. Skullpants December 8, 2019 at 6:27 am on Jordan Peterson fans mansplain makeup: “You try to cheat men’s brains by presenting a more sexually attractive face than you really have”
  • Kat, ambassador of the feminist government in exile December 8, 2019 at 5:20 am on Jordan Peterson fans mansplain makeup: “You try to cheat men’s brains by presenting a more sexually attractive face than you really have”
  • Kat, ambassador of the feminist government in exile December 8, 2019 at 5:07 am on Jordan Peterson fans mansplain makeup: “You try to cheat men’s brains by presenting a more sexually attractive face than you really have”
  • Kat, ambassador of the feminist government in exile December 8, 2019 at 5:03 am on Jordan Peterson fans mansplain makeup: “You try to cheat men’s brains by presenting a more sexually attractive face than you really have”
  • StarStorm December 8, 2019 at 2:49 am on I read this incel “field report” and now you have to, too
  • vaiyt December 8, 2019 at 2:30 am on Jordan Peterson fans mansplain makeup: “You try to cheat men’s brains by presenting a more sexually attractive face than you really have”

Random WHTM Posts!

  • Breaking News from Imaginary Backwards Land: Atheists "worship at the altar of feminism."Breaking News from Imaginary Backwards Land: Atheists "worship at the altar of feminism."February 8, 2012
  • Aliens, Bitch Snacks and Baby-Aborting Whores: The Totally Not Hateful Graphic Art of the MGTOW SubredditAliens, Bitch Snacks and Baby-Aborting Whores: The Totally Not Hateful Graphic Art of the MGTOW SubredditMarch 17, 2016
  • Return of Kings: Society is so anti-male that more and more men are becoming womenReturn of Kings: Society is so anti-male that more and more men are becoming womenApril 28, 2016
  • Happy Thanksgiving and/or ThursdayHappy Thanksgiving and/or ThursdayNovember 26, 2015
  • Alt Right goes Alt Banksy with amazing(ly dumb) Adidas memeAlt Right goes Alt Banksy with amazing(ly dumb) Adidas memeOctober 2, 2016

If You’re Being Harassed

  • Speak Up & Stay Safe(r)
  • Crash Override
  • DIY Feminist Cybersecurity
  • Without My Consent
  • 9 Ways to Dodge Trolls

Creep Watchers

  • Hail to the Gynocracy!
  • Right Wing Watch
  • Hate Watch (SPLC)
  • Media Matters
  • Fundies Say the Darndest Things
  • My Right Wing Dad
  • r/ShitRedditSays
  • r/GamerGhazi
  • r/TheBluePill
  • r/AgainstMensRights
  • r/CreepyPMs

Mammothy Fun

  • Official WHTM Welcome Package!
  • Artistry For Feminism. And Kittens.
  • A Voice for Pierre

Feed the Mammoth!

Keep this blog going by clicking on the link below! You don't even need a PayPal account.

Privacy & Cookies: This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this website, you agree to their use.
To find out more, including how to control cookies, see here: Cookie Policy
We Hunted The Mammoth | Copyright © 2019 All Rights Reserved
loading Cancel
Post was not sent - check your email addresses!
Email check failed, please try again
Sorry, your blog cannot share posts by email.
%d bloggers like this: