hate misogyny murder rape rape culture

If you make misogyny a hate crime, it will just increase misogyny, explains oafish British PM Boris Johnson

Misogyny is hate, so why aren’t crimes motivated by misogyny considered hate crimes? That’s a question a lot of people in the UK have been asking for a long time.

The discussion has a particularly raw edge to it these days, in the wake of the brutal rape and murder of a 33-year old London woman named Sarah Everard, a mortifying event that has UK citizens worried about the safety of women on the streets. Especially since the killer was a cop.

But not everyone is on board with the idea of making misogyny a hate crime. Oafish British Prime Minister Boris Johnson is one of them. Asked about the issue recently, he explained that making misogyny a hate crime would just make more misogyny.

After declaring that violence against women is “the number one issue in policing,” he went on to argue that the real solution would just be to enforce current laws more stringently. Because making misogyny a hate crime would give police and the courts so much new work to do that it would just overwhelm them. And somehow this would cause misogyny to get worse.

“To be perfectly frank, if you simply widen the scope of what you ask the police to do, you’ll just increase the problem,” he recently told reporters.

It’s a little hard to take this logic seriously. It’s not as if making murder a crime increased the number of murders. Johnson’s argument is less an argument than a rather flippant excuse for the status quo, and UK women deserve a lot better than that.

Follow me on Twitter.

Send tips to dfutrelle at gmail dot com.

We Hunted the Mammoth relies on support from you, its readers, to survive. Please donate here if you can, or at David-Futrelle-1 on Venmo.

Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
1 year ago

Theoretically, there could be some logic behind the whole “making misogyny a crime would increase misogyny”.

It goes like this:
– If more demands are put on the justice system, then there’s probably going to be more money going to the police.
-The police regularly commit acts of misogynistic violence, as demonstrated by the shitstain that killed Sarah Everard, and by the 40% of police that admit to beating their spouse.
-Increasing funding to the police will grant them more power, and therefore more capacity for misogynistic violence.

‘course, the rational response to this line of thinking would be to abolish the fucking cops, not to ignore misogynistic crime.

Last edited 1 year ago by Catalpa
%d bloggers like this: