Categories
empathy deficit entitled babies FemRAs misogyny reddit

Aussie FeMRA Bettina Arndt’s victim- blaming remarks about a grisly murder are making it hard for even her fans to stick up for her

By David Futrelle

If all publicity is good publicity, then Bettina Arndt is absolutely killing it right now. The Australian “sex therapist” and Men’s Rights grifter has been in the news there almost constantly since late January, when she was mysteriously awarded one of Australia’s top honors for her alleged “services to gender equity,” which seem to have consisted mostly of slagging off the “feminist domestic violence industry” and offering strange apologetics for literal pedophiles.

And so the news of her winning the Australia day award was immediately followed by calls for her to be stripped of the award as soon as humanly possible.

Now she’s ignited an even bigger firestorm (not literally) with her appalling, victim-blaming response to news of a grisly murder. On February 19th, a Queensland man with a history of violence and stalking and threats brutally killed his estranged wife and their three children by pouring gasoline on their car and setting it (and them) on fire.

Arndt responded by echoing the words of a Queensland police detective who had wondered aloud if the murder was the result of the husband being “driven too far” by his wife. She also mocked what she called the “misplaced outrage” around the detective’s remarks.

These comments set off another round of well-placed outrage directed at Arndt, which ultimately resulted in the Australian parliament itself voting for a resolution demanding she be stripped of her award lest she “bring the Order of Australia, instituted by Her Majesty The Queen, into disrepute.” This is largely a symbolic gesture, as the Parliament is not directly involved in granting or un-granting the award, but as symbolic gestures go, it’s kind of a big deal.

Still, Arndt has her defenders. In the Men’s Rights subreddit, a commenter called Rabel111 complained that

The removal of her Order of Australia medal may silence those who speak up for men’s health and the support of fathers in family law, and signal further despair and marginalisation of men and boys in our community.

Not unless those men are murderers and/or pedophiles.

Another commenter took aim at feminists.

Feminism views society in terms of a struggle between the genders. Men as the oppressors and women as the oppressed. They are not interested in compassion or understanding for all. To them, it is a war of attrition, and only one side can be ultimately victorious. Arndt pisses them off for many reasons, one being that she is a traitor who has defected to the enemy. She deserves her medal.

A third commenter was even more blunt:

Feminists one day will pay [for] their shit

But even some of her supporters have been having a little trouble defending her latest remarks. As one of them put it in a comment in the Australia subreddit:

While I don’t agree with Arndt on this one or several other matters (she chooses some terrible hills to die on) she’s one of the only people daring to speak out on behalf of men, and she’s firmly in the sights of the feminist mafia as a result. Even before this kerfuffle, she was being hounded by radical feminist groups for daring to suggest that men aren’t the privileged ones. Arndt dared to break ranks and she’s being targeted for silencing as a result.

Then there was the guy who somehow managed to compare her to some of history’s worst tyrants in what was ostensibly a statement of support for her winning (and keeping) the award:

I don’t like Arndt and most of her “work”, but I’m very, very glad she got an honour for her work to recognize male victims of domestic violence …

I’m on a permanent disability pension after being bashed by my ex-wife for years. …

It is so incredibly rare in Australia for anyone to take up the mantle of male DV victims and fight for them. If … Stalin or Hitler or Goebbels [were] fighting for male victims of violence to get equal assistance and support in Australia I would be cheering them on too, simply because there is nobody else doing it and we need someone, even if they were a literal Nazi or a pedo sympathizer or member of the National Party or whatever.

With friends like those .. well, with friends like those you’re probably Bettina Arndt.

Send tips to dfutrelle at gmail dot com.

We Hunted the Mammoth relies entirely on readers like you for its survival. If you appreciate our work, please send a few bucks our way! Thanks!

28 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Skye
Skye
2 years ago

@Surplus

Loving fathers don’t set their children on fire.

This.

Always and forever

Jennifer Wells
Jennifer Wells
2 years ago

Well yes. There is alot of speculation and bullshit about how the father wasn’t allowed to see his kids. I think if you set your children on fire….. Bloody hell.

Jenora Feuer
Jenora Feuer
2 years ago

@Lainy:

I think a lot of people don’t realize that if you try to leave an abuser, doesn’t mean the abuser is going to let you go.

As an indirect personal note on this… I may have told this story before, but here goes:

I was called up for jury duty (I think it was the fourth time I was called up). We sat in the courtroom waiting, got told to wait, got told to go to lunch, got told to wait, and then the judge came in to explain what had been going on. The original case we had been called in for had been settled the night before, but since we were already there anyway, the jury panel got used as leverage in another case.

The new case involved what was originally a sexual harassment case, with a man who had been stalking his ex-girlfriend. Over the years since the initial case he had racked up a laundry list of a couple dozen charges of harassment, stalking, contempt of court due to violations of restraining orders, inappropriate use of resources (he’d got a police officer to look up his ex-girlfriends new address, I forget the actual name of the offence) and other things. I repeat above: this had been going on for years.

The man in question had his previous two lawyers quit on him, had fired his court-appointed lawyer, was representing himself, and was in fact a disbarred lawyer. Pretty much a perfect storm of ‘things no judge ever wants to see in his courtroom’.

So I was nearly on a jury about a guy who refused to take ‘no’ for an answer for over two years and multiple court orders, and he wasn’t even obviously violent. I have no trouble believing that this sort of thing happens.

%d bloggers like this: