Ugh. It’s the Jailbait subreddit again. If you’ve been following any of the discussions that have recently been swirling around Reddit’s popular subreddit dedicated to the posting of technically-not-child-porn pics of underage girls, you probably ran across the standard Jailbait apologia: The pics there aren’t nude pics, and besides, most of them were originally posted on the internet by the girls themselves. So it’s all good clean fun, I guess.
It’s going to be a little bit harder for the Jailbaiters to use this bullshit argument in the future. A day or so ago, you see, a Jailbaiter calling himself TheContortionist posted a pic of his (alleged) 14-year-old ex-girlfriend’s ass in a thong. Naturally, the regulars demanded more. The OP noted that the only other pics he had of her were nudes.
So literally dozens of the regulars – I counted around 70 in all — begged him to PM the nudes to them. And … apparently he did send some of them the pics, at least according to a r/jailbait moderator with the charming handle I_RAPE_PEOPLE.
I can only hope that some of the requesters were FBI agents.
Here’s a screenshot of the whole disgusting thread (SFW; in an earlier NSFW screenshot posted to Reddit virtually all of the comments you see downvoted here still had net upvotes).
TheContortionist’s post (and the Jailbaiters’ reaction to it) was first brought to the attention of non-pedo Redditors by Me_bender in ShitRedditSays, then brought to the attention of the rest of Reddit by SRS regular HPLovecraft.
Naturally, this being Reddit, the r/jailbait apologists are still insisting that, hey, even though something like 70 people in r/jailbait publicly requested PMs of child porn, this sort of thing is officially frowned upon by the subreddit’s mods, so, you know, not to worry. As CapNRoddy put it:
The existence of r/jailbait does not mean nudes of children. Those are against the rules. Those posters broke the rules.
And then of course there were various iterations of this non-argument, set forth here by im_only_a_dolphin:
You know what I do about /r/jailbait?
I don’t visit it. Bam. Problem solved.
If by “solved” you mean “ignored, because I don’t give a shit about crimes that harm people other than me,” then I guess, yeah, that is “problem solved.”
I’ve been taking these quotes from the sometimes surreal discussion of the issue on the WTF subreddit. That discussion also produced this rather surreal exchange with I_RAPE_PEOPLE, the r/jailbait moderator I mentioned earlier:
Meanwhile, in another discussion of the topic elsewhere on Reddit, voidsong managed to get more than a dozen net upvotes for a comment that attempted to place the blame for the pics in r/jailbait on “daddy’s little angels slutting themselves up and taking pictures in the mirror” (and, of course, their parents).
I can only hope that the authorities are investigating these creeps, and that the Reddit admins are cooperating fully with them.
Gina tingles is creepy, but it’s a great drag name.
OMG hellkell I think we have to have a “walk-off” now, Zoolander style.
“‘Gina tingles’ is not creepy. It’s an example of the entitlement of the wimminz.”
I am honestly trying to think of an equally creepy-sounding term for a man’s arousal and I CAN’T. Agh! Is “cock twitches” creepy? “Ball tingles” just sounds silly.
@Baglesan: Ha! you may have it, for Kitty Glitter is already my drag name.
Ball tingles sounds like something you need a prescription cream for.
…”Scrotum scrunchies”? “Prick tickles”?
And yes, I’ll take Gina Tingles as my name (Kitty Glitter is fabulous!) 😀
Are these men breaking the law? No. Then shut the fuck up. So a few people asked for nudes, I really don’t see the big deal. Did he give them out? If no, there’s no problem.
“Ball tingles sounds like something you need a prescription cream for.”
This is a total thread derail, but now I’m wondering if creepy terms for mens’ arousal even exist. Google’s not helping.
Anyway…
@MRAL: So you’re saying all women feel entitled to have sex with younger men? Is that why cougars are worshiped in our culture?
Trying to solicit child porn = totally alright and legal. Obvs.
“Are these men breaking the law? No. Then shut the fuck up.”
No.
“Are these men breaking the law? No.”
Um, MRAL? Here’s a direct quote from the post above:
“Jailbaiter calling himself TheContortionist posted a pic of his (alleged) 14-year-old ex-girlfriend’s ass in a thong. Naturally, the regulars demanded more. The OP noted that the only other pics he had of her were nudes.
“So literally dozens of the regulars – I counted around 70 in all — begged him to PM the nudes to them. And … apparently he did send some of them the pics…”
Having nude pics of a 14 year old girl is indeed illegal. It’s child porn.
Scrotum Horripilation.
There.
MRAL, you shut the fuck up. Soliciting underaged nudes is not legal.
Molly, no, you’ve got to follow the formula: leave off the first syllable: ‘nis stiffies, perhaps?
“Wee wee wiggles”? “Dick thickenings”? “Johnson jiggling”? “Cock cuntchemotaxis”?
…Apologies to the people on here who will never be able to feel sexual arousal again after reading my suggestions.
‘nis stiffies sounds like a British candy.
(Also apologies for the cis and hetero-centrism of the last suggestion. ;D)
“peen pangs?”
“Scrote bloats”?
…Ew, that should honestly get looked at by a doctor.
Thank you hellkell! I was trying to think of a “peen” one. 😀
Actually, how about “glistening shaft”? If you had a dick and someone referred to it in that way, would you give them the side eye?
Young girls wearing nothing or next to nothing and calling men pervs for looking.
Oh. The. Irony.
You’re welcome!
I would give someone the side-eye for “glistening shaft.”
Oh, are we introducing bad porn!fic terms now, too? “Throbbing man meat” is a classic, natch. :p
Okay, well personally I think ephebephilism is quite different from pedophilism.
By the way, I cannot be an ephebephile because I’m 19, so I have no skin in the game.
NWO, learn to read plz. No one is calling them pervs for looking. They are being called pervs for asking for nude pics of underage girls. Can you spot the difference?