MRA Jack Barnes is trying to silence me with increasingly explicit threats

Jack Barnes, in a screenshot of one of his YouTube videos
Jack Barnes, in a screenshot from one of his YouTube videos

Jack Barnes, the notoriously hotheaded Men’s Rights Activist and longtime contributor to A Voice for Men, has escalated his attacks on me. In a post on AVFM, Barnes addressed me directly:

I’m a junkyard dog with no owner and no collar. …

Didn’t anyone ever tell you that you shouldn’t piss off a redheaded country boy from the backwoods of Tennessee? I promise you David that for the rest of your life there will be nights you cry yourself to sleep in anger and frustration over me.

In a followup post on TwitLonger, someone claiming to be Barnes — and it seems abundantly clear that it is in fact him — threatened to drive from Tennessee to Chicago to confront me in

a face to face in person discussion … No cops. No lawyers or prosecutors. No judges. No jury. No hiding behind a computer. Just me and you. …

I don’t know of any parent that would blame me for stomping a mud hole in your fucking ass and walking that motherfucker dry for what you have done!

What I have done is, in fact, nothing — nothing beyond letting the world know of some of the disturbing things Barnes has posted online.

But as Barnes sees it, I am responsible for putting his family in danger. How? Well, not long ago, someone apparently doxed Barnes, posting personal information about Barnes and his family on Twitter.

Of course, I had nothing to do with the doxing and only learned about it later from an AVFM video. I don’t know who did it, and I have publicly condemned it several times.

I will condemn it again, right here: the doxing of Jack Barnes and his family was wrong and a deeply shitty thing to do; whoever did it is a shithead and no friend of mine.

But Barnes is convinced one of my “cult followers” did the deed and bluntly warns me that ” I hold you personally responsible for this occurring.”

Even though I did not dox him, don’t know who doxed him, did not tell anyone to dox him, and have publicly denounced doxing in general and the doxing of Barnes and his family specifically.

The TwitLonger post declares:

You have crossed a line David. This is no longer about the MHRM vs feminism. This is no longer about AVFM, which I have no affiliation with, and your website. This is no longer about Paul Elam publisher of AVFM vs you as publisher of your website. You have made this personal. This is now about me vs you.
I don’t care that your little cult follower doxxed me. But when he/she doxxed my wife and little girl it became personal.

The author of the TwitLonger post, almost certainly Barnes himself, says that he will only come to Chicago for the promised “face to face in person discussion” if his family members come to harm.

But I do not have the luxury of seeing the threats as conditional ones. There are no conditions listed when he writes:

I don’t know of any parent that would blame me for stomping a mud hole in your fucking ass and walking that motherfucker dry for what you have done! Hell, I bet even Gondi would be like “he did what to you family? Fuck him up!

He is not saying that he would only be justified in “stomping a mud hole in [my] fucking ass” if something were to happen to his family; he is saying he is justified in doing so now.

Because some person who is not me, and who is unknown to me, did something I only found out about later and that I have publicly denounced.

And a possible “stomping” is not all I have to worry about: in his AVFM post, Barnes made sure I know that he

live[s] in a state with more guns than people, where a side arm is as common as a cell phone and where it is legal for 10yr olds to hunt with high powered rifles and without adult supervision.

So I can only assume that if he ever decides to pay me an unwanted visit he will be armed.

The author of the TwitLonger post — almost certainly Barnes — declares that his obvious threats against me are not in fact threats but “simply a statement of fact.” I think any reasonable person reading these posts would see them as clear threats, and I am treating them as such.

And it is plainly obvious to me that Barnes intends to terrorize me into silence with his threats — as his “promise” on AVFM that “for the rest of your life there will be nights you cry yourself to sleep” thinking about him makes abundantly clear. His threats are consistent with the threatening language he uses against feminists online, particularly on Twitter, which are clearly intended to shut his opponents up. As he put it in one notorious Tweet

Adding to the surreality of this all, Barnes and his allies at A Voice for Men are so committed to their bizarre caricature of me as some kind of cartoon supervillain that they not only blame me for things I haven’t done but for not doing things that I have done. In this case, their eyes seem to have blurred over when they’ve come across the things I’ve written condemning the doxing.

In his AVFM post, Barnes wrote that while other feminists had denounced the doxing,

there was one person who has remain eerily silent about all this. That person is David Futrelle. Seems odd since all of this doxxing was done to avenge him. There is not a peep from Futrelle about this on his site or on social media anywhere that I could find. As a parent I know my kid is up to no good when she is quiet. Wonder if the same goes for adults (assuming the word applies)?

In fact, I had condemned the doxing two days earlier in a post that Barnes has publicly acknowledged reading.

On Twitter, AVFM’s “Chief Public Relations Officer” Suzy McCarley did Barnes one better, somehow managing to miss my denunciation of the doxing in a Tweet of mine that she was literally quoting at the time, leading to this rather surrealistic exchange:

Suzy McCarley ‏@SuzyMcCarley Suzy McCarley Retweeted David Futrelle Boobz had to know it and he didn't make a peep until he was called out. @DavidFutrelle STILL hasn't condemned it. Suzy McCarley added, David Futrelle @DavidFutrelle . @Jackbarnesmra I DID NOT DOX YOU OR YOUR FAMILY. I DON'T KNOW WHO DOXED YOU OR THEM. WHOEVER DOXED YOU/THEM WAS WRONG. RETWEET 1 LIKES 3 Bob LorinczMike KlengenburgMel Liflora 9:19 PM - 8 Nov 2015 Reply Retweet Like More Tweet text Reply to @SuzyMcCarley Who's in these photos? David Futrelle ‏@DavidFutrelle Nov 8 @SuzyMcCarley I called it out as soon as I heard about it. I condemned in in a post and in the tweet you just fucking quoted.

It is almost as if they are so committed to seeing me as a monster that they cannot handle it when reality defies their expectations.

Another longtime AVFM supporter, so-called “Honey Badger” Hannah Wallen, has added a decidely Kafkaesque series of Tweets to the Twitter dogpile, including one that puzzled me greatly until she explained her “logic” in more detail:

Eventually, I was able to understand that she was taking my concern over Barnes’ threats … as proof that I was planning to harm his family.

She explained her “logic” in a blog post I discovered later. Utterly ignoring my denunciations of the doxing, and of doxing in general, she declared that if i didn’t immediately “admit”that my worries about Barnes’ threats were “a completely irrational overreaction to being held responsible for the effects of his dishonest shit stirring on his followers” I was essentially admitting that I was planning some sort of attack on Barnes’ family:

[H]is current response indicates .. that he intends for harm to come Jack’s family as a result of his shit stirring, that he DOES encourage his readers to engage in this type of behavior, and that he DOES intend for one or more of his readers to respond to his writing by engaging in violence against HIS political opponents.

After all, “If X, then Y” only infers Y on the condition of X… so responding to “If you X, then I’ll Y” as if the individual has only stated “I’m going to Y” is an admission that you’ve planned on X happening.

This, I have to admit, is pretty ingenious. Kafka would be proud.

But just in case anyone thinks there is anything to Wallen’s sophistry: I do not support doxing in general, and have made this clear on numerous occasions. I did not, do not, will not support the doxing of Jack Barnes or his family, nor do I have the slightest idea who did it. I do not “intend … for harm to come [to] Jack’s family” or to him. (Indeed, I don’t even know where they live; not only did I have nothing to do with the doxing of Barnes and his family, I didn’t even know about it until after the doxing tweets were deleted.) I do not support violence against my political opponents.

All of this is obvious to anyone who actually reads what I write on this blog without their perceptions distorted by MRA-induced prejudice or preconceptions.

That said, I will not apologize for taking Barnes’ threats seriously.

Nor will I apologize for exposing misogynistic Men’s Rights activists to the light of day — not by “shit stirring” or engaging in Wallen-esque sophistry, but by quoting their own words and reporting their real deeds.

And when people harass and threaten me — whether that’s Barnes, those at AVFM who have aided and abetted his threats, or anyone else — I will take every legal step I feel is necessary for my safety and the safety of others.

This post is one of those steps.


322 replies on “MRA Jack Barnes is trying to silence me with increasingly explicit threats”

David, just want to give you all my best wishes.

You wade through a mound of mindboggling shit to report back to us, and I admire your courage, humour and lucidity in doing so.

Sometimes I can’t even read your posts, the subject matter is so horrifying. But it’s important and empowering to know just what is going on in the misogyno-sphere.

Problem is, as you have ably documented, there is virtually *no* appalling behaviour that someone out there won’t justify, excuse, or glorify.

Keep safe and may your kitties hug you.

This shit about “invoking Futrelle as a reason” to dox someone makes zero sense. You can’t invoke random people as the reason you’re doing something that the person would be opposed to. Well, you can, but the person you’re invoking is obviously not responsible for whatever stupid shit you decide to do.

nthing that we have no reason to believe Jack is being abusive to his family, other than the fact that he is abusive to strangers on the internet. He could be a very loving husband and father, and it just so happens that he takes his rage out on everybody else instead. The reason to get CPS involved is when there’s actual evidence of abuse.

Having said that, I obviously would be thoroughly unsurprised if he’s as much of a violent monster to his family as he is to others.

Just to add

a) I’m not “afraid to admit” I’m a feminist. I’m PROUD to PROCLAIM I’m a feminist.



Kitten massage for you David, with purring:

AVFM is once again attempting to construct a false narrative where lies and half truths are repeated until they sound plausible to their followers. These accusations are as spurious as when they accused David of being a pedophile, on the basis that he once wrote an article which didn’t call for the banning of the film ‘Salo’ (which depicts simulated acts of violence against teenagers).

On the bright side, this sort of thing makes it incredibly easy to recognize which people aren’t worth the time to attempt engaging in any sort of dialogue. The people who swallow this sort of story wholesale are the people who only like to shut down discussions and try talking at or over everyone else. In some ways it’s actually impossible to have a dialogue with them, because they’re so fundamentally unwilling to accept literally any opinion that doesn’t match up to their own.

Hi Dave. I know I don’t comment very often anymore, but I still come around. Thank you for facing this bullshit for all of us. What you do is a good, important thing.

As for Jack Barnes or any of his supporters reading this thread and looking for quotes to mine, I get the impression that you’re bullies who are used to getting away with what you do. But you might just want to consider taking this seriously. What you’ve done could already be considered a federal offense. No, seriously, look at subsection C. And no, neither “free speech” nor “I wasn’t really serious” are valid defenses. Your laughable attempts at veiling your threats might, but I certainly wouldn’t want to count on it.

No “face to face in person discussion”, but all the lawyers, prosecutors, judges and juries you could hope for. And every threat you publish – online, for millions to see – only makes it worse.

I believe that this whole thing has been handled inappropriately. David had many times stated that he is against doxing, it is written on many articles, who wants (“wants” is the key word here) to know David’s stance on doxing can easily read it, it’s out there.

As this is being said, the question should be: WHO THE FUCK CARES who doxed Jack Barnes?? Seriously? Who the fuck cares?
Jack Barnes is a hateful, threatening harasser that hardly deserve any sympathy from anyone. And someone that he harassed or threatened decided to dox him.
And that is not David’s problem or the problem of anybody except of Jack Barnes.
David has nothing to apologize for and nothing to confirm. It is not David’s problem that the cuckoos that quote him deliberately ignore the parts of his article in which he stated that he is against doxing.

It is not David’s problem that he deals with people with infantile capabilities when it comes to comprehension, thinking and honesty.
David should only make sure that he is safe and contact the authorities, because the threats of Jack Barnes should be taken seriously just like the ones from other rage-filled-mra maniacs with access to guns.

The rest of their “writing” should be ignored because sociopaths feed on attention, it acknowledges their pathetic existence, it gives them validity.
They deserve none of that. The same as creationists don’t deserve any attention because they start to think that the gibberish they spout has some validity.

Okay, I know it’s not the main focus of this piece, but I’d just like to address Hannah Wallen’s “logic” real quick. X implies Y only equates to false if X is true and Y is false. If X is false, Y can be either true or false. Saying that X implies Y is equivalent to Y implies X is fallacious.

I hope you (AND Jack) stay safe, I really hope the situation de-escalates in a peaceful and civil manner.

This is old hat for JackBarnes he already threw a tantrum and accused several others of “doxxing” him on a website called Experience Project YEARS AGO, he also explicitly threatened various forms of violence and harassment to a few feminist members of Experience Project. (He denied they were actual threats. ) No proof of the doxxing ever existed and all people he accused repeatedly condemned doxxing. So this is a repeat performance from JackBarnesMRA (formerly known as KnightrunnerMRA,) and anyone with enough time can dig through the comment history on to see what a fraud this accusation is.

Now this is interesting. I’ve seen no actual proof that he was doxed, either, other than his own say-so. And that of other MRAs. All of whom are, collectively, so full of shit that their earwax is brown and smells like a manure pile. If he was in fact doxed, as he claims, where is the proof? And where is the proof of threats to his family? And where, above all, is the proof that David or any other feminist is responsible?

The more I think about it, the more this reeks of a propaganda offensive to me, and a very inept one at that.

I sympathise with anyone upset about potential harm of themselves, their family and loved ones. Absolutely. However, this attack on you is beyond surreal, completely horrifying and I hope you are tacking on the appropriate authorities to keep yourself safe.

How a person who advocates harassment of people not see how insane their point of view is, particularly as it pertains to themselves and the effects of harassment on people, is sanity threatening. Honestly.

Be vigilant. None of this is okay.

@ Denteavvelenato – If you know where to look, it might be useful to Dave for you to find and provide those comments on the Experience Project. If this is a pattern to Jack Barnes’s harassment, that could be important information for any legal case.

I’m just going to point this out: You know that whole recent internet drama between Laughing Witch and Thunderf00t?

OK, in overall structure this isn’t really any different, with Futrelle holding the position analogous to Thunderf00t. The main difference is instead of bad Yelp reviews, someone doxxed Jack Barnes and threatened his child, and did so expressly invoking Futrelle as a reason.

I hate to have to say it this way, but there are a lot of people who will get irrational and aggressive when someone threatens their children.

Likewise, when people are threatening children because of you, you might need to rethink your platform, your audience, or both.

Nice try, trolly, but you, too, are so full of shit that your tear ducts are leaking raw sewage.

This is, as several commenters above have already pointed out, NOTHING like the situation with Thunderfart. And there is no evidence that anyone DID dox Jackass Barnes, or threaten his child, much less on behalf of WHTM. The only evidence we have is him and a bunch of other MRAs claiming so, and given their track record for truthiness, I choose to take all those claims with a truckload of road salt.

All this noise and hullabaloo they’re making is just to whip up terrorism against feminists. Yes, TERRORISM. Because if he’d REALLY been doxed and threatened, he’d be taking it to the police, not the fucking internets. And he’d be lying low, not mouthing off like the fucking idiot he is.

As for “getting irrational and aggressive when someone threatens their children”, there’s already ample proof that he is irrational and aggressive to begin with, and if he had any sense (which he doesn’t) he would leave his kid out of it. He’s just spoiling for a fight, and he isn’t going to get one. He’s trying to intimidate his critics into silence, and he isn’t going to get that, either.

Lastly, fuck off with that “rethink your platform, your audience, or both” shit. That, too, reeks of silencing, and that, too, ain’t gonna happen.

I guess what I’m really trying to say here is, FUCK OFF, YOU TROLL.

“Because if he’d REALLY been doxed and threatened, he’d be taking it to the police, not the fucking internets.”

No! No no no! This is the same bullshit people say to harassment and rape victims, and it is not okay. Anita and Zoey and Rebecca all had to deal with it. Victims do NOT have to go to the police for us to take their claims seriously. If anyone is being harassed or doxxed, we condemn it. Period.

If anyone is being harassed or doxxed, we condemn it. Period.

IF anyone is being harassed or doxxed. IF is the operative word. There is no proof, only his claims. Why should I believe a word he says? As I’ve said before, he’s full of shit. How do we know that he’s not just another MRA-boy crying wolf? He is a stochastic terrorist.

IF it happened, I condemn it. But I have a right to expect proof first. His mere say-so is not proof. Got that?

Also, I deeply resent you of accusing me of acting the way people do toward rape victims. THAT is not okay.

@ColeYate you mean you haven’t heard of Gondi? The man who freed Indiana from Grate Burton? He was a big inspiration to Marten Luthier Qing.

No! No no no! This is the same bullshit people say to harassment and rape victims, and it is not okay. Anita and Zoey and Rebecca all had to deal with it.

This is one of the worst comparisons I’ve ever seen. Anita etc have a long history of being harassed, threatened and doxxed; Barnes has a long history of lying about being harassed, threatened and doxxed. Anita etc have provided literally millions of words’ worth of proof and provide more every day; Barnes’ proof boils down to “Uhh… Look over there! It’s Elvis! And he’s a feminist and he’s doxxing meee!” Anita etc went to the police and the media; Barnes went to Paul Elam. Anita etc are honest, forthright and blunt about what’s been happening; Barnes, well, read the article.

If he was doxxed, the person who did it should be fucking ashamed of themselves. But Barnes couldn’t tell the truth if he was dangled over a Lego pit. Saying that not believing him is like not believing Anita etc (or like not believing rape victims) just comes across as being really offensive to Anita etc (or to rape victims). It’s apples and vintage pogo sticks.

@autosoma @mrex – Ack, I didn’t mean my response to sound like an endorsement. I meant it more to call out his reasoning and to say, “Even if someone’s a complete asshat with whom we disagree on just about everything, that doesn’t mean that they’re abusive to their family and randomly calling CPS on people is never OK.”

I’ve known enough people with really awful views and who’ve even acted out those views in the public sphere but who were absolutely lovely otherwise or in specific other facets of their lives* to make any assumptions.
* Of course, as in the example I provided, it can help if you don’t know about their views.

Buuuuuut I guess I should have just written that.

It was early.
No coffee.

And to reiterate: If you call CPS on Barnes (or anyone) without damn good reason – and by that I mean “you’ve actually witnessed abuse or had it disclosed to you” – you’re being a piece of shit and I hope that there’s some law against wilfully false reports that can be applied in your jurisdiction.

False allegations are bullshit and never OK.

And if there’s someone out there who did dox Barnes or who is thinking about acting on doxxed info – especially against his family – back the fuck off.

mockingbird, my bad too, I was trying to agree with you calling out @joe and adding my two-penorth-worth to the call out to. I think anyone with half an eye would agree that attempting to escalate this is more than wrong.

Joining the chorus of support here. Stay strong and safe, Dave. Do what you must to protect yourself. I hope you are involving LE in this. Direct threats to your safety warrant it.

1) argh, a pox on the ableism in this thread. Being a royal asshole does not make one insane, nuts, cuckoo or whatever other term you feel like using to call his mental health into question. He’s a known liar, and a right ass, that doesn’t make him mentally ill, so just stop, please.

2) being an asshole isn’t grounds for calling CPS either.

3) I take it swatting in this context is not like swatting a small buzzing insect and it’s a good thing I didn’t make a joke about it?

4) “Likewise, when people are threatening children because of you, you might need to rethink your platform, your audience, or both.”

Nope. First of, we have absolutely no info on who did the dox’ing, besides that it wasn’t David, and likely wasn’t anyone here, so your premise of “because of you” is already flawed and any conclusions arrived at due to it are on weak ground. Second, his platform is wordpress, given the number of people hosted on, claiming that running a feminist site on it is somehow bad is just ludicrous. Third, if you’ve decided his platform is the message, that’s just extra silly since all he does is quote this shit, post cat pics, and generally make the frequently violent misogyny palatable. And fourth, his audience condemns dox’ing! His audience, aka us, are condemning this six ways to Sunday.

5) hey seraph, long time no see!

First time poster, but I’ve been lurking for a while. David you have my full support FWIW. This is more than just a blog, this work you do is important. Just reading the comments makes me a better person.

Never has the complete inability to step back and look on ones actions with some perspective been more clear than with these MRA etc types. The real scary bit (for me) is how I can sympathise with certain aspects at times. I was once a very lonely, ostracised and angry young man – could I have been one of them with a different course in life? I don’t think so because I’ve never seen women as anything other than equal human beings, but those thoughts are the cold-sweat kind.

Please stay safe and carry on being a beacon of truth David.

I also haven’t been able to find where and how this doxxing happened. Frankly, I’m not inclined to believe a word of what these liars say without evidence. My default setting here is to not believe it happened until there’s evidence. And if it did happen, my default would be he did it to himself. If there was evidence that he didn’t do it himself, my default would be some other MRA did it. These are reasonable assumptions based on what we know about Jack Barnes, the MRM, and of David Futrelle.

I find it interesting that this happened so soon after David’s articles on Cassie Jaye and The Red Pill. Almost like someone’s trying to discredit David, the website and the community at the same time, by implicating all three in the situation.

I also find it interesting that Barnes explicitly portrayed himself as independent of AVFM.

I also find it interesting that before this post, the last post David wrote that mentioned Barnes is dated 4th February (he may have referred to him elsewhere, of course).

I also find it interesting that the doxxer told Barnes to apologise or else; apologise for what exactly? What has Barnes said explicitly about David that anyone would demand an apology for? I’m no expert but surely doxxing is targeted in some way? Why target Barnes as opposed to anyone else in the MRM for an apology?

I googled but have not been able to find anything specifically Barnes has said about David prior to this. Now, of course there are forums and Twitter and such which I might be missing (and open to correction if anyone can find anything) but the question again arises – why Barnes?

I may be way out, of course.

I was going to say that doubting the veracity of the “doxing” claim was kind of a morally shaky thing as well, but… if he has a history of making false accusations and claims, it’s more understandable that someone might think that. I can just see him pointing at us and saying “Look, a bad thing happened to a horrible MRA person and they don’t care!” Sigh.

I take it swatting in this context is not like swatting a small buzzing insect and it’s a good thing I didn’t make a joke about it?

SWATting is the practice of phoning up the police to report a fake bomb threat or hostage situation to send an armed response unit round to someone’s house, typically while they’re streaming game footage with a webcam so that the reaction is captured on camera.

Yes, this is real and there are people who find it funny.

Yes, seriously.

I am happy to see that AVFM has such a strong opinion against doxxing. We can all agree that doxxing is wrong, whether the target is an MRA or a feminist. Right? I mean, it would sure be hypocritical if they were only against it when it’s happening to one of their own.

Argenti: “SWATing” (note the all-caps) is a recent trend, in which one person calls in a crime-report to the local police, claiming they heard gunshots or some other violent crime going on at the target’s address. The goal is to get the SWAT* team to show up and bust in. SWAT teams use aggressive tactics meant to completely overwhelm anyone present–they use hand-held battering rams on the doors, rush in in large numbers from multiple points, if possible, wearing riot gear and usually pointing semi-automatic rifles at anyone who looks like they might be a threat. At the very least, a ‘successful’ SWATing causes hundreds or even thousand dollars in damages and can traumatize anyone present in the residence (particularly young children). At worst, someone can end up dead because the cops are entering on a hair-trigger, believing that there is an active crime in-progress.

*: SWAT stands for Special Weapons And Tactics. They were originally formed in response to a sharp upswing in bank robberies back in the ’60s, and their approach is meant to eliminate threats before potential hostages can be injured.


I understand skepticism for the MRM, and any of its more odious individuals, but I’m going to agree that we should not be tossing around potentially dismissive comments. Rape culture thrives, in part, because of the narrative that says that people make false claims of assault or threats all the time. I genuinely hope that this shitbag and his family are safe, and see no reason or benefit in trying to claim that we should assume he’s lying from the start.

We know David didn’t do it, and that no one did it at his behest, and that David condemns such things. That’s enough to show the inherent dishonesty and occluded thinking of Barnes and his fellow-travelers.

Also, Shadrach? I truly hope you’re a better person in real life, because I’d feel horrible for your family and associates if they have to deal with someone who acts as mendaciously as you do when you post here. Feel free to fuck off with all the fucks.

The problem with denying that any doxxing happened because of the source being an MRA is that it’s a really awful reason not to believe someone when it comes to abuse, and doxxing is abuse. I see a lot of othering in here; a lot of us vs. them where they are made out to be monsters. They’re not monsters. They’re not crazy. They’re not bad parents.* They’re humans, and they see us as political enemies in the same way we see them as political enemies. If they were to threaten to call CPS on us for our political views or if they denied a claim of doxxing because they see us as liars (and they do), we would all agree that they’re not being fair.

I know their actions have been historically different than ours and that there’s a lot of context behind this that I’m leaving out, but I still feel the need to say this denying the doxxing and treating them like they’re not like us in any respect** is only going to drag us down. They’re humans, and even though they’re awful to us, we should still treat them with dignity and respect because we believe in human rights and we should reflect those beliefs with our actions.

*Maybe some individuals are some of these things, but we shouldn’t generalize or assume.

**As humans, we all share similarities, as uncomfortable as it might make us to realize we have something in common with Roosh or Elam.

MRA’s: We condemn doxing and swatting here. Of ANY one. Full stop.

We also support David and feminism. The angry threats David has received are not okay. Angry Jack saying it’s not a threat means nothing; not even as a CYA measure.

David: I hope you have a lawyer on retainer to advise you. If you need a place to lay low for a while, my dad’s house is mostly vacant and I have high-speed internet and cable there.

The downsides are: Airfare would be required, no real kitchen facilities*, plus I am there intermittently to clean the house out. But I’m serious about this; if your safety becomes a serious issue, please contact me!

*Fridge is fine, I don’t trust the stove, and the sink leaks too much to be usable. Bathroom is a-ok, though.

You have my support too, David. Thank you so much for what you do. To document and expose these horrid douchebags for years is clearly not good for one’s faith in humanity. But it is extremely helpful to show them that the world is not oblivious of their words and actions.

All Barnes is doing to feminists is justifying us openly calling ourselves feminists. People like him want to eradicate feminism, but they’re the reason it exists in the first place. And to be honest, I get the feeling that what he fears most as a result of someone doxxing him is that his family finds out what he does and what kind of person he is. That’s the kind of bad thing I could wish upon him.


Since you gave your name, I guess you knew that sooner or later some of these wankers would try something like that, while chances are high that he is another internet tough guy, this might encourage someone else.

If you haven´t already done so already, buy yourself and then learn to use a gun, a taser or a powerfull flashlight, the kind that can blind a would-be attacker @ close range. Or something else that I can´t think of right now.

I didn’t know it was possible to dox someone who makes videos where he shows everyone what he looks like, and tells people what state he lives in. Does no one who knows him have access to the Internet? That aside, thank you David for writing about all this toxic stuff. I don’t know how you do it without getting really depressed.

@Argenti – SWATing is when someone contacts the police about a fake situation that requires the SWAT team to respond. It is very dangerous to the intended victim. For some reason it became a tactic used by some gamers against others. It is a horrible crime that no one I know of here would support.

So… is there any proof — you know, actual, factual evidence — that Barnes was at all doxxed recently (or ever)?

Or is he making it up to stir shit again, something that’s apparently his reason for existence?

Jack, I sincerely hope you and your family are safe.

David, keep strong and keep safe. I don’t comment a lot, but I read every post and comment. Keep up the good work.

Mammothers, thanks for existing and do keep being awesome people.

Hey, Argenti. I’ve largely given up commenting on political blogs, and have severely cut back on even reading them. I was developing a bad case of Internet Rage Addiction. A few nasty fights and cases of irreconcilable differences with nominal allies, the shutdown of Pandagon, and a few other changes to the landscape made it easier.

But I had to come back for this.

People, please, go back and read kupo’s post. Barnes claims that he’s been doxxed and in a threatening manner. We gain nothing by being hyperskeptics on the issue. It’s enough to assert our own uninvolvement in the matter.

As for JetGirl’s question–yes, it is possible to “Dox” someone who seems to have a fairly public persona. There’s a difference between a face on a screen and home state, and knowing someone’s address and personal details about their lives. Do some of Barnes’ associates know about his online career? Most likely. But deciding who to tell should still be his own decision. Noting that his actions (such as appearing with his face visible in the videos) may have made the alleged doxxing easier doesn’t make the action of doxxing any less reprehensible.

And even if he is making it up, well, that just means he’s that much more of a shitty human being. We can stake out the moral high ground just fine without resorting to dubious tactics that can ultimately come back against us. That’s one of the advantages of not being pond scum.


I’m just going to point this out: You know that whole recent internet drama between Laughing Witch and Thunderf00t?

OK, in overall structure this isn’t really any different, with Futrelle holding the position analogous to Thunderf00t. The main difference is instead of bad Yelp reviews, someone doxxed Jack Barnes and threatened his child, and did so expressly invoking Futrelle as a reason.

Does the Geneva Convention cover tortured logic? Seriously, Footie featured that Yelp page in his video, clearly egging his fanbase to hate bomb her family business’s rating. David responded to this guy’s pissy AVFM article and posted some his obnoxious tweets, merely pointing out that Barnes is a dishonest troll and a harassing asshole. So, the “overall stucture” (lol wut?) is in fact different.

Show me one example of David harassing someone or encouraging readers to harass others. JB is a veritable harassment enthusiast, David even posted a tweet where JB wishes his internet enemies would share the same fate as Laughing Witch.

“Hear what happened to laughingbitch? What’s it going to take for [feminist twitter enemy/target 1 and 2] to learn?”

Likewise, when people are threatening children because of you, you might need to rethink your platform, your audience, or both.

I don’t know who doxxed Barnes, but the “WHTM superfan” theory is suspect to me because no one on this website seemingly gave a shit about this guy. I read this blog regularly and I honestly didn’t know who the hell this guy was when David recently posted about him. The post shows he’s an AVFM blowhard who writes not particularly true things on that website when he’s not busy being a huge abusive asshole on Twitter. There’s a gaggle of those on AVFM and Jack Barnes appears to be a very minor one.

For instance, peruse the comparatively paltry 78 comments on that original post. No posters seem particularly worked up and KFC gets mentioned as much or than Barnes. I’ve seen this comment board get outraged over some terrible people and terrible acts, but that didn’t happen over Barnes. It was all pretty much ‘ho hum, a MRA thinks harassment is activism yet again’.

I googled “knightrunnermra” and found a blog where covered his numerous dust-ups with feminists on Experience Project in excruciating detail. Clearly his online battles/harassment campaigns against his feminist enemies are really, really important to him. He’s cast himself as an arch enemy of feminists and I think he doesn’t realize that no one he’s not actively harassing gives a shit about him or his antics.

He’s also projecting his own threadbare ethics on to people who would never condone harassment: “What has resulted is that one of your cult members has drunk the cool-aid and now feels that any action against MHRAs is justified including endangering the safety and wellbeing of innocent people such as my family.”
Again, I don’t remember David or anyone else here making even one call to action on this website. Sorry Barnes, but all the childish rabble-rousing nitwits involved are currently found frothing at AVFM.

Jesus I’m sorry man, that is fucking terrifying, I hope you are safe. If this doxxer is so righteous and such a follower of yours they would step up and take the heat themselves instead of letting it fall on you.

@kupo –

They’re humans, and even though they’re awful to us, we should still treat them with dignity and respect because we believe in human rights and we should reflect those beliefs with our actions.

@a few who have posted ablist stuff: I’m seconding Argenti Aertheri here.

I’m on my phone and so can’t easily link to this site’s rules, but ablism is against guidelines.

When I first started reading this comment section, I had no idea what ablism even was. Then, when people spoke against it my initial reaction was, “Really? REALLY? I can’t say ‘insane’ or ‘crazy’???”
But then I actually thought about it and about the impact that such comments might have. I slip up sometimes (much more IRL than when posting), but they’re good rules in general – and, regardless, they’re the rules for here .

Here’s a question, why the fuck is Twitter allowing a man who openly says he intends to abuse people to maintain an account at all? Twitter is giving him most of his power right now.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.