bad anatomy bad science dude you've got no fucking idea what you're talking about lesbians lgbtq misogyny reddit women hate sex women love sex

“Lesbians don’t get periods” and even more great insights into the enigma that is woman from the NotHowGirlsWork subreddit

We’re going back in!

There were way too many amazing screenshots of self-confident mansplainers of women’s bodies and sexuality to fit in my post on r/NotHowGirlsWork the other day. So I’m doing another one. Like right here, and right now. It’s the very post you are reading at this moment!

Weird coincidence, that. Anyway, let’s see how completely wrong it is possible for human beings to be, in convenient screenshot form.

Only women who are virgins can fully close their legs:

Lesbians don’t get periods because bleeding from your vagina is too girly.

I mean, trans lesbians don’t have periods, but I don’t think that’s what this person is talking about.

When women sit down on the toilet thy never know if they’re going to pee or poop.

Women like to have sex with, er, lobsters?

I’ll bet they only go for the lobsters at the top of the dominance hierarchy, you know how women are.

Actually you don’t because women, far from being inveterate lobster humpers, have no sex drive at all. Because of science.

This next one should win some sort of award. For what, I’m not sure, but wow.

The end. Or is it?

Follow me on Twitter.

Send tips to dfutrelle at gmail dot com.

We Hunted the Mammoth relies entirely on readers like you for its survival. If you appreciate our work, please send a few bucks our way! Thanks!

Notify of

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Weird (and tired of trumplings) Eddie
Weird (and tired of trumplings) Eddie
4 months ago

Full Metal:

I dunno if this will work in Tumbler, but right-click on the image, then see if you get a drop-down menu with “open image in new tab” then go to the new tab and copy the address. If it’s still “… Tumbler…” it may not work. I have only limited success with ANY of this technology, and I rarely understand why it works/doesn’t work 🙁

Any geeks on line who might be able to help the Ox???

Weird (and tired of trumplings) Eddie
Weird (and tired of trumplings) Eddie
4 months ago

@ Alan RobertShaw:

Hmmm… is that “the book” that they throw at you when they throw the book at you??? 🙂 🙂 🙂

Weird (and tired of trumplings) Eddie
Weird (and tired of trumplings) Eddie
4 months ago

CW domestic abuse

Alice Cooper 1975

Last edited 4 months ago by Weird (and tired of trumplings) Eddie
Alan Robertshaw
4 months ago

@ weird eddie

Well it’s more of a loose leaf binder…

Weird (and tired of trumplings) Eddie
Weird (and tired of trumplings) Eddie
4 months ago

@ Ox, V.Parasol:

sigh… I tried to paste a video, didn’t work right, but V.P. has pasted one in a comment up the page so it’s at least possible.

I used to have a great deal of anxiety over not being able to master this technology. Then one day, a high-end geek coworker of miner told me The Sacred Truth.

This s**t really doesn’t work very well, and the solution is the same as it was on the 1960’s black’n’white television I had when I was a child:

“Jus’ Keep Wiggling The Rabbit Ears Until It Does What You Want!!!”

Weird (and tired of trumplings) Eddie
Weird (and tired of trumplings) Eddie
4 months ago

from “the bench book”

Not all people who have adopted a social or legal gender different from their birth gender will be happy to be referred to as ‘trans’ without checking it is appropriate. 

a month or so ago, I was having a burger with some extended family members who are right-wing-but-pretend-they’re-not regarding a transgender woman who worked at the local med clinic. My family members were confused as to what-should-we-call-him/her… “he?” “she?”… “them?”… should we use the “old” first name? the “new” first name?…a “woman” or a “transgender woman?”…. ???

I offered the guidance, “have you asked?”

Crip Dyke
Crip Dyke
4 months ago


This is what I’ve got so far (only up through pg 330 — page 331 is where the format and information changes significantly so this seemed like a good stopping point to allow me to post what I have so far…)

Obviously such things as the Bench Book are compromises between many involved parties. I’ll happily comment on the BB, but I am not saying that I’m correct about what should be in it (even when I feel I’m correct on a fact) for several reasons: 
1) you need buy in from all involved parties. That means the BB needs to be written in a language the audience can hear. I don’t know any UK judges, so I am not at all the best authority on how to couch the language of the BB so that it will be heard appropriately by them. 
2) the social context of western USA & Canada is different from that of the UK and what I think is true based on what I know from my local experience or even from my reading about the UK experience isn’t necessarily true in the UK. Language in particular changes not merely with time, but also with geography. 

That said, you asked for me comments, and so I’ll just lay down random thoughts as I go, then if I have larger observations, I’ll try to add them in later. 

pg. 327 “transgendered”
The sentence “Trans, transgender or transgendered are umbrella terms often used to describe many different people who cross the conventional boundaries of gender.” is true as far as it goes. However “transgendered” – despite being commonly heard, is discouraged as less respectful everywhere I’m familiar with use. The “ed” ending suggests that “transgender” is a verb instead of an adjective. There are several problems with that, not least that someone has to take a certain action or actions before one qualifies as truly transgender(ed). Trans folk have had decades of being judged by others, and often struggle with deciding for themselves whether they are “trans enough” to come out as trans. Also, anti-trans person tend to use the form “transgendered” and to use “transgender” as a verb to describe an imagined process where adults corrupt young persons into coming out, in other words that this is a wrong done to them rather than something they discover about themselves. 

The words are close enough that you’ll here the “ed” form pretty regularly from the general public, and it should not be assumed to be malicious in intent (or even unintentionally hurtful). The form is even used in trans communities either as a slip of the tongue or by people who grew up where that form was more common. Nonetheless, its association with judgement, forced hoop-jumping, and anti-trans rhetoric is enough to make it a word to be disfavored save when a person explains that they use that term for themselves. 

pg 327: 
the whole section on “Who are trans people?” should really start out with the note that the respectful thing to do is to echo back the language used by the person the court is addressing. If they call themselves “non-binary” do not assume “trans” is appropriate. If they call themselves “transgender” do not assume you know the appropriate pronouns. Courts should simply be encouraged to ask the simple and inoffensive question: “The court would like to address you with respect. When asked to describe your gender or use pronouns to refer to you, which terms would be most respectful to you? The court will choose to use those whenever possible.” (The court may, of course, need to record the offensive language of others when quoting hate speech, etc., thus the “whenever possible” caveat… or maybe the better caveat is “whenever it speaks for itself”.)

pg 327: 
“The Equality Act 2010 refers to a protected characteristic of ‘gender reassignment’ and uses the term ‘transsexual’, which is now widely considered to be out-of-date and stigmatising.”
This quote simply needs a small drop in, like so: 
“The Equality Act 2010 refers to a protected characteristic of ‘gender reassignment’ and uses the term ‘transsexual’, which is now widely but not universally considered to be out-of-date and stigmatising. The only time to use the term transsexual to refer to someone before the court is when that person chooses freely to use the word for themselves.” 

pg 327: 
Where a person has decided to live permanently in an acquired gender, the process of gender reassignment is usually called ‘transitioning’”

The word “permanently” rubs me wrong here. On the one hand this is an educational book and probably gets things close enough, but on the other hand “permanently” isn’t actually correct. Social transition can, for some people, be a “test run”. To say this doesn’t mean that they aren’t trans, but some folks might transition from one standard gender to another, realize that doesn’t resolve dysphoria, and choose instead to come out **again**, this time as non-binary. Others might choose the opposite process, being so burned by their experience with gender that it seems non-binary is going to be the most comfortable home, but having some experience with it realizing that the comfort of being referred to as a woman (e.g.) is more than worth the shit one takes for defying the gender stereotypes of women, and that on the whole transitioning to the gender “woman” is more psychologically healthy. Finally, some “test runs” involve, say, coming out to one’s family but not at work. Here there isn’t (yet) a permanent gender change, and in the hypothetical the decision to make a permanent gender change hasn’t happened. Nonetheless a gender transition with the family is a gender transition. 

Although there’s no need to broadcast it, there are also a few detransitioning folks (hard to know how many, but almost certainly less than 3% and probably less than 1%). It’s not as if they didn’t transition just because they later detransition. 

On the whole, these complicated issues don’t need to be put to judges, I don’t think. THAT SAID, I think we should not MISeducate judges. Thus I would rephrase the sentence only mildly and add no more information about these issues here. Swapping the word “permanently” for “significantly” (or just deleting permanently with no replacement) is enough to make the sentence accurate. If judges need more information about the process of transition, then I would have expected more to be presented with this paragraph. Since there wasn’t anything about the process originally, I wouldn’t include my comments above. I am solely concerned here about judges believing that they can consider some effort “not really a transition” because of a small amount of unintentional misinformation. 

pg 328: 
“Research shows that levels of self-harm and suicide ideation among young trans people and trans adults are much higher than for other people. “

I think it’s vital to mention here that research ALSO shows that self-harm and suicidal ideation is drastically reduced where transition is available and an individual is supported. It is in significant part for this reason that we ask courts to use respectful language in the first place. Judges should know that they have the power to prevent (or encourage) such negative outcomes. Going to court is stressful for most. The court cannot by itself prevent that stress, but it can prevent a differential and disproportionate effect on trans and other GNC folk. Including this information will provide motivation to judges who aren’t particularly motivated and will serve as reassurance to judges already making an effort that those efforts are worthwhile. 

Pg 327-328: 
This section on Discrimination, Harassment & Violence has a glaring hole. Maybe it’s just me, because all my early work was about domestic violence rather than stranger violence, but everything in this section contributes to the idea that domestic & family harassment & violence are not issues for trans people, when in fact nothing could be further from the truth. Of all my comments so far, if I could prioritize any one, I would prioritize changing this section to include mention of risks within the home environment. Even publicly supportive partners or parents can shame or harass trans persons in private. The mechanisms and tactics are as complicated as any other case of domestic violence, but the important thing to realize is that where a trans person lives is not automatically a safe refuge. 

If you need more, I can add to this, but the point is not to change the character of the section. The point, rather, is to make sure that this problem is not deemphasized. Where domestic violence or harassment occurs, it is typically more harmful than workplace harassment, yet workplace harassment gets a specific mention while DV does not. A sentence or two emphasizing risks of DV is all that is required to make sure that the safe refuge assumption is disrupted. 

PG 328-329
Trans people as victims of crime:
This section mentions “transphobic hate crime” but again, DV is more likely. It should be mentioned. Such cases may require particular sensitivity since being out in all aspects of one’s life is more common these days, but the court will still encounter cases where one is known to be trans at home by one’s abuser, but not elsewhere. This can provide a strong disincentive to reporting a crime since testifying about the crime might be impossible without discussing motivations, specific insults, etc. which would reveal trans history or status. 

Pg 330
“Acceptable terminology” 
This refers back to earlier writing in the Bench Book for acceptable terminology rather than encouraging (or reinforcing earlier encouragement if added as I suggest) that the court simply inquire politely what terms and pronouns will be most respectful to the person before the court. The current framing puts pressure on courts to be the experts in how trans someone is and even what sort of trans person someone is. That’s not good for the persons thrust into that decision making role nor is it good for the persons that they will be judging as in/sufficiently trans. Just fucking ask. It’s not that hard. 

Alan Robertshaw
4 months ago

@ crip dyke

As alway, you make excellent points after a thorough analysis.

The bit you’ve read so far is like the executive summary. The change in style is where it goes into more detail on each of the points. So I’ll wait until you’ve had a chance to peruse that before thinking about commenting.

But without getting too much into ‘spoilers’ or prejudicing* any further comments you may have, it does seem to address some of the issue you mention. With regards to ‘acceptable terminology’ the approach does seem to be, just go with whatever people themselves feel comfortable with, but be sensitive about sussing that out.

But that’s just my uneducated surmising; I look forward to your expert commentary.

[*in the technical sense of the word]

Crip Dyke
Crip Dyke
4 months ago

I’m not ready to give commentary on the more elaborated writing since I have something else to do just now, but I did glance ahead and see that they suggest just asking about terminology.

This is, as you say, a good thing and addresses what I was saying, though I still wish the executive summary made clear:

You are not the expert here, and we’re not asking you to be, the simple solution is simply to ask respectful questions as necessary.

Hell, that could even be its own section, sort of a disclaimer at the top, and it doesn’t have to be any longer than what I’ve just written (though i’m not saying that what I’ve written should be the final language – rephrase the basic message as necessary to fit the style of the Bench Book).

More later.

GSS ex-noob
GSS ex-noob
4 months ago

@Weird Eddie: Your story reminds me of when my lily-white grade school got a new principal with a significantly higher melanin content.

The PTA ladies were all worried before the first meeting about whether he should be referred to as Black, Afro-American, Negro, etc. (you can tell how long ago this was!)

My mother reasonably said, “Why don’t you ask him?”

Cue muttering, hemming, hawing, Mom walking over to him and politely inquiring “Mr. So-and-so, which do you prefer (list)?” While the other PTA ladies gawped in fear.

IIRC, he preferred Black, but Afro-American was okay, and no thanks to Negro.

Also IIRC, when Mom told me the story, it may have contained “…bless their hearts.”

@Alan: It still might hurt if it hit you with one of the edges, but I doubt M’Lud Whoever is going to throw it. Or be all that accurate with it if he/she/they did.

Last edited 4 months ago by GSS ex-noob
4 months ago

Speaking of image embedding, I need to test how link embedding works here.

Plain url pasted:

James Webb Space Telescope – Wikipedia

HTML tags:

<a href=”James Webb Space Telescope – Wikipedia“>Link to Wikipedia</a>


[Link to Wikipedia](James Webb Space Telescope – Wikipedia)

4 months ago

Not very well, I see. Is there a way to paste a link with different displays, or a youtube link that doesn’t automatically embed the video?

Go SWERF Yourself
4 months ago

haha I haven’t visited your blog in quite a while, I have some fond memories back when it had a different name and the early days after it became We hunted the mammoth.

I somehow landed here today after I came across a really, really odd twitter account (I’m fairly new to twitter) and my google search for aimee terese took me on a ride then stopped here. Couldn’t resist checking out a few of the most recent gems posted, such as this one. Makes you really wonder how these poor schmucks even manage to tie their shoes in the morning. Hard to imagine living while so dumb.

Well, I’ve had a good laugh and I’m going to bookmark this blog so I can visit for comedic relief when my research or ‘discussions’ with SWERF’s/TERF’s nutjobs gets me too frustrated. God, there are dumb people on the internet. IRL too but at least they’re much easier to avoid.

I’m just getting my ducks in order before I kick off a blog about some of the stupid shit these people argue but in the meantime I’m entertaining myself with screenshots of the stuff they post on reddit/twitter/tumblr and comment section cesspool on some of their popular online blogs (Meghan Murphy’s feminist current has the best comments, I swear)

I’ll definitely be back!

Last edited 4 months ago by Go SWERF Yourself
Go SWERF Yourself
4 months ago


Use the “source code” icon:
comment image

Use image URL ending with .jpg or .png
<br> if you want more lines
<p> start and <p> at the end.
comment image

comment image

Last edited 4 months ago by Go SWERF Yourself
Would love your thoughts, please comment.x
%d bloggers like this: