Categories
Uncategorized

Daily Stormer: Sexbots and artificial wombs will render women obsolete and “solve our white reproduction problem”

At the White Baby Hatchery

By David Futrelle

Like a lot of his fellow Nazis, The Daily Stormer’s Andrew Anglin is worried about the declining white birth rate — and the prospect of being “outbred” by people of darker hues. As he sees it, the main bottleneck has been what he sees as the “unregulated” white woman, unwilling to have babies in sufficient quantities and also not particularly interested in dating Nazis like him.

But Anglin is now convinced that both of these problems have been solved by SCIENCE — the sex problem by sexbots and the white baby problem by artificial wombs.

He seems most excited by the former. In a recent post on the Stormer, Anglin hails the development of sexbots that can hold a converstation with their owners — if by “conversation” you mean that these robots can respond with prefab comments to certain questions, like an AI-enhanced Chatty Cathy doll.

But this is more than enough for Anglin, who sees these rudimentary conversation skills as being more advanced than the conversational skills of actual human women. “[H]uman females cannot have conversations,” he asserts, before dropping a bit of copypasta: “All they know is McDonald’s, charge their phone, twerk, be bisexual, eat hot chip & lie.”

With sex and conversation taken care of, all that’s left to worry about is the baby making, and Anglin is convinced that recent experiments with sheep prove that artificial human wombs are not only possible but could soon be widely available.

“We will have sex with the robots, and we will grow our children in plastic bags,” he writes.

They’ve already done this with a sheep, you see.

A sheep is a mammal, so all of the dynamics for doing it with a human are already there.

The sex robots will also be better mothers than any human female could ever hope to be.

Basically, we’ve solved our white reproduction problem. Now we just need to implement the program.

Yeah, good luck with that.

Send tips to dfutrelle at gmail dot com.

We Hunted the Mammoth relies entirely on readers like you for its survival. If you appreciate our work, please send a few bucks our way! Thanks!

83 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Naglfar
Naglfar
1 year ago

@Snowberry

but to make for a more “realistic experience”.

Out of curiosity, are any sexbots designed to act as though they are having an orgasm and exhibit signs of orgasm for realism? I’m curious if that’s a feature that is being developed.

unless sexbots were virtually indistinguishable from humans.

This will also likely be required for sexbots to become popular, as is I find them a bit creepy in an uncanny valley way and I’d imagine I’m not alone in that assessment. Until they are more indistinguishable they might be the preserve of robot fetishists and enthusiasts who will spend hours comparing the specs of their bots.

@Rabid Rabbit

But a lot of its more profound societal effects took a while to percolate.

Yes, but many of those effects are quite significant. It meant people could also have sex but still not have huge families at a time when it was becoming less economically feasible to have a large family.

The only context I usually see “decanted” in involves wine.

In this case, it’s a reference to Huxley’s Brave New World, in which fetuses gestate in bottles and are “decanted” instead of born.

I read that book when I was 10 years old and didn’t know much about sex, it gave me some very odd ideas about sexuality that it took quite a while to unlearn. Not a good book for preteens.

Threp (formerly Shadowplay)
Threp (formerly Shadowplay)
1 year ago

Out of curiosity, are any sexbots designed to act as though they are having an orgasm and exhibit signs of orgasm for realism?

Samantha, designed by some guy called Sergei in Barcelona back in 2017. You got the choice of Daily Heil prurience, or The Star has video if you wish to Google …

(I know this for a Starbound mod I wrote, honest!)

Masse_Mysteria
Masse_Mysteria
1 year ago

@CriticalDragon1177

I have to wonder if it occurs to Andrew Anglin, that even with sex bots and artificial wombs, women will still have to be involved. I mean until they find a way for a sex bot with an artificial womb to produce human eggs, it won’t be possible for a sex bot to get pregnant.

Since Anglin obviously hasn’t thought any of this through, I’m fairly certain he doesn’t realize how important eggs are. He’s probably going by his gut feeling, which is likely to be that his sperm just needs a cozy little nook to gestate so that the homunculus inside grows into an actual human.

Lumipuna
Lumipuna
1 year ago

Re: access to eggs

One could always treat that as a trivial issue, at least compared to the problems with artificial gestation itself. Like, maybe eggs could be grown from stem cells in a lab. Or, maybe lots of women would be going through egg extraction process to have their own (biological) children, in which case it’d be easy for them to sell some surplus eggs.

But more realistically,

For the assorted online misogynists, “sexbots and artificial wombs” seems to be mostly an empty catchphrase; a meme associated with the vague fantasy of making actual women obsolete, somehow. Practical details or even basic mechanisms need not be discussed; it’s the principle that delights the heart of a misogynist. Perhaps this whole topic isn’t so much even a pipe dream for the future, but rather just a rhetorical way to ritualistically reassert what the misogynists already hold true: that women only have real value in sex and reproduction.

Buttercup Q. Skullpants
Buttercup Q. Skullpants
1 year ago

@Snowberry

Eh, not quite that bad. The only parts made of steel in current sexbots is their skeleton. The most of the rest of them is made of soft medical-grade silicone, which doesn’t feel exactly like skin, but supposedly some sex doll enthusiasts prefer to real skin.

But we’re talking about attachment here, not sex. The material the sexbot is made from is irrelevant. Surely you’re not agreeing with Anglin that silicone and human skin are indistinguishable in providing comfort to a baby?

Rabid Rabbit
Rabid Rabbit
1 year ago

@Buttercup Q. Skullpants

Surely you’re not agreeing with Anglin that silicone and human skin are indistinguishable in providing comfort to a baby?

Well, given that women make no difference between dildos/vibrators and dicks, clearly they’re indistinguishable. (/s, in case that wasn’t clear, and I’m horrified it has to be specified.)

Allandrel
Allandrel
1 year ago

@Lumipuna

Perhaps this whole topic isn’t so much even a pipe dream for the future, but rather just a rhetorical way to ritualistically reassert what the misogynists already hold true: that women only have real value in sex and reproduction.

So it is a proclamation of shared values, to be seen as virtuous with no action required? What one might call… virtue signalling?

Naglfar
Naglfar
1 year ago

@Allandrel

What one might call… virtue signalling?

Conservatives virtue signal to each other all the time, so yes, I think that fits under that category. They really took the whole “accuse your enemy of that which you are guilty” line seriously.

Other conservative things that I think qualify as virtue signaling are constantly repeating and posting slogans like “Make America Great Again,” rambling about support for troops or police forces, making helicopter jokes (both kinds), and threatening to boycott companies while never actually doing so.

%d bloggers like this: