• Home
  • Comments Policy
  • About
    • Mammoth FAQ
    • David Futrelle FAQ
  • T-Shirts, etc.
  • WTF is a MGTOW? A Glossary
← Today in Imaginary Feminism: The Slap Circle of Misandry
CoAlpha Forum member on Elliot Rodger: "Had he just butchered as many sorority girls as he could he would have been a true hero." →

Is The Mankind Initiative's #ViolenceIsViolence video a fraud?

 May 30, 2014
  · 935 Comments

The We Hunted the Mammoth Pledge Drive continues! If you haven’t already, please consider sending some bucks my way. (And don’t worry that the PayPal page says Man Boobz.) Thanks! And thanks again to all who’ve already donated.

The ManKind Initiative, a UK organization devoted to fighting domestic violence against men, recently put out a video that’s been getting a lot of attention in the media and online, racking up more than six million views on YouTube in a little over a week.

The brief video, titled #ViolenceIsViolence, purports to depict the radically different reactions of bystanders to staged incidents of domestic violence between a couple in a London plaza. When the man was the aggressor, shoving the woman and grabbing her face, bystanders intervened and threatened to call the police. When the woman was the aggressor, the video shows bystanders laughing, and no one does a thing.

The video has been praised by assorted Men’s Rights Activists, naturally enough, but it has also gotten uncritical attention in some prominent media outlets as well, from Marie Claire to the Huffington Post.

There’s just one problem: The video may be a fraud, using deceptive editing to distort incidents that may well have played out quite differently in real life.

A shot-by-shot analysis of the video from beginning to end reveals that the first “incident” depicted is actually a composite of footage shot of at least two separate incidents, filmed on at least three different times of day and edited together into one narrative.

A careful viewing of the video also reveals that many of the supposed “reaction shots” in the video are not “reaction shots” at all, but shots taken in the same plaza at different times and edited in as if they are happening at the same time as the staged “incidents” depicted.

Moreover, none of the people depicted as laughing at the second incident are shown in the same frame as the fighting couple. There is no evidence that any of them were actually laughing at the woman attacking the man.

The editing tricks used in the video were brought to my attention by a reader who sent me a link to a blog entry by Miguel Lorente Acosta, a Professor of Legal Medicine at the University of Granada in Spain, and a Government Delegate for Gender Violence in Spain’s Ministry of Equality. He goes through the video shot by shot, showing each trick for what it is.

The post in Spanish, and his argument is a little hard to follow through the filter of Google Translate, so I will offer my own analysis of the video below, drawing heavily on his post. (His post is still worth reading, as he covers several examples of deceptive editing I’ve left out.)

I urge you to watch the video above through once, then follow me through the following analysis.

The first “incident” is made up of footage taken at three distinct times, if not more. The proof is in the bench.

In the opening shot of the video, we see an overview of the plaza. We see two people sitting on a bench, a man in black to the left and a woman in white to the right, with a trash can to the right of them. (All of these lefts and rights are relative to us, the viewers.) The trash can has an empty green bag hanging off of it.

vv1bench

As the first incident begins, we see the same bench, only now we see two women sitting where the man was previously sitting. The trash can now has a full bag of trash sitting next to it.

vv2bench

In this shot, showing bystanders intervening in what is portrayed as the same fight, and supposedly depicting a moment in time only about 30 seconds after the previous shot, we see that the two women on the bench have been replaced by two men, one in a suit and the other in a red hoodie. The full trash bag has been removed, and the trash can again has an empty trash bag hanging off of it.

vv5benchtrash

Clearly this portion of the video does not depict a single incident.

What about the reaction shots? The easiest way to tell that the reaction shots in the video did not chronologically follow the shots that they come after in the video is by looking at the shadows. Some of the video was shot when the sky was cloudy and shadows were indistinct. Other shots were taken in direct sunlight. In the video, shots in cloudy weather are followed immediately by shots in roughly the same location where we see bright sunlight and clear shadows.

Here’s one shot, 9 seconds in. Notice the lack of clear shadows; the shadow of the sitting woman is little more than a vague smudge.

vvmuted

Here’s another shot from less than a second later in the same video – the timestamp is still at 9 seconds in. Now the plaza is in direct sunlight and the shadows are sharp and distinct.

vvbright

If you watch the video carefully, you can see these sorts of discontinuities throughout. It seems highly unlikely that the various reaction shots actually depict reactions to what they appear to be reactions to. Which wouldn’t matter if this were a feature film; that’s standard practice. But this purports to be a depiction of real incidents caught on hidden camera and presented as they happened in real time.

The issue of non-reaction reaction shots is especially important when it comes to the second incident. In the first incident, we see a number of women, and one man, intervening to stop the violence. There is no question that’s what’s going on, because we see them in the same frame as the couple.

In the second incident, none of the supposed laughing onlookers ever appear in the same frame as the fighting couple. We have no proof that their laughter is in fact a reaction to the woman attacking the man. And given the dishonest way that the video is edited overall, I have little faith that they are real reaction shots.

The people who are in frame with the fighting couple are either trying resolutely to ignore the incident – as many of the onlookers also did in the first incident – or are clearly troubled by it.

I noticed one blonde woman who looked at first glance like she might have been laughing, but after pausing the video it became clear that she was actually alarmed and trying to move out of the way.

vvnervousblonde

There is one other thing to note about the two incidents. In the first case, the onlookers didn’t intervene until after the man escalated his aggression by grabbing the woman by her face. In the second video, the screen fades to black shortly after the woman escalates her aggression to a similar level. We don’t know what, if anything, happened after that.

Is it possible that the first part of the video, despite being a composite of several incidents, depicts more or less accurately what happened each time the video makers tried this experiment? Yes. Is it possible that onlookers did indeed laugh as the woman attacked the man? Yes.

But there is only one way for The ManKind Initiative to come clean and clear up any suspicion: they need to post the unedited, time-stamped footage of each of the incidents they filmed from each of their three cameras so we can see how each incident really played out in real time and which, if any, of the alleged reactions were actual reactions.

In addition to the editing tricks mentioned above, we don’t know if the video makers edited out portions of the staged attacks that might have influenced how the bystanders reacted.

The video makers should also post the footage of the incidents that they did not use for the advert, so we can see if reactions to the violence were consistently different when the genders of attackers and victims were switched. Two incidents make up a rather small sample – even if one of these incidents is actually two incidents disguised as one.

Domestic violence against men is a real and serious problem. But you can’t fight it effectively with smoke and mirrors.

Share this:

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Reddit
  • Tumblr
  • Email
  • More
  • Google
  • Pinterest
  • LinkedIn
  • Pocket
  • Print

Like this:

Like Loading...

Related

Posted in: domestic violence, MRA, shit that never happened
← Today in Imaginary Feminism: The Slap Circle of Misandry
CoAlpha Forum member on Elliot Rodger: "Had he just butchered as many sorority girls as he could he would have been a true hero." →

Comments

Please read the comments policy before leaving a comment - thanks!

  1. Pages:
  2. «
  3. 1
  4. ...
  5. 12
  6. 13
  7. 14
  8. 15
  9. 16
  10. 17
  11. 18
  12. 19
  1. kittehserf MOD says:
    July 30, 2014 at 12:55 am

    Easy, you could use the empty buildings and fill them with rubble.

    My favourite laser death cat is this one (any excuse to post this again). I didn’t know until now that it’s you! I guess the dudes are all the NiceFeministGuys(TM) trying to shoot you with No Naughty Words weapons.

    http://youtu.be/vb_9vxXyqdU

    Reply
  2. pallygirl says:
    July 30, 2014 at 1:39 am

    Yep, although I feel guilty about my flamethrower abilities as I feel they’re contributing to global warming.

    Mr studmuffin cat watched that entire clip, apart from a couple of seconds when I looked at him watching, and then he looked away. But he started watching it again. Must Be Careful About What To Disclose To The Furrinati Of The Household.

    I have cunningly convinced them I am under the paw. I have two photos of me being actually under the paw. This is a ploy to disguise my real being.

    Reply
  3. kittehserf MOD says:
    July 30, 2014 at 1:55 am

    But, but, if you are Laser Death Cat, would they not approve of your cunning duplicitous disguise as a human?

    Of course Mr studmuffin might be looking at the vid as a how-to. That could be alarming.

    Reply
  4. weirwoodtreehugger says:
    July 30, 2014 at 2:00 am

    Shortly after I read about Pallygirl’s laser death catness, I turned the light back on and saw that Darrow was lying on the floor beneath my feet staring up at me. He never hangs out there.

    I think they know. They know. Oh dear god.

    Reply
  5. pallygirl says:
    July 30, 2014 at 2:08 am

    He’s the one that has me most under the paw (yes, this is one where an objective scale is possible from most under the paw to least under the paw). He already walks in front of my keyboard and then sits there so I can’t type. Or wants to sit on my lap at the computer so I can’t type. He has a meow that sends daggers directly into my heart so I immediately stop whatever I am doing with him. He also gentle bites me when he’s annoyed. The last thing I need is for him to get more ideas and capability. /cries

    Reply
  6. kittehserf MOD says:
    July 30, 2014 at 2:16 am

    The Furrinati are revealing their power

    THE END IS NIGH

    oh look shiny!

    Reply
  7. weirwoodtreehugger says:
    July 30, 2014 at 2:30 am

    Cats love nothing more than walking across the keyboard. Mine both do it. Darrow also loves rubbing against the remote control when I’m trying to look at the guide.

    Reply
  8. cassandrakitty says:
    July 30, 2014 at 2:32 am

    My cat prefers putting her front paws on the keyboard tray next to my mousepad and nudging my hand until I pet her.

    Reply
  9. pallygirl says:
    July 30, 2014 at 2:40 am

    I have a mechanical keyboard, so just the weight of the tail of one of my cats is enough to cause random shit to occur. Actually, that will be my excuse every time I do a mistake in a comment. Why did it take me so long to click to this?

    Reply
  10. kittehserf MOD says:
    July 30, 2014 at 4:01 am

    My computer desk only has room for the laptop and keyboard, and the kitties show no interest in jumping up here. Why, why am I so neglected?

    Reply
  11. pallygirl says:
    July 30, 2014 at 4:37 am

    I can vacuum up some of the cat fur inside my keyboard, package it into a nicely decorated bag, and post it over to you so you can sprinkle it over your keyboard. I don’t want you to feel you’re missing out!

    Reply
  12. kittehserf MOD says:
    July 30, 2014 at 4:52 am

    Speaking of LOLing loudly!

    Fear not, I have plenty of cat fur in my keyboard, under my computer desk, in everything. It’s just that the beasties don’t get up and stamp around on the keyboard. Katie used to – I have an email from her somewhere.

    Reply
  13. shotgunnoblitz says:
    September 20, 2014 at 11:59 pm

    Who cares if the thing is edited… The point still stands that people are much less likely to do anything when a man is being attacked by his girlfriend but will run to the defense of a female being attacked by a man. Sure they use some deceptive things to get the point across, but the point stands that NOT A SINGLE PERSON does anything in one instance, but at least 4 others say or do something in another instance where only genders are reversed. By calling this entire video into question you miss the entire point. Its not to defend men or villainize women, its to raise awareness.

    Reply
  14. weirwoodtreehugger says:
    September 21, 2014 at 12:43 am

    Read the whole thread necro troll. We’ve been over this.

    Reply
  15. John Allman says:
    October 26, 2014 at 6:40 pm

    “If you watch the video carefully, you can see these sorts of discontinuities throughout. It seems highly unlikely that the various reaction shots actually depict reactions to what they appear to be reactions to. Which wouldn’t matter if this were a feature film; that’s standard practice. But this purports to be a depiction of real incidents caught on hidden camera and presented as they happened in real time.”

    You had me going there for a minute! The real “smoke and mirrors” is on this site, not in the video. It’s in the final sentence quoted, in a paragraph near the end of this blog post. The sentence that isn’t true. “But this purports to be a depiction of real incidents caught on hidden camera and presented as they happened in real time.”

    The video doesn’t purport this. Glad we’ve sorted that out.

    Reply
  16. Graham says:
    November 10, 2014 at 10:58 am

    Isn’t the only thing anyone should be ashamed of that WeHuntedTheMammoth lists as top Google Result for #ViolenceisViolence aiming to cast doubt on a campaign that tries to raise awareness about domestic violence. Like imagine a Cancer charity posted a dramatic video to highlight cancer awareness and the top result for their hash tag was that their video was edited for maximum effect. Class act, douchebags.

    Reply
  17. Mark Krijgsman says:
    November 25, 2014 at 9:47 am

    You need the video to be fake , you need it to be fabricated, as you do not dare to touch the women on men violence as a problem, that wont fit with your world vieuw as the man always being the one doing the domestic violence, well thanks to people like you men who are in that situation will never be taken seriously …..if thats your brand of equality you can keep it and shove it .

    Reply
  18. Policy of Madness says:
    November 25, 2014 at 9:59 am

    its hilarious that you can overlook that there is no shot of a fighting couple with people laughing in the same frame, even though those shots would be available if there was no deceptive editing.

    i bet you believe that the shower scene in psycho has nudity and stabbing in it.

    Reply
  19. kirbywarp says:
    November 25, 2014 at 10:44 am

    @Mark:

    Preeettty sure the situation is reversed. You need the video to be real, because you need something shocking to prove that men have it just as bad in the domestic violence sphere; the statistics don’t help you.

    We, on the other hand, are not straw-feminists that believe women can do no wrong and men can do no right. If the video were 100% accurate, it’d be rather bizarre and worthy of discussion, but it is certainly no worldview killer.

    Feminists have long known that men can be abused, raped and assaulted, and have long pointed to toxic masculinity as a reason for why those men aren’t taken seriously (they’re supposed to be stronger than women, how could they let themselves get beaten up by a girl har har har).

    However, this phenomena is splash damage, and the cause is still patriarchy and rigid gender roles. The people who want to divert the conversation to say that men suffer just as badly from domestic abuse as women are proposing an entirely different cause, one that doesn’t match up with the facts.

    You need this video to be real. We don’t need it to be fake.

    Reply
  20. weirwoodtreehugger says:
    November 25, 2014 at 11:01 am

    Like imagine a Cancer charity posted a dramatic video to highlight cancer awareness and the top result for their hash tag was that their video was edited for maximum effect.

    No. The equivalent would be if a cancer charity falsely claimed that a privileged demographic group was being given inferior oncological care and should therefore receive the lion’s share of the money and attention.

    You need the video to be fake , you need it to be fabricated, as you do not dare to touch the women on men violence as a problem

    What Kirbywrap said. Get back to us when just in the US (sorry I don’t know the stats for other countries) 3 men are killed by their female domestic partners every day. Because currently it’s not even close to that. But three women are killed by their male domestic partners every day.

    You also conveniently left out the fact that many male domestic violence victims have male abusers. Way to erase gay men completely in your effort to make women look horrible and violent. That’s very human rightsy of you!

    Reply
  21. Miguel Lorente Acosta says:
    December 26, 2014 at 9:19 am

    Thanks David for your work and for your comments about my post on the topic.

    Equality is good for women and for men, and we need men in Equality, but when some men try to confuse and manipulate society, like they did with the video, they prove that many men prefer to keep their male privileges instead of living together in equality.

    We are improving but we need to do the time shorter. There is no way back, we are moving towards Equality, and the best thing that all of us, men and women, can do is to work together to reach the goal as soon as possible.

    Best regards from Spain.
    Miguel Lorente

    Reply
  22. grumpyoldnurse says:
    December 26, 2014 at 10:26 am

    Wow! I’m getting jaded, as I expected to find that this necro’d thread had a troll on it. Instead, thank-you very much for your work on this vital topic, Miguel Lorente! 🙂

    Reply
  23. Luzbelitx says:
    December 26, 2014 at 11:10 am

    Ha! Same here, grumpyoldnurse.

    Thank you for coming by, Miguel! I’ve been following your work for a while now and all I can say is: I’m really happy to have you on our side 🙂

    Reply
  24. EricP says:
    December 29, 2014 at 6:10 pm

    Feminists have long supported domestic violence against men, no surprise that they desperately
    (and quite pathetic) try to trivialize the problem.

    Reply
  25. emilygoddess says:
    May 19, 2015 at 7:49 pm

    Tell you what, Dan: normally I delete comments with sexist slurs in them, but I’ll offer you a troll challenge of sorts: if you can find a single example of David or anyone in this thread saying “who gives a fuck about male victims of DV” or anything like it, I’ll edit your comment instead of deleting the whole foolish thing. Good luck!

    Reply
  26. brooked says:
    May 19, 2015 at 7:54 pm

    And I don’t know if you’ve ever been to London, but it can go from overcast to sunny and back to overcast in a matter of minutes. The fact that it isn’t raining in any of the shots makes me suspect that it was all shot in under 15 minutes.

    It rains every 15 minutes in London? And I thought Seattle was bad.

    Reply
  27. Pandapool -- The Species that Endangers YOU (aka Banana Jackie Cake, for those who still want to call me "Banana", "Jackie" or whatever) says:
    May 19, 2015 at 8:01 pm

    Reply
  28. Pandapool -- The Species that Endangers YOU (aka Banana Jackie Cake, for those who still want to call me "Banana", "Jackie" or whatever) says:
    May 19, 2015 at 8:02 pm

    You know, while we’re talking about old shit, why not listen to old shit?

    Reply
  29. emilygoddess - WHTM Mod says:
    May 19, 2015 at 8:07 pm

    I may or may not have that song in regular rotation. Also this one:

    Reply
  30. Pandapool -- The Species that Endangers YOU (aka Banana Jackie Cake, for those who still want to call me "Banana", "Jackie" or whatever) says:
    May 19, 2015 at 8:19 pm

    N*Sync was carried by pretty boy Justin Timberlake. Fact. That’s why while Backstreet Boys had all the good songs, N*Sync was more popular.

    Also Justin Timberlake is just plain awesome.

    If you listen closely to most of his songs, there’s beatboxing in them.

    Reply
  31. weirwoodtreehugger says:
    May 19, 2015 at 8:42 pm

    This thread gets necro’d so much. It’s been awhile though!

    Reply
  32. athyco says:
    May 19, 2015 at 9:03 pm

    “Cool,” I thought. “I’ll listen to the updated concept via Justin Timberlake.” And I wish I had only listened, Pandapool. The peeping tom stalker stuff at the end of the video squicked me out. Since the lyrics said she “called me on the phone,” I thought he was going to send the kissing-the-new-girl image back via the phone.

    Reply
  33. Pandapool -- The Species that Endangers YOU (aka Banana Jackie Cake, for those who still want to call me "Banana", "Jackie" or whatever) says:
    May 19, 2015 at 9:15 pm

    @athyco

    Admittedly, I didn’t really watch the video, I just posted it for the song…so…yeah, it got weird.

    Reply
  34. Emilygoddess - WHTM mod says:
    May 25, 2015 at 3:32 pm

    Dan failed to meet the troll challenge so his comment has been deleted.

    Reply
  35. booburry says:
    May 25, 2015 at 5:16 pm

    God damnit, Dan! You had one job!
    (I really wanted to read his mess of a comment ya’ll)

    Reply
  1. Pages:
  2. «
  3. 1
  4. ...
  5. 12
  6. 13
  7. 14
  8. 15
  9. 16
  10. 17
  11. 18
  12. 19

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Please read the comments policy before leaving a comment - thanks!

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Donate to the Mammoth!

We Hunted the Mammoth is an ad-free, reader-supported publication written and published by longtime journalist David Futrelle, who has been tracking, dissecting, and mocking the growing misogynistic backlash since 2010, exposing the hateful ideologies of Men’s Rights Activists, incels, alt-rightists and many others.

We depend on support from people like you. Please consider a donation or a monthly pledge by clicking below! there's no need for a PayPal account.

1
Send comments, questions, and tips for stories to me at dfutrelle@gmail.com, or by clicking here

Follow Me

  • View david.futrelle’s profile on Facebook
  • View DavidFutrelle’s profile on Twitter
  • View David Futrelle’s profile on YouTube
  • View David Futrelle’s profile on Google+

Subscribe via Email

Recent Posts

  • Jordan Peterson fans mansplain makeup: “You try to cheat men’s brains by presenting a more sexually attractive face than you really have”
  • Open thread to discuss the legacy and honor the victims of the École Polytechnique massacre
  • Banning abortion “is about making women scared to have more than one sexual partner,” Red Pill Redditor declares
  • I read this incel “field report” and now you have to, too
  • The Daily Stormer launches an attack on the female orgasm
  • Black athletes are turning white men into a cucked “third sex” by being better at sports, weirdo racist football fan argues
  • Where I’ve been
  • In the battle betwen John Wayne and Mr. Rogers it’s the gentler soul who’s winning
  • Amazon is promoting “racial hate crimes” with a new show featuring Nazi hunters as the heroes, professional mad guy One Angry Gamer declares
  • HE SAID THE THING! YouTube ranter Warcorpse666 thinks men deserve privilege because they hunted the you-know-what

Top Posts

  • Banning abortion "is about making women scared to have more than one sexual partner," Red Pill Redditor declares
  • The Daily Stormer launches an attack on the female orgasm
  • I read this incel "field report" and now you have to, too
  • Jordan Peterson fans mansplain makeup: "You try to cheat men's brains by presenting a more sexually attractive face than you really have"

Archives

My Twitter

Tweets by DavidFutrelle

Recent Comments

  • Paireon December 7, 2019 at 11:16 pm on Jordan Peterson fans mansplain makeup: “You try to cheat men’s brains by presenting a more sexually attractive face than you really have”
  • WMDKitty December 7, 2019 at 11:08 pm on Open thread to discuss the legacy and honor the victims of the École Polytechnique massacre
  • Paireon December 7, 2019 at 10:59 pm on Jordan Peterson fans mansplain makeup: “You try to cheat men’s brains by presenting a more sexually attractive face than you really have”
  • Redsilkphoenix: Jetpack Vixen, Intergalactic Meanie December 7, 2019 at 10:06 pm on Jordan Peterson fans mansplain makeup: “You try to cheat men’s brains by presenting a more sexually attractive face than you really have”
  • Viscaria December 7, 2019 at 10:06 pm on No-nut November NoFappers Need to Know: Am I not-nutting correctly in the eyes of God?
  • Paireon December 7, 2019 at 9:59 pm on No-nut November NoFappers Need to Know: Am I not-nutting correctly in the eyes of God?
  • Naglfar December 7, 2019 at 9:46 pm on Jordan Peterson fans mansplain makeup: “You try to cheat men’s brains by presenting a more sexually attractive face than you really have”
  • Paireon December 7, 2019 at 9:29 pm on Jordan Peterson fans mansplain makeup: “You try to cheat men’s brains by presenting a more sexually attractive face than you really have”

Random WHTM Posts!

  • Feminists are all the same woman. And that woman is Hillary Clinton.Feminists are all the same woman. And that woman is Hillary Clinton.February 16, 2012
  • MGTOWs completely lose their sh*t over a gif of a toddler on a cell phoneMGTOWs completely lose their sh*t over a gif of a toddler on a cell phoneDecember 7, 2016
  • Attention Buzzfeed readers: Here's more, much more, about the charming Paul ElamAttention Buzzfeed readers: Here's more, much more, about the charming Paul ElamFebruary 6, 2015
  • A Voice for Men’s TyphonBlue uses the case of a man who set himself and his son on fire as evidence of the moral superiority of menA Voice for Men’s TyphonBlue uses the case of a man who set himself and his son on fire as evidence of the moral superiority of menDecember 26, 2013
  • MGTOW channels Molly Bloom in stream-of-consciousness rant against “worthless abusive neglected finger pointing self made drama whores”MGTOW channels Molly Bloom in stream-of-consciousness rant against “worthless abusive neglected finger pointing self made drama whores”July 19, 2015

If You’re Being Harassed

  • Speak Up & Stay Safe(r)
  • Crash Override
  • DIY Feminist Cybersecurity
  • Without My Consent
  • 9 Ways to Dodge Trolls

Creep Watchers

  • Hail to the Gynocracy!
  • Right Wing Watch
  • Hate Watch (SPLC)
  • Media Matters
  • Fundies Say the Darndest Things
  • My Right Wing Dad
  • r/ShitRedditSays
  • r/GamerGhazi
  • r/TheBluePill
  • r/AgainstMensRights
  • r/CreepyPMs

Mammothy Fun

  • Official WHTM Welcome Package!
  • Artistry For Feminism. And Kittens.
  • A Voice for Pierre

Feed the Mammoth!

Keep this blog going by clicking on the link below! You don't even need a PayPal account.

Privacy & Cookies: This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this website, you agree to their use.
To find out more, including how to control cookies, see here: Cookie Policy
We Hunted The Mammoth | Copyright © 2019 All Rights Reserved
loading Cancel
Post was not sent - check your email addresses!
Email check failed, please try again
Sorry, your blog cannot share posts by email.
%d bloggers like this: