• Home
  • Comments Policy
  • About
    • Mammoth FAQ
    • David Futrelle FAQ
  • T-Shirts, etc.
  • WTF is a MGTOW? A Glossary
← The “Nice Guy” Who Raped and Strangled a Young Irish Woman
Our Misandrist Future? →

MRA lackwit declares Sheryl Sandberg an “arrogant Lindsay Lohan Look-a-like” who “promotes sexism, bias and hate.”

 March 15, 2013
  · 380 Comments
Separated at birth?

As hard as this is to believe, these are actually different women.

I haven’t been paying much attention to the recent brouhaha over Facebook COO Sheryl Sandberg’s new book.  But I feel safe in saying that MRA lackwit Christian J.’s “Sheryl Sandberg, Your Usual “Modern” Crass, Arrogant, Sexist, Biased Female” may be the dumbest thing anyone has written, or ever will write, on the subject.

Mr J’s post on WMASAW – the blog that used to be called What Men Are Saying About Women – starts off with a puzzling description of Sandberg as an “arrogant Lindsay Lohan Look-a-like, [who] Promotes sexism, bias and hate.” (Um, what?) And it only gets worse from there:

It is amazing what these sexist and abusive, addled females get away with while they continually praise themselves and raise themselves as being the “Saviours” of the world with the “If Only Women ran the World” meme. Take Sandberg for example, the bastion of that left-wing mentality … .

Yes, that’s right. Mr. J is describing Sandberg as a “bastion” of left-wing thought. Mr. J and the English language are not good friends.

They make the claim that “Equality” is about the aim of making women level with men, erm! level suggests what?  In every area possible,  even if it means reducing standards and tests and lowering anything that women have problems with. …

Every time they make the same claim that (Lindsay Lohan Look-a-Like)Sandberg bloviates about here, like every other member of that same HATE movement, it was never about anything else but giving women a FREE ride to the top and don’t anyone every dare hold them back because there would be screaming and wailing and it would be introduce another excuse to cry that usual lie of “holding them back”, amazing.

In reality, it’s because job placement used to be based on merit and ability, even though that has been tossed out and replaced with quotas in favour of women. It has everything to do with sexism, v*gina and pro-female “Equal Opportunity” as Sandberg denies is the case. ….

What a sexist loathsome, despicable female.

Mr J. then quotes a couple of not-exactly earthshatteringly controversial comments of Sandberg’s:

“I think a world that was run where half our countries and half our companies were run by women, would be a better world.”

“I hope that . . . you have the ambition to run the world,” Sandberg told Barnard graduates, “because this world needs you to run it.”

As Mr. J figures it, Sandberg is promulgating female supremacy here, “saying that every females alive could out perform any male. Sickening, petty, self-congratulatory, back-slapping and wishful thinking or what !”

I choose “what.”  (They speak English in What?)

Mr J, for his part, seems to believe that, in an inversion of the the man-hatred he attributes to feminists, every male alive could outperform any female:

As far as I can see so far, those countries that have women in charge, are not doing that crash hot at all. …

Yet this odious and tedious Sandberg has the temerity to state that the world would be a better place run by women. What a complete, compulsive liar that women really is, women these days have problems being genuine and real, let alone anything else. But it does demonstrate that standard egotistical side of these “New Women”, who have been granted the easy option and helped along the way, every way possible by compliant men. Do they get any thanks for it, forget that. They just get the knife in the back for their efforts and gloat, even after changing conditions, being sued, forced to comply to changes that women demand and then turn around and state “Look at me, I am so good” .

Was that last sentence even a sentence? If so, please diagram it for me. I dare ya!

What hypocrites they are. It is about time men stopped capitulating to these arrogant and narcissistic females, stopped giving them automatic promotions, a free ride and start giving them some competition and let’s see how well they go then.

It’s always funny when blithering idiots suggest that women’s brains are inferior to their own.

Share this:

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Reddit
  • Tumblr
  • Email
  • More
  • Google
  • Pinterest
  • LinkedIn
  • Pocket
  • Print

Like this:

Like Loading...

Related

Posted in: antifeminism, evil women, imaginary backwards land, imaginary oppression, incoherent rage, men who should not ever be with women ever, misogyny, MRA, oppressed men, playing the victim, vaginas
← The “Nice Guy” Who Raped and Strangled a Young Irish Woman
Our Misandrist Future? →

Comments

Please read the comments policy before leaving a comment - thanks!

  1. Pages:
  2. «
  3. 1
  4. 2
  5. 3
  6. 4
  7. 5
  8. 6
  9. 7
  10. 8
  11. »
  1. Some Gal Not Bored at All says:
    March 15, 2013 at 2:23 pm

    @kamilla1960

    I am very sorry that your brother is abusive (and a horrible writer).

    Reply
  2. Gillian says:
    March 15, 2013 at 2:33 pm

    @kamilla1960 It’s bad enough that they exist, to have one related to you. Ugh.

    My sympathy knows no bounds.

    Reply
  3. Gillian says:
    March 15, 2013 at 2:44 pm

    Is it wrong of me to want to ask if a “vogina” is a female Vogon? (My sci-fi geekdom, let me show you it).

    In my defense, news about the Steubenville Rolling Miscarriage of Justice Rape Trial is sapping my will to live and driving me to seek ever more extreme forms of compensatory silliness.

    Reply
  4. thebewilderness says:
    March 15, 2013 at 2:50 pm

    This is my favorite bit!

    But it does demonstrate that standard egotistical side of these “New Women”, who have been granted the easy option and helped along the way, every way possible by compliant men. Do they get any thanks for it, forget that.

    Where is the GRATITUDE???
    We let these women learn to read and write and everything. We even let them vote.
    What do we get for it? They take our jobs and don’t even say thank you or give us a blow job.

    I have been hearing one form or another of this lament all my long life. You got your effing civil rights, now show me some gratitude by pretending that I am your superior.
    Criminy!

    Reply
  5. Some Gal Not Bored at All says:
    March 15, 2013 at 2:51 pm

    @Gillian

    I think, after yesterday’s thread, all the trolls who have recently popped up like they want us to play Whack-a-Troll,* and depressing news like Steubenville, that we are entitled to some silliness.

    *Of course, in Whack-a-Troll, one has to hit the popping-up trolls with a different spoon each time. This is why it is great we play in a group and can pool our spoons.

    Reply
  6. Some Gal Not Bored at All says:
    March 15, 2013 at 2:52 pm

    @thebewilderness

    It is just different words to the same Nice Guy tune.

    Reply
  7. Marie says:
    March 15, 2013 at 2:55 pm

    @bewilderness

    Where is the GRATITUDE???
    We let these women learn to read and write and everything. We even let them vote.
    What do we get for it? They take our jobs and don’t even say thank you or give us a blow job.

    I have been hearing one form or another of this lament all my long life. You got your effing civil rights, now show me some gratitude by pretending that I am your superior.
    Criminy!

    That is a great way to phrase it. *holds in my own personal rant about patriarchy, because all I’d probably manage is a ‘but I hate it and it sucks :P*

    Reply
  8. Virgil says:
    March 15, 2013 at 2:59 pm

    Feminism is about giving women absolute power.

    Wtf makes women think they are oppressed?

    Life for a modern woman is living like a hollywood celeb.

    Not only do you have beta white knights catering to your every whim, you have the advantage of chivalry plus NOW you can have a free ride up the corporate ladder because of inclusive policies promoting “equality”.

    You can focus on your career while freezing your eggs until you decide to have autist kids @ fucking 40.

    Your careers are set, your family life is set and your social lives are set? You can become VP’s whilst fucking male models half your age.

    If all else fails you can still just marry a rich guy who’ll take care of your every status whoring desire.

    You’re not oppressed.

    Reply
  9. Carleyblue says:
    March 15, 2013 at 3:01 pm

    Can’t be bothered to read the Christian J post, ’cause: what an idiot.

    I have to say I disagree somewhat with the assertion that the advice to ‘just be more ambitious’ is ridiculous. People here say we need to change the culture, how people think, and yes, we do. But how should that be done? Often when people are ‘lectured’ too much on a topic, or hear about it too much, it tends to backfire. They will rebel against their perceived ‘teachers’. I think that’s part of the reason so many men feel oppressed today. They see all this attention being given to women, all these special societies for them, and they become resentful. Case in point: I get e-mails all the time from my university about new ‘societies for women’, prizes just for women, magazines just for women, etc. etc. Some of these things are also interesting and good. Thing is, more than 50% of the students in my department are women, many of the people who win the major prizes are women, over half of the lecturers are women (an exception at the university in general, yes). The head of the department? Always a man. Always. We need to see more women in actual leadership, not just agitating, not just forming societies for women. Of course it won’t change everyone’s mind (nothing ever will), but it mind change more minds than just ‘changing the culture’.

    Culture or society are such vague, nebulous concepts. We can’t change a whole culture, we can only change individuals. Or am I just thinking in a wrong way? I’m interested to know…

    Reply
  10. hellkell says:
    March 15, 2013 at 3:12 pm

    I think there is a difference between ambitious and assertive, that women are and should be encouraged to be both, and that the advice to “just be more assertive” or “just be ambitious” is ridiculous advice.

    How is it ridiculous? How do you encourage otherwise?

    Reply
  11. cloudiah says:
    March 15, 2013 at 3:13 pm

    Steubenville is getting me down too. I think there’s a decent chance the two young men will be convicted, but reading about the texts and crap where they were just openly admitting she was unconscious and that they could do anything because their football coach had their backs…

    Reply
  12. Pear_tree says:
    March 15, 2013 at 3:19 pm

    Carleyblue, back when I was still a PhD student there was a training day on managing your career and your life. It was open to men and women and attended mainly by women. After several talks on how you balance relationships/children with a career one of the male attendees commented this was all irrelevant to him as he’d never have to be primary care giver for a child or follow a partner for a job. This wasn’t an aggressive comment just acknowledging women have other concerns.

    I have to admit that I rolled my eyes when one speaker suggested that you need a relationship not where your partner helped but where he took responsibility for household chores. I guess it is possible, but it seems so unlikely. I hope people here have relationships like that but it just seems asking so much.

    I think a lot of women’s groups are advice on how to deal with these issues, that many men find irrelevant and don’t want to talk about.

    Reply
  13. Some Gal Not Bored at All says:
    March 15, 2013 at 3:21 pm

    @Carleyblue

    I would like to see more lectures aimed at men. That is one way of trying to change the culture that also doesn’t send a message that there is something wrong with or lacking in women and if we just stepped up, we’d be where we need to be.

    The advice for women to do more, be more, change more implies there is something women aren’t doing that keeps them out of positions of power when, in fact, it is often because of the things men are doing. In addition, there have been numerous studies that show that women who are as assertive as men (that is, do what men are told to do to advance their careers) often do less well than women who don’t. Assertiveness alone just doesn’t work. Neither does ambition. Both are necessary, but not sufficient and often detrimental.

    Reply
  14. hellkell says:
    March 15, 2013 at 3:22 pm

    I guess it is possible, but it seems so unlikely. I hope people here have relationships like that but it just seems asking so much.

    Not really if you can communicate with your partner. Mr. HK and I have worked out a division of chores based on what we don’t like doing. I hate vacuuming, so he does it, etc. It does help that he’s way neater than I am, not all men are slobs.

    Reply
  15. cloudiah says:
    March 15, 2013 at 3:25 pm

    From Twitter, yet another thing that is getting me down today:
    “so we are clear, North Dakota just banned abortion less than 2 weeks after a missed period. In a state with 1 clinic. w/24hr wait” (@robinmarty)

    About ND banning any abortions after a fetal heartbeat can be detected, usually around 6 weeks but occasionally as early as 5 weeks after conception.

    Reply
  16. hellkell says:
    March 15, 2013 at 3:27 pm

    Assertiveness alone just doesn’t work. Neither does ambition. Both are necessary, but not sufficient and often detrimental.

    What does work, and what are these things men are doing?

    Reply
  17. hellkell says:
    March 15, 2013 at 3:27 pm

    cloudiah: that is awful.

    Reply
  18. Marie says:
    March 15, 2013 at 3:29 pm

    @cloudiah

    gaaaah. *grimaces* How early do they think people can find out they’re pregnant. grrr. I’m probably going to end up ranting soon, but…bwuh. How long is it going to take this anti choice shit in america to turn around. I’m rambling. I just hate it.

    Reply
  19. augochlorella says:
    March 15, 2013 at 3:36 pm

    I’m literally walking distance from North Dakota if anyone wants me to go throw rocks at it or something. (Not at people, of course. Just the state.)

    Reply
  20. starskita says:
    March 15, 2013 at 3:40 pm

    I’d say working it out isn’t *easy.* We do something like hellkell and mr hk.

    Except we both really really hate dishes. It turns out that I hate cooking and I hate dishes, and he kinda likes cooking but hates dishes, so he cooks, and I do dishes.

    So variously, different chores have to get worked out, and we have to talk about expectations and such. And getting at what I think the speaker that Pear_tree is referencing meant, we worked out that *remembering* something needed to be done counted as a chore.

    So list of chores might be:
    vaccuming
    dishes
    clean the bathroom
    keeping an eye on the dog’s needs
    checking whether we’re keeping on top of things
    etc.

    so the first three are “traditional housework” and the second two are “responsibility for housework” but they all count as doing a share of the housework.

    Reply
  21. Some Gal Not Bored at All says:
    March 15, 2013 at 3:45 pm

    @hellkell

    Asking for a promotion, talking yourself up, speaking up, taking credit for your work, etc. are all things men are advised to do that often backfire on women. (My browser is still trying to load the search results for that, but I will follow up with links.)

    I found this Forbes article discussing a study that found what worked was being stereotypically masculine at some times and stereotypically feminine at others and knowing exactly when to do this worked really well,* but that isn’t truly encapsulated in “just be more assertive” or “just be ambitious.”

    *This article loaded before my internet got weird and is annoyingly gender essentialist and trying to sell the secret to this masculine/feminine tightrope act. I am going to reboot and try this internet thing again, but didn’t want to lose my comment. Sorry.

    Reply
  22. Gillian says:
    March 15, 2013 at 3:45 pm

    I just went looking and now I can’t find the article I was reading about the ND ban. It was one of the legislators behind the measure, arguing that even though they knew it was likely to be judged unconstitutional, they intended to go forward with it anyway. Since the state has a budget surplus, thanks to oil and natural gas deposits, they have the money to fight against the “highly lucrative” abortion “industry” (seriously, why did no one tell me that the path to riches led through the field of obstetrics and gynecology?) who will fight the ban in order to preserve their profit centers.

    Ugh.

    Reply
  23. Pear_tree says:
    March 15, 2013 at 3:45 pm

    I think what the speaker meant is instead of “helping” with the vacuuming, it was his responsibility to ensure the vacuuming was done. She never had to mention it, nag, or do it herself because it wasn’t done. My ex and I did the cooking together, but he did not like doing any other chores. Nor did I really but someone has to do it.

    Reply
  24. starskita says:
    March 15, 2013 at 3:50 pm

    Cloudiah & Marie– Exactly! Periods aren’t always regular.

    After I got an ultrasound, it turned out I was more than 2 weeks farther along than I thought I was based on my average cycle.

    checking the charts… Yep, I found out I was pregnant at about 6 weeks (2 weeks after missed period for a 4-week standard cycle), and was surprised because I didn’t think I was late yet. (The constant nausea was what drove me to check it out)

    Also it turned out that I had had a CT scan 1 week after conception, because the pregnancy test came out negative that early. The fetus has the modal number of arms and legs though.

    Reply
  25. Gillian says:
    March 15, 2013 at 4:01 pm

    @starskita From the tenses involved, I’m inferring some congratulations are in order?

    Reply
  26. starskita says:
    March 15, 2013 at 4:11 pm

    @ Gillian

    20 weeks now 🙂 So far so good.

    Reply
  27. hellkell says:
    March 15, 2013 at 4:14 pm

    Some Gal: That article and study is awful. All of that could be filed under “well, no shit,” and how interesting that men who were adaptive had no success. Makes me wonder how this study was put together.

    Reply
  28. Baroncognito says:
    March 15, 2013 at 4:16 pm

    How does he jump from “If half the world’s countries and half the world’s corporations were run by females” to “if the world was run by females”?

    Does he assume that if the world was run by females they would still assign half of all the leadership jobs to men?

    Reply
  29. Some Gal Not Bored at All says:
    March 15, 2013 at 4:21 pm

    @hellkell

    Here is a NPR article discussing the different perceptions of men and women asking for a raise in exactly the same way and finding that women needed to ask in a differently, more traditionally feminine way to avoid being disliked.

    Here is a Washington Post piece discussing how when women follow the advice for men, the strategies that work for men, they did worse than women who didn’t follow that advice.

    Here is a CNN article discussing findings that men who did what they are supposed to did better than men who did not while women who did what men are supposed to didn’t do much better than women who didn’t.

    Reply
  30. Some Gal Not Bored at All says:
    March 15, 2013 at 4:23 pm

    @hellkell

    Yeah. I think it was so bad it broke my browser. 🙂 I think the study was desperate to find out what worked and found that, surprise surprise, the successful women are human beings! Which tells us nothing really.

    Reply
  31. hellkell says:
    March 15, 2013 at 4:29 pm

    I think I’m working for an unusual place because our CEO is relatively evolved for a man in the C suite. I think a large part of that is because he has a daughter–who yes, is a VP, but she can actually do the job and do it well–so he’s OK with promoting women who do a good job, not just those who kiss his ass.

    Our owner is a different story. He’s installed his asshole little brother, and holy shit is this guy walking insecurity, which to me makes him incredibly dangerous. Just what we need, some man child with an ego problem who needs constant coddling and validation.

    Reply
  32. Some Gal Not Bored at All says:
    March 15, 2013 at 4:30 pm

    For customer service jobs, I found a study (that I can re-find if anyone is interested) that showed it was the presence of a woman or POC that led to complaints. I don’t know what is in the actual study, but that makes me despair for humanity.

    Reply
  33. abuinge says:
    March 15, 2013 at 4:31 pm

    OK, um, I hate to break this to you, but that is an entirely correct use of the word “bastion”.

    Reply
  34. hellkell says:
    March 15, 2013 at 4:33 pm

    Some Gal: I bet that’s because assholes think they can complain and steamroll over a woman or POC to get their way.

    Reply
  35. Gillian says:
    March 15, 2013 at 4:34 pm

    @Some Gal I’d be interested, actually. Whenever I hear something like that, I tend to want to go to the study itself and see what it says. Then, when I need to rant about it, I have the details at hand!

    @hellkell My sympathies!

    Reply
  36. Marie says:
    March 15, 2013 at 4:37 pm

    @ some gal

    For customer service jobs, I found a study (that I can re-find if anyone is interested) that showed it was the presence of a woman or POC that led to complaints. I don’t know what is in the actual study, but that makes me despair for humanity

    gah. O_O

    Reply
  37. Marie says:
    March 15, 2013 at 4:37 pm

    whopsie. That last part was me *blushes*

    Reply
  38. Alex says:
    March 15, 2013 at 4:38 pm

    Regarding the ND ban, they have also made it illegal to have an abortion due to genetic anomalies with the fetus. They’re yammering about preventing eugenics, but the reality is that any reasonable person imagines that having an abortion due to a genetic anomaly with the fetus is nothing but heart wrenching, regardless of the outcome, and is not a decision made out of a desire to cleanse the human race but, rather, to minimize suffering. There are no exceptions or loopholes in the law, so even in cases of inevitably terminal diseases which result in short, pain filled lives, women are prevented from being able to choose what to do. That’s horrible, in my opinion. Some people will think it is right to continue the pregnancy and comfort the resulting infant during its life, others will think that an abortion is the more merciful option (or, let it not be overlooked, the only option they can afford), but it is something that the woman should be able to decide with the support and guidance of her doctors, family, and friends.
    The whole bill is a real ugly piece of work.

    Reply
  39. Some Gal Not Bored at All says:
    March 15, 2013 at 4:40 pm

    @hellkell

    The problem with trying to change workplace culture only or primarily through women pushing their way up is the women who get promoted are probably going to be those who most adhere to the culture, which doesn’t change a lot. Women are fully capable of discriminating against other women just like men are.

    Even without the studies, though, it just doesn’t seem like only telling women to change to fit workplace culture is a good long-term solution. It seems like rather than breaking down the gender binary and our assumptions about what good men and good women each are, we are sending the message that only stereotypically masculine qualities are valuable and stereotypically feminine ones are, if anything, just a little bonus that women bring to “male” jobs.

    Reply
  40. Some Gal Not Bored at All says:
    March 15, 2013 at 4:41 pm

    @Marie

    The blockquote monster got ya. (I “gah”ed too though, so it works.)

    Reply
  41. Marie says:
    March 15, 2013 at 4:45 pm

    I guess I should’ve known the blockquote monster would get me someday.

    Reply
  42. Gillian says:
    March 15, 2013 at 4:46 pm

    Okay, the comments on that CNN article are gag inducingly familiar.

    Reply
  43. hellkell says:
    March 15, 2013 at 4:47 pm

    The problem with trying to change workplace culture only or primarily through women pushing their way up is the women who get promoted are probably going to be those who most adhere to the culture, which doesn’t change a lot. Women are fully capable of discriminating against other women just like men are.

    That’s just about anyone in a corporate culture who gets promoted. And that last sentence was totally unecessary, IMHO.

    Reply
  44. cloudiah says:
    March 15, 2013 at 4:48 pm

    Congratulations starskita!

    Reply
  45. Neurite says:
    March 15, 2013 at 4:54 pm

    Some Gal, helkell: I believe there is a difference between (1) encouraging women to be ambitious and telling them that those who discourage them from being ambitious are sexist and holding them back, and (2) telling women “it is all your fault for not being more ambitious”. Of course, there is a fine line here, and it might be easy to fall from “encouraging women to be more ambitious” to sounding like one is blaming them for not being more ambitious. But I don’t believe that it is impossible to do the former without doing the latter, just as I believe it is possible to do the former while also calling out and trying to work against the many external factors that discourage women from, and punish women for, being ambitious and assertive.

    Reply
  46. Gillian says:
    March 15, 2013 at 4:55 pm

    @starskita Congratulations and best wishes!!

    Reply
  47. Some Gal Not Bored at All says:
    March 15, 2013 at 4:58 pm

    @hellkell

    I just mentioned it because a couple of the studies determined that women actually have a greater bias against assertive women than men do.* And, yes, it is true of most people who get promoted share the company culture, but that is why we should direct as much attention to forcing that to change as we do advising women to just be more assertive, and/or be more ambitious.

    *If true, this could mean that more women in charge might actually hurt women in the lower levels of a company more.

    Reply
  48. Some Gal Not Bored at All says:
    March 15, 2013 at 5:02 pm

    @starskita

    Congratulations! Yay for more mini Manboobzers. 🙂

    @hellkell

    Here is the race and gender study.

    Reply
  49. hellkell says:
    March 15, 2013 at 5:03 pm

    If true, this could mean that more women in charge might actually hurt women in the lower levels of a company more.

    As with most things, it depends on the individual. But, hey, thanks for giving the sexists more ammo with that line.

    Reply
  50. hellkell says:
    March 15, 2013 at 5:06 pm

    Study needs a subscription to read, it looks like.

    Reply
  1. Pages:
  2. «
  3. 1
  4. 2
  5. 3
  6. 4
  7. 5
  8. 6
  9. 7
  10. 8
  11. »

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Please read the comments policy before leaving a comment - thanks!

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Donate to the Mammoth!

We Hunted the Mammoth is an ad-free, reader-supported publication written and published by longtime journalist David Futrelle, who has been tracking, dissecting, and mocking the growing misogynistic backlash since 2010, exposing the hateful ideologies of Men’s Rights Activists, incels, alt-rightists and many others.

We depend on support from people like you. Please consider a donation or a monthly pledge by clicking below! there's no need for a PayPal account.

1
Send comments, questions, and tips for stories to me at dfutrelle@gmail.com, or by clicking here

Follow Me

  • View david.futrelle’s profile on Facebook
  • View DavidFutrelle’s profile on Twitter
  • View David Futrelle’s profile on YouTube
  • View David Futrelle’s profile on Google+

Subscribe via Email

Recent Posts

  • Jordan Peterson fans mansplain makeup: “You try to cheat men’s brains by presenting a more sexually attractive face than you really have”
  • Open thread to discuss the legacy and honor the victims of the École Polytechnique massacre
  • Banning abortion “is about making women scared to have more than one sexual partner,” Red Pill Redditor declares
  • I read this incel “field report” and now you have to, too
  • The Daily Stormer launches an attack on the female orgasm
  • Black athletes are turning white men into a cucked “third sex” by being better at sports, weirdo racist football fan argues
  • Where I’ve been
  • In the battle betwen John Wayne and Mr. Rogers it’s the gentler soul who’s winning
  • Amazon is promoting “racial hate crimes” with a new show featuring Nazi hunters as the heroes, professional mad guy One Angry Gamer declares
  • HE SAID THE THING! YouTube ranter Warcorpse666 thinks men deserve privilege because they hunted the you-know-what

Top Posts

  • The Daily Stormer launches an attack on the female orgasm
  • Jordan Peterson fans mansplain makeup: "You try to cheat men's brains by presenting a more sexually attractive face than you really have"
  • Banning abortion "is about making women scared to have more than one sexual partner," Red Pill Redditor declares
  • Open thread to discuss the legacy and honor the victims of the École Polytechnique massacre

Archives

My Twitter

Tweets by DavidFutrelle

Recent Comments

  • Buttercup Q. Skullpants December 8, 2019 at 6:27 am on Jordan Peterson fans mansplain makeup: “You try to cheat men’s brains by presenting a more sexually attractive face than you really have”
  • Kat, ambassador of the feminist government in exile December 8, 2019 at 5:20 am on Jordan Peterson fans mansplain makeup: “You try to cheat men’s brains by presenting a more sexually attractive face than you really have”
  • Kat, ambassador of the feminist government in exile December 8, 2019 at 5:07 am on Jordan Peterson fans mansplain makeup: “You try to cheat men’s brains by presenting a more sexually attractive face than you really have”
  • Kat, ambassador of the feminist government in exile December 8, 2019 at 5:03 am on Jordan Peterson fans mansplain makeup: “You try to cheat men’s brains by presenting a more sexually attractive face than you really have”
  • StarStorm December 8, 2019 at 2:49 am on I read this incel “field report” and now you have to, too
  • vaiyt December 8, 2019 at 2:30 am on Jordan Peterson fans mansplain makeup: “You try to cheat men’s brains by presenting a more sexually attractive face than you really have”
  • Definitely not Steve December 8, 2019 at 12:48 am on Jordan Peterson fans mansplain makeup: “You try to cheat men’s brains by presenting a more sexually attractive face than you really have”
  • Catalpa December 7, 2019 at 11:45 pm on Jordan Peterson fans mansplain makeup: “You try to cheat men’s brains by presenting a more sexually attractive face than you really have”

Random WHTM Posts!

  • Is the "Sarkeesian Effect" documentary just an elaborate practical joke? Take a look at the project's latest updateNovember 1, 2014
  • After video game tournament shooting, Reddit gamers are turning their anger towards … game journalistsAfter video game tournament shooting, Reddit gamers are turning their anger towards … game journalistsAugust 26, 2018
  • Hillary Clinton is pushing an insidious cat GIF agendaHillary Clinton is pushing an insidious cat GIF agendaOctober 14, 2016
  • News Quiz: What is the “one thing” American women are good for, according to Return of Kings?News Quiz: What is the “one thing” American women are good for, according to Return of Kings?July 23, 2015
  • Explosion, many deaths at Ariana Grande concert in Manchester: Open ThreadExplosion, many deaths at Ariana Grande concert in Manchester: Open ThreadMay 22, 2017

If You’re Being Harassed

  • Speak Up & Stay Safe(r)
  • Crash Override
  • DIY Feminist Cybersecurity
  • Without My Consent
  • 9 Ways to Dodge Trolls

Creep Watchers

  • Hail to the Gynocracy!
  • Right Wing Watch
  • Hate Watch (SPLC)
  • Media Matters
  • Fundies Say the Darndest Things
  • My Right Wing Dad
  • r/ShitRedditSays
  • r/GamerGhazi
  • r/TheBluePill
  • r/AgainstMensRights
  • r/CreepyPMs

Mammothy Fun

  • Official WHTM Welcome Package!
  • Artistry For Feminism. And Kittens.
  • A Voice for Pierre

Feed the Mammoth!

Keep this blog going by clicking on the link below! You don't even need a PayPal account.

Privacy & Cookies: This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this website, you agree to their use.
To find out more, including how to control cookies, see here: Cookie Policy
We Hunted The Mammoth | Copyright © 2019 All Rights Reserved
loading Cancel
Post was not sent - check your email addresses!
Email check failed, please try again
Sorry, your blog cannot share posts by email.
%d bloggers like this: