• Home
  • Comments Policy
  • About
    • Mammoth FAQ
    • David Futrelle FAQ
  • T-Shirts, etc.
  • WTF is a MGTOW? A Glossary
← The “Nice Guy” Who Raped and Strangled a Young Irish Woman
Our Misandrist Future? →

MRA lackwit declares Sheryl Sandberg an “arrogant Lindsay Lohan Look-a-like” who “promotes sexism, bias and hate.”

 March 15, 2013
  · 380 Comments
Separated at birth?

As hard as this is to believe, these are actually different women.

I haven’t been paying much attention to the recent brouhaha over Facebook COO Sheryl Sandberg’s new book.  But I feel safe in saying that MRA lackwit Christian J.’s “Sheryl Sandberg, Your Usual “Modern” Crass, Arrogant, Sexist, Biased Female” may be the dumbest thing anyone has written, or ever will write, on the subject.

Mr J’s post on WMASAW – the blog that used to be called What Men Are Saying About Women – starts off with a puzzling description of Sandberg as an “arrogant Lindsay Lohan Look-a-like, [who] Promotes sexism, bias and hate.” (Um, what?) And it only gets worse from there:

It is amazing what these sexist and abusive, addled females get away with while they continually praise themselves and raise themselves as being the “Saviours” of the world with the “If Only Women ran the World” meme. Take Sandberg for example, the bastion of that left-wing mentality … .

Yes, that’s right. Mr. J is describing Sandberg as a “bastion” of left-wing thought. Mr. J and the English language are not good friends.

They make the claim that “Equality” is about the aim of making women level with men, erm! level suggests what?  In every area possible,  even if it means reducing standards and tests and lowering anything that women have problems with. …

Every time they make the same claim that (Lindsay Lohan Look-a-Like)Sandberg bloviates about here, like every other member of that same HATE movement, it was never about anything else but giving women a FREE ride to the top and don’t anyone every dare hold them back because there would be screaming and wailing and it would be introduce another excuse to cry that usual lie of “holding them back”, amazing.

In reality, it’s because job placement used to be based on merit and ability, even though that has been tossed out and replaced with quotas in favour of women. It has everything to do with sexism, v*gina and pro-female “Equal Opportunity” as Sandberg denies is the case. ….

What a sexist loathsome, despicable female.

Mr J. then quotes a couple of not-exactly earthshatteringly controversial comments of Sandberg’s:

“I think a world that was run where half our countries and half our companies were run by women, would be a better world.”

“I hope that . . . you have the ambition to run the world,” Sandberg told Barnard graduates, “because this world needs you to run it.”

As Mr. J figures it, Sandberg is promulgating female supremacy here, “saying that every females alive could out perform any male. Sickening, petty, self-congratulatory, back-slapping and wishful thinking or what !”

I choose “what.”  (They speak English in What?)

Mr J, for his part, seems to believe that, in an inversion of the the man-hatred he attributes to feminists, every male alive could outperform any female:

As far as I can see so far, those countries that have women in charge, are not doing that crash hot at all. …

Yet this odious and tedious Sandberg has the temerity to state that the world would be a better place run by women. What a complete, compulsive liar that women really is, women these days have problems being genuine and real, let alone anything else. But it does demonstrate that standard egotistical side of these “New Women”, who have been granted the easy option and helped along the way, every way possible by compliant men. Do they get any thanks for it, forget that. They just get the knife in the back for their efforts and gloat, even after changing conditions, being sued, forced to comply to changes that women demand and then turn around and state “Look at me, I am so good” .

Was that last sentence even a sentence? If so, please diagram it for me. I dare ya!

What hypocrites they are. It is about time men stopped capitulating to these arrogant and narcissistic females, stopped giving them automatic promotions, a free ride and start giving them some competition and let’s see how well they go then.

It’s always funny when blithering idiots suggest that women’s brains are inferior to their own.

Share this:

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Reddit
  • Tumblr
  • Email
  • More
  • Google
  • Pinterest
  • LinkedIn
  • Pocket
  • Print

Like this:

Like Loading...

Related

Posted in: antifeminism, evil women, imaginary backwards land, imaginary oppression, incoherent rage, men who should not ever be with women ever, misogyny, MRA, oppressed men, playing the victim, vaginas
← The “Nice Guy” Who Raped and Strangled a Young Irish Woman
Our Misandrist Future? →

Comments

Please read the comments policy before leaving a comment - thanks!

  1. Pages:
  2. «
  3. 1
  4. 2
  5. 3
  6. 4
  7. 5
  8. 6
  9. 7
  10. 8
  1. Some Gal Not Bored at All says:
    March 17, 2013 at 2:26 am

    @The Kittehs’

    I read a couple of his comments when the big prostitution fight was going on at Feministe and you and Bagelsan (?) were talking about it here and my curiousity got the better of me.

    He was a weirdie! It seemed a little put on to me, but it was hard to tell for sure.

    Reply
  2. Some Gal Not Bored at All says:
    March 17, 2013 at 2:28 am

    @CassandraSays

    As long as my male models arrive, I think I can keep my jealousy in check. 😉

    Reply
  3. The Kittehs' Unpaid Help says:
    March 17, 2013 at 2:29 am

    I now suspect the Easter Bunny is really BIG BUNNY from The Goodies.

    Reply
  4. The Kittehs' Unpaid Help says:
    March 17, 2013 at 2:31 am

    Or possibly General Woundwort.

    Reply
  5. Argenti Aertheri says:
    March 17, 2013 at 2:46 am

    I may have to complain about inhaling poor innocent rodents. Can’t you eat crickets or something like my brother’s bearded dragons?

    Funny thing, they live with his “co-owner”/not-boyfriend…who’s place he stays at, without a spare bed…I’m not sure whether to believe the “we’re just friends” or press the “dude, I don’t care” line. Either way, bearded dragons, eat bugs, live not-here because my mother is only okay with creatures who’s food can’t run away.

    And it might’ve been Jane Fonda, definitely one of those actresses who’s done fuck all in my lifetime (no disrespect or anything, just not anyone I’ve ever paid attention to, certainly not as a feminist overlady!)

    Reply
  6. CassandraSays says:
    March 17, 2013 at 2:54 am

    You’d think he could at least pick a more current feminist actress, like Ashley Judd.

    Reply
  7. The Kittehs' Unpaid Help says:
    March 17, 2013 at 2:54 am

    Some Gal – I’d thought it was Cassnandra who’d mentioned him (obviously wrong there), but yeah, I think it might have been Bagelsan. I don’t comment much at Feministe, but it’s a handy spot to do a bit of Read My Blog stuff on occasion.

    Tomek is decidedly strange, and yeah, I can never figure out whether he’s putting it on or not.

    Reply
  8. hellkell says:
    March 17, 2013 at 9:23 am

    I can’t tell if Tomek is performance art or what. The comment section over there is… a rage-inducing clusterfuck most times.

    Reply
  9. pillow in hell says:
    March 17, 2013 at 9:49 am

    Well, sometimes the comment section on feministe is a clusterfuck because Jill wants to hold forth on things she doesn’t want to do/know about/really stopped to consider herself.

    If I hear one more “choose your choice feminists” comment from jill I’m really going to lose it.

    Reply
  10. hellkell says:
    March 17, 2013 at 9:53 am

    That is true. I get her frustration with “choose my choice” thing, but she does go about it rather ham-handedly.

    But there are also people there who seem to exist on oxygen and moral outrage and can’t WAIT to be offended.

    Reply
  11. pillow in hell says:
    March 17, 2013 at 9:59 am

    Hellkell, true enough.

    It would be nice if people there were somewhat more open to realizing that not all feminists have had the opportunity to read every feminist thought ever, and that everyone has to make the best decision they can based on their particular circumstances. What grinds my teeth is that Jill is ready to make this allowance for herself and a few others (who’s particular situation she’s familiar with) but not to every woman.

    I’m willing to grant that Jill is only human, I just wish that sometimes she left certain articles to people better able to handle them.

    How many threads now have ended in flames?

    Reply
  12. hellkell says:
    March 17, 2013 at 10:07 am

    Seems like all threads lately. I totally agree with what you’re saying.

    Reply
  13. Argenti Aertheri says:
    March 17, 2013 at 10:10 am

    So I googled “choose my choice feminism” cuz I can never remember if the problem is that some feminists make choices that are not just teeming with feminist ideals…or that the people who think that makes sense are assholes.

    Ozy wins the internet — http://ozyfrantz.com/2013/02/14/why-im-a-choice-feminist/

    Reply
  14. pillow in hell says:
    March 17, 2013 at 10:15 am

    The part that does bother me about “chose my choice” is not that the women make a particular choice, but that society makes it almost impossible for a woman to make a choice without being disporportionately penalized and judged (often wrongly about what motivated the choice) for it. And that even the most aware feminist is forced to uphold certain parts of patriarchy, though that was never the intention.

    The fact that women feel more free to make their own decisions, and that often they don’t give a damn about what other people think of it is to be celebrated as a step in the right direction.

    Reply
  15. Diogenes The Cynic says:
    March 17, 2013 at 10:28 am

    Sandberg is brilliant, but her interview on NPR was terribly obnoxious.

    http://www.npr.org/2013/03/11/173740524/lean-in-facebooks-sheryl-sandberg-explains-whats-holding-women-back

    This is almost ver batim what was said.

    Reply
  16. Argenti Aertheri says:
    March 17, 2013 at 10:45 am

    Hey Diogenes, pop over to the more active thread, Virgil might like to hear your thoughts on blowjobs. Note: do not go off about blowjobs here, so over there and reply to the topic. Please and thank you.

    Reply
  17. CassandraSays says:
    March 17, 2013 at 2:34 pm

    There are Feministe threads that don’t end up being giant clusterfucks?

    Reply
  18. Gillian says:
    March 17, 2013 at 3:08 pm

    @Kittehs

    Sometimes I think the commenters at Feministe need a massive humour injection. It does go toxic often enough.

    Amen, sister, preach it!

    I spent a goodly amount of time lurking there (and here) and a few other places where I’ve also seen your avatar. The posts there are often interesting and thought provoking, but it bogs down in identity politics quite quickly for my tastes. That’s not to say there aren’t smart commenters who post interesting responses, but I’ve grown quite disillusioned at the amount of ‘your privilege is worse than mine’ and ‘your opinion is oppressing me and killing women’ that seems to go on.

    Oh, and tomek is the smelliest and most stale of all the socks…

    Reply
  19. Diogenes The Cynic says:
    March 17, 2013 at 4:24 pm

    Argenti, done.

    Never thought my input would be valued here.

    Reply
  20. The Kittehs' Unpaid Help says:
    March 17, 2013 at 5:38 pm

    Marie – you got it! Identity politics is all the rage (pun intended) over there. One word out of place and it’s a bloody dogpile. Plus so many of them seem to have NO grasp of reading sarcasm or irony in a comment – I know it’s harder to do with written comments from someone you don’t know, but the number of times I’ve seen regulars slammed for what was so freaking obviously sarcasm or irony is unbelievable. And some of the regulars there play Oppression Olympics all the bloody time. It gets tedious, which is why I don’t comment that much (also it has a touch of US = the world – I know it’s a US blog mostly looking at US issues, but fuck, it gets wearisome in the comments).

    Hmm, I must check and see if tomek has got his head around the not-reincarnated concept yet … heheheh. I felt like throwing that blog post into the open thread partly ’cause tigtog was doing it (she’s an Aussie involved with Hoyden About Town, an Oz feminist blog) and partly because I got the feeling it might piss some of the more anti-religious types there off. For all the language squabbles, Feministe doesn’t strike me as being as happy to have a mix of beliefs as this blog.

    Reply
  21. hellkell says:
    March 17, 2013 at 5:54 pm

    Never thought my input would be valued here.

    Was that your idea of input? You half-assed it when someone WANTED you to participate.

    Reply
  22. drashizu says:
    March 17, 2013 at 6:28 pm

    Diogenes, I am very disappointed that you couldn’t drum up a bit more in the Virgil thread. I was reading with bated breath to know what you were going to say, but you didn’t even answer your own rhetorical question. I suppose Virgil’s embanment prevented him from taking the bait, but you could at least have laid out your methods of detecting his socioeconomic status via the Internet for those of us playing at home.

    (In the other thread, naturally.)

    (More) on-topic, Argenti, thanks for the link to Ozy’s blog. I always love finding myself there, and that post especially was good for clarifying a lot of what I think about choice feminism in my own head.

    Reply
  23. The Kittehs' Unpaid Help says:
    March 17, 2013 at 6:46 pm

    Ditto on thanks for the link, Argenti – I enjoyed Ozy’s article a lot. Gods, the shitift that went on at Feministe over the names business! And one commenter on Ozy’s doing the same old, same old “Marriage sux and you shouldn’t do it!” while completely ignoring the point that marriage is different things for different people, especially where matters of race or sexuality intersect.

    I mean (ignore if you don’t want to read a ME example) I have the privilege of not marrying; I have the choice, it’s not barred to me and my race would not get me branded in the US if I lived there (afaik it’s not the same here). I’d never intended to marry anyone, even if Mr K hadn’t been in the picture. But there is something special for us about being married vs being lovers, and if that were reflected in material matters, it would be nobody else’s damn business to tell me I’m caving in to the patriarchy. I know what marriage has been and is still in many instances, but that does not wipe out the personal significance, however culturally ingrained it is.

    (Did that make any sense?)

    Reply
  24. Argenti Aertheri says:
    March 17, 2013 at 6:59 pm

    “(Did that make any sense?)”

    Yeah, I knew a pair of gay men who had a lovely private ceremony instead of getting legally married, because of their views in the institution of marriage — their families are both totally cool about it though, so things like hospital visitation will probably never matter. Still, I get that being able to marry is actually a privilege for some (many?) couples.

    And no problem on the link, I wish Ozy still posted in these parts!

    Reply
  25. The Kittehs' Unpaid Help says:
    March 17, 2013 at 7:15 pm

    That’s the first time I’ve managed to read her blog. Every time I’ve tried it says I have to log in and I can’t get any further.

    Reply
  26. joanimal says:
    March 17, 2013 at 7:30 pm

    “(Did that make any sense?)”

    Yes, it did.

    My wife and I married after living with each other for 15 years. We did it for the medical insurance coverage. I was surprised by how I felt afterwards. A public declaration of how I felt about her became very special to me.

    She, on the other hand, took ten years before she stopped calling me her “ball and chain”… crazy hippie. 😉

    Reply
  27. Argenti Aertheri says:
    March 17, 2013 at 7:34 pm

    Zir blog, and that’s too bad, zie’s rather brilliant.

    Reply
  28. The Kittehs' Unpaid Help says:
    March 17, 2013 at 7:50 pm

    Whoops! My bad, I forgot Ozy’s preferred pronoun. (Apologies if you see this, Ozy!)

    joanimal – LOL to your hippie wife! 😀

    I seriously don’t know if Sir and I would marry were he on this plane, though I expect so, if only for tax breaks, welfare, pensions and so on. It’s a good thing we never had to organise it, since bein’ organised is not our strong point. He started thinking of us as married months before I did; then months later we had a sort of “Hey, look, we’re married!” shindig at Home, then months after that he proposed, and a couple of weeks ago (we’ve been married six-years-come-April-by-his-count) I got an engagement ring from a friend. 😛

    Reply
  29. howardbann1ster says:
    March 18, 2013 at 8:00 am

    @Kitteh: hey, if you’re following David’s link to Ozy’s blog, that’s the problem; he never updated the link, so that’s to an out-dated blog. (ozyfrantz.com vs. ozymandius3) Bookmark the new one!

    Reply
  30. The Kittehs' Unpaid Help says:
    March 18, 2013 at 2:10 pm

    Yay! Thanks, Howard!

    Reply
  1. Pages:
  2. «
  3. 1
  4. 2
  5. 3
  6. 4
  7. 5
  8. 6
  9. 7
  10. 8

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Please read the comments policy before leaving a comment - thanks!

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Donate to the Mammoth!

We Hunted the Mammoth is an ad-free, reader-supported publication written and published by longtime journalist David Futrelle, who has been tracking, dissecting, and mocking the growing misogynistic backlash since 2010, exposing the hateful ideologies of Men’s Rights Activists, incels, alt-rightists and many others.

We depend on support from people like you. Please consider a donation or a monthly pledge by clicking below! there's no need for a PayPal account.

1
Send comments, questions, and tips for stories to me at dfutrelle@gmail.com, or by clicking here

Follow Me

  • View david.futrelle’s profile on Facebook
  • View DavidFutrelle’s profile on Twitter
  • View David Futrelle’s profile on YouTube
  • View David Futrelle’s profile on Google+

Subscribe via Email

Recent Posts

  • Stefan Molyneux grossed us all out with his comments on Taylor Swift’s eggs. But he’s been obsessed with ovulation for a long time.
  • Nazis, Yes; Tiddies, No: Gab launches “cultural revolution” against porn and lust
  • MRAs: What do feminists do for men? ALSO MRAs: Why should men care about women?
  • Jordan Peterson fans mansplain makeup: “You try to cheat men’s brains by presenting a more sexually attractive face than you really have”
  • Open thread to discuss the legacy and honor the victims of the École Polytechnique massacre
  • Banning abortion “is about making women scared to have more than one sexual partner,” Red Pill Redditor declares
  • I read this incel “field report” and now you have to, too
  • The Daily Stormer launches an attack on the female orgasm
  • Black athletes are turning white men into a cucked “third sex” by being better at sports, weirdo racist football fan argues
  • Where I’ve been

Top Posts

  • Nazis, Yes; Tiddies, No: Gab launches "cultural revolution" against porn and lust
  • Stefan Molyneux grossed us all out with his comments on Taylor Swift's eggs. But he's been obsessed with ovulation for a long time.
  • MRAs: What do feminists do for men? ALSO MRAs: Why should men care about women?
  • Jordan Peterson fans mansplain makeup: "You try to cheat men's brains by presenting a more sexually attractive face than you really have"

Archives

My Twitter

Tweets by DavidFutrelle

Recent Comments

  • Ohlmann December 11, 2019 at 8:25 am on Stefan Molyneux grossed us all out with his comments on Taylor Swift’s eggs. But he’s been obsessed with ovulation for a long time.
  • happy cat December 11, 2019 at 8:15 am on Stefan Molyneux grossed us all out with his comments on Taylor Swift’s eggs. But he’s been obsessed with ovulation for a long time.
  • weirwoodtreehugger: chief manatee December 11, 2019 at 8:10 am on Stefan Molyneux grossed us all out with his comments on Taylor Swift’s eggs. But he’s been obsessed with ovulation for a long time.
  • Dormousing_it December 11, 2019 at 7:01 am on Stefan Molyneux grossed us all out with his comments on Taylor Swift’s eggs. But he’s been obsessed with ovulation for a long time.
  • Buttercup Q. Skullpants December 11, 2019 at 6:45 am on Stefan Molyneux grossed us all out with his comments on Taylor Swift’s eggs. But he’s been obsessed with ovulation for a long time.
  • Shadowplay December 11, 2019 at 6:27 am on Stefan Molyneux grossed us all out with his comments on Taylor Swift’s eggs. But he’s been obsessed with ovulation for a long time.
  • Prith kDar December 11, 2019 at 4:58 am on Stefan Molyneux grossed us all out with his comments on Taylor Swift’s eggs. But he’s been obsessed with ovulation for a long time.
  • Naglfar December 11, 2019 at 4:48 am on Stefan Molyneux grossed us all out with his comments on Taylor Swift’s eggs. But he’s been obsessed with ovulation for a long time.

Random WHTM Posts!

  • Just some dudes who think a lady-only Wonder Woman showing makes them Rosa ParksJust some dudes who think a lady-only Wonder Woman showing makes them Rosa ParksMay 28, 2017
  • Heartiste: Funny like a clownHeartiste: Funny like a clownJuly 12, 2012
  • Donald Trump: Not guilty of rape by reason of polling better than Jeb Bush?Donald Trump: Not guilty of rape by reason of polling better than Jeb Bush?July 28, 2015
  • Mr. Smallestpenisever the MGTOW demands: SHOW ME THE EFFORT CHICKENS!Mr. Smallestpenisever the MGTOW demands: SHOW ME THE EFFORT CHICKENS!November 25, 2016
  • Alternate Open ThreadAlternate Open ThreadNovember 14, 2015

If You’re Being Harassed

  • Speak Up & Stay Safe(r)
  • Crash Override
  • DIY Feminist Cybersecurity
  • Without My Consent
  • 9 Ways to Dodge Trolls

Creep Watchers

  • Hail to the Gynocracy!
  • Right Wing Watch
  • Hate Watch (SPLC)
  • Media Matters
  • Fundies Say the Darndest Things
  • My Right Wing Dad
  • r/ShitRedditSays
  • r/GamerGhazi
  • r/TheBluePill
  • r/AgainstMensRights
  • r/CreepyPMs

Mammothy Fun

  • Official WHTM Welcome Package!
  • Artistry For Feminism. And Kittens.
  • A Voice for Pierre

Feed the Mammoth!

Keep this blog going by clicking on the link below! You don't even need a PayPal account.

Privacy & Cookies: This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this website, you agree to their use.
To find out more, including how to control cookies, see here: Cookie Policy
We Hunted The Mammoth | Copyright © 2019 All Rights Reserved
loading Cancel
Post was not sent - check your email addresses!
Email check failed, please try again
Sorry, your blog cannot share posts by email.
%d bloggers like this: