whtmheader4

  • Home
  • Comments Policy
  • About
    • Mammoth FAQ
    • David Futrelle FAQ
  • T-Shirts, etc.
  • WTF is a MGTOW? A Glossary
← Ann Barnhardt, contemporary anti-suffragette: “As soon as the 19th amendment was passed, men were effectively castrated, and in many, many cases disenfranchised by their wives.”
Complementarian Loner: “Due to their lame, banal talking, [women] show they are only good for sex.” So online sexual harassment of women is just peachy! →

The Man Boobz Street Team Flying Squad goes on a postering blitz!

 September 5, 2012
  · 85 Comments

Sorry to post so late today, but I’ve been super busy helping to coordinate the Man Boobz Street Team Flying Squad in its latest postering blitz. Here are some shots of the team at work in Cleveland, Ohio and Humpy Creek, Alaska.

 

 

And here’s the Man Boobz Misandrymobile we use to transport Street Team members to and from their targets. Don’t worry! As you can see, it’s driven by a man. (You know what they say about women drivers.)

 

 

Keep up the good work, gals!

NOTE: The Man Boobz Street Team Flying Squad is imaginary.

 

 

Share this:

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Reddit
  • Tumblr
  • Email
  • More
  • Google
  • Pinterest
  • LinkedIn
  • Pocket
  • Print

Like this:

Like Loading...

Related

Posted in: I am making a joke, shit that never happened
← Ann Barnhardt, contemporary anti-suffragette: “As soon as the 19th amendment was passed, men were effectively castrated, and in many, many cases disenfranchised by their wives.”
Complementarian Loner: “Due to their lame, banal talking, [women] show they are only good for sex.” So online sexual harassment of women is just peachy! →

Comments

Please read the comments policy before leaving a comment - thanks!

  1. Pages:
  2. «
  3. 1
  4. 2
  1. Major Kong says:
    September 6, 2012 at 11:16 am

    : WWI airplanes are TEH AWESOME, except that the open cockpit and proximity to the engines means that the crew was freezing and deafened. I’d like to fly one, but I’d be glad when it was over.

    WWI airplanes were rather unstable. If you were flying something even from the 1940s, if you took your hands off the controls the plane would keep going more or less in the direction it was pointed.

    Try that in something like a Sopwith Camel and it would immediately depart controlled flight.

    Even von Richthofen crashed 2 or 3 of them while taking off and landing.

    Reply
  2. howardbann1ster says:
    September 6, 2012 at 11:16 am

    fwiw what i meant was that there seems like a lot of obvious and not-so-obvious social factors that would easily explain differing levels of engagement in the political process and that’s almost certainly a better fit than ‘girls have cooties’

    Yes, that. Plus, they outscored men on some questions, but on others appeared much less engaged. The question of why some politics interest men more than women or vice versa seems kind of interesting to me.

    And some of the questions where they scored lower… I’m not sure that the answer marked as correct is actually correct. Obama never really came out for gay marriage… Joe Biden kinda-sorta frog-marched him out there. Is that a distinction without a difference? Maybe. Maybe not. It’s simplifying something complex. To suggest that the women who didn’t identify him as pro-gay-marriage were wrong… well.

    Plus, as I think about it, the pro-life question… I need to know how many called Obama pro-life vs. how many thought that Mitt Romney isn’t, based on his flip-flopping.

    Which is not to take away from the socialization point. I know people who literally say ‘just vote how your husband tells you to vote, poor dear.’ That kind of attitude is going to lead to all kinds of problems.

    Reply
  3. howardbann1ster says:
    September 6, 2012 at 11:18 am

    @Kendra: well, Rehnquist was chief justice for about the last decade, the longest-serving chief justice in a long, long time. But, of course, I expect everybody to know John Roberts is chief justice now, because since being chief justice his biggest accomplishment has been Citizen’s United, and I expect everybody to share my white-hot fury.

    Reply
  4. howardbann1ster says:
    September 6, 2012 at 11:19 am

    *last two decades, rather.

    Reply
  5. blitzgal says:
    September 6, 2012 at 11:24 am

    I’m not sure that the answer marked as correct is actually correct. Obama never really came out for gay marriage… Joe Biden kinda-sorta frog-marched him out there.

    Yeah, for that one you have to go by his most recent evolution on the topic. His previous stance was that he was not in favor of gay marriage, but also against a constitutional amendment that banned it.

    Reply
  6. cloudiah says:
    September 6, 2012 at 11:37 am

    @blitzgal, That LA Times story has had me reeling. Especially in light of this r/mr thread yesterday. Worst comments have now been deleted, but yesterday some of the most upvoted comments were from guys fantasizing about locking their ex-wives/girlfriends + their new boyfriends into a house and burning it down, and then downvoting and attacking anyone who said that violence was wrong.

    I saved screen caps of some of the worst ones.

    Reply
  7. ostara321 says:
    September 6, 2012 at 11:41 am

    Omitted facts:
    1) He’s quite wealthy
    2) She said yes

    This matters, why? It doesn’t make the stunt he pulled any less coercive or full to bursting with abuser logic. Decent people want their partners to be happy. They don’t want them to “realise how empty her life would be without me and how life would have no meaning without me”

    That’s from the article champ. Yeah, guy sounds like a real catch. It’s not creepy at all that he wants her to have nothing to live for without him.

    Reply
  8. blitzgal says:
    September 6, 2012 at 11:45 am

    Worst comments have now been deleted, but yesterday some of the most upvoted comments were from guys fantasizing about locking their ex-wives/girlfriends + their new boyfriends into a house and burning it down, and then downvoting and attacking anyone who said that violence was wrong.

    Let’s link that every time another troll comes in here to complain about Sharon Osborne.

    Reply
  9. Falconer says:
    September 6, 2012 at 11:49 am

    WWI airplanes were rather unstable. If you were flying something even from the 1940s, if you took your hands off the controls the plane would keep going more or less in the direction it was pointed.

    Try that in something like a Sopwith Camel and it would immediately depart controlled flight.

    Well, yeah, probably had something to do with the giant spinning gyroscope mounted directly in front of the Camel pilot, known as a rotary engine. Even in controlled flight, the pilot would have to fight the Camel to get it to turn left, but it would whip right round in a right-hand turn. Helicopters have counter-rotating blades or tail blades to counter their torque; rotary-engined crates didn’t, although there were some experiments with two propellors before the war.

    By contrast to the Camel, the SE5a had a reputation as a very stable gun platform. It had an inline engine. Similarly, inline-engined Albatroses and Fokkers were stable, and though they couldn’t win a turning battle against Nieuports and Sopwiths, they were faster and could climb better.

    I am a Nerd of Many Subjects.

    Reply
  10. cloudiah says:
    September 6, 2012 at 11:52 am

    Screen cap #1:
    Screen cap #2:

    I could go on…

    Reply
  11. Falconer says:
    September 6, 2012 at 11:52 am

    And some of the questions where they scored lower… I’m not sure that the answer marked as correct is actually correct. Obama never really came out for gay marriage… Joe Biden kinda-sorta frog-marched him out there. Is that a distinction without a difference? Maybe. Maybe not. It’s simplifying something complex. To suggest that the women who didn’t identify him as pro-gay-marriage were wrong… well.

    Yeah, I answered that question “Obama” and as the next question loaded in, I thought, hey wait, isn’t he in favor of separate-but-equal “civil unions?” And then I remembered that he Came To Jesus about marriage equality a few months ago, and everybody was saying, why weren’t you in favor of it years ago?

    But the one I got wrong was, I thought the Rs had both branches of Congress.

    Reply
  12. Falconer says:
    September 6, 2012 at 11:55 am

    @Kendra: well, Rehnquist was chief justice for about the last decade, the longest-serving chief justice in a long, long time. But, of course, I expect everybody to know John Roberts is chief justice now, because since being chief justice his biggest accomplishment has been Citizen’s United, and I expect everybody to share my white-hot fury.

    I remember thinking at the time, wait, shouldn’t Chief Justice go to the Justice with seniority? But no, I guess the Prez can appoint any ass-kisser xie wants to, to be Chief Justice. Also, Chief Justice is a position with less authority than I thought.

    But yeah, Citizens United. Fuck ’em.

    Reply
  13. Gametime says:
    September 6, 2012 at 11:57 am

    Hamster Rule #54: when a logical conclusion is unpleasant, Occam’s Razor = “lazy reasoning.”

    Tiresome troll rule #6: “Occam’s Razor” means that plurality must never be posited without necessity, unless the plurality is the plurality of ways in which women are terrible because we all know those hypergamous wenches can’t be trusted to vote, amirite?

    Reply
  14. Linds says:
    September 6, 2012 at 12:09 pm

    Yeah, I got them all right but had the same reservations as a lot of the other commentors RE: both Romney and Obama changing positions on things.

    The one I was most likely to have gotten wrong was that I knew the Rs were the majority in one but not the other Congressional groups, but couldn’t remember which one.

    FTR, the only reason I know about Roberts is that I spend a ton of time on SCOTUSblog, which is a truly fascinating website, even if they tend to sometimes lapse into lawyertalk.

    Reply
  15. David Futrelle says:
    September 6, 2012 at 12:12 pm

    Cloudiah, could you send me your screencaps? I missed the worst of the comments in that thread.

    Reply
  16. Amnesia says:
    September 6, 2012 at 12:14 pm

    What I wonder about that test is the scores of liberals compared to conservatives compared to independents, etc. Or how college educated men compared to college educated women.

    I also got 11 out of 11. Not to brag or anything, I’d imagine just about any non-troll USian regular or lurker of Manboobz would score above the average.

    Reply
  17. jennydevildoll says:
    September 6, 2012 at 12:34 pm

    I love that the suffragettes in the first photo are pasting over an ad for some movie lauding The Crusades. And as a historical/economical side note it’s also amusing how that poster boasts “$5000 production”, no doubt very opulent back THEN…

    Reply
  18. Sharculese says:
    September 6, 2012 at 12:44 pm

    I’d imagine just about any non-troll USian regular or lurker of Manboobz would score above the average.

    owlslave on the other hand was flummoxed by his inability to pick ‘rothchild’ as an answer

    Reply
  19. blitzgal says:
    September 6, 2012 at 12:48 pm

    Hey, where is our fuzzy mascot these days, anyway?

    Reply
  20. cloudiah says:
    September 6, 2012 at 12:51 pm

    Sent, David. There are like 200 more comments since the last time I checked; I don’t have the stomach to look at any more. Something about reading that in juxtaposition with the LA Times story blitzgal posted seems to have blown one of my fuses.

    Reply
  21. Falconer says:
    September 6, 2012 at 12:53 pm

    “THE CRUSADERS, or, JERUSALEM DELIVERED

    THE WORLD’S GREATEST MOVING PICTURE”

    LOL. Yeah, people are still talking about that one 9_9

    Reply
  22. pecunium says:
    September 6, 2012 at 1:03 pm

    Irrelevant facts:

    Omitted facts:
    1) He’s quite wealthy
    2) She said yes

    He’s an asshole. He’s a bigger asshole than the people (I’ve seen women do it too) who “merely” make a really over the top proposal in a public place, but he’s still an asshole.

    Reply
  23. pecunium says:
    September 6, 2012 at 1:22 pm

    Fighter planes are, at best marginally unstable. Some (the F-100) were known as ‘active flyers” because they couldn’t keep level without constant input (the B-2 and the F-117 are both so unstable that if the computers adjusting the flight fail they crash). The Brewster Buffalo (Australian “Whirraway”) was notoriously unstable, and in the US was limited to being an advanced trainer (the Aussies tried to use it as an actual fighter, it didn’t last long).

    Rotary planes were dueced hard to keep steady, in part because they only had one speed for the motor, and that motor was spinning around the axle.

    The B-24 had something of the same problem, in that all four of it’s motors rotated in the same direction (the other bombers all had counter-rotating engines). The P-38 was counter rotating, in the US versions, but the British versions were right-hand rotation, so that they didn’t need two supply lines to keep them running.

    But things like the Fokker DVII, or the Taube, were very stable. Inline engines, not rotary. On the flip side both the Albatross and the Nieuport were infamous for losing the upper wing in a dive.

    Reply
  24. Falconer says:
    September 6, 2012 at 1:33 pm

    Whup, forgot about the whole wings fall off, all die situation.

    Reply
  25. blitzgal says:
    September 6, 2012 at 1:56 pm

    He’s an asshole. He’s a bigger asshole than the people (I’ve seen women do it too) who “merely” make a really over the top proposal in a public place, but he’s still an asshole.

    But you are clearly ignoring the fact that this is PROOF that EVERY SINGLE WOMAN IN THE WORLD is hypergamous. DUH!!!!

    /sarcasm

    Reply
  26. pecunium says:
    September 6, 2012 at 2:04 pm

    Falconer: Still better than submarines. What goes up must come down… the reverse is not the case.

    Reply
  27. pecunium says:
    September 6, 2012 at 2:18 pm

    Falconer: A talented Chief Justice can use the small perks of the office to great effect.

    1: The Chief Justice always votes last.
    2: The senior justice on the side chooses who writes the opinion.
    3: The Chief Justice is, de jure always senior.

    As a result the Chief Justice can, in a tie, side with one side or the other to set the initial decision (the actual decision isn’t final until it’s issued from the bench. There have been reversals).

    More to the point, by siding with a win for the position the Cheif doesn’t share who writes the opinion can be handed to the person the Chief thinks most likely to write a narrow ruling.

    Reply
  28. Falconer says:
    September 6, 2012 at 2:44 pm

    @Pecunium — Yeah, come to think of it, I’m not sure which I would freak out over more: being up high and looking at all the down I could fall on, or being surrounding by tons and tons of crushing water.

    Reply
  29. Major Kong says:
    September 6, 2012 at 4:14 pm

    @Pecunium

    If you can find a (used) copy of it, you might enjoy Frank Talmann’s book Flying the Old Planes. He was a famous Hollywood stunt pilot who logged a lot of hours in WWI and WWII aircraft.

    Reply
  30. pecunium says:
    September 6, 2012 at 11:01 pm

    Major Kong: I might look it up. I’ve read a lot of memoirs of WW1/2 pilots. Scary, and thrilling, stuff.

    The most amazing snippit I got was about the lubrication; it was castor oil, and the fumes gave them the runs. Apparently brandy helped combat it.

    Falconer: Parachutes.

    Reply
  31. katz says:
    September 7, 2012 at 6:06 pm

    Zanana: I listened to Transatlantic. What a neat story!

    Reply
  32. Magpie says:
    September 8, 2012 at 2:16 am

    Magpie bro collects books about planes. My favourite title: “Submarine Aircraft” 🙂

    Reply
  33. (Sic) Male says:
    September 9, 2012 at 7:16 pm

    Hi, I’m a typical Manboobz supporter & I don’t know the difference between the Suffragettes & the Suffragists, so I’ll look at old photos of women putting up posters with “Votes For Women” on them & assume “it’s all good”, not realising that the Suffragettes were a middle class movement opposed to working class women ( oh yeah and working class men, but hey they don’t count right? ) having the vote. Hey, but they’re women right? So “it’s all good”.

    Reply
  34. Myoo says:
    September 10, 2012 at 7:13 am

    @(Sic) Male
    a) [citation needed]

    b)from what I understand the difference between Suffragette and Suffragist is that Sufragettes were women working to get voting rights for women, while suffragist is a more general term that could apply to men as well.

    c)even if we assume that your definition is true, how do you know the women in the photos are Suffragettes and not Suffragists?

    Reply
  35. ithiliana says:
    September 10, 2012 at 9:46 am

    Sic Dude: Google is your friend.

    http://www.northallertoncollege.org.uk/history/Suffrage%20website%202/Suffragists%20vs.%20Suffragettes.htm

    Differences between different groups.

    I don’t know whether you’re talking about the movement in Britain or the United States — but as far as I know, men in the U.S. (including working class and African American men, but NOT men who were members of indigenous cultures) had the vote when the Votes for Women movement started.

    Frederik Douglass supported that: too bad that the racism in the white women’s movement (which was yes largely middle-class) led to problems.

    Too bad that people who are members of oppressed/marginalized groups aren’t magically perfect unlike the oppressing groups–there has been and is racism and classism among civil rights groups, sexism and racism and classism among glbt groups, racism and classism among feminist groups.

    In other words, sicktroll, fuck off.

    Reply
  1. Pages:
  2. «
  3. 1
  4. 2

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Please read the comments policy before leaving a comment - thanks!

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

1
We Hunted the Mammoth tracks and mocks the white male rage underlying the rise of Trump and Trumpism. This blog is NOT a safe space; given the subject matter -- misogyny and hate -- there's really no way it could be.

~ David Futrelle, writer/editor/cat entertainer. Click my name to email me.

Donate to the Mammoth!

WHTM is now AD-FREE and depends on READERS LIKE YOU for survival! Please DONATE what you can by clicking below. No need for a PayPal account.

Follow Me

  • View david.futrelle’s profile on Facebook
  • View DavidFutrelle’s profile on Twitter
  • View David Futrelle’s profile on YouTube
  • View David Futrelle’s profile on Google+

Subscribe via Email

Recent Posts

  • Everything I know about Brexit I learned from Janey Godley, including the stuff about Big Theresa’s flute
  • Nazis lose it over an interracial cartoon couple in a condom ad, blaming “a Jewish agenda to deny white men sex”
  • Fat women are pretending to be pregnant to get seats on buses, MGTOW conspiracy theorist warns fellow men
  • Jews are using yoga pants to genocide the white race, weirdo racist dingbat charges
  • Happy Day Before Post-Valentine’s Day Candy Sales! Open Thread with BONUS CREEPY V-DAY CARDS
  • Incels spend Valentine’s day celebrating the Parkland shooting one year ago that left 17 dead
  • Incels of the world, unite! Presenting the not-so-glorious new science of Marxism-Incelism
  • Pro athletes are cucking Brad Pitt, because all women love jocks, confused MGTOW contends
  • Vulvagate: When mansplaining goes so wrong the dictionary itself has to step in
  • Porn star and accused sexual abuser Mercedes Carrera: The only women the MGTOWs ever loved?

Top Posts

  • Nazis lose it over an interracial cartoon couple in a condom ad, blaming "a Jewish agenda to deny white men sex"
  • Everything I know about Brexit I learned from Janey Godley, including the stuff about Big Theresa's flute
  • Fat women are pretending to be pregnant to get seats on buses, MGTOW conspiracy theorist warns fellow men
  • Jews are using yoga pants to genocide the white race, weirdo racist dingbat charges

Old Crap

Recent Comments

  • Ire February 21, 2019 at 2:20 pm on Fat women are pretending to be pregnant to get seats on buses, MGTOW conspiracy theorist warns fellow men
  • Weird (and tired of trumplings) Eddie February 21, 2019 at 2:03 pm on Everything I know about Brexit I learned from Janey Godley, including the stuff about Big Theresa’s flute
  • Citerior Motive February 21, 2019 at 1:56 pm on Everything I know about Brexit I learned from Janey Godley, including the stuff about Big Theresa’s flute
  • Kiwiwriter February 21, 2019 at 12:59 pm on Nazis lose it over an interracial cartoon couple in a condom ad, blaming “a Jewish agenda to deny white men sex”
  • Trip Space-Parasite February 21, 2019 at 12:19 pm on Jews are using yoga pants to genocide the white race, weirdo racist dingbat charges
  • Rabid Rabbit February 21, 2019 at 12:15 pm on Everything I know about Brexit I learned from Janey Godley, including the stuff about Big Theresa’s flute
  • Robert February 21, 2019 at 12:02 pm on Nazis lose it over an interracial cartoon couple in a condom ad, blaming “a Jewish agenda to deny white men sex”
  • Fishy Goat February 21, 2019 at 11:45 am on Everything I know about Brexit I learned from Janey Godley, including the stuff about Big Theresa’s flute

Feed the Mammoth!

Keep this blog going by clicking on the link below! You don't even need a PayPal account.

Tweet Tweet

My Tweets

Random WHTM Posts!

  • Gals! Drive away creepy dudes with dirty socks, condoms, and the Pixie Cut of DoomGals! Drive away creepy dudes with dirty socks, condoms, and the Pixie Cut of DoomMay 12, 2016
  • Meet the Kittens 3: BFF EditionMeet the Kittens 3: BFF EditionAugust 13, 2012
  • Vox Day defeats me in debate with brilliant "you're a loser who can't get laid and also women shouldn't vote" argumentVox Day defeats me in debate with brilliant "you're a loser who can't get laid and also women shouldn't vote" argumentJuly 27, 2014
  • A man and an old lady get in an elevatorA man and an old lady get in an elevatorJuly 18, 2011
  • Quiz! Computer-generated recipe title, or misogynistic slur for women?Quiz! Computer-generated recipe title, or misogynistic slur for women?March 29, 2017

If You’re Being Harassed

  • Speak Up & Stay Safe(r)
  • Crash Override
  • DIY Feminist Cybersecurity
  • Without My Consent
  • 9 Ways to Dodge Trolls

Creep Watchers

  • Hail to the Gynocracy!
  • Right Wing Watch
  • Hate Watch (SPLC)
  • Media Matters
  • Fundies Say the Darndest Things
  • My Right Wing Dad
  • r/ShitRedditSays
  • r/GamerGhazi
  • r/TheBluePill
  • r/AgainstMensRights
  • r/CreepyPMs

Mammothy Fun

  • Official WHTM Welcome Package!
  • Artistry For Feminism. And Kittens.
  • A Voice for Pierre
Privacy & Cookies: This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this website, you agree to their use.
To find out more, including how to control cookies, see here: Cookie Policy
We Hunted The Mammoth | Copyright © 2019 All Rights Reserved
loading Cancel
Post was not sent - check your email addresses!
Email check failed, please try again
Sorry, your blog cannot share posts by email.
%d bloggers like this: