whtmheader4

  • Home
  • Comments Policy
  • About
    • Mammoth FAQ
    • David Futrelle FAQ
  • T-Shirts, etc.
  • WTF is a MGTOW? A Glossary
← The New Statesman publishes an excellent précis of the Men’s Rights movement; MRAs are, naturally, outraged. [UPDATED]
Oh, the questions they ask! →

Banned in the MRA!

 May 21, 2012
  · 135 Comments

Well, I have been banned from the Men’s Rights subreddit, evidently for mentioning The Spearhead too often. And also, apparently, because of Lorena Bobbit? Honesty, I’m not sure I fully understand why I’m banned; I am pretty sure I haven’t breached any of the tenets of Reddiquette in any of my comments in r/mr. See if you can figure it out:

I’m also banned from A Voice for Men. And Toysoldier. Not sure about The Spearhead. I don’t think so, but there’s not really much point posting somewhere where all dissenting commenters (and most women) are downvoted so thoroughly that you have to click a special link to even see them. I might or might not be able to comment on other MRA blogs, I don’t know.

But honestly, the only Men’s Rights forum I really have (or had) any reason or desire to comment in is the Men’s Rights subreddit, because for all of its faults it’s really the only MRA forum of any size that’s not completely overrun with misogynists and fanatics. The only one where there is even a chance of holding any kind of substantive discussions with MRAs online. And Ig has shut that door, at least for me.

(There are of course many other places to discuss things with MRAs online, like, you know, here, and NSWATM, and so on, but these places aren’t run by MRAs.)

I asked Ig if he would also ban the guy who wished me liver cancer earlier today. I have not heard back from him yet.

EDITED TO ADD: Ig has gotten back to me. He recommends that I “go to hell.” Meanwhile, the liver-cancer wisher has reaffirmed his desire that I “catch” cancer.

Elsewhere in r/mr, another fellow describes me as “an accumulation of grunge far worse than any of the quotes you mine.” Which doesn’t make a lot of sense, but at least has a spark of originality to it.

Share this:

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Reddit
  • Tumblr
  • Email
  • More
  • Google
  • Pinterest
  • LinkedIn
  • Pocket
  • Print

Like this:

Like Loading...

Related

Posted in: drama, misogyny, MRA, reddit
← The New Statesman publishes an excellent précis of the Men’s Rights movement; MRAs are, naturally, outraged. [UPDATED]
Oh, the questions they ask! →

Comments

Please read the comments policy before leaving a comment - thanks!

  1. Pages:
  2. «
  3. 1
  4. 2
  5. 3
  1. Amused says:
    May 22, 2012 at 7:13 pm

    CassandraSays:

    Actually I’d say Antz is less stupid and more dishonest. Buttman, however, is dumb as bricks.

    That’s not fair to bricks.

    Reply
  2. ozymandias42 says:
    May 22, 2012 at 7:19 pm

    Garvan: It’s bizarre, I know all kinds of people– male, female, and other– who have been sexually and romantically unsuccessful. My best friend got his first kiss when he was 21. And yet somehow he managed to avoid sending obnoxious messages on dating websites because of it.

    I don’t like “die cis scum” myself, but it is generally read as referring to “die scumbags, who are all cis” not “die cis people, who are all scumbags,” and I am not entirely against wishing death upon transphobic scumbags. Mostly because they keep wishing death upon US, and fair is fair.

    Buttman: Men are less likely to get custody primarily because they’re less likely to fight for it. Men are less likely to fight for it because taking care of kids is women’s work. The patriarchy was the one that decided that taking care of kids is women’s work. Hence, yes, it is caused by the patriarchy.

    Reply
  3. hellkell says:
    May 22, 2012 at 7:19 pm

    Ture, bricks are useful.

    Reply
  4. Crumbelievable says:
    May 22, 2012 at 7:27 pm

    FIGURING OUT RELATIONSHIPS IS ACTUALLY PRETTY FUCKING HARD BECAUSE WE CAN’T READ EACH OTHER’S MINDS, AND THE DUDE IS ANGRY BECAUSE HE THINKS HE’S DOING WHAT HE’S “SUPPOSED” TO BE DOING AND BEING REPRIMANDED FOR IT, AND OH GOD, BEING ALONE IS KIND OF LIKE IT’S OWN SILENT HELL

    Oh look, another MRA making excuses for someone`s horrible misogyny by saying, “He`s just hurting inside!”

    Go piss up a rope.

    Reply
  5. CassandraSays says:
    May 22, 2012 at 8:05 pm

    Doesn’t matter why our hypothetical shouty all-caps guy is screaming misogynist insults at random women on dating sites, he’s still being an asshole. If he is (again, hypothetically) shouty and angry because he’s not getting what he wants out of relationships, guess what? His behavior is ensuring that he never will.

    Reply
  6. Polliwog says:
    May 22, 2012 at 8:05 pm

    a) FIGURING OUT RELATIONSHIPS IS ACTUALLY PRETTY FUCKING HARD BECAUSE WE CAN’T READ EACH OTHER’S MINDS, AND THE DUDE IS ANGRY BECAUSE HE THINKS HE’S DOING WHAT HE’S “SUPPOSED” TO BE DOING AND BEING REPRIMANDED FOR IT, AND OH GOD, BEING ALONE IS KIND OF LIKE IT’S OWN SILENT HELL.

    That’s nice and all, but the thing is, pretty much everybody has been lonely at some point, and the vast majority of us don’t respond by yelling, “Fuck you cunt” at people. I don’t judge people for being lonely. I judge them for being assholes, and I’m not sure why you seem to think we shouldn’t criticize people for being assholes if they’re sad about something. I’m freaking clinically depressed – does that mean I have an ongoing license to call everyone I meet cunts and worthless pieces of shit without criticism? Because I really don’t think it does; I think grown-ups are capable of being sad without throwing tantrums at people, and if they do throw tantrums, I think other grown-ups are more than entitled to say, “Wow, you are being a pathetic little asshole. Stop that right now.”

    Reply
  7. Alpha Asshole Cock Carousel says:
    May 22, 2012 at 8:14 pm

    I think grown-ups are capable of being sad without throwing tantrums at people, and if they do throw tantrums, I think other grown-ups are more than entitled to say, “Wow, you are being a pathetic little asshole. Stop that right now.”

    But … but … intent: it’s fucking magic!

    http://genderbitch.wordpress.com/2010/01/23/intent-its-fucking-magic/

    Reply
  8. Buttman says:
    May 22, 2012 at 8:34 pm

    “Mmmm, part of the reason men pay more is because men take more risks. So you know, work on that.”

    Which would be fine if MEN didn’t have to pay for women’s choices in Health care. But you demand that MEN pick up the tab for your decisions. You don’t want equality. You want special rights.

    Reply
  9. Tulgey Logger says:
    May 22, 2012 at 8:52 pm

    I don’t buy that Solanas was pursuing any agenda outlined in SCUM, because her statements after the shooting reflect her personal conflict with Warhol and her would-be publisher; furthermore, it’s pretty odd that she would try to get SCUM published through a man if she were serious about its contents. From her wiki page:

    “After going into police custody, Solanas was brought before the Manhattan Criminal Court where she told the judge, “It’s not often that I shoot someone. I didn’t do it for nothing. Warhol had tied me up, lock, stock and barrel. He was going to do something to me which would have ruined me.”

    She clearly connects her actions to her suspicions about others’ use of her works, and not to any plan or agenda outlined in SCUM. Even someone who’s bad at planning can tell you why they did something.

    On the other hand, not only does Breivik’s manifesto reflects not only his planning and rationale for his massacre, his post-arrest statements reflect his written ideology as well:

    http://bloomberg.com/news/2011-07-24/norway-killing-suspect-may-explain-motives.html

    If the only two data points we had for both Solanas and Breivik were
    1. Wrote document about killing
    2. Subsequently killed people
    then the analogy might make sense. However, there are more than two points in both cases, so one simply cannot sneer “oh yeah! Well Breivik was writing satire, too!” and expect it to be a serious argument. The relationship the SCUM Manifesto bears to Solanas’ shooting is much more ambiguous than Breivik’s case.

    Miscellany:
    Solanas was actually trying to publish the SCUM Manifesto, and had a contract with a publisher. Some of the language in her contract apparently fed her paranoia. Her play “Up Your Ass” was found in a trunk, not the Manifesto.
    SCUM doesn’t appear to have originally meant “society for cutting up men,” but instead refers to a certain kind of empowered woman who steps outside the boundaries of contemporary society.

    Reply
  10. indifferentsky says:
    May 22, 2012 at 8:53 pm

    Regarding this post. Pinegrove33 includes the Spearhead often when he’s talking about men’s rights sights. I believe he even referred to them as our brothers over on the Spearhead. If he’s talking about anything mentioned an Spearhead also, then they get a mention. Pinegrove33 is more prominent, active, and “mainstream” than those reddit posters, I daresay. I would name him as a moderate and careful/safe in his commentaries if he didn’t so often mention these other extremist slugs in his videos.

    Reply
  11. scarlettpipistrelle says:
    May 22, 2012 at 9:18 pm

    To me, the significance of the quotes over in MRAland are not that they are obnoxious but that so many of them cross the border into the advocacy of cruelty or even violence against women, and serve as an encouragement of the attitude that women should be targets. The denial of humanity, the disparagement of basic citizenship rights, the ugly blanket accusations and descriptions, and even sometimes the defense of perpetrators of violence (Josh Powell, to give a recent example) are signposts to where this sort of thing can lead. I have no idea what W. F. Price is like as a person, but he should feel no surprise if law enforcement investigators come knocking at his door, considering some of the online company he keeps. Anyone who keeps a garden without weeding it may find some bad things growing. That’s why they call some of it “hate speech.” Any genuine beef he may have got lost long ago in that noxious underbrush he feeds and waters. I’m not holding the manosphere responsible for the entire Internet, only the parts they moderate.

    Reply
  12. indifferentsky says:
    May 22, 2012 at 9:22 pm

    Buttman you must be obtuse if you bring up insurance. -Insurance. How does it work?
    Have you ever been asked by your car insurance agent if you’re left handed? I have. Why do you think that is? I’ve also been asked if I “name” my cars. Why is that?

    Insurance companies profile and charge according to risk. It means men get in more accidents. According to car accidents. com, men are more than TWICE as likely to die in car accidents than women. If women got in more accidents, they would be charged more. If Insurance companies could go Full-Orwell, they would. They’d do whatever they can get away with.

    Nader used to point out to women if they take the exact same shirt to the cleaners, they are charged more than men. People would argue with him and try to come up with excuses for this, and he shot them all down. It’s almost like the people that started the MRM writing actually took whatever women’s issues/complaints were and tried to find equivalents, and that’s why we get these weird Tom Martin arguments.

    It actually is true that men are built so that sitting for long periods of time is harder for them. Well, instead of saying “it’s true” I should say that’s what I was taught in high school, just as a point of interest. It has to do with the shoulders vs. waist, supposedly. But what’s more alarming in this oppression Olympics is that men are considered the default in society to the point where seat belts are made for them, and if women die in an accident because their seat belt was not fit for them, the women are called “too small”. Because everyone knows that default is male, and that outside of that is some abnormality. If anyone can find the article I’m referring to (I think it was in Yahoo News and was a statement from the manufacturer), that would be great, I can’t find it again.

    Reply
  13. Pecunium says:
    May 22, 2012 at 9:47 pm

    garvan: Ander’s Breivik’s Manifesto should be taken as satire, like Valerie Solanas and the SCUM Manifesto, or Jonathan Swift’s A Modest Proposal.

    But now we’re doing it for a girl who attempted to kill a person but wrote about it before she attempted kill them?

    You are in the same fetid pit as your enemy throwing shit at each other, whilst both sides consume their own excrement.

    Nope.

    Solanas didn’t write about killing Andy Warhol. She didn’t publish the manifesto. It wasn’t published until well after she shot Warhol. She wasn’t, so far as anyone can tell, trying to convince people to go out and shoot men.

    Breivik is in court right now, saying he meant every word of it.

    Reply
  14. Pecunium says:
    May 22, 2012 at 10:11 pm

    garvan: Except Solanas wans’t joking, hence shooting Andy Warhol.

    Except that she shot him because she thought he had stolen from her.

    So the equivalence, is as false here as it was elsewhere.

    Wait, please please tell me that they do not equate because one caused more death than the other.

    They don’t equate because they had different motives.

    If you’d like, we can take large sticks and hit each other until one of us dies if that’s more to your liking.

    But I’m going to poison your drink before you get a chance to step into the ring.

    Ooh… you think you are clever, and cunning, and that you will be allowed to be treacherous; and that no one else thinks like that.

    If you think a mortal combat is something I’m going to treat as a duel, good luck. I was a soldier. I’m not in combat for the glory, and I’m an old soldier. I’m good at checking the skyline.

    Poser.

    Reply
  15. Pecunium says:
    May 22, 2012 at 10:12 pm

    garvan: Really… you think that someone can have a reasonable justification for hating all women?

    And then you think that feminists are evil for saying that some men hate all women?

    Reply
  16. Buttman says:
    May 22, 2012 at 10:52 pm

    “Buttman you must be obtuse if you bring up insurance. -Insurance. How does it work?”

    Maybe feminists literally can’t realize the inequality in charging a man more because his choices and charging a woman less when her choices lead to higher costs. It’s quite simple. If women cost more for health care then they should pay more. If not, then MEN should not have to pay more for auto and life insurance. You only want equality when it benefits females.

    Reply
  17. Pecunium says:
    May 23, 2012 at 12:59 am

    If you can show that women, as a class, are more expensive to insure, for routine procedures, go ahead.

    We’ll wait.

    Facts and figures; i.e. with data, otherwise you are just blowing smoke.

    Reply
  18. Amnesia says:
    May 23, 2012 at 2:32 pm

    @Buttman
    Men being on average bigger than women means bigger structures are needed to accommodate them comfortably. It would probably be much cheaper material-wise if we built to fit the average woman, and just made men deal with it. Should we charge men extra for taking up more space?

    Reply
  19. princessbonbon says:
    May 23, 2012 at 6:53 pm

    Which would be fine if MEN didn’t have to pay for women’s choices in Health care.

    Here is something interesting-the only choice you could be referring to is a woman choosing to have a child. That is it.

    So let us break it down: the average cost (in 2009, latest numbers I could find quickly) was $1,800 to 21,000 depending on where and what kind of birth. On average a woman will have 2 kids. So at the top the woman will cost an insurance company $42,000 to give birth. Prenatal care will be around $2000 a kid so $4000. So you have a cost to the company of $46,000.

    Now let us take a look at accidents: Average cost of 1, count ’em, 1 injury only crash is $126,000. It is an average of $6,000,000 when there is a fatality. And with 1.542 million injury crashes in the US in 2010 alone, you are talking some serious cash. And who causes these very very pricey accidents? Males, in one study they were 80 more likely to be involved. In fact it has been pretty steady since 1975 that men cause about 70% of fatalities.

    So $126,000 is more than $46,000. And that $46,000 is much smaller than $6,000,000 plus the devastation that a death can cause.

    But you demand that MEN pick up the tab for your decisions.

    Mainly because we have been picking up yours. Now go work on reducing risk in male drivers.

    Reply
  20. David Futrelle says:
    May 23, 2012 at 6:56 pm

    princessbonbon, thank you for that!

    Reply
  21. princessbonbon says:
    May 23, 2012 at 7:05 pm

    You are welcomed. The good news is that people are less and less likely to get hurt in car crashes nowadays. But 1.5 million is still a huge number.

    Reply
  22. darksidecat says:
    May 23, 2012 at 7:06 pm

    Just as one side cherry picks “Black Panthers”, the other side cherry picks “Klan Members”.

    Ah, mras never fail to be racist as well as sexist, do they? Sexist, check, racist, check, cissexist, check. The self proclaimed “good” mras are just as nasty as the rest.

    Reply
  23. darksidecat says:
    May 23, 2012 at 7:07 pm

    Posted that last comment w/my gmail address because I’m forgetful today, but it was mine David, just so you know.

    Reply
  24. Buttman says:
    May 23, 2012 at 8:31 pm

    ” It is an average of $6,000,000 when there is a fatality.”

    ಠ_ಠ

    Reply
  25. Argenti Aertheri says:
    May 23, 2012 at 9:08 pm

    Buttman — that’s the cost to the insurance company — that very likely includes investigating how the fatality happened and how to prevent future fatalities. Investigations are more expensive than birth, that’s surprising somehow?

    princessbonbon — I’ve bookmarked that math for the next time this comes up, the bad math seems to work in cycles.

    Reply
  26. Jessay (@jessay) says:
    May 24, 2012 at 5:24 am

    I just want to comment on the attempted rationalization of that online dating comment. For real? Because if I was to come on here and say that the last guy who rejected me, “was a worthless piece of shit just like all men,” MRAs would be having a field day, proof of misandry.

    I don’t understand why some men seem to think that dating woes only apply to men and not to women. That women don’t face rejection, confusion, heartbreak, and suffering on account of the people they are interested in. And why it’s only seemingly ok to generalize all women based out of anger and frustration, but not the other way around? I mean, rape victims are frowned upon for perceiving all men as potential rapists after being brutalized, but this guy is justified in calling a woman a cunt for having the audacity to not be interested in him? This is a woman whose affections he has no stake in because it’s just some random from an online dating site who he hasn’t even met. He took her lack of interest that personally that he used it to justify his hateful opinions of women as a whole. That is somehow a valid response?

    He didn’t exactly make her regret her decision to reject him either. That’s the funny thing about that sort of “I didn’t want you anyways!” type of reaction. It just solidifies our stance that we were right in rejecting your advances. You’re not hurting us or making yourself look better, just making us thank our lucky stars that we didn’t go home with you.

    Side note: I got a message on OKC today from someone whose profile mentioned how he was tired of being friend-zoned. I was just like, “Really?” He also took my profile which is a joke from the show the IT Crowd seriously and made it clear that he was solely interested in me based on my looks (because that profile is not flattering) because I was his type. Sorry bro. Dudes who lament about being friend-zoned are not MY type. Cue him being mad because I didn’t give him the sex he deserved.

    Reply
  27. seranvali says:
    May 24, 2012 at 9:00 am

    I get really annoyed when people curse those they don’t like with various forms of cancer. That kind of obvious and concentrated malice can be quite upsetting and unsettling.

    Maybe people who say that deserve to be put on chemotherapy for a month or two and see if they still feel like wishing extremely painful and potentially fatal illnesses on people just because they don’t agree with them.

    Grrrr…

    Sorry, for obvious reasons this particular piece of nastiness makes me want to bang their stupid, malicious heads together.

    Reply
  28. Crumbelievable says:
    May 24, 2012 at 9:06 am

    And then they say, “Feminists don’t like people who challenge their viewpoints!”

    Never seen a feminist wish cancer on someone .

    Reply
  29. seranvali says:
    May 24, 2012 at 9:18 am

    Crumbelievable said:

    “And then they say, “Feminists don’t like people who challenge their viewpoints.”

    Never seen a feminist wish cancer on someone .”

    Me neither. I’ve been through it and I wouldn’t wish it on anyone. They really need to stop doing it. I don’t know, maybe having them spend time with the patients in a treatment room would teach them that you don’t say that kind of thing. Also: this stuff can be triggering if you’ve had to actually deal with it.

    Reply
  30. Kendra, the bionic mommy says:
    May 24, 2012 at 10:37 am

    Buttman, you’re complaining that women’s health care tends to cost more than men’s. First, it’s important to note that some men need pap smears, birth control pills, and prenatal care, too. Cis men do not, but even they can benefit from insurance companies making women’s health care affordable. When a man has a pregnant partner, he also benefits from hir receiving good prenatal care. If a cis, straight couple doesn’t want to have a baby, they both benefit from the woman having affordable birth control. You describe health care as a source of conflict between men and women, but a lot of people don’t. They want their loved ones to have good health care regardless of gender.

    Many of the prenatal health care provisions of the Affordable Care Act are more for the health of the fetus than the mother, and those provisions help just as many male babies as female babies. The Rh immune globulin doesn’t cost very much, but it can prevent Rhesus disease which can be fatal to newborns. The group B strep test and penicillin are easy, affordable ways to prevent Group B strep infections in newborns, which can also be fatal. You can look at the March of Dimes website to learn about all sorts of easy, cost effective ways good prenatal care can saves the lives of babies, half of whom are male.

    What I’m trying to say here is that contraception and prenatal care are not just women’s issues. They are important for everyone.

    Reply
  31. ithiliana says:
    May 25, 2012 at 3:48 pm

    @Kendra: Because I’m sure ButtTroll will simply live up to his name, I want to say how much I appreciated your very clear and detailed post about how it’s impossible to (logically) think that contraception and prenatal care are some sort of specialized women’s issues that teh menz should never have to deal with (because, cooties!).

    Great stuff, and only some immature (which is not about age), illogical, unreasonable, prejudiced butthead would not be able to learn something.

    Reply
  32. Kendra, the bionic mommy says:
    May 25, 2012 at 8:37 pm

    Thanks, ithiliana. I agree that ButtTroll will probably not learn anything from what I wrote. If he reads it at all, he will probably respond with an unrelated rant. I sometimes motivate myself by hoping that open minded lurkers might read and learn even when the trolls keep being close minded asshats.

    Reply
  33. Pecunium says:
    May 27, 2012 at 12:05 pm

    Kendra: That’s a large part of my debate philosophy. I don’t expect the Buttmen,and NWOs of the world to learn. I do think those who haven’t yet become like them might be swayed.

    And sometimes (to my wonder and amazement) one of them does gain a clue. Hope springs eternal.

    Reply
  34. filo4000 says:
    May 28, 2012 at 10:10 pm

    I got banned on near, if not same, as you from /r/mensrights, I guess they’re cracking down on dissenters

    Reply
  35. filo4000 says:
    May 28, 2012 at 10:11 pm

    *same day

    Reply
  1. Pages:
  2. «
  3. 1
  4. 2
  5. 3

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Please read the comments policy before leaving a comment - thanks!

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

1
We Hunted the Mammoth tracks and mocks the white male rage underlying the rise of Trump and Trumpism. This blog is NOT a safe space; given the subject matter -- misogyny and hate -- there's really no way it could be.

~ David Futrelle, writer/editor/cat entertainer. Click my name to email me.

Donate to the Mammoth!

WHTM is now AD-FREE and depends on READERS LIKE YOU for survival! Please DONATE what you can by clicking below. No need for a PayPal account.

Follow Me

  • View david.futrelle’s profile on Facebook
  • View DavidFutrelle’s profile on Twitter
  • View David Futrelle’s profile on YouTube
  • View David Futrelle’s profile on Google+

Subscribe via Email

Recent Posts

  • Ruin your weekend with this grotesque “field report” from a MGTOW who had sex
  • Hot Local Stock Photo Models Want to Talk to You Now About White Genocide
  • Everything I know about Brexit I learned from Janey Godley, including the stuff about Big Theresa’s flute
  • Nazis lose it over an interracial cartoon couple in a condom ad, blaming “a Jewish agenda to deny white men sex”
  • Fat women are pretending to be pregnant to get seats on buses, MGTOW conspiracy theorist warns fellow men
  • Jews are using yoga pants to genocide the white race, weirdo racist dingbat charges
  • Happy Day Before Post-Valentine’s Day Candy Sales! Open Thread with BONUS CREEPY V-DAY CARDS
  • Incels spend Valentine’s day celebrating the Parkland shooting one year ago that left 17 dead
  • Incels of the world, unite! Presenting the not-so-glorious new science of Marxism-Incelism
  • Pro athletes are cucking Brad Pitt, because all women love jocks, confused MGTOW contends

Top Posts

  • Hot Local Stock Photo Models Want to Talk to You Now About White Genocide
  • Ruin your weekend with this grotesque "field report" from a MGTOW who had sex
  • Nazis lose it over an interracial cartoon couple in a condom ad, blaming "a Jewish agenda to deny white men sex"
  • Everything I know about Brexit I learned from Janey Godley, including the stuff about Big Theresa's flute

Old Crap

Recent Comments

  • Jarnsaxa February 23, 2019 at 6:15 am on Ruin your weekend with this grotesque “field report” from a MGTOW who had sex
  • Valkyrine February 23, 2019 at 6:07 am on Ruin your weekend with this grotesque “field report” from a MGTOW who had sex
  • Bluecat February 23, 2019 at 5:36 am on Ruin your weekend with this grotesque “field report” from a MGTOW who had sex
  • Not Edward February 23, 2019 at 5:06 am on Ruin your weekend with this grotesque “field report” from a MGTOW who had sex
  • (A)utonomous Escapist February 23, 2019 at 5:05 am on Ruin your weekend with this grotesque “field report” from a MGTOW who had sex
  • Surplus to Requirements, Observer of the Vast Blight-Wing Enstupidation February 23, 2019 at 5:04 am on Ruin your weekend with this grotesque “field report” from a MGTOW who had sex
  • (A)utonomous Escapist February 23, 2019 at 4:13 am on Ruin your weekend with this grotesque “field report” from a MGTOW who had sex
  • Lukas Xavier February 23, 2019 at 4:04 am on Ruin your weekend with this grotesque “field report” from a MGTOW who had sex

Feed the Mammoth!

Keep this blog going by clicking on the link below! You don't even need a PayPal account.

Tweet Tweet

My Tweets

Random WHTM Posts!

  • The 5 Creepiest Details from GQ's Long-Awaited Account of A Voice for Men's Conference Last SummerThe 5 Creepiest Details from GQ's Long-Awaited Account of A Voice for Men's Conference Last SummerFebruary 25, 2015
  • New Reddit theory: Girls develop early in order to entrap guys and send them to prisonNew Reddit theory: Girls develop early in order to entrap guys and send them to prisonApril 23, 2012
  • In creepy Reddit megathread, thousands of women recount the first time they were perved on by a grown manIn creepy Reddit megathread, thousands of women recount the first time they were perved on by a grown manApril 11, 2015
  • Christian J wins the gold in the Incoherence OlympicsChristian J wins the gold in the Incoherence OlympicsSeptember 19, 2011
  • Red Piller wins the culture war with innovative "panty sniffer" insultRed Piller wins the culture war with innovative "panty sniffer" insultOctober 10, 2014

If You’re Being Harassed

  • Speak Up & Stay Safe(r)
  • Crash Override
  • DIY Feminist Cybersecurity
  • Without My Consent
  • 9 Ways to Dodge Trolls

Creep Watchers

  • Hail to the Gynocracy!
  • Right Wing Watch
  • Hate Watch (SPLC)
  • Media Matters
  • Fundies Say the Darndest Things
  • My Right Wing Dad
  • r/ShitRedditSays
  • r/GamerGhazi
  • r/TheBluePill
  • r/AgainstMensRights
  • r/CreepyPMs

Mammothy Fun

  • Official WHTM Welcome Package!
  • Artistry For Feminism. And Kittens.
  • A Voice for Pierre
Privacy & Cookies: This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this website, you agree to their use.
To find out more, including how to control cookies, see here: Cookie Policy
We Hunted The Mammoth | Copyright © 2019 All Rights Reserved
loading Cancel
Post was not sent - check your email addresses!
Email check failed, please try again
Sorry, your blog cannot share posts by email.
%d bloggers like this: