whtmheader4

  • Home
  • Comments Policy
  • About
    • Mammoth FAQ
    • David Futrelle FAQ
  • T-Shirts, etc.
  • WTF is a MGTOW? A Glossary
← Things Redditors actually think: “If you can read this, and we’re alone, I can be legally convicted of rape.”
Reddit Rape Joker: “Let’s all use this as a learning experience.” →

Happy Mother’s Day, the A Voice for Men way. (Note: Much worse than you’d think.)

 May 13, 2012
  · 287 Comments

Over on A Voice for Men, our dear friend Paul Elam has come up with an interesting new way to celebrate Mother’s Day – with what is essentially the longest, least funny, and most rage-filled “Yo Mama” joke ever. (Indeed, it’s so rage-filled I should probably put a Trigger Warning right about here.)

Elam starts off by addressing the mothers of the world, suggesting he’s got a “a socially conscious twist” on the traditional Mother’s Day celebrations. Mothers, he argues, should gather together the flowers they’ve been given by their loved ones and:

Place a bunch of daffodils at a dumpster near you, perhaps one in which one of you, or one of your kind, has tossed an unwanted baby, leaving it there to slowly die alone in a pile of trash.

Perhaps you could lay a single rose at the base of a bridge that has been used by a mother to throw her baby into an icy river. Perhaps you can lay it there with hands that have beaten or shaken a baby to death.

You probably didn’t see that coming, did you? He goes on.

Now perhaps some of you could place large, colorful arrangements at the abortion centers where women go to have children cut out and laid to rest in those colorful and attractive biohazard containers that are all the rage in the clinics. …

Maybe you can lay virtual flowers at your computers to honor all the children that you and your sisters have pimped out to pedophiles, or perhaps the blossoms could be placed in your child’s room, which also doubles as your preferred place to abuse your own.

Oh, but you say you haven’t done any of these things, and that abortion isn’t actually the same as infanticide? No matter. Elam has an answer for that:

This is not a request for some mothers, or a percentage of them, but all of you. In fact, you don’t even have to be a mother. If you have a vagina, the blood of all those children, who are abused far more at the hands of women than men, has stained your skin and caked around the cuticles of your fingers.

If you are a mother, particularly one of the many abusers, or just one that has remained silent as your sisters have beaten, choked, stabbed, burned, drowned, abused, neglected, dumped, tortured and otherwise done the unspeakable to the most defenseless among us, then I hope to see those flowers in your murderous hands, paying homage to those that have been unfortunate enough to be placed in your path. …

In Daffodils for Dumpsters the gash gets you in, and you don’t really have a choice.

You see, Elam has decided that we live in an era of “collective guilt,” and that the evil (straw) feminists who go around blaming all men for the actions of a few – through such dastardly things like rape awareness seminars – deserve to find themselves collectively blamed as well.

Except that Elam’s post goes well beyond an  ill-conceived and ill-intentioned attempt at “turnabout is fair play.” This isn’t a piece of Swiftian satire. He actually believes all this hateful nonsense, and says as much:

Now, do I really mean all this? Yes. It is not that women deserve to be collectively regarded as child abusers and killers. Most aren’t. Most are actually very good to their children and can even be trusted with the children of others. But that truth is not what is important here.

What is important is the children, or the principle, or whatever other bullshit we make up to convince ourselves it is not about demonizing women when that is exactly what we are doing.

I have to confess I have no idea what he’s trying to say in the second paragraph here. Did he mean to say “men” instead of “women?” If so, this is an interesting little slip.

He continues:

The fact is that mothers are more dangerous than fathers where it concerns children. They always have been. It is only a few percentage points in that direction, but of course in a White Ribbon way, it is more than enough to justify pointing a finger at your entire sex and feeling superior as we watch you atone for the unspeakable acts of a minority.

So, suck it up ladies. If you knew about White Ribbon and said nothing to object to it; if in general you have remained silent or actively participated as the image of the male half of the population has been reduced to that of a depraved threat, the step up and get your flowers. You deserve every last petal, stem and thorn.   

I imagine Elam chuckling a bit as he typed that final word.

And a happy Mother’s Day to you, too!

Oh, and if you found yourself wondering about that “White Ribbon” thing, Elam is evidently (as best I can figure it) referring either to the women who, during World War I, handed out white ribbons to men who didn’t enlist in the army. Or he’s referring to this contemporary campaign to fight violence against women. But I don’t live inside Elam’s head, so I’m not sure what he meant, or why he seems to think that all women would know about either campaign, much less have any responsibility for them.

NOTE: Elam is also celebrating Mother’s Day by suggesting I had something to do with creating Reddit’s appalling “beatingwomen” subreddit as part of a nefarious plot to make the Men’s Rights movement look even worse than it manages to do on its own.

You may notice that Elam presents no actual evidence to back up his claims. There is no such evidence, because Elam’s accusations are utterly and completely untrue.

I have nothing whatsoever to do with r/beatingwomen. Nothing. I don’t know anything about who created it, or what their aim was beyond laughing at pictures and videos of violence against women. As I’ve said before, it’s a vile place. I think Reddit should shut it down.

 

Share this:

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Reddit
  • Tumblr
  • Email
  • More
  • Google
  • Pinterest
  • LinkedIn
  • Pocket
  • Print

Like this:

Like Loading...

Related

Posted in: a voice for men, antifeminism, disgusting women, douchebaggery, evil women, false accusations, lying liars, misogyny, MRA, paul elam, reddit, shit that never happened, trigger warning, vaginas
← Things Redditors actually think: “If you can read this, and we’re alone, I can be legally convicted of rape.”
Reddit Rape Joker: “Let’s all use this as a learning experience.” →

Comments

Please read the comments policy before leaving a comment - thanks!

  1. Pages:
  2. «
  3. 1
  4. 2
  5. 3
  6. 4
  7. 5
  8. 6
  1. LBT says:
    May 15, 2012 at 12:11 pm

    RE: Argenti

    *snort* Well, he’s stuck here, and due to coconsciousness and bodily dissonance wtfery, not like he’d be sleeping around even if we WEREN’T together…

    Reply
  2. Sara says:
    May 15, 2012 at 12:14 pm

    @Argenti,

    The “let’s stop the women bashing” doesn’t make any sense when considering that is basically his entire occupation. I believe he probably sincerely doesn’t think he hates women. There’s a lot of this kind of denial in many hate groups disguised as a “cause.” Just look at fundamentalist Chrisitans who claim not to hate gays, yet all their practices, beliefs and language point to the contrary.

    He’s probably married to someone who more or less shares his beliefs – or maybe she’s just rolling her eyes in the background. Hard to say…

    There are horrible people throughout history with families they seem to love – hard to make sense of it all. When I come across people like this, I surmise that he himself must be pretty miserable. How could anyone hold on to so much anger and be happy or even empowered? I take solace in that when he goes on the attack…

    Reply
  3. Argenti Aertheri says:
    May 15, 2012 at 12:37 pm

    @LBT — I’d gathered, I just didn’t even want to ponder wtf they’d say about that.

    @Sara — I’ve never heard a fundie tell anyone to stop bashing gays though, quite the opposite. Maybe he had a moment of clarity and realized most women were simply born as women though, contra the fundie insistence that homosexuality is a choice. Or maybe all that eye rolling got to him. Idk, it’s an impressive level of cognitive dissonance, beyond that I haven’t a clue.

    Reply
  4. ostara321 says:
    May 15, 2012 at 12:56 pm

    Argenti – Yeah, I kinda figured as much. Still, like… feminists talk about a LOT of other things besides the Vagina Monologues. I could figure having a hissy fit over feminists engaging in Slut Walks if you’re the kind of asshole who thinks showing you care about one issue obvs means you don’t care about other issues, but … yeah. Not really surprised that another MRA has some problems with logic, but sheesh.

    Reply
  5. Argenti Aertheri says:
    May 15, 2012 at 1:13 pm

    ostara321 — revspinnaker definitely has problems with logic, he was at least less offensive than most MRAs though. And idfk on the Vagina Monologues, the only time I remember seeing them come up in feminist discussion it quickly turned into a debate on how to fix their transphobia and whether the rape-y monologue was still in there — not exactly outstanding praise. Slut Walks though…I’ve never seen anyone, MRA or feminist or meh, except revspinnaker, complain that they prove feminists only care about rape — I have seen assholes who totally don’t get it and give a response of either “who’d rape her?” or “well of course, dressed like that!” (congrats assholes, you are part of the problem).

    On his logic fail, did you see where I said post-natal education targets mothers because they’re already in the hospital and thus it’s easy, while the father may or may not show up, and he replied with how she must not know who the father is then? Like wait, do we target mothers because they’re more dangerous, or because they’re all sluts who don’t know who the baby-daddy is?

    Or where he managed to read just enough statistics to see that couples where excluded from the child abuse analysis and then twist that to mean “mothers acting with a paramour”? It was really some impressive cherry-picking. I guess that should be expected from an SN that reads as Rev. Spinnaker though huh? All hail the reverend of spin! >.<

    Despite how much fun this summary of trolling has been I really should get to bed. Goodnight everyone!

    Reply
  6. Myoo says:
    May 15, 2012 at 1:55 pm

    You know, there’s a tiny kernel of a good argument in what Rev. Spinnaker said about the Vagina Monologues, namely that some important events get overshadowed in the media by more trivial things. However, the problem is rarely the existence of the more trivial things and rather the way the media reports on things. I’ve repeatedly seen important events getting overshadowed by stuff like a soccer match or whatever (soccer is BIG in my country), but it never occurred to me to protest soccer itself, that would be ridiculous.

    Reply
  7. red_locker says:
    May 15, 2012 at 2:16 pm

    “You know, there’s a tiny kernel of a good argument in what Rev. Spinnaker said about the Vagina Monologues, namely that some important events get overshadowed in the media by more trivial things. However, the problem is rarely the existence of the more trivial things and rather the way the media reports on things. I’ve repeatedly seen important events getting overshadowed by stuff like a soccer match or whatever (soccer is BIG in my country), but it never occurred to me to protest soccer itself, that would be ridiculous.”

    Allow me to second this, because this is a great of stating how caring for one thing doesn’t always (or necessarily) downgrade another.

    Reply
  8. red_locker says:
    May 15, 2012 at 2:20 pm

    Plus, like, in the age of blogs and the internet, I think that the way things are presented is becoming less and less of a problem…well, ok, CNN and Fox News can still make me angry, but still, people usually get up off their asses (or even stay on their asses) and bring attention to important things.

    Instead of, you know, whining at people and placing yourself on a pedestal in a fucking comment section.

    Reply
  9. Sharculese says:
    May 15, 2012 at 2:23 pm

    which had already been condemned by the Hague for tacit approval of drunken lesbian child molestation.

    yo, this lie isn’t any less nonsensical than the first time you said it. do you actually know what the hague is?

    Reply
    • revspinnaker says:
      May 15, 2012 at 7:41 pm

      The Hague, a city in the Netherlands, is home to the International Criminal Court and host to the UN Convention on the Rights of the Child and the Hague Convention on Protection of Children.

      I haven’t found the exact criticism of the “Monologues” I spotted a few years ago. There was a heated debate about combining women’s right with children’s rights. I did find the following:

      In opening remarks, UNICEF Deputy Executive Director Rima Salah acknowledged the fears of some women’s rights advocates, who feel that “integrating women’s and children’s rights will restrict women to the role of caregiver of children.

      “On the other hand,” continued Ms. Salah, “for the children’s rights advocates, this integration will put the focus only on the rights of the girls – thus resulting in the boy child being left out.”

      Children’s Rights Advocates, like myself (CRA not an MRA), were critical of Ensler’s and some feminist’s exclusion of boys as victims and females as perpetrators of violence against children.

      My question for you is, do you approve of a 20 something woman plying a 13 year old with alcohol and seducing them? Do you consider that “good rape” as stated in the “Little Coochi Snorcher that Could?”

      Seems that’s what the folks at the Hague Convention objected to.

      Reply
  10. Sharculese says:
    May 15, 2012 at 7:56 pm

    right, we went through this list time, i forgot how you don’t understand what convention means in this case. it’s not a literal gathering of people, it’s a document. and for that matter, it has literally note one that has a

    and yes, the hague is the home to the icc. that’s one thing you actually seem to get. when people refer to the ‘the hague’ doing something, they’re talking about the icc. the hauge didn’t condemn the vagina monologues because the hague doesn’t pay attention to plays and because that’s so far outside their jurisidiction as to be laughable.

    the hague cares about genocide and war. they don’t dare about your silly little ‘girls are evil crusade’ and when you say ‘the hague’ is on your side, you clearly either don’t get what you’re saying or are too dishonest to care. given your track record i’m assuming it’s both, but seriously, stop talking about things you obviously don’t understand.

    Reply
  11. Sharculese says:
    May 15, 2012 at 7:58 pm

    *final sentence of the first paragraph was supposed to say ‘not one that has anything to do with the hague, it’s monitored by a subcommitte of the plain old general assembly’

    Reply
    • revspinnaker says:
      May 15, 2012 at 8:15 pm

      Sorry for being vague. I should have said UN Convention at The Hague. It was UNICEF participants of the UN Committee on the Convention on the Rights of the Child that criticized the Monologues.

      You still haven’t answered my question. Do you approve of a 20 something woman plying a 13 year old with alcohol and seducing them?

      Reply
  12. Bagelsan says:
    May 15, 2012 at 8:28 pm

    You still haven’t answered my question. Do you approve of a 20 something woman plying a 13 year old with alcohol and seducing them?

    Lol wat? The trolls I run into here…

    Reply
  13. Sharculese says:
    May 15, 2012 at 8:28 pm

    Sorry for being vague. I should have said UN Convention at The Hague. It was UNICEF participants of the UN Committee on the Convention on the Rights of the Child that criticized the Monologues.

    that’s right, you should have said something like that! this is the second time i’ve had to correct you for pushing this dishonest talking point! it would be awesome if it didn’t happen again, but somehow i doubt that’s going to be the case.

    Reply
  14. hellkell says:
    May 15, 2012 at 8:29 pm

    Oh, fuck off Revspin, we’ve been over this shit before. No one here is in favor of child abuse. Now run along, this horse has been beaten.

    Disingenuous fuckwit.

    Reply
  15. Bagelsan says:
    May 15, 2012 at 8:33 pm

    I read a book with a rape in it once, hence all feminists approve of rape. I watched a movie with a murder in it once, hence all feminists approve of murder. I saw a play with– eh, the MRAs can fill in the blanks for me. What else do all feminists approve of? 😀

    Reply
    • tatjna says:
      May 15, 2012 at 8:40 pm

      Argument, RevSpin style:

      Irrelevant fact. Obfuscation. Tangent. Ridiculous question.

      Shout “SEE THAT PROVES MY POINT!” when everyone goes “Lolwut?”

      Reply
  16. red_locker says:
    May 15, 2012 at 9:21 pm

    “Argument, RevSpin style:

    Irrelevant fact. Obfuscation. Tangent. Ridiculous question.

    Shout “SEE THAT PROVES MY POINT!” when everyone goes “Lolwut?””

    *nods*

    And does no one else see the hilarity of Rev going on about how WE aren’t doing enough to help children, while he has been doing nothing but wanking over his superiority on a blog?

    Reply
  17. CassandraSays says:
    May 15, 2012 at 9:37 pm

    Wanking on a blog is totally activism, you guys.

    Reply
  18. Shadow says:
    May 15, 2012 at 9:49 pm

    Wanking on a blog is totally activism, you guys.

    Well, he’s trying to spread some seeds of doubt. Unfortunately his arguments continue to be impotent. *rimshot*

    Reply
  19. Argenti Aertheri says:
    May 15, 2012 at 10:05 pm

    I answered “You still haven’t answered my question. Do you approve of a 20 something woman plying a 13 year old with alcohol and seducing them?” before he asked it >.< — see the first paragraph

    “And idfk on the Vagina Monologues, the only time I remember seeing them come up in feminist discussion it quickly turned into a debate on how to fix their transphobia and whether the rape-y monologue was still in there — not exactly outstanding praise.”

    Since I’ve never seen the damned things, and read all of one description, I’d forgotten it was flat out rape, not rape-y — but no, feminists do not support that.

    “You know, there’s a tiny kernel of a good argument in what Rev. Spinnaker said about the Vagina Monologues, namely that some important events get overshadowed in the media by more trivial things. However, the problem is rarely the existence of the more trivial things and rather the way the media reports on things. I’ve repeatedly seen important events getting overshadowed by stuff like a soccer match or whatever (soccer is BIG in my country), but it never occurred to me to protest soccer itself, that would be ridiculous.”

    Thirding that.

    “I watched a movie with a murder in it once, hence all feminists approve of murder.” — hell, I’ve seen Dahmer, so all feminists approve of serial killers?

    Reply
  20. Helen says:
    May 16, 2012 at 7:31 am

    I was in a production of the Vagina Monologues, and whilst that particular monologue DEFINITELY has issues (as does the rest of the play in general at times), the girl is 16, not 13. Or at least she is in my script —

    “Memory: sixteen years old.
    There’s this gorgeous 24-year-old woman in our neighborhood and I stare at her all the time. One day she invites me into her car…” etc.

    For me it was the alcohol that’s the questionable bit, not the age. But then I’m from Britain, and the legal age for sex here is 16.

    Reply
  21. Pecunium says:
    May 16, 2012 at 10:55 am

    For much of the US 16 is legal too.

    Reply
  22. Vindicare says:
    May 16, 2012 at 1:02 pm

    @cloudiah: Well, you have to give it to those ultra-orthodox Jews, they are simply epic trolls… you know what kind of protest this incident spawned…

    http://www.nytimes.com/2012/01/02/world/middleeast/holocaust-images-in-ultra-orthodox-protest-anger-israeli-leaders.html

    Ok, to be fair, it was only a minority. But to compare sitting next to a woman on public transport with being sent to camp…

    Reply
  23. Gametime says:
    May 16, 2012 at 4:15 pm

    The original age of the character in that monologue was 13. It was changed to 16 after (totally justified) criticism.

    Eve Ensler has been pretty thoroughly criticized by feminists, especially in recent years; like, the Vagina Monologues is well-intentioned, but it’s RIFE with the most problematic elements of second-wave feminism.

    Reply
    • revspinnaker says:
      May 16, 2012 at 8:29 pm

      @Gametime:

      “The original age of the character in that monologue was 13. It was changed to 16 after (totally justified) criticism.”

      I believe that’s when Ensler lost that line about “good rape” too, at the behest of UNICEF contingents at the UN Committee on the Rights of the Child at The Hague, among others.

      But since we’re on the topic of female pedophilia, check out this video with Michele Elliott of Kidscape. She received hate mail and was shouted down by feminists when she disclosed her research on the issue. tsk tsk.

      Reply
  24. hellkell says:
    May 16, 2012 at 8:34 pm

    Technically we’re NOT on the subject of female pedophilia, it’s just your favorite flavor of derail.

    Kindly fuck off.

    Reply
    • revspinnaker says:
      May 16, 2012 at 8:46 pm

      hellkell: Glad to see you made it through the 11 min. video in 4 minutes. A testament to your open-mindedness.

      Reply
  25. hellkell says:
    May 16, 2012 at 8:49 pm

    Do you really think anyone here is in favor of child abuse? I know it’s your pet project, but wanking here is not activism.

    Reply
  26. pillowinhell says:
    May 16, 2012 at 8:56 pm

    Um rev..what exactly would it take for you to give up on coming here about child abuse? I don’t think the men or women here are at all in favor of it. Quite the opposite.

    Reply
  27. jumbofish says:
    May 16, 2012 at 9:03 pm

    Feminists just lovee child abuse! and they cause breast cancer too!

    /sarcasm

    Reply
  28. jumbofish says:
    May 16, 2012 at 9:04 pm

    They also snort nutmeg!

    Reply
  29. Helen says:
    May 17, 2012 at 3:36 am

    Shit, I didn’t know she changed it! OR that there was a line about good rape >.< My mistake.

    And now I don't like her very much.

    Reply
  30. estelle stewart says:
    May 31, 2012 at 8:48 pm

    My theory is that Elam’s doing this simply for his own sadistic enjoyment. He saw how big the MRM got, and decided to pull one of his many classic troll moves and be all “fuck you” to his own backups. The more I learn about Paul Elam, he seems very “bite the hand that feeds you” and deeply self-destructive in a “oh this is so good, I must destroy it” kind of way.

    Reply
  31. estelle stewart says:
    May 31, 2012 at 8:51 pm

    Btw, I’m actually officially stanning for paul elam just because of the major trolling he’s done to feminists and MRAs alike.

    Reply
  32. marie says:
    June 8, 2012 at 6:38 pm

    Paul has a wife and daughter, doesn’t he? I can’t help but wonder what they think of his involvement in the MRM – or if they even know.

    Reply
  1. Pages:
  2. «
  3. 1
  4. 2
  5. 3
  6. 4
  7. 5
  8. 6

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Please read the comments policy before leaving a comment - thanks!

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

1
We Hunted the Mammoth tracks and mocks the white male rage underlying the rise of Trump and Trumpism. This blog is NOT a safe space; given the subject matter -- misogyny and hate -- there's really no way it could be.

~ David Futrelle, writer/editor/cat entertainer. Click my name to email me.

Donate to the Mammoth!

WHTM is now AD-FREE and depends on READERS LIKE YOU for survival! Please DONATE what you can by clicking below. No need for a PayPal account.

Follow Me

  • View david.futrelle’s profile on Facebook
  • View DavidFutrelle’s profile on Twitter
  • View David Futrelle’s profile on YouTube
  • View David Futrelle’s profile on Google+

Subscribe via Email

Recent Posts

  • Jews are using yoga pants to genocide the white race, weirdo racist dingbat charges
  • Happy Day Before Post-Valentine’s Day Candy Sales! Open Thread with BONUS CREEPY V-DAY CARDS
  • Incels spend Valentine’s day celebrating the Parkland shooting one year ago that left 17 dead
  • Incels of the world, unite! Presenting the not-so-glorious new science of Marxism-Incelism
  • Pro athletes are cucking Brad Pitt, because all women love jocks, confused MGTOW contends
  • Vulvagate: When mansplaining goes so wrong the dictionary itself has to step in
  • Porn star and accused sexual abuser Mercedes Carrera: The only women the MGTOWs ever loved?
  • Reddit dickheads are losing it over the new “tiny dick” emoji
  • Porn star Mercedes Carrera was a Gamergate icon. Now that she’s been charged with child sexual abuse, ex-fans pretend they never knew her
  • Creepy Nazi NoFapper: The Jews “fear men who practice semen retention”

Top Posts

  • Jews are using yoga pants to genocide the white race, weirdo racist dingbat charges
  • Vulvagate: When mansplaining goes so wrong the dictionary itself has to step in
  • Incels spend Valentine's day celebrating the Parkland shooting one year ago that left 17 dead
  • Happy Day Before Post-Valentine's Day Candy Sales! Open Thread with BONUS CREEPY V-DAY CARDS

Old Crap

Recent Comments

  • Ariblester February 18, 2019 at 7:34 am on Jews are using yoga pants to genocide the white race, weirdo racist dingbat charges
  • Rabid Rabbit February 18, 2019 at 7:09 am on Jews are using yoga pants to genocide the white race, weirdo racist dingbat charges
  • occasional reader February 18, 2019 at 6:04 am on Jews are using yoga pants to genocide the white race, weirdo racist dingbat charges
  • Rabid Rabbit February 18, 2019 at 3:49 am on Jews are using yoga pants to genocide the white race, weirdo racist dingbat charges
  • ellesar February 18, 2019 at 3:43 am on Jews are using yoga pants to genocide the white race, weirdo racist dingbat charges
  • ellesar February 18, 2019 at 3:38 am on Incels spend Valentine’s day celebrating the Parkland shooting one year ago that left 17 dead
  • occasional reader February 18, 2019 at 3:06 am on Jews are using yoga pants to genocide the white race, weirdo racist dingbat charges
  • occasional reader February 18, 2019 at 2:49 am on Jews are using yoga pants to genocide the white race, weirdo racist dingbat charges

Feed the Mammoth!

Keep this blog going by clicking on the link below! You don't even need a PayPal account.

Tweet Tweet

My Tweets

Random WHTM Posts!

  • #ResistTrump today by calling and/or marching against the Muslim ban#ResistTrump today by calling and/or marching against the Muslim banJanuary 30, 2017
  • Gold-digging c**ts and over-inflated pussy: An A Voice for Menner “refutes” RooshGold-digging c**ts and over-inflated pussy: An A Voice for Menner “refutes” RooshAugust 30, 2012
  • Trolls launch campaign to prove that SJWs are a bunch of fake “Non-Player Characters” by … creating fake NPC accountsTrolls launch campaign to prove that SJWs are a bunch of fake “Non-Player Characters” by … creating fake NPC accountsOctober 14, 2018
  • Lou Reed was a violent monster who abused women, new bio claimsLou Reed was a violent monster who abused women, new bio claimsOctober 12, 2015
  • Now that women have jobs, men can’t control them with money any more: A MGTOW’s lamentNow that women have jobs, men can’t control them with money any more: A MGTOW’s lamentJune 18, 2018

If You’re Being Harassed

  • Speak Up & Stay Safe(r)
  • Crash Override
  • DIY Feminist Cybersecurity
  • Without My Consent
  • 9 Ways to Dodge Trolls

Creep Watchers

  • Hail to the Gynocracy!
  • Right Wing Watch
  • Hate Watch (SPLC)
  • Media Matters
  • Fundies Say the Darndest Things
  • My Right Wing Dad
  • r/ShitRedditSays
  • r/GamerGhazi
  • r/TheBluePill
  • r/AgainstMensRights
  • r/CreepyPMs

Mammothy Fun

  • Official WHTM Welcome Package!
  • Artistry For Feminism. And Kittens.
  • A Voice for Pierre
Privacy & Cookies: This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this website, you agree to their use.
To find out more, including how to control cookies, see here: Cookie Policy
We Hunted The Mammoth | Copyright © 2019 All Rights Reserved
loading Cancel
Post was not sent - check your email addresses!
Email check failed, please try again
Sorry, your blog cannot share posts by email.
%d bloggers like this: