This is how they get you!
The dude at What Men Are Saying About Women – you may recall him as the inventor of the MRA two-dot period – remains my favorite illiterate MRA blogger. To be fair, the illiteracy is really just the icing on the cake of his ridiculous opinions. In a recent post he wrote about a new study that purports to show that there is more sex in countries with greater gender equality. (Probably true; the study itself, probably bullshit.)
Here’s the two-dot blogger trying to make some sort of point about it all:
Feminists have always promoted shagging as some type of recommended behaviour that should be allowed at random without limitation or indeed have any limits attached to it. Probably explains why most of the feminist mangina sites have little tags like “I support Porn” or “I support BDSM” as they would heartily agree that the promotion of free sex on demand would allow them unlimited access especially if there is a feminist female involved. Brainwashing does apparently have it positive side..
What surprises me the most is the lack of information concerning sexually transmitted diseases of all types. Those nasty disease like HIV or those others that munch your body at random. Not really something you want to be told after a night of debauchery with some slut feminist ( they promote themselves to be sluts now) willingly spreads her legs for some horizontal tango..
So apparently having more sex is bad because feminists..
And then you get AIDS..
And sentences should always be ended with not one but two periods..
@hellkell
“NWO, you are full of it. You just read selectively and get nasty with people.”
Aww, boohoo. Don’t the mockers like being mocked for having their lying ideology exposed?
“First off, it’s pointless due to feminists notorious ability to discount anything that goes against their failed destructive ideology. Secondly, do your own research ya lazy slob.”
I just wanted to highlight that this was being said by a creationist antivaxxer who seriously believes in various bircher conspiracy theories.
Someone here has a lying ideology, and it’s you.
“First off, it’s pointless due to feminists notorious ability to discount anything that goes against their failed destructive ideology. Secondly, do your own research ya lazy slob.”
I’ll second Rutee on highlighting this. One can cut the irony with a hot butter knife.
You made the claim, you justify it. Sounds like bullshit to me, but surely if you’re all resourced up you surely can easily link to where you found the data to state this as a fact that we all should accept.
No? Pulled it out of your ass? Thought so.
I’d also, while we’re asking, like to know how feminism has failed or destructed anything. Last I checked, I knew I’d be able to vote when I came of age, the same wasn’t true for my grandmother, hmmm, that is a huge fail.
NWO: I have never been pumped and dumped actually! I’ve had sex with a guy and dumped him the day after cuz he sucked donkey balls in bed, though. I honestly don’t understand why someone would pump and dump someone else. So you have someone whom you’re attracted to, who’s attracted to you, and who’s good in bed and capable of having a casual-sex relationship. Why the hell wouldn’t you fuck them again instead of having to go find someone else who’s attracted to you? That’s incredibly inefficient.
And also I have loyalty, fidelity and honor in spite of my promiscuity. It is as if my morals have almost nothing to do with what i do with my own personal vagina. Funny, that.
Thank you, NWO. You just proved something with this response (hint: it was the fact that you are full of shit).
“So you have someone whom you’re attracted to, who’s attracted to you, and who’s good in bed and capable of having a casual-sex relationship. Why the hell wouldn’t you fuck them again instead of having to go find someone else who’s attracted to you? That’s incredibly inefficient.”
Are you implying that the PUA community is extremely inefficient at sex?
Yes.
I mean, unless you view seduction as a pleasure in and of itself, and the sex as a cherry on the top of the process of making someone be attracted to you, which seems like a valid position. But most of the PUA rhetoric seems to suggest that they want to get laid a lot and are just very, very bad at it.
There’s so much wrong in this, I scarcely know where to begin (there were no STD’s in the olden days? ORLY?). But I will give you this–they were the good old days…when Blacks, other minorities and women were oppressed. Yes, those were fine days indeed. Now, it’s like you can’t call someone a “nigger” without some do-gooding liberal or feminist screaming bloody murder.
Also, what is “appaulling,” aside from your spelling and reasoning?
Valid position. Heh.
OK, I am one of these people. I confess I get a deal of pleasure out of the chase. It’s heady, heady, addicting stuff…that dance that people do.
In the good old days STD’s were unheard of?
Syphilis anyone?
Can we name the famous people in the good old days that went mad and then died from it?
NWO has pushed the used up oxytocin myth here before. He’s an excellent reverse bullshit detector: if he believes it, it’s probably bullshit. Saves a lot of time, really.
Nope. Nothing to see here.
“In the good old days STD’s were unheard of?
Syphilis anyone?
Can we name the famous people in the good old days that went mad and then died from it?”
That’s Feminist propaganda you’re spouting. Those people didn’t die from Syphilis, they died from ALIENS WITH IONIZED RADIATION LAZER GUNS. The lizard-brained cyborg lizard femists have brainwashed the masses with their history about famous so that they could continue getting away with hitting on boys and then accusing them of rape.
WAKE UP, SHEEPLE!
Props to vacuumslayer for mentioning the Syphilis experiment, BTW.
@captainbathrobe
“NWO has pushed the used up oxytocin myth here before.”
Before right now I have never once typed the word oxytocin on this site. Do feminists ever do anything other than lie?
I seem to recall that you did, NWO.
So you have someone whom you’re attracted to, who’s attracted to you, and who’s good in bed and capable of having a casual-sex relationship. Why the hell wouldn’t you fuck them again instead of having to go find someone else who’s attracted to you?
Most of these PUAs are closeted gay. They don’t want to have sex several time with the same woman and they have sex with women (only once) to prove to themselves they are not gay.
I could have mistaken you for someone else, I suppose. My apologies if you were not, in fact, full of shit in this particular manner previously. Better luck next time.
@NWOslave
“I’m guessing the emperical evidence that STDs are much more rampant in countries with loose sexual mores and high indexes of gender equality would be the emperical evidence.”
Betch, honestly. You cannot be serious.
Ah, Africa. Bastion of liberalism and feminism.
Also, empirical! empirical!
“Well except for the emperical evidence that shows for every time a woman fucks a different man her ability to form a lasting relationship with a man drop percentagewise.”
I would also like to point out that this is going to be hard to prove empirically, as you have huge correlation / causation problems. I doubt very much that is has been done.
Seriously, guys, am I wasting my time? Is this guy a joke?
“@ozymandias42
“I dunno, I’ve been throwing away my value and honor quite avidly”
No shit sherlock, you’re what’s called a pump and dump. You just wanna be praised for it, good luck with that.”
And if you’re the sort of person who encounters and uses that term, that makes you a…what? When you can get it, of course.
I like pump and dump for men too, actually.
Ew, that spacing didn’t work out the way I thought it would.
No, you don’t understand. “Emperical” is a different word. It means “agreeing with NWO.”
Seriously, guys, am I wasting my time? Is this guy a joke?
Yes. He just doesn’t realize it yet.
@NWOslave
“I’m guessing the emperical evidence that STDs are much more rampant in countries with loose sexual mores and high indexes of gender equality would be the emperical evidence.”
Uh… what empirical evidence brosef?
You mean this evidence that is specifically counter to what your saying? That is well researched, has the WHO and many other health based NGO’s that are working at preventing the spread of? I understand if you want empirical evidence to be your magic sky fairy, but that’s not how language works, young one.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Syphilis_world_map_-_DALY_-_WHO2004.svg
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Gonorrhoea_world_map_-_DALY_-_WHO2002.svg
@NWOSlave
Also, maybe STD’s were largely unheard of before sex ed, but they certainly weren’t nonexistent as a consequence. Gonorrhea as a public health issue, for example, probably dates from at least the Middle Ages.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gonorrhea
@theindigolmon: “I’m guessing the emperical evidence that STDs are much more rampant in countries with loose sexual mores and high indexes of gender equality would be the emperical evidence.”
Betch, honestly. You cannot be serious.
Ah, Africa. Bastion of liberalism and feminism.
Also, empirical! empirical!”
Unfortunately, you’ve missed the bit where NWO has set himself up as the arbiter of truth, it’s only empirical evidence if is says “that STDs are much more rampant in countries with loose sexual mores and high indexes of gender equality ”
Seriously, he say it right there. That is the only way it could be evidence, if it lines up with his preconceived notions. Usually he tries to hide it better, but he’s been a little off kilter lately. I blame the fact that he’s off moderation, it’s gone to his head.
Oh, and welcome, by the way. Er, assuming you haven’t been around previously. I haven’t noticed your handle before, but that’s hardly a reliable measure, in my case.
Er, *theindigolemon, not theindigolmon. Sorry about that.
“Seriously, guys, am I wasting my time? Is this guy a joke?”
Yes on both counts.
In my teen years, there were ads on buses and billboards with cartoons and slogans like “if it’s not on, it’s not on” and “no balloon, no party” and “no cover, no lover”. When I finally got around to having sex, it never occurred to me NOT to use a condom.
Okay, here’s another fact about oxytocin overlooked by the abstinence only education advocates. Oxytocin is released by the body during childbirth and breastfeeding, not just from orgasms. I breastfed both of my children for over a year for both, and every time they drank my milk, my body was producing oxytocin to trigger my letdown reflex and release the milk. By the logic of those anti sex moralizers, my breastfeeding actually caused me to bond with my children at the expense of my husband. Of course that is crap, though. I could bond with my children as well as my husband. You can be attached to more than one person at the same time.
If oxytocin was a finite resource, I would have used it up by now, since I fed each baby at least 6-10 times a day for over a year. Some women have and breastfeed 10 or more children and the children don’t wean until they’re four or five years old. Once again, there is that idea that a woman can be used up. In the other context, people act like the vagina can be used up. In this, it’s that her hormonal bonding and attachment hormones can be used up.
But don’t ya know women are meant to have LOTS of children (except…not) and only one man, ever (except, not). And our oxytocin knows it, too! Wow, smart stuff. (sorry I don’t think I can roll my eyes any harder)
On a different but somewhat related note (seeing as how it deals with MRA misogyny) this rip off appears to be making the rounds at the moment http://mymilkspilt.tumblr.com/post/8894705610/when-the-feminists-came-for-the-rapists-i
Skyal – so, is the implication there that he, the NiceGuy(TM) should have spoken up on behalf of the rapists and stalkers? …classy, that one. And by “classy” I mean “wtf????”
“On a different but somewhat related note (seeing as how it deals with MRA misogyny) this rip off appears to be making the rounds at the moment http://mymilkspilt.tumblr.com/post/8894705610/when-the-feminists-came-for-the-rapists-i”
If ever one doubted that MRAs like him have a supreme lack of perspective…doubt no more.
theLaplaceDemon, yep. Apparently criminals and “nice guys” are exactly the same to this guy.
Oh, NWOslave: You said:
Apparently they do, because a while back when you tried to make the exact same argument, with the exact same lack of evidence, someone asked if you were talking about oxytocin, and you responded with this bit of masterful sarcasm which made clear that, yes, you were talking about oxytocin: :
http://manboobz.com/2011/05/05/desperately-seeking-ubermenschen/comment-page-2/#comment-16151
He has to use two dots because the scariest thing to an MRA is a period haha haa hahahha HAHAHA!!!!ELEVEN!!
Twelve.
^^Ba bum psh!
Skyal, thanks for alerting me to that tumblr post. I’m just finishing up a post on it that will go up later today.
“What surprises me the most is the lack of information concerning sexually transmitted diseases of all types. Those nasty disease like HIV or those others that munch your body at random. Not really something you want to be told after a night of debauchery with some slut feminist ( they promote themselves to be sluts now) willingly spreads her legs for some horizontal tango..”
Don’t any of these guys know how to use condoms? Get tested?
Where they obviously manage to get along just fine without Sex Ed, because breast ironing is a much more reasonable and successful alternative measure.
Ozymandias: “HPV and the hep both have vaccines.”
I am not disagreeing with your general point. However, I think it is important to point out that the HPV vaccine does NOT protect against all strains of HPV: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Human_papillomavirus#Vaccines
(On the other hand, it is perfectly possible to be infected with HPV and to never develop cervical cancer… Plus, regular pap-smears are a pretty good protection. Oh, and while condoms don’t protect against HPV as well as against other STDs, they still reduce the risk of becoming infected.)
Sex has some health benefits but it also carries risks, even if every possible precaution is taken. This is also true for many other normal and healthy behaviors, however, some of which are necessary for survival. For example, you can reduce the risk of food poisoning, but no matter what you do, as long as you eat anything at all a small risk will remain – but then the only other option is not to eat at all, and of course not eating at all will result in starving to death. So the point is not so much to avoid possible dangers completely, but to know the risks and benefits and to make informed decisions.
(By the way: Hi – this is my first comment.)
Thank you, Dave. I remembered that one pretty clearly.
I think I’ve solved the double-dot mystery. Ya see, a full stop is known as a “period” in some weird countries with insufficient Us and an overabundance of Zs. The period is also the monthly uterine bleeding practised by feminazis as a form of sexual terrorism. Ending every sentence with one of these so-called “periods” is a tacit admission that women must always have the final word!
Cleverly, this brave defender of the Y chromosome has turned the tables by doubling this punctuation mark, changing it from a symbol of feminazi oppression into a pair of proud, masculine testicles, thereby reasserting man’s dominance in social discourse.
And you all just thought it was a product of his fourth grade writing level. For shame!
These guys believe that the more women have sexual freedom, the more women will fuck other guys.
And they’re right.. “sexual freedom” is worse than worthless if you’re not getting any of the sex.
Probably no sex until marrage and then monogamy after? Or maybe no sex until a committed relationship hopefully leading to marriage?
…how dare they?